Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:27:24.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The wisdom of Semonides fr. 7

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Teresa Morgan
Teresa Morgan
Affiliation:
Oriel College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Semonides fr. 7, for a long time one of the poor relations of archaic literature, has recently been basking in the attentions of both literary critics and historians. A comic catalogue of the types of women created by Zeus, each of them derived from an animal, insect or inanimate material and nearly all of them vicious, it has been connected with Hesiod's myth of Pandora and other stories in which women are seen as dangerously and subversively different from men. Along with other invective iambic poetry, it has been sited in the symposium, where scholars have suggested that the exclusion and degradation of women helped to create and reinforce male solidarity. Since as individuals men often like women, and need wives, and their sympotic invective therefore cannot be taken too seriously, readers have highlighted the poem's use of irony and paradox.

In what follows I hope to add something to our reading of both the poem and its context. I shall try to show that Semonides' picture of women and male–female relations is more complex than has been assumed, and that we can place it in a tradition of moralizing literature which is concerned not just to pillory aspects of its world, but to explore its problems and stimulate people to think about them.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 51 , 2005 , pp. 72 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Boardman, J. (1999) The Greeks overseas (4th edn.), Oxford.Google Scholar
Broodbank, C. (2000) An island archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Catling, R. W. V., Jones, R. E. (1989) ‘Protogeometric vases from Amorgos’, BSA, 177–85.Google Scholar
Chambry, E. (ed.) (1925–1926) Aesopi fabulae, Paris.Google Scholar
Coldstream, J. N. (1993) ‘Mixed marriages at the frontiers of the early Greek world’, OJA 12, 89–107.Google Scholar
Gould, J. (1980) ‘Law, custom and myth: aspects of the social position of women in classical Athens’, JHS 100, 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halstead, P., Jones, G. (1989) ‘Agrarian ecology in the Greek islands: time stress, scale and risk’, JHS 109, 41–55.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (1982) Mausolus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jeffery, L. H. (1990) The local scripts of archaic Greece (rev. edn.), Oxford.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1975) Females of the species: Semonides on women, London.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1993) The children of Athena, Princeton.Google Scholar
Marangou, L. (1983) ‘Découvertes recentes à Amorgos’, in Les Cyclades, Paris, 121–9.Google Scholar
Mohanty, C. T. (1993) ‘Under western eyes’, in Williams, P., Chrisman, L. (eds.) Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory – a reader, New York.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (2001) ‘The use of abuse’, PCPS 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, S. (2003) ‘Of dogs and men: Archilochus, archaeology and the Greek settlement of Thasos’, PCPS 49, 1–13.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1989) ‘The fraternal social contract’, in id. The disorder of women, Cambridge, 33–57.Google Scholar
Pellizer, E., Tedeschi, G. (eds.) (1990) Semonide: introduzione, testimonianze, testo critico, traduzione e commento, Rome.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. (1975) Goddesses, whores, wives and slaves, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. (2002) Spartan women, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rougemont, G. (1983) ‘Amorgos colonie de Samos?’, in Les Cyclades, Paris, 131–4.Google Scholar
Rougemont, G. (1990) ‘Géographie historique des Cyclades. L'homme et le milieu dans l'archipel’, Journal des Savants, 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, G. (1987) A history of Samos, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. (1997) Performance and gender in ancient Greece, Princeton.Google Scholar
Temple, O., Temple, R. (1998) Aesop: the complete fables, London.Google Scholar
Theissen, G., Merz, A. (1998) The historical Jesus, trans. Bowden, J., London.Google Scholar
Trinh, M.-H. (1989) Woman, native, other, Indiana.Google Scholar
van Dijk, G.-J. (1997) Ainoi, logoi, muthoi. Fables in archaic, classical and Hellenistic Greek literature, Leiden.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1989) ‘At man's table’, in Detienne, M., Vernant, J.-P. (eds.) The cuisine of sacrifice, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. A. (1969) ‘Egyptian instructions’, in Pritchard, J. B. (ed.) Ancient Near Eastern texts (3rd edn. with supplement), Princeton.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1985) ‘Playing the other: theater, theatricality and the feminine in Greek drama’, Representations 11, 63–94.Google Scholar