Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:53:41.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Science of Comparative Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

M. Schmitthoff
Get access

Extract

In the course of the recent revival of the study of Comparative Law, repeated attempts have been made to define the nature and province of this branch of the law. Some writers maintain that Comparative Law represents a method of study rather than a department of legal science. They point to the fact that the technique of comparing different legal systems can be employed in almost every branch of the law and that Comparative Law, unlike the branches of positive law, does not fulfil a definite function in the life of society. In particular, writers on jurisprudence and history such as J. Bryce, Holland and Professor Jenks are inclined to subscribe to this view. Among the jurists who have made a special study of Comparative Law, Professor Gutteridge and Professor Kaden are strongly in favour of this view. Professor Gutteridge says: ‘The comparative method lends itself to the study of any branch of legal learning.’ According to Professor Kaden, it is the province of Comparative Law to disclose the points of agreement and difference in the solution which is provided by several legal systems for the same legal problem. The learned writer denies, however, that it is the function of Comparative Law to found a system of legal abstractions on the results of factual comparison. On the other hand, a number of students of Comparative Law consider their subject as a special branch of the science of law. Professor Saleilles, Professor Lambert and Professor Rabel support this view.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1939 , pp. 94 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bryce, J., Studies in History and Jurisprudence, Oxford, 1901, vol. ii, 142 seq.Google Scholar

2 Holland, , Jurisprudence, 13th ed., 1924, 8.Google Scholar

3 Jenks, E., The New Jurisprudence, 59.Google Scholar

4 Professor Gutteridge, H. C., ‘The Value of Comparative Law’, in the Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law, 1931, 28.Google Scholar

5 Professor Kaden, Erich-Hans, ‘Rechtsvergleichung’ in Rechtsvergleichendes Handwoerterbuch, ed. by Schlegelberger, Dr. P., Berlin, 1936, vol. 6, 11.Google Scholar

6 R. Saleilles, Doc. I, 168, 179.

7 E. Lambert, La fonction du droit civil comparé, 915.

8 Rabel, E., Zeitschrift fuer Auslaendisches und Internationales Privatrecht, 1927, n. 1.Google Scholar

9 By Bryce, J., Studies in History and Jurisprudence, Oxford, 1901, vol. ii, 142.Google Scholar

10 ‘The Science of Legal Method’, Select Essays by Various Authors, ed. by the Association of American Law Schools, New York, 1921.Google Scholar

11 Lambert, E., in Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, the Macmillan Company, 1931, vol. iv, 127.Google Scholar

12 J. H. Wigmore, A Panorama of the World's Legal Systems, Saint Paul, vol. iii, 1120.

13 Salomon, Max, Grundlegung zur Rechtsphilosophie, 2nd ed. 1925, p. 30.Google Scholar

14 5 Cambridge Law Journal, 22.

15 Sir Pollock, Frederick, ‘The History of Comparative Jurisprudence’, in Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation (N. S.) vol. v (1903), 1905, 76.Google Scholar

16 Lee, R. W., in ‘Comparative Law and Comparative Lawyers’ in the Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law, 1936, 3: ‘The nearer the resemblance between the two systems to be compared the more profitable will be the comparison.’Google Scholar

17 G. Escarra, ‘The Aims of Comparative Law’, 7 Temple L. Q. 309 : ‘It is perfectly useless, for instance, to look for points of comparison between the institutions of original Chinese law, that is of the ancient law dating back a great many centuries, and the contemporary institutions taken from another nation.’

18 Professor Kaden, op. cit. 10—11.

19 Code Civil, Art. 967 seq.

20 Compare St. P. Ladas, the International Protection of Industrial Property Harvard Studies in International Law, vol. ii, Cambridge, Mass. 456) (Japan and Poland have followed the German example).

21 Lord Tomlin in Pearl Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Government of the Union of South Africa (50 T. L. R. 564) observes with regard to the Roman-Dutch law: ‘That law is a virile living system of law, ever seeking, as every such system must, to adapt itself consistently with its inherent basic principles to deal effectively with the increasing complexities of modern organized society.

22 Vesey-FitzGerald, S. G. in Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law, 1931, 32.Google Scholar

23 Institut de Droit Comparé (Professor H. Lévy-Ullmann).

24 Institut de Droit Comparé (Professor B. Lambert).

25 Institut de Droit Comparé.

26 Institut fuer Auslaendisches und Internationales Privatrecht (Professor E. Rabel).

27 Institut International pour 1'Unification du Droit Privé (under the direction of the League of Nations); Istituto di Studi Legislativi (Professor Galgano).

28 Istituto Ibero-Americano de Derecho Comparado (Professor Altamira).

29 Sir Pollock, Frederick, op. cit. 77.Google Scholar

30 Escarra, J., op. cit. 304Google Scholar

31 The Commercial Laws of the World, London, vol. i, at p. vii.

32 Die Zivilgesetze der Gegenwart, originated by Karl Heinsheimer, Mannheim.

33 Rechtsvergleichendes Handwoerterbuch, ed. by Schlegelberger, Franz, Berlin.Google Scholar

34 Rechtsverfolgung im Internationalen Verkehr, ed. by Leske-Loewenfeld, , Berlin.Google Scholar

35 Bryce, J., ‘Methods of Legal Science’, in Studies in History and Jurisprudence, vol. ii, Oxford, 1901, 174.Google Scholar

36 Professor Jenks, Edward, in The New Jurisprudence, 26.Google Scholar

37 Professor Jenks, Edward, op. cit. 64—65.Google Scholar

38 Giorgio del Vecchio, L'idée d'une science du droit universel comparé.

39 Lambert, R., op. cit. 915.Google Scholar

40 Pierre Lepaulle, The Function of Comparative Law, with a Critique of the Sociological Jurisprudence, in 35 Harvard Law Beview, 852.

41 Escarra, J., op. cit. 307—308.Google Scholar

42 Kaden, , op. cit. 14.Google Scholar

43 Sir Frederick Pollock, in the introduction to Sir Henry Maine, ‘Ancient Law’, at p. xvi (John Murray, London).

44 (3 volumes), 1928, Saint Paul, West Publishing Co.

45 A. S. Diamond, Primitive Law, 1935.

46 Compare Walter Hug, The History of Comparative Law, XLV Harvard Law Review, 1030.

47 Professor Theodore F. T. Plucknett, A Concise History of the Common Law, 2nd ed. 233.

48 Compare Resolution of the Assembly of the League of Nations, of September 30, 1924 (Resolutions and Recommendations of the League of Nations, 1924, at p. 18), and Statutes of the Institute, approved by the Council on March 15, 1926, Art. 2 (League of Nations Official Journal, VII (1926), at p. 579 (C. 156 (2), 1926, V)).

49 Randall, H. J., in ‘Sir John Macdonell and the Study of Comparative Law’, in Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Third Series, vol. xii, 1930, 189—190.Google Scholar

50 Hug, Walter, op. cit. 1069.Google Scholar

51 Sir Maine, Henry, in Village-Communities in the East and West, London, Murray, John, 1871, 4.Google Scholar

52 Gutteridge, H. C., op. cit. 28.Google Scholar

53 Alvarez, Alexandra, ‘Methods for Scientific Codification’, in Science of Legal Method, 453.Google Scholar

54 Escarra, J., op. cit. 300.Google Scholar

55 Schmitthoff, M., in ‘The Gold Clause in International Loans’ in The Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, 3rd series, vol. xviii, 1936, at p. 266.Google Scholar

56 [1936] 3 All E. R. 426.

57 [1937] A. C. 500, 556; see also Wortley, B. A., ‘The Gold Clause’ in British Yearbook of International Law, 1936, p. 112.Google Scholar

58 (1843) 12 M. & W. 324, 353.

59 (1863) 32 L. J. Q. B. 164, at p. 166.

60 [1923] 2 K. B. 218—219.

61 (1863) 32 L. J. Q. B. 164, at p. 166.

62 62 [1923] 2 K. B. 218–219.

63 63 (1843) 12 M. & W. 324.

64 64 (1881) 6 App. Cas. 740.

65 65 See Lord Bussell in Feist v. Société Intercommunale Beige d'Electricité [1934] A. C. 161. Lord Eussell refers here to the Judgment of the Permanent Court of International Justice at The Hague in the case concerning the Serbian Loans, and he says here : ‘I do not, I need hardly say, treat these as in any way binding upon us.’

66 66 The modern cases where the corpus iuris has been referred to, are collected and considered by David T. Oliver in ‘Roman Law in Modern Case’, in Cambridge Legal Essays, Cambridge, 1936, 91.

67 67 J. Bryce, in ‘The Extension of Eoman and English Law throughout the World’, in Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, vol. i, 619–620.

68 68 See P. A. Landon in 52 L. Q. E. 170.

69 69 R. Pound, Introduction to Winfield, Chief Sources of English Legal History, xiii–xiv.

70 70 [1937] 2 K. B. 197, 216.

71 71 B. Keith, in ‘The American Law Institute's Restatement of the Conflict of Laws’, University of Toronto Law Journal, vol. i, 1936, 233 and 254.

72 72 Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] A. C. 562, 598, 617.

73 73 [1926] 1 Ch. 692, 709.

74 74 Ante, p. 100.

75 75 J. Beale, The Conflict of Laws, vol. i, 1.

76 76 Professor G. C. Cheshire, Private International Law, 2nd ed. 10.

77 77 E. Lambert, Fonction du droit comparé, at p. 907.

78 78 Léone Levy, International Commercial Law, 2nd ed. vol. i, at p. x.

79 79 H. C. Gutteridge, in ‘An International Code of the Law of Sale’, in the British Year Book of International Law, 1933, 76.

80 80 H. C. Gutteridge, in ‘An International Code of the Law of Sale’, in the British Year Book of International Law, 1933, 76.

81 81 Erich-Hans Kaden, op. cit. 18.

82 82 Edward Jenks, op. cit. 63–64.

83 83 H. C. Gutteridge, op. cit. 78.

84 84 E. Lambert, in ‘Comparative Law’ in the Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, The Macmillan Co., New York, 1931, vol. iv, 128; H. C. Gutteridge, op. cit. 76; Edward Jenks, op. cit. 64.

85 85 1 & 2 Geo. 5, c. 57.

86 86 14 & 15 Geo. 5, c. 22; for further examples of this branch of Applied Comparative Law, see Cheshire, Private International Law, 2nd ed. 12–19.

87 87 International Law Association, 30th Report, 1921, vol. ii, 218.

88 88 14 & 15 Geo. 5, c, 22 (Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1924).