Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2011
Some years ago the late Ronald Balfour wrote a paper on the Study of History at Cambridge. His main preoccupation was the nature of history as a study. To-day interest is focused on more practical matters of detail, and we wish to know why the Cambridge Historical Tripos developed as it did, what was the purpose behind the various reforms, how far the character of the Tripos was affected by the example of foreign Universities, by experience at Oxford or by the requirements of the Civil Service examinations, and, finally, who most influenced the Tripos, the professors or the more junior College lecturers and supervisors.
2 Cambridge University Studies (1933, ed. Wright, )Google Scholar.
3 Cambridge University Calendar (1873).
4 Stephen, J., Lectures on the History of France (1851)Google Scholar. This has a very illuminating dedicatory epistle.
5 Trevelyan, G. O., The Life and Letters of Lord Macaulay (1876)Google Scholar.
6 Seeley, J., Lectures and Essays (1870)Google Scholar.
7 Kingsley, F., Charles Kingsley, his letters and memories of his life (1885)Google Scholar.
8 Preface by Miiller, Max to Kingsley, C., The Roman and the Teuton (1884)Google Scholar.
9 Published as an appendix to Kingsley, C., The Roman and the Teuton (1884)Google Scholar.
10 Report, dated 20 January 1917, of the Committee appointed by the Lords Commissioners of H.M. Treasury to consider and report upon the scheme of examination for Class I of the Civil Service. Parliamentary Papers, 1917-18, vol. VIII.
11 Ward, A. W., ‘The Study of History at Cambridge’, The Saturday Review, 6 07 1872Google Scholar, reprinted in Collected Works, vol. v.
12 A. W. Ward, Suggestions Towards the Establishment of a History Tripos. A pamphlet published by the Cambridge University Press, 1872. A copy of this is in the Cambridge University Library.
13 A. W. Ward, Suggestions Towards the Establishment of a History Tripos.
14 This is noted in J. P. Whitney, ‘Sir George Prothero as an Historian’, an unpublished paper given to the Royal Historical Society in 1922. A copy is preserved in the Library of King's College, Cambridge. The author is very grateful to Mr J. Saltmarsh for having brought it to her attention.
15 On Seeley's work as a teacher see an article by Tanner, J. R., English Historical Review, vol. xGoogle Scholar.
16 Inaugural Lecture published in his Lectures and Essays (1870).
17 See Appendix B for specimen examination papers.
18 Student's Guide to Cambridge (1874).
19 The records of what is now the History Board, including three volumes of Minutes from 1876 to 1927, are deposited in the Seeley Library, Cambridge. These records will be referred to as History Board Minutes though in fact the Board has various names at different times. They have been made available by the courtesy of the present Secretary of the Board, Mr Oakeshott.
20 Report to the Senate filed in Minute Book of History Board under 24 February 1885.
21 Librarian's Report for the year ending 1889 filed in History Board Minutes.
22 Librarian's Report for the years ending 1891 and 1892 filed in History Board Minutes.
23 List of books recommended by the Board 1874, see Appendix A.
24 History Board Minutes, 12 June 1879.
25 J. R. Tanner in English Historical Review, vol. x.
26 Woodward, E. L., British Historians (1943)Google Scholar.
27 History Board Minutes, 25 March 1879. See also an obituary notice on Sir George Prothero, Quarterly Review, 1922. The text of his Inaugural Lecture at Edinburgh University is in National Review, 1894.
28 Fisher, H. A. L., Frederick William Maitland, a biographical sketch (1910)Google Scholar.
29 Obituary notice, Economic Journal, 1919.
30 His educational views are charmingly expressed in the essay he contributed to Essays on the Teaching of History, edited by Maitland, F. W. (1901)Google Scholar.
31 Life and Letters of Mandell Creighton, by his wife (1904).
32 Cambridge Review, 1884.
33 Life and Letters of Mandell Creighton, by his wife (1904).
34 History Board Minutes, 3 February 1885.
35 Ibid. 2 May 1885.
36 Ibid. 9 May 1885.
37 History Board Minutes, 9 June 1885, to which is attached a Draft Report.
38 A most illuminating essay on Creighton, Maitland and Acton is in an appendix to Figgis, J. N., Churches and the Modern State (1914)Google Scholar.
39 Acton, Lord, The Study of History (1905)Google Scholar.
40 Clark, G. N. on ‘The origins of the Cambridge Modern History’, in Cambridge Historical Journal (1946)Google Scholar.
41 History Board Minutes, 2 February 1897, to which is attached a report of speeches made 28 January 1897.
42 Ibid. 9 May 1885.
43 Ibid. 24 November 1894.
44 Ibid.22 October 1895, to which is attached a letter from Cunningham dated 18 October 1895.
45 History Board Minutes, 22 October 1895.
46 Letter of 18 October 1895, attached to History Board Minutes, 22 October 1895.
47 History Board Minutes, 19 November 1895.
48 Ibid. 23 November 1895.
49 Ibid.19 November 1895.
50 History Board Minutes, 2 February 1897, to which is attached reports of speeches made 28 January 1897.
51 Ibid. 5 November 1895.
52 Ibid. 19 November 1895.
53 Ibid. 29 February 1896.
54 Ibid. 5 March 1896.
55 Ibid. 10 March 1896.
56 Ibid. 5 May 1896.
57 Ibid. 2 February 1897, to which is attached reports of speeches made 28 January 1897.
58 History Board Minutes, 22 February 1896.
59 Ibid. 2 February 1897
60 Bury, J. B., Selected Essays (1930)Google Scholar, with an Introduction by H. W. V. Temperley. See also Bibliography of the Works of J. B. Bury (1929), prefaced by a memoir by N. Baynes.
61 H. W. V. Temperley, Introduction to J. B. Bury's Selected Essays.
62 History Board Minutes, 27 April 1909, to which is attached a Report to the Senate.
63 Cambridge University Reporter, 26 May 1909.
64 For extracts from the speeches made in the Senate House Discussion of as May 1909 see Appendix C.
65 For a comparative chart of forms of the Historical Tripos as prescribed for successive periods from 1875 to 1948 see Appendix D.