Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:11:09.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ACCEPTING THE OMEN: EXTERNAL REFERENCE IN GREEK DECLAMATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

William Guast
William Guast*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, UK
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Traditional accounts of Greek declamation paint this important imperial genre as a flight from the alleged impotence of Greek cities under Roman rule into a nostalgic fantasy of the autonomy of the classical past. But there is clear evidence of declaimers using their works to refer to the world outside the fiction, often to the immediate performance context, and above all to themselves. This paper examines examples from Aelius Aristides, Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists and Polemo, and shows that such a practice facilitated vigorous and eloquent communication, while also allowing for any external message to be plausibly denied.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 63 , December 2017 , pp. 82 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For helpful feedback of all kinds, which has improved this article immeasurably, I wish to thank Prof. Tim Whitmarsh, Prof. Chris Pelling, Prof. Jaś Elsner, audiences at Radboud University, Nijmegen (particularly my respondent on that occasion, Prof. Bé Breij), the Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa (particularly Prof. Glenn Most) and Corpus Christi College, University of Oxford, and the two anonymous CCJ readers. This article was begun when I held a Stavros Niarchos Foundation graduate scholarship at the University of Oxford, and finished when I held a fellowship funded by the A. G. Leventis Foundation at the University of Bristol's Institute for Greece, Rome and the Classical Tradition: I wish to place on record my deep gratitude to all three organisations, without whom this research would not have been possible.

I cite Hermogenes, De statibus according to the edition of Patillon (2009), [Hermogenes,] De inventione according to the edition of Patillon (2012) and Apsines, Ars rhetorica according to the edition of Spengel and Hammer (1894); following convention, I cite Polemo's two surviving declamations as ‘A’ and ‘B’. RG refers to Walz (1832–6). All translations are my own unless otherwise noted.

References

Works cited

Albini, U. (1968) [Erode Attico] ΠΕΡΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΕΙΑΣ: introduzione, testo critico e commentario, Florence.Google Scholar
Amandry, M. and Burnett, A. M. (2015) Roman provincial coinage. Volume iii, part i, London and Paris.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1986) Philostratus: biography and belles lettres in the third century AD, London.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1993) The Second Sophistic: a cultural phenomenon in the Roman empire, London.Google Scholar
Behr, C. A. (1968) Aelius Aristides and The sacred tales, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Behr, C. A. (1981–6) P. Aelius Aristides: the complete works, 2 vols., Leiden.Google Scholar
Bost-Pouderon, C. (2010) ‘Quelques considérations sur le traitement de l'exemple historique chez Dion Chrysostome’, in Malosse, P.-L., Noël, M.-P. and Schouler, B. (eds.), Clio sous le regard d'Hermès: l'utilisation de l'histoire dans la rhétorique ancienne de l’époque hellénistique à l'Antiquité Tardive. Actes du colloque international de Montpellier (18–20 octobre 2007), Cardo 8, Alessandria, 93–118.Google Scholar
Boulanger, A. (1923) Aelius Aristide et la sophistique dans la province d'Asie au iie siècle de notre ère, Bibliothèque des Écoles Françaises d'Athènes et de Rome, fasc. 126, Paris.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. (1969) Greek sophists in the Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1970) ‘Greeks and their past in the Second Sophistic’, P&P 46.1, 3–41.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. (1994) ‘The bubble of the Second Sophistic’, BICS 39, 25–52.Google Scholar
Cadoux, C. J. (1938) Ancient Smyrna: a history of the city from the earliest times to 324 AD, Oxford.Google Scholar
Civiletti, M. (2002) Filostrato: Vite dei sofisti. Testo greco a fronte. Introduzione, traduzione e note, Milan.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. (1968) ‘Three notes on Roman education’, CPh 63.1, 42–4.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2001) ‘Reclaiming the theatrical in the Second Sophistic’, Helios 28, 75–96.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1992) ‘Filostrato: la contemporaneità del passato greco’, in Gascó, F. and Falque, E. (eds.), El pasado renacido: uso y abuso de la tradición clásica, Seville.Google Scholar
Downie, J. (2013) At the limits of art: a literary study of Aelius Aristides’ Hieroi logoi, Oxford.Google Scholar
den Dulk, M. and Langford, A. (2014) ‘Polycarp and Polemo: Christianity at the center of the Second Sophistic’, in Blanton, T. R. IV, Calhoun, R. M. and Rothschild, C. K. (eds.), The history of religions school today: essays on the New Testament and related ancient Mediterranean texts, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament i 340, Tübingen, 211–40.Google Scholar
Francis, J. A. (1995) Subversive virtue: asceticism and authority in the second-century pagan world, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995) Making men: sophists and self-presentation in ancient Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (2009) ‘Shock and awe: the performance dimension of Galen's anatomy demonstrations’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the world of knowledge, Cambridge, 85–114.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2003) Declamation, paternity, and Roman identity: authority and the rhetorical self, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harmon, A. (1913) Lucian. Volume i, Loeb Classical Library 14, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harmon, A. (1936) Lucian. Volume v, Loeb Classical Library 302, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (2004) Menander: a rhetor in context, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hinck, H. (1873) Polemonis declamationes quae extant duae, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Israelowich, I. (2012) Society, medicine and religion in the Sacred tales of Aelius Aristides, Mnemosyne Supplements 341, Leiden.Google Scholar
Janiszewski, P., Stebnicka, K. and Szabat, E. (2015) Prosopography of Greek rhetors and sophists of the Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1974) ‘The sophists as declaimers’, in Bowersock, G. W. (ed.), Approaches to the Second Sophistic, University Park, PA, 17–22.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1983) Greek rhetoric under Christian emperors, Princeton.Google Scholar
Kiehr, F. (1906) Lesbonactis sophistae quae supersunt, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kohl, R. (1915) De scholasticarum declamationum argumentis ex historia petitis, Paderborn.Google Scholar
Korenjak, M. (2000) Publikum und Redner: ihre Interaktion in der sophistischen Rhetorik der Kaiserzeit, Zetema Monographien 104, Munich.Google Scholar
Lenz, F. W. and Behr, C. A. (1976) P. Aelii Aristidis opera quae exstant omnia, Leiden.Google Scholar
Leppin, H. (2011) ‘The Late Empire’, in Marasco, G. (ed.), Political autobiographies and memoirs in antiquity: a Brill companion, Leiden, 417–53.Google Scholar
Macleod, M. D. (1972–87) Luciani opera, 4 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Marrou, H.-I. (1965) Histoire de l’éducation dans l'antiquité. Sixième édition revue et augmentée, Paris.Google Scholar
Patillon, M. (2009) Corpus rhetoricum. Volume ii: Hermogène: Les états de cause, Collection des Universités de France, Série grecque 470, Paris.Google Scholar
Patillon, M. (2012) Corpus rhetoricum. Volume iii: Pseudo-Hermogéne: L'Invention; Anonyme: Synopse des exordes; Anonyme: Scolies au traité Sur l'invention du Pseudo-Hermogéne, Collection des Universités de France, Série grecque 485, Paris.Google Scholar
Penella, R. J. (ed.) (2009) Rhetorical exercises from late antiquity: a translation of Choricius of Gaza's preliminary talks and declamations, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (1998) ‘Periautologia: problèmes et méthodes de l’éloge de soi-même dans la tradition éthique et rhétorique gréco-romaine’, REG 111, 101–24.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (2007) ‘Il non-detto della declamazione greco-romana: discorso figurato, sottintesi e allusioni politiche’, in Calboli Montefusco, L. (ed.), Papers on rhetoric 8 , Rome, 209–34.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (2008) ‘Les faux-semblants de la rhétorique grecque’, in Mouchel, C. and Nativel, C. (eds.), République des lettres, république des arts. Mélanges en l'honneur de Marc Fumaroli, de l'Académie française, Geneva, 427–50.Google Scholar
Perry, B. E. (1955) ‘Literature in the second century’, CJ 50, 295–8.Google Scholar
Petsalis-Diomidis, A. (2010) Truly beyond wonders: Aelius Aristides and the cult of Asklepios, Oxford Studies in Ancient Culture and Representation, Oxford.Google Scholar
Puech, B. (2002) Orateurs et sophistes grecs dans les inscriptions d’époque impériale, Paris.Google Scholar
Reader, W. W. (1996) The severed hand and the upright corpse: the declamations of Marcus Antonius Polemo, SBL Texts and Translations 42 Graeco-Roman 12, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1971) Courants littéraires grecs des iie et iiie siècles après J.-C., Paris.Google Scholar
de Romilly, J. (1975) Magic and rhetoric in ancient Greece, Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Rothe, S. (1989) Kommentar zu ausgewählten Sophistenviten des Philostratos, Sammlung Groos 38, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1983) Greek declamation, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (1995) ‘The poetics of the paraphthegma: Aelius Aristides and the decorum of self-praise’, in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and rhetoric: classical essays for Donald Russell on his seventy-fifth birthday, Oxford, 193–204.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1887–97) Der Atticismus in seinen Hauptvertretern: von Dionysius von Halikarnass bis auf den zweiten Philostratus, 5 vols., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. (1997) Bildung und Macht: zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit, Munich.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. (1998) ‘Performing history in the Second Sophistic’, in Zimmerman, M. (ed.), Geschichtsschreibung und politischer Wandel im 3. Jh. n. Chr., Stuttgart, 71–92.Google Scholar
Schouler, B. (1986) ‘Le déguisement de l'intention dans la rhétorique grecque’, Ktèma 11, 257–72.Google Scholar
Spengel, L. and Hammer, C. (1894) Rhetores Graeci. Volume i.2, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Stefec, R. S. (2013) ‘Die Überlieferung der Deklamationen Polemons’, Römische historische Mitteilungen 55, 99–154.Google Scholar
Stefec, R. S. (2016) Flavii Philostrati vitas sophistarum ad quas accedunt Polemonis Laodicensis declamationes quae exstant duae recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit Rudolf S. Stefec, Oxford.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1991) ‘The reliability of Philostratus's Lives of the Sophists ’, ClAnt 10, 148–63.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and empire, Oxford.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, L. (2010) ‘Greek rhetoric and the later Roman Empire: the bubble of the “Third Sophistic”’, AntTard 18, 211–24.Google Scholar
Vössing, K. (2003) ‘Vom Sitzenbleiben des Deklamators: zu einem Witz in Sen. Con. 3, Pr. 11’, Mnemosyne 56.1, 74–80.Google Scholar
Walz, C. (1832–6) Rhetores Graeci, ex codicibus Florentinis, Mediolanensibus, Monacensibus, Neapolitanis, Parisiensibus, Romanis, Venetis, Taurinensibus et Vindobonensibus, 9 vols., Stuttgart and Tübingen.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2006) ‘Fiction, mimesis and the performance of the Greek past in the Second Sophistic’, in Konstan, D. and Saïd, S. (eds.), Greeks on Greekness: viewing the Greek past under the Roman Empire, Cambridge Classical Journal, Supplementary Volume 28, 27–46.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2004) ‘Philostratus’, in Narrators, narratees and narratives in ancient Greek Literature, Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative 1; Mnemosyne Supplements 257, 423–39Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2005) The Second Sophistic, Greece & Rome: New Surveys in the Classics 35, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (2000) ‘Demosthenes’ (in)activity during the reign of Alexander the Great’, in Worthington, I. (ed.), Demosthenes: statesman and orator, London, 90–113.Google Scholar