Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:31:38.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taming the Unfair Prejudice Remedy: Sections 459–461 of the Companies Act 1985 in the House of Lords

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1999

Robert Goddard
Get access

Extract

The shape of the unfair prejudice remedy—sections 459–461 of the Companies Act 1985—owes much to the influence of Lord Hoffmann, for throughout his judicial career he has played a leading role in the remedy's development (see, e.g., Re a Company [1986] B.C.L.C. 376 and Re Saul D. Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 B.C.L.C. 14 (C.A.)). In Re a Company (No. 00709 of 1992) [1999] 1 W.L.R. 1092 (O' Neill v. Phillips), the House of Lords considered sections 459–461 for the first time. In a strong, wide-ranging judgment, Lord Hoffmann delivered the opinion of the House. By reasserting the remedy's contractual focus, he sought to bring greater certainty to its operation; in so doing, he signals a restriction in the remedy's ambit.

Type
Case and Comment
Information
The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , November 1999 , pp. 487 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © The Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors, 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)