Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T03:53:58.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ROLE OF LYSIAS’ SPEECH IN PLATO'S PHAEDRUS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2021

Jenny Bryan
Jenny Bryan*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, UK
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that the attribution to Lysias of the erōtikos (230e6–234c5) in Plato's Phaedrus is more significant than has generally been acknowledged. The erōtikos is attributed to Lysias because he is a logographer, whose success is dependent on writing speeches for other people. A careful consideration of both the context and the content of the speech encourage us to consider its relevance to Socrates. By attributing an (underwhelming) attempt at Socratic rhetoric to Lysias, the Phaedrus frames his speech as an example of the potential pitfalls of putting words into Socrates’ mouth. As such, the speech has broader significance for our understanding of what it means to write Socratic logoi.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 67 , December 2021 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Cambridge Philological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful for the constructive comments, patience and guidance of Andrew Morrison, Elizabeth Pender, Kelli Rudolph, Frisbee Sheffield, Stephen Todd and James Warren.

References

Works cited

Adkins, A. W. H. (1996) ‘The “Speech of Lysias” in Plato's Phaedrus’, in Louden, R. B. and Schollmeier, P. (eds.), The Greeks and us: Essays in honor of Arthur W. H. Adkins, Chicago, 224–40.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1986) ‘Psychagogia in Plato's Phaedrus’, ICS 11, 153–72.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J., Moreschini, C., Samama, G. and Vicaire, P. (2011) Platon: Phèdre, 3rd edn, Paris.Google Scholar
Buccioni, E. (2007) ‘Keeping it secret: reconsidering Lysias’ speech in Plato's “Phaedrus”’, Phoenix 61, 15–38.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (2007a) Lysiae orationes cum fragmentis, Oxford.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (2007b) ‘Epideictic rhetoric’, in Worthington, I. (ed.), A companion to Greek rhetoric, Oxford, 236–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, G. J. (1969) A commentary on the Phaedrus of Plato, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dimock, G. E. (1952) ‘ΑΛΛΑ in Lysias and Plato’, AJPh 73, 381–96.Google Scholar
Dorter, K. (1971) ‘Imagery and philosophy in Plato's Phaedrus’, JHPh 9, 279–88.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1968) Lysias and the Corpus Lysiacum, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1978) Greek homosexuality, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1987) Listening to the cicadas: a study of Plato's Phaedrus, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, C. L. (1986) Self-knowledge in Plato's Phaedrus, New Haven.Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. (1952) Plato's Phaedrus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Howland, J. (2004) ‘Plato's reply to Lysias: Republic 1 and 2 and Against Eratosthenes’, AJPh 125, 179–208.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2012) Plato and the traditions of ancient literature: the silent stream, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, M. M. (2007) ‘Looking inside Charmides’ cloak’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: essays in ancient philosophy in honour of Myles Burnyeat, Oxford, 1–19.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. and Woodruff, P. (1995) Plato: Phaedrus, Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. (2009) Socrates on friendship and community: reflections on Plato's Symposium, Phaedrus, and Lysis, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (1995) Genres in dialogue: Plato and the construct of philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1986) The fragility of goodness: luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Porter, J. R. (1997) ‘Adultery by the book: Lysias 1 (On the Murder of Eratosthenes) and comic diēgēsis’, Echos du Monde Classique: Classical Views 41, 421–53.Google Scholar
Robin, L. (1970) Platon: Phèdre, 7th edn, Paris.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (1988) Plato: Phaedrus, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sales, J. and Monserrat, J. (2013) ‘Sobre el logos de Lisias al Fedre’, in Carvalho, M., Caeiro, A. and Telo, H. (eds.), In the mirror of the Phaedrus, Sankt Augustin, 63–75.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. (1933) ‘On the Erōtikos of Lysias in Plato's Phaedrus’, CPh 28, 131–2.Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. (1967) Studies in the Styles of Plato, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C. (2007) A Commentary on Lysias, Speeches 1–11, Oxford.Google Scholar
Usher, S. (1976) ‘Lysias and his clients’, GRBS 17, 31–40.Google Scholar
Wersinger, A. G. (2001) Platon et la Disharmonie, Paris.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. (1996) Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens, Ithaca and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yunis, H. (2011) Plato: Phaedrus, Cambridge.Google Scholar