No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2009
1 Or, presumably, at the time when D1 settled without action, if such was the fact. Morris L.J. seems to have contemplated the possibility that if D1 settled without being sued, even after the one year, he might have a claim against D2 for contribution, although P was then barred against D2; but it is difficult to reconcile this with the rest of his judgment.