Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:00:55.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An inflexion and a deflection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Michael D. Reeve
Affiliation:
Pembroke College, Cambridge

Extract

In memory of Volkmar Schmidt

Even before Homeric -ϕι reappeared as Mycenaean -pi, much thought had been given to its origin, number, and case. Here are some conclusions that had been drawn about its case and functions:

The independent uses [uses without a preposition] are instrumental and locatival … The next step is the most critical, to explain its extension to the functions of the Greek genitive … -ϕι = Greek genitive is almost always combined with a preposition … The ending was first thought of as instrumental … The locatival use is only rarely independent.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shipp, G. P., Studies in the language of Homer (Cambridge 1953) 1–17 ‘Homeric -ϕι’ at pp. 4, 12, 13, 15Google Scholar.

2 Essays in Mycenaean and Homeric Greek (Melbourne 1961) 29–41 ‘Homeric -ϕι’, Mycenaean -pi and Indo-European -bhi(s)', at p. 40Google Scholar. My interest in the matter was reawakened after a long interval when Rupert Thompson discussed it at the Cambridge Philological Society in October 1997, and I thank him for his comments on this note.

3 Hainsworth, J. B., The Iliad: a commentary. Volume III: Books 9–12 (Cambridge 1993) 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Paley, F. A., The Iliad of Homer with English notes (London 18661871) I 393, 435Google Scholar. He was apparently citing Müller, Max's Lectures on the science of language in the second of their many editions (London 1862)Google Scholar, and the author of The new Cratylus, which he cites in its third (London 1859), was Donaldson, J. W.Google Scholar.

5 Leaf, W., The Iliad edited with English notes and introduction (London 18861888) I 373Google Scholar. ‘H. G.’ is Monro, D. B.'s Grammar of the Homeric dialect (Oxford 1882)Google Scholar.

6 Voigt, E.-M. in Lexikon des frühgriechischen Epos I (1979) 1089Google Scholar § 1aβ.

7 Heyne, C. G., Homeri carmina cum brevi annotatione (Leipzig & London 1802) VII 240Google Scholar; Ameis-Hentze, ed. 4 (Leipzig & Berlin 1908) 41.

8 Monro, , Homer: Iliad, Books XIII–XXIV (Oxford 1888) 318Google Scholar. Many commentators have no note.

9 F. Portus or his son (Geneva 1580) 606; A. Divus (Venice 1537) f. 183r.