Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:59:02.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CATULLUS 61: EPITHALAMIUM AND COMPARISON

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2013

Denis Feeney*
Affiliation:
Princeton University, USA

Abstract

Similes are a prominent feature of epithalamia, with poets comparing the bride and groom to characters from myth or to elements of the natural world. Catullus wrote two epithalamia (61 and 62), together with two other poems with marked epithalamian characteristics (64 and 68). This paper examines the question of why similes are so important to the genre of epithalamium, concentrating on Catullus 61, which is particularly rich in its deployment of comparison. The paper argues that comparison is crucial to the themes of Roman marriage: similes locate the human institution of marriage between the poles of myth and nature, and they afford a vehicle for considering the way marriage links together the disparate terms of male and female.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works cited

Allan, W. (2008) Euripides: Helen, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1993) ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid's Heroides’, HSCP 95, 333–65.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (2011) ‘Alman's first Partheneion and the song the Sirens sang’, in Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E. (eds.) Archaic and classical choral song: performance, politics and dissemination, Berlin, 3365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. D. (1987) Lucretius on love and sex: a commentary on De rerum natura 4.1030–1287, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, T. (1966) ‘The function of the simile in Ovid's Metamorphoses’, CJ 61, 354–63.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1979) Structure and history in Greek mythology and ritual, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. P. (1983) Three archaic poets: Archilochus, Alcaeus, Sappho, London.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. A. (1982) Greek Lyric I, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1994) Genres and readers: Lucretius, love elegy, Pliny's Encyclopedia, tr. Most, G. W., Baltimore [first published in Italian in 1991].Google Scholar
Contiades-Tsitsoni, E. (1990) Hymenaios und Epithalamion, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1985) ‘Three poems of Catullus: (1) Poem 62 and its Greek background’, BICS 32, 85–8.Google Scholar
Daly, M. and Wilson, M. I. (1982) ‘Whom are newborn babies said to resemble?’, Ethology and Sociobiology 3, 6978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornseiff-Greifswald, F. (1936) ‘Ägyptische Liebeslieder, Hoheslied, Sappho, Theokrit’, Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischern Gesellschaft 90, 589601.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. (1995) Aristophanes: Birds, Oxford.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. (1992) ‘Apples, blood and flowers: Sapphic bridal imagery in Catullus’, in Leroux, C. (ed.) Studies in Latin literature and Roman history VI, Coll. Latomus 217, Brussels, 181203.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. (1991) The Iliad: a commentary. Volume V: Books 17–20, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Effe, B. (1978) ‘Die Destruktion der Tradition: Theokrits mythologische Gedichte’, RhM 121, 4877.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1983) Catullus' Carmen 61, tr. Nardella, M., 2nd edn, Amsterdam [first published in Italian in 1972].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (1992) ‘“Shall I compare thee …?” Catullus 68b and the limits of analogy’, in Woodman, T. and Powell, J. (eds.) Author and audience in Latin literature, Cambridge, 3344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (2007), Caesar's calendar: ancient time and the beginnings of history, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (2010), ‘Fathers and sons: the Manlii Torquati and family continuity in Catullus and Horace’, in Kraus, C., Marincola, J. and Pelling, C. (eds.) Ancient historiography and its contexts, Oxford, 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2010) Sappho's gift: the poet and her community (tr. Acosta-Hughes, B. and Prauscello, L.), Michigan [first published in Italian in 2007].Google Scholar
Foley, H. P. (1985) Ritual irony: poetry and sacrifice in Euripides, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Fordyce, C. J. (1961) Catullus: a commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1955) ‘Vesper adest (Catullus LXII)’, JRS 45, 18.Google Scholar
Fuller, C. J. (1992) The camphor flame: popular Hinduism and society in India, Princeton.Google Scholar
Glinski, M. L. von (2012) Simile and identity in Ovid's ‘Metamorphoses’, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, J. (1995) Catullus: Poems 61–68, Warminster.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991) The poet's voice: essays on poetics and Greek literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffith, A. (1983) Aeschylus: Prometheus Bound, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. (1972) ‘Alcman's Partheneion: the morning after the night before’, QUCC 14, 730.Google Scholar
Hague, R. (1983) ‘Ancient Greek wedding songs: the tradition of praise’, Journal of Folklore Research 20, 131–43.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. and Heyworth, S. J. (1998) ‘Notes on the text and interpretation of Catullus’, PCPhS 44, 85109.Google Scholar
Haupt, M. (1837) Quaestiones Catullianae, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hersch, K. (2010) The Roman wedding: ritual and meaning in antiquity, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1994) ‘Some allusions to Callimachus in Latin poetry’, MD 33, 5179.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2001) ‘Catullian Iambics, Catullian Iambi’, in Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A. and Barchiesi, A. (eds.) Iambic ideas: essays on a poetic tradition from archaic Greece to the late Roman Empire, Lanham, MD, 117–40.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (2006) ‘Venus, Varro and the vates: towards the limits of etymologizing interpretation’, Dictynna 3, 173208.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (2007) Fragments of Roman poetry c.60 BC—AD 20, Oxford.Google Scholar
Horstmann, S. (2004) Das Epithalamium in der lateinischen Literatur der Spätantike, Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1996) Theocritus and the archaeology of Greek poetry, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2006) The shadow of Callimachus: studies in the reception of Hellenistic poetry at Rome, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1988) Hellenistic poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2001) Greek lyric poetry: a commentary on selected larger pieces, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (2011) Macrobius: Saturnalia, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kerrigan, J. (1986) Shakespeare: the ‘Sonnets’ and ‘A Lover's Complaint’, London.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1959) Catull, 3rd edn, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. (1955) Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre, 3rd edn, rev. A. Thierfelder, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2008) ‘“Reading for the moral” in Valerius Maximus: the case of seueritas’, CCJ 54, 160–87.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. (2001) ‘Keening Sappho: female speech genres in Sappho's poetry’, in Lardinois, A. and McClure, L. (eds.) Making silence speak: women's voices in Greek literature and society, Princeton, 7592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesky, A. (1966) A history of Greek literature, tr. Willis, J. and de Heer, C., New York [first published in German in 1957/58].Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. (1958) ‘L'ordinamento ed i reciproci rapporti dei carmi maggiori di Catullo’, RIFC 86, 2347.Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. (1962) Puella divina. Die Gestalt der göttlichen Geliebten bei Catull im Zusammenhang der antiken Dichtung, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lyghounis, M. G. (1991) ‘Elementi tradizionali nella poesia nuziale greca’, MD 27, 159–98.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1980) The Latin love poets from Catullus to Horace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (2002) Collected papers on Latin poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1991) A lexicon of ancient Latin etymologies, Leeds.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorff, E. A. (1913) Das lyrische Hochzeitsgedicht bei den Griechern und Römern, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Morgan, Ll. (2010) Musa pedestris: metre and meaning in Roman verse, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neudling, C. L. (1955) A prosopography to Catullus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970) A commentary on Horace: Odes 1, Oxford.Google Scholar
Oakley, J. H. and Sinos, R. H. (1993) The wedding in ancient Athens, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. (2005) A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X. Volume IV: Book X, Oxford.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. J. (2007) Inconsistency in Roman epic: studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, E. (2009) Freud's Rome: psychoanalysis and Latin poetry, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, K. (2008) Dress and the Roman woman: self-presentation and society, Abingdon and New York.Google Scholar
Page, D. (1955) Sappho and Alcaeus: an introduction to the study of ancient Lesbian poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Panoussi, V. (2007) ‘Sexuality and ritual: Catullus' wedding poems’, in Skinner, M. B. (ed.) A companion to Catullus, Malden, MA, 276–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, A. S. (1935) Publi Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber quartus, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Ready, J. L. (2004) ‘A binding song: the similes of Catullus 61’, CPh 99, 153–6.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. H. (2012) The Fabii and the Gauls: studies in historical thought and historiography in Republican Rome, Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1977) The rule of metaphor: multidisciplinary studies in the creation of meaning in language, tr. Czerny, R., Toronto [first published in French in 1975]Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. G. (1969) The green cabinet: Theocritus and the European pastoral lyric, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Schäfer, E. (1966) Das Verhältnis von Erlebnis und Kunstgestalt bei Catull, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (2009) ‘Sex and empire: a Darwinian perspective’, in Morris, I. and Scheidel, W. (eds.) The dynamics of ancient empires: state power from Assyria to Byzantium, Oxford, 255324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrenk, L. P. (1994) ‘Sappho Frag. 44 and the Iliad’, Hermes 122, 144–50.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (1986) ‘Wedding ritual and textual criticism in Sophocles' “Women of Trachis”’, Hermes 114, 50–9.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (1987) ‘The tragic wedding’, JHS 107, 7690.Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. A. (2005) ‘The judgment of Helen in Athenian art’, in Barringer, J. M. and Hurwit, J. M. (eds.) Periklean Athens and its legacy: problems and perspectives, Austin, TX. 4762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, J. (1978) ‘Theocritus' epithalamion for Helen’, RBPh 56, 2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigers, E. S. (1977) ‘Retreat from the male: Catullus 62 and Sappho's erotic flowers’, Ramus 6, 83102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svennung, J. (1945) Catulls Bildersprache I: Vergleichende Stilstudien, Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift, 3, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. (1990) Catull: Eine Interpretation. Zweiter Teil: Die Großen Gedichte (61–68), Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Thomsen, O. (1992) Ritual and desire: Catullus 61 and 62 and other ancient documents on wedding and marriage, Aarhus.Google Scholar
Thomsen, O. (2002) ‘An introduction to the study of Catullus' wedding poems: the ritual drama of Catullus 62’, C&M 53, 255–87.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (1998) Catullus, edited with a textual and interpretative commentary, corr. edn, Toronto.Google Scholar
Tosi, R. (1991) Dizionario delle sentenze latine e greche, Milan.Google Scholar
Trappes-Lomax, J. M. (2007) Catullus: a textual reappraisal, Swansea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1991) Roman marriage: ‘iusti coniuges’ from the time of Cicero to the time of Ulpian, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, A. L. (1930) ‘Tradition in the epithalamium’, AJPh 51, 205–23.Google Scholar
von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1924) Hellenistische Dichtung in der Zeit des Kallimachos, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1969) Catullan questions, Leicester.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1985) Catullus and his world: a reappraisal, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (1996) Playing the other: gender and society in classical Greek literature, Chicago.Google Scholar