Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:01:57.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Legal Procedure and Democracy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Get access

Extract

It was with the greatest pleasure that I accepted the invitation of the American Judicature Society to pay a tribute to the Supreme Court of the United States tonight. This tribute comes from both sides of the Atlantic because I know that what I am going to say represents the feelings of the whole English legal profession—the Bench, the Bar, and the Solicitors. I dare not speak for the Scottish legal profession as I have no authority to do so.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 (1961) 367 U.S. 820, 872.

2 [1963] 2 W.L.R. 935.

3 Ibid. p. 939.

4 [1898] A.C. 375.

5 At p. 58.

6 [1963] 2 Q.B. 744

7 p. 749.

8 (1960) 76 L.Q.R. 39–77.

9 5th ed., p. 237.

10 Y.B. 1 and 2 Edw. II (Selden Soc.) LXXXI.

11 SirPollock, Frederick, Jurisprudence and Legal Essays (ed. Goodhart, A. L.). St. Martin's Press. 1961, p. 187.Google Scholar

12 Ibid. p. 196.

13 The Genius of the Common Law (1912).Google Scholar