No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 March 2016
This case presents several fundamental ethical issues. The first issue is the patient’s refusal of treatment (a nasogastric tube [NGT] insertion). Second, the patient’s refusal of a seemingly beneficial treatment, combined with her medical history, ultimately necessitates an assessment of her decisionmaking capacity. Third, the sister’s reluctance to participate in decisionmaking requires a discussion of appropriate surrogate decisionmakers. Finally, the main ethical component to this case is a cultural one, which should be addressed appropriately.
1. Appelbaum, P. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;357(18):1834–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Murphy, L, Lipman, T. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy does not prolong survival in patients with dementia. Archives of Internal Medicine 2003;163:1351–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar