Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:59:31.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hellenistic philosophers on Phaedrus 229b–30a

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

René Brouwer
René Brouwer
Affiliation:
University of Utrecht
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At M. 7.433 the sceptic Sextus Empiricus infers from the statement that the early Stoics did not profess themselves to be sages that ‘Cleanthes did not know whether he was a human being or a beast more complex than Typhon.’ Since in two other passages, at M. 7.264 and PH 2.22, Sextus ascribes (variations upon) this confession of ignorance to Socrates rather than Cleanthes, whom Sextus otherwise obviously presents as one of his dogmatic adversaries, it has been alleged that the reference to one of the heads of the Stoic school must simply have been a ‘wilful misreading’ on Sextus' behalf. As I hope to show, there are good reasons for Sextus to refer to a Stoic here, or rather even better reasons for a Stoic to have brought up this reference himself.

As has been picked up well in modern scholarship, Sextus' inference at M. 7.433 (as in the other two passages) ultimately refers back to the beginning of the Phaedrus, at 229e–30a, which contains an image (or perhaps even self-portrait) of Socrates.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 54 , 2008 , pp. 30 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2008

References

WORKS CITED

Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (2000) Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of scepticism (2nd edn.), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. (1997) Hermeias von Alexandrien, Kommentar zu Platons ‘Phaidros’, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Berry, E. G. (1940) The history and development of the concept of θεία μοȋϱα and θεία τύχη down to and including Plato, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2005) Sextus Empiricus, Against the logicians, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, R. (2006) ‘Socrates and skepticism’, in Ahbel-Rappe, S., Kamtekar, R. (eds.) A companion to Socrates, Oxford, 298–311.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M. (1987) ‘Faule Fische. Zu Timons von Phleius und seiner Philosophensatire’, Museum Helveticum 44, 127–33.Google Scholar
Blaise, F. (1992) ‘L'épisode de Typhée dans la Théogonie d'Hésiode (v. 820–885): la stabilisation du monde’, RÉG 90, 349–70.Google Scholar
Bluck, R. S. (ed.) (1961) Plato's Meno, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2001) Post-Hellenistic philosophy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, L. (1989) Platan, Phèdre, Paris.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2002) ‘Sagehood and the Stoics’, OSAP 23, 181–224.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2007) ‘The early Stoic doctrine of the change to wisdom’, OSAP 33, 285–315.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1999a) ‘Introduction: the beginnings of Hellenistic epistemology’, in Algra, K. et al. (eds) The Cambridge history of Hellenistic philosophy, Cambridge, 229–59.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1999b) ‘Livre IX’, in Goulet-Caźe, M.-O. (ed.) Diogène Laërce, Vies et doctrines des philosophes illustres, Paris, 1015–1145.Google Scholar
Bury, R. G. (1935) Sextus Empiricus, Against the logicians, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Canto-Sperber, M. (1993) Platon, Ménon (2nd edn.), Paris.Google Scholar
Chiesara, M. L. (2001) Aristocles of Messene, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2003) Hesiod's cosmos, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1980a) ‘Democrito in Sesto Empirico’, Siculorum Gymnasium 33, 393–410.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1980b) ‘Τûϕος: contributo alla storia di un concetto’, Sandalion 3, 53–66 (repr. with original pagination in Billerbeck, M. (ed.) (1991) Die Kyniker in der modernen Forschung, Amsterdam, 273–85).Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (ed.) (1981) Pirrone, Testimonianze, Naples.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (ed.) (1901) Poetarum philosophorum fragmenta, Berlin.Google Scholar
DK = Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (eds.) (1952) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (6th edn.), Berlin.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1994) ‘I frammenti di Anassarco di Abdera’, Atti e Memorie dell'Accademia toscana di Scienze e Lettere 59, 9–59.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (ed.) (1999) Antigone de Caryste, Fragments, Paris.Google Scholar
Dudley, D. R. (1937) A history of Cynicism, London.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2004) A commentary on Cicero, De legibus, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einarson, B. and de Lacy, P. H. (eds.) (1967) Plutarch, Moralia 14, 1086c–147a, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. (ed.) (1718) Sexti Empirici opera, Leipzig.Google Scholar
FDS = Hülser, K. (ed.) (1987–1888) Fragmente der Dialektik der Stoiker, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. A. (1968) ‘Due fonti sullo scetticismo antico’, SIFC 40, 200–24.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. A. (1981) ‘L'immagine dell'equilibrio’, in Giannantoni, G. (ed.) Lo scetticismo antico, Naples, 339–76.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1987) Listening to the cicadas. A study of Plato's Phaedrus, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festugière, A.-J. (1932) L'idéal religieux des grecs et l'évangile, Paris.Google Scholar
Fontenrose, J. (1959) Python. A study of Delphic myth and its origins, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, H. N. (1914) Plato, vol. 1, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Gannon, J. F. (1987) ‘An interpretation of Timon of Phlius Fr. 38 D’, AJP 108, 603–11.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (1990) God and Greek philosophy, London.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, = Giannantoni, G. (ed.) (1990) Socratis et socraticorum reliquiae (2nd edn.), Naples.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (1986) L'ascèse cynique, Paris.Google Scholar
Greene, W. C. (1944) Moira. Fate, good, and evil in Greek thought, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, C. L. Jr., (1986) Self-knowledge in Plato's Phaedrus, New Haven.Google Scholar
Gruppe, O. (1906) Griechische Mythologie und Religionsgeschichte, Munich.Google Scholar
Gundel, H. (1912) ‘Heimarmene’, RE 7, 2623–4.Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. (1952) Plato's Phaedrus, translated with introduction and commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1998) The sceptics (2nd edn.), London.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. (1993) Platan, Phaidros, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Höfer, O. (1902–1909) ‘Pythios’, in Roscher, W. H. (ed.) Ausführliches Lexikon der griechischen und römischen Mythologie, vol. 3.2, Leipzig, 3370–99.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A.-M. (1980) ‘Anassarco e il cinismo’, Siculorum Gymnasium 33, 499–506.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A.-M. (1995) ‘Socrate nelle tradizione accademica e pirroniana’, Memorie dell'Istituto italiano per gli Studi filosofici 25 (1995) 89–123.Google Scholar
Léger, J.-F. (1997) ‘Anaxarque d'Abdère’, diss. Paris.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parsons, P. (eds.) (1983) Supplementum hellenisticum, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A.A. (1978) ‘Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonist and satirist’, PCPS n.s. 24, 68–91 (revised reprint in his (2006) 70–95).Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1988) ‘Socrates in Hellenistic philosophy’, CQ n.s. 38, 150–71 (reprinted with a ‘Postscript 1995’ in his (1996) 1–34).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A.A. (1996) Stoic studies, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (2006) From Epicurus to Epictetus, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LS = Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic philosophers, Cambridge.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. (1990) ‘The meaning of άλαζών’, in Craik, E. (ed.) Owls to Athens, Oxford, 287–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
di Marco, M. (ed.) (1989) Timone di Ftuente, Silli, Rome.Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. (ed.) (1999) Diogenis Laertii Vitae philosophorum, vol. 1, Libri 1–10, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. and Vicaire, P. (1998) Platon, Phèdre, Paris.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2006) Hesiod, Theogony, Works and days, Testimonia, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Mutschmann, H. (ed.) (1914) Sexti Empirici opera, vol. 2, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Norden, N. (1892) ‘In Varronis saturas menippeas observationes selectae’, Jahrbücher für classische Philologie, Suppl. 18, 265–352.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (2002) ‘“All gods are true” in Epicurus’, in Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.) Traditions of theology, Leiden, 183–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pianko, G. (1948–1949) ‘De Timonis Phlasii Sillorum dispositione’, Eos 43, 120–6.Google Scholar
des Places, É. (1949) Pindare et Platon, Paris.Google Scholar
des Places, É. (ed.) (1987) Eusèbe de Césarée, La préparation évangélique, Livres 14–15, Paris.Google Scholar
Reale, G. (1998) Platone, Fedro, s.l.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, O. (1882) Alazon. Ein Beitrag zur antiken Ethologie und zur Kenntniss der griechisch-römischen Komödie nebst Übhersetzung des plautinischen Miles gloriosus, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, O. (1888) Agroikos. Eine ethologische Studie, Abhandlungen der philologisch-historischen Classe der königlich sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 10, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1975) ‘Homeric professors in the age of the sophists’, PCPS n.s. 21, 65–81.Google Scholar
Riley, M. T. (1980) ‘The Epicurean criticism of Socrates’, Phoenix 34, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, C. (1922) Platans Dialog Phaidros (2nd edn.), Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (1988) Plato, Phaedrus, translation and commentary (2nd edn.), Warminster.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (2005) ‘Hommes et monstres: Platon et Socrate parlent de la nature humaine’, in Dillon, J. and M. Dixsaut, (eds.) Agonistes. Essays in honour of D. O'Brien, Aldershot, 139–55.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (2007) Plato and the art of philosophical writing, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999) The Stoic idea of the city (2nd edn.). Chicago.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1999) ‘The Stoic-Platonist debate on kathêkonta’, in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) Topics in Stoic philosophy. Oxford, 128–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, P. (1933) What Plato said, Chicago.Google Scholar
Souilhé, J. (1930) ‘La θεία μοȋϱα chez Platon’, in von Rintelen, F.-J. (ed.) Philosophia perennis, vol. 1. Regensburg, 13–25.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1986) ‘Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung in der alten Stoa’, Rheinisches Museum N.F. 129, 18–30.Google Scholar
SVF = von Arnim, J. (ed.) (1903–1905) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, 3 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. H. (ed.) (1868) The Phaedrus of Plato with English notes and dissertations, London.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. B. (1991) review of di Marco (1989)', Classical Review n.s. 41, 469–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1955) ‘Notes on Plato's Phaedrus’, Mnemosyne 4.8, 265–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, G. J. (1969) A commentary on the Phaedrus of Plato, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. (ed.) (1885) Sillographorum graecorum reliquiae, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2002a) Epicurus and Democritean ethics, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2002b) ‘Socratic scepticism in Plutarch's Adversus Colotem’, Elenchos 23, 333–56.Google Scholar
Weniger, L. (1870) Die religiöse Seite der großien Pythien, Breslau.Google Scholar
West, M. (ed.) (1966) Hesiod, Theogony, Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. (ed.) (2007) Indo-European poetry and myth, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilamowitz, W. von (1881) Antigonos von Karystos, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilkins, E. G. (1917) ‘Know thyself’ in Greek and Latin literature, Chicago.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. and Nestle, W. (1920) Die Philosophic der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, vol. 1.2 (6th edn.), Leipzig.Google Scholar