Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:41:48.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sibylline syllables: The intratextual Aeneid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Ellen Oliensis
Ellen Oliensis
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As recent scholarship on the poem has demonstrated, the Aeneid is punctuated by reiterated episodes of opening. These ruptures, often violently produced, release violence into the world of the poem, prolonging the epic action by postponing its appointed end. The pattern is set in the first book when Aeolus strikes at the mountain that houses the winds, unleashing the storm that drives Aeneas off course, from Italy to Carthage. What is ‘opened’ here is at once something within the poem (the cavernous prison of the winds) and the poem itself, which restarts, as it were, when it seemed on the verge, with Aeneas' approach to Italy, of shutting down. Much valuable work has been done to illuminate and complicate this convergence of the action in the poem with the action of the poem, with one focus being the agency of Juno, a figure especially closely linked here with openings and beginnings.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 50 , 2004 , pp. 29 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ahl, F. (1985) Metaformations, Ithaca & London.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1997) Ovid's Metamorphoses, books 1–5, Norman & London.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (1995) ‘The impossibility of metathesis: Philodemus and Lucretius on form and content in poetry’, in Obbink, D. (ed.) Philodemus and poetry, New York & Oxford, 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1966) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber secundus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1997) The poet and the prince, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1998) ‘Arms and the man: the politics of art in Virgil's Aeneid’, CP 93, 322–42.Google Scholar
Bloch, A. (1970) ‘Arma uirumque als heroisches Leitmotiv’, MH 27, 206–11.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1991) The gods in epic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1997) ‘Virgilian narrative: story-telling’, in Martindale, C. (ed.) The Cambridge companion to Virgil, Cambridge, 259–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. (1998) ‘Opening the gates of war’, in Stahl, H.-P. (ed.) Vergil's Aeneid: Augustan epic and political context, London, 155–74.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2002) ‘Masculinity under threat?’, in Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. (eds.) Cultivating the muse, Oxford, 141–60.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (1993) The walking muse, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (forthcoming) ‘Virgil's Sibyl and the “many mouths” cliché (Aen. 6.625–7)’, CQ 54.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1993) The epic successors of Virgil, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1994) Virgil Aeneid book IX, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. (1998) The madness of epic, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1992) ‘Arma in Ovid's Fasti part I,’ Arethusa 25, 81–112.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (1998) ‘Ter quinque uolumina as carmen perpetuum: the division into books in Ovid's Metamorphoses’, MD 40, 77–98.Google Scholar
Hubaux, J. (1939) ‘Deiphobe et la Sibylle,’ Ant Cl 8, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, P. A. (1998) ‘Juno's anger and the sibyl at Cumae’, Vergilius 44, 13–22.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2002) ‘Authority and ontology of the Muses in epic reception’, in Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. (eds.) Cultivating the muse, Oxford, 117–40.Google Scholar
Levitan, W. (1993) ‘Give up the beginning? Juno's mindful wrath (Aeneid 1.37),’ LCM 18, 14.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. (1998) ‘Gnawing at the end of the rope’, Ramus 27. 95–126.Google Scholar
Michalopoulos, A. (2001) Ancient etymologies in Ovid's Metamorphoses, Leeds.Google Scholar
Monti, R. C. (1994) ‘The identification of Vergil's cave of the Cumaean Sibyl’, Vergilius 40, 19–34.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (2003) ‘Child's play: Ovid and his critics’, JRS 93, 66–91.Google Scholar
Oberhelman, S. and Armstrong, D. (1995) ‘Satire as poetry and the impossibility of metathesis in Horace's Satires’, in Obbink, D. (ed.) Philodemus and poetry, New York & Oxford, 233–54.Google Scholar
Perutelli, A. (1974) ‘Commento ad alcuni sogni dell'Eneide’, Athenaeum 52, 241–67.Google Scholar
Santirocco, M. S. (1986) Unity and design in Horace's Odes, Chapel Hill & London.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (1994) Seduction and repetition in Ovid Ars amatoria 2, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharrock, A. (2002) ‘An a-musing tale’, in Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. (eds.) Cultivating the muse, Oxford, 207–28.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (2000) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman textual relations, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar