Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T00:13:57.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lesbia, the poet, and the two faces of Sappho: ‘womanufacture’ in Catullus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Niklas Holzberg
Niklas Holzberg
Affiliation:
Munich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our understanding of ancient erotic poetry has, in my opinion, been greatly furthered in recent years by the shift from an approach which sees the poetic world of Roman love elegy as the creation of mimesis to one which reads it as semiosis. The elegiac poet portrays neither experienced reality nor conditions at least conceivable as such, but constructs a fictional situation using certain literary motifs provided by generic tradition, and thus challenges the reader to a game of semiotics. The latter, conversant with the ‘sign language’ of the motifs – for example of servitium amoris – will appreciate the poet's playful variations on a familiar theme and decipher the new meaning it has been given. Particularly significant here is, I find, the new perception of the two central characters in the elegiac world: the first-person poetalamator and his puella are both part of this fiction. The poet assumes the mask of an elegiac lover, playing the part as an actor would; he does not, then, re-enact his own experiences for an audience. In addition to this he designs the figure of the puella, who appears less as a character with its own personal profile and more as a typified representation, contrived in the main to reflect the poetic ego's thoughts. Women such as Cynthia, Delia, and Corinna are, to use Alison Sharrock's very apt definition, the product of ‘womanufacture’, and their names therefore cannot be read as pseudonyms for real-life women.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (Second Series) , Volume 46 , 2001 , pp. 28 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE ABBREVIATED IN THE FOOTNOTES

Arkins, Brian (1982): Sexuality in Catullus. Altertumswissenschaftliche Texte und Studien, 8 (Hildesheim/Zürich/New York).Google Scholar
Beck, Jan-Wilhelm (1996): ‘Lesbia’ und ‘Juventius’: Zwei libelli im Corpus Catulliunum. Untersuchungen zur Publikationsform und Authentizität der überlieferten Gedichtfolge. Hypomnemata, 111 (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Biondi, Giuseppe Gilberto (1998): ‘Il carme 35 di Catullo’, MD 41, 35–69.Google Scholar
Brooten, Bernadette J. (1996): Love between women: early Christian response to female homoeroticism (Chicago/London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dettmer, Helena (1997): Love by the numbers: form and the meaning in the poetry of Catullus. Lang Classical Studies, 10 (New York, etc.).Google Scholar
Dörrie, Heinrich (1975; ed.): Publius Ovidius Naso: Der Brief der Sappho an Phaon. Mit literarischem und kritischem Kommentar im Rahmen einer motivgeschichtlichen Studie. Zetemata, 58 (Munich).Google Scholar
Dover, Kenneth (1978): Greek homosexuality (London).Google Scholar
Edwards, Catharine (1993): The politics of immorality in ancient Rome. Roman Literature and Its Contexts (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, Denis (1992): ‘“Shall I compare thee …?”: Catullus 68B and the limits of analogy’, in: Woodman, Tony/Powell, Jonathan (edd.): Author and audience in Latin literature (Cambridge) 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, William (1995): Catullan provocations: lyric poetry and the drama of position. Classics and Contemporary Thought, 1 (Berkeley/Los Angeles/London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, Kathryn J. (1998): Poetic garlands: Hellenistic epigrams in context. Hellenistic Culture and Society, 28 (Berkeley/Los Angeles/London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1979): ‘Catullus 58 and Ausonius, Ep. 71’, LCM 4, 87–91.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan (1993): The arts of love: five studies in the discourse of Roman love elegy. Roman Literature and Its Contexts (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Martin, Charles (1992): Catullus. Hermes Books (New Haven/London).Google Scholar
Meyer-Zwiffelhoffer, Eckhard (1995): Im Zeichen des Phallus: Die Ordming des Geschlechtslebens im antiken Rom. Historische Studien, 15 (Frankfurt/New York).Google Scholar
Miller, Paul Allen (1994): Lyric texts and lyric consciousness: the birth of a genre from archaic Greece to Augustan Rome (London/Rome).Google Scholar
Miller, Paul Allen (1997): ‘Catullan consciousness, the “care of the self”, and the force of the negative in history’, in: Larmour, David H. J./Allen, Miller Paul/Platter, Charles (edd.): Rethinking sexuality: Foucault and classical antiquity (Princeton, N. J.) 171–203.Google Scholar
Nappa, Christopher (forthcoming): The man and the mask: aspects of Catullus' social fiction (Frankfurt. etc.).Google Scholar
Randall, J. G. (1979): ‘Mistresses' pseudonyms in Latin elegy’, LCM 4, 27–35.Google Scholar
Randall, J. G. (1980): ‘Glubit in Catullus 58: rectractio’, LCM 5, 21–2.Google Scholar
Ross, David O. (1975): Backgrounds to Augustan poetry: Gallus, elegy and Rome (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ernst A. (1985): Catull. Heidelberger Studienhefte zur Altertumswissenschaft (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Skinner, Marilyn B. (1983): ‘Clodia Metelli’, TAPA 113, 273–87.Google Scholar
Skinner, Marilyn B. (1993): ‘Ego Mulier. the construction of male sexuality in Catullus’, Helios 20, 107–30.Google Scholar
Stroh, Wilfried (1979): ‘Ovids Liebeskunst und die Ehegesetze des Augustus’, Gymnasium 86, 323–52.Google Scholar
Stroh, Wilfried (2000): ‘Lesbia und Iuventius: Ein erotisches Liederbuch im Corpus Catullianum’, in: id., Apocrypha: Entlegene Schriften (Stuttgart) 79–99.Google Scholar
Thomas, Richard F. (1993): ‘Sparrows, hares, and doves: a Catullan metaphor and its tradition’, Helios 20, 131–42.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (1997): Catullus: edited with a textual and interpretative commentary. Phoenix Suppl., 34 (Toronto/Buffalo/London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veyne, Paul (1988): Roman love elegy: love, poetry and the West. Transl. Pellauer, D. (Chicago/London).Google Scholar
Williams, Craig A. (1999): Roman homosexuality: ideologies of masculinity in classical antiquity. Ideologies of Desire (New York/London).Google Scholar
Williamson, Margaret (1995): Sappho's immortal daughters (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1969): Catullan questions (Leicester).Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1974): Cinna the poet and other Roman essays (Leicester).Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1979): Clio's cosmetics: three studies in Greco-Roman literature (Leicester).Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1985): Catullus and his world: a reappraisal (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Wray, David Lamar (1996): Catullus: sexual personae and invective tradition (diss., Harvard University).Google Scholar
Wyke, Maria (1989): ‘Mistress and metaphor in Augustan elegy’, Helios 16, 25–47.Google Scholar