Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:11:38.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LUCRETIUS 5.1442 PROPTER ODORES: THE SWEET SMELL OF (VERY BELATED) SUCCESS?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2015

Keith Mitchell
Keith Mitchell*
Affiliation:
Sunderland, UK
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper offers a new reading of the end of Lucretius 5.1442, arguing that the line-end as we have it (much less Servius’ apparent reference to it) cannot stand, but that the original reading may yet be recovered from the transmitted text. The paper also seeks to show how the corruption may have arisen.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 61 , December 2015 , pp. 62 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

IN MEMORIAM Professor David West

References

Works cited

Bailey, C. (1947) T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, Oxford.Google Scholar
Blickman, D. R. (1989) ʻLucretius, Epicurus and prehistoryʼ, HSCP 92, 157–91.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. (1966) De rerum natura, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. J. (2008) ʻEmendations on the fifth book of Lucretiusʼ, Materiali e Discussioni 60,177–89.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. J. (2009) ʻFour Lucretian emendationsʼ, CCJ, 49–56.Google Scholar
Colin, J. (1954) ʻLes voiles de l'annone et l’évolution de lhumanité: Lucrèce v. 1442ʼ, Athenaeum 32, 121–33.Google Scholar
Deshayes, M. L. (1964) ‘À propos d'un vers de Lucrèce’, Humanités. Revue d'Enseignement Secondaire et d’Éducation 41, no. 5, 28.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. (1924) Titus Lucretius Carus: ‘De la nature’, Paris.Google Scholar
Housman, A. E. (1937) M. Manilii Astronomicon liber primus, 2nd edn, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Krokiewicz, A. (1918) ‘Emendationes quaedam Lucretianae’, Eos 23, 29–30.Google Scholar
Leonard, W. E. and Smith, S. B. (1942) T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, London.Google Scholar
Lord, H. G. (1970) ‘A lost line of Lucretius’, G&R 17, 197–8.Google Scholar
MacKay, L. A. (1961) ‘Notes on Lucretius’, CP 56, 103–5.Google Scholar
Murgia, C. E. (2000) ʻ“The most desperate textual crux” in Lucretius–5.1442ʼ, CP 95, 304–17.Google Scholar
Olszaniec, W. (2014) ʻA Lucretian gloss reconsidered (Lucr. 5.1442)ʼ, Hermes 142, 492–3.Google Scholar
Richter, W. (1976) ‘Nachträgliches zum Lukreztext’, RhM 119, 158–61.Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. (1964) ʻDe rerum natura v. 1440–7ʼ, Hermathena 98, 45–52.Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. (1971) ‘Lucretius v. 1442’, G&R 18, 102–3.Google Scholar
Szymański, M. (1981) ‘Glossae Lucretianae interpretatae’, Eos 69, 257.Google Scholar
Wikarjak, J. (1983) ‘Lukretianum V 1442’, Eos 71, 5–9.Google Scholar