Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:40:36.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Causation, Loss and Double Recovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2003

Get access

Extract

In 1987, Mr. Primavera, a restaurant owner, was approached by the defendant, who offered him a loan for the development of a second restaurant, linked to an Executive Retirement Plan (ERP) for Mr. Primavera himself. The ERP promised a tax-free lump sum payment of £500,000 after seven years. However, the defendant neglected to tell Mr. Primavera that in order to qualify for the lump sum, he would have to draw a salary of not less than £334,000 per annum for at least three of the seven years. Unaware of this, Mr. Primavera paid himself a smaller salary. When he came to claim his lump sum in 1995, he found that the maximum that he could draw tax-free was £125,875. A claim form was issued against the defendant in respect of, amongst other things, £101,000 representing the tax payable on the rest of the lump sum. In the meantime, Mr. Primavera chose to continue with the ERP, paid himself a larger salary and, in 2000, qualified for the full £500,000 tax-free.

Type
Case and Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)