Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:05:16.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sub aqua, sub aqua: submerged repetition in Ovid and Rutilius Namatianus*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Extract

We may begin with Quintilian 9.3.44: prioris sententiae uerbum ultimum ac sequentis primum frequenter est idem, quo quidem schemate utuntur poetae saepius. This is indeed a common phenomenon, and textual corruption is a common consequence; one of the two repeated words is lost by haplography and the gap is filled with a metrical interpolation; this type of corruption is as old as the archetype of Vergil; cf. Aen. 10.705, Cisseis regina Parin; <Paris> urbe paterna, where Paris was lost and creat inserted; Paris was restored by Bentley. Similarly at Ov. Tr. 1.11.12 all the MSS have omnis ab hac cura mens releuata mea est, and cura leuata is restored from CIL 6.9632; cf.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Doblhofer, E. (1972) Rutilius Claudius Namatianus, (2 vols., Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1971) P. Ovidii Nasonis epistulae heroidum (Berlin).Google Scholar
Hall, J. B. (1989) ‘Problems in Ovid's Tristia’, in Diggle, J., Hall, J. B., Jocelyn, H. D. (eds.) Studies in Latin literature and its tradition in honour of C. O. Brink, Cambridge Philological Society Supplementary volume 15, 2038.Google Scholar
Hall, J. B. (1990a) ‘Conjectures in Ovid's Heroides’, ICS 15 (1990) 263–92.Google Scholar
Hall, J. B. (1990b) ‘More notes on Ovid's Tristia’, Euphrosyne 18, 8598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housman, A. E. (1937) M. Manilii Astronomicon liber primus (2nd edn.) Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wills, J. (1996) Repetition in Latin poetry (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar