Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:30:00.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Upper Palaeolithic Installation Art: Topography, Distortion, Animation and Participation in the Production and Experience of Cantabrian Cave Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2020

Takashi Sakamoto Open the ORCID record for Takashi Sakamoto [Opens in a new window] ,
Paul Pettitt  and
Roberto Ontañon-Peredo Open the ORCID record for Roberto Ontañon-Peredo [Opens in a new window]
Takashi Sakamoto
Affiliation:
Via Monte Zovetto 28, 12100Cuneo, Italy Email: [email protected]
Paul Pettitt
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Durham University, South Road, DurhamDH1 3LE, United Kingdom Email: [email protected]
Roberto Ontañon-Peredo
Affiliation:
MUPAC, C/ Ruiz de Alda 19, 39009Santander, Spain Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The physical nature of cave walls and its impact on Upper Palaeolithic image making and viewing has frequently been invoked in explanations about the function of cave art. The morphological features (convexities, concavities, cracks and ridges) are frequently incorporated into the representations of prey animals that dominate the art, and several studies have attempted to document the relationship between the cave wall and the art in a quantitative manner. One of the effects of such incorporation is that undulating walls will distort the appearance of images as viewers change their viewing position. Was this distortion deliberate or accidental? Until now, the phenomenon has not been investigated quantitatively. We address this here, analysing 54 Late Upper Palaeolithic animal images deriving from three Cantabrian caves, Covalanas, El Pendo and El Castillo. We introduce a novel use for photogrammetry and 3D modelling through documenting the morphology of these caves’ walls and establishing the specific relationship between the walls and the art created on them. Our observations suggest that Palaeolithic artists deliberately placed images on very specific topographies. The restricted nature of these choice decisions and the fact that the resulting distortions could have been avoided but were not suggest that the interaction between viewer, art and wall was integral to the way cave art functioned.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , November 2020 , pp. 665 - 688
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcalde del Río, H., Breuil, H. & Sierra, L., 1911. Les cavernes de la région cantabrique {Caves of the Cantabrian region]. Monaco: Impr. Vve A. Chêne.Google Scholar
Ahn, S.H., Jin, B., Kwon, S. & Yun, M.H., 2014. A research on curved display comparing to flat display regarding posture, tilt angle, focusing area and satisfaction. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea 33(3), 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apellániz, J.M., 1978. Análisis e interpretación de Ekain [Analysis and interpretation of Ekain]. Munibe 30, 110–50.Google Scholar
Arias, P., 2009. Rites in the dark? An evaluation of the current evidence for ritual areas at Magdalenian cave sites. World Archaeology 41(2), 262–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, P. & Ontañón, R., 2012. La Galma [Spain]: long term human activity in a karst system, in Cave in Context: The cultural significance of caves and rockshelters in Europe, eds Bergsvik, K.A. & Skeates, R.. Oxford: Oxbow, 101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert, M., Brumm, A., Ramli, M., Sutikna, T., Saptomo, E.W., Hakim, B. & Dosseto, A., 2014. Pleistocene cave art from Sulawesi, Indonesia. Nature 514(7521), 223–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aubert, M., Brumm, A. & Huntley, J., 2018. Early dates for ‘Neanderthal cave art’ may be wrong. Journal of Human Evolution 125, 215–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aujoulat, N., 1985. Analyse d'une oeuvre pariétale paléolithique anamorphosée [Analysis of a Palaeolithic parietal anamorphic work]. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique de l'Ariège Tarascon-sur-Ariège 40, 185–93.Google Scholar
Aujoulat, N., 2005. The Splendour of Lascaux: Rediscovering the greatest treasure of prehistoric art. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Azéma, M., 2008. Representation of movement in the Upper Palaeolithic: an ethological approach to the interpretation of parietal art. Anthropozoologica 43(1), 117–54.Google Scholar
Azéma, M., 2010. L'art des cavernes en action [Cave art in motion]. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Azéma, M. & Rivère, F., 2012. Animation in Palaeolithic art: a pre-echo of cinema. Antiquity 86, 316–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahn, P.G., 1995. Cave art without the caves. Antiquity 69, 231–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahn, P.G., 2003. Location, location: what can the positioning of cave and rock art reveal about Ice Age motivations?, in Höhlenkunst und Raum: Archäologische und architektonische Perspektiven [Cave art and space: archaeologichal and architectural perspectives], eds Pastoors, A. & Weniger, G.C.. Düsseldorf: Jan van der Most, 11–20.Google Scholar
Bahn, P.G., 2007. Cave Art: A guide to the decorated Ice Age caves of Europe. London: Frances Lincoln.Google Scholar
Bahn, P.G., 2011. Religion and ritual in the Upper Palaeolithic, in The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion, ed. Insoll, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 344–57.Google Scholar
Bahn, P.G., 2016. Images of the Ice Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bahn, P.G. & Vertut, J., 1997. Journey Through The Ice Age. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Baptista, A.M., 2009. O paradigma perdido: o Vale do Côa e a arte paleolítica de ar livre em Portugal [Paradigm lost: the Côa valley and open-air Palaeolithic art in Portugal]. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Batarda Fernandes, A., Reis, M., Escudero Remirez, C. & Vázquez Marcos, C., 2017. Integration of natural stone features and conservation of the Upper Palaeolithic Côa Valley and Siega Verde open-air rock-art. Time and Mind 10(3), 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, C., 2005. Installation Art. London: Tate Publishing.Google Scholar
Bourdier, C., 2013. Rock art and social geography in the Upper Paleolithic. Contribution to the socio-cultural function of the Roc-aux-Sorciers rock-shelter (Angles-sur-l'Anglin, France) from the viewpoint of its sculpted frieze. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 32(4), 368–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdier, C., Fuentes, O., Pinçon, G. & Baleux, F., 2017. Methodological contribution to the integrated study of European Palaeolithic rock art: the issue of the audience and the perceptibility of Roc-aux-Sorciers rock art (Angles-sur-l'Anglin, France). Quaternary International 430, 114–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuil, H., 1952. Quatre cents siècles d'art pariétal: les cavernes ornées de l'âge du renne. Montignac: Centre d’études et de documentation préhistoriques.Google Scholar
Brot, J., 2012. L'utilisation des reliefs naturels dans l'art pariétal paléolithique, in Pleistocene Art of the World. Actes du Congres IFRAO, Tarascon sur Ariège, septembre 2010, ed. Clottes, J.. Préhistoire, Art et Sociétés: Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Ariège-Pyrénées (Special number) 45–46 (2010–2011), CD-75–91.Google Scholar
Chodoronek, M., 2015. The Use and Application of Photogrammetry for the In-field Documentation of Archaeological Features: Three Case Studies from the Great Plains and Southeastern Alaska. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
Clottes, J. & Simonnet, R., 1990. Retour au Réseau Clastres (Niaux, Ariège). Préhistoire Ariégeoise 45, 51–139.Google Scholar
Conkey, M.W., 1987. New approaches in the search for meaning? A review of research in Paleolithic art. Journal of Field Archaeology 14(4), 413–30.Google Scholar
Criado Boado, F. & Penedo Romero, R., 1993. Art, time and thought: a formal study comparing palaeolithic and postglacial art. World Archaeology 25(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Beaune, S., 2004. Un atelier magdalénien de sculpture de la stéatite au Rocher de la Caille (Loire) [A Magdalenian steatite sculpture workshop at Rocher de la Caille (Loire)], in L'art du paléolitique [Art of the Palaeolithic], eds Lejeune, M. & Welté, A.C.. Liège: ERAUL, 177–86.Google Scholar
Feruglio, V., Dutailly, B., Ballade, M., et al. , 2015. Un outil de releve´s 3D partage´ en ligne: premie`res applications pour l'art et la taphonomie des parois orne´es de la grotte de Cussac (ArTaPOC/programme LaScArBx) [A 3D modelling tool shared online: first applications for art and taphonomy of decorated panels in Cussac cave], in Virtual Retrospect 2013: Actes du colloque Pessac (France), 27–28–29 novembre 2013, eds Vergnieux, R. & Delevoie, C.. (Archéovision 6.) Pessac: Ausonius, 49–56.Google Scholar
Fritz, C., Wills, M.D. & Tosello, G., 2016. Reconstructing Paleolithic cave art: the example of Marsoulas cave (France). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 10, 910–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Diez, M., Garrido, D., Hoffmann, D.L., Pettitt, P.B., Pike, A.W. & Zilhão, J., 2015. The chronology of hand stencils in European Palaeolithic rock art: implications of new U-series results from El Castillo Cave (Cantabria, Spain). Journal of Anthropological Sciences 93, 135–52.Google Scholar
Geneste, J.M., Hordé, T., Tanet, C. & Dagen, P., 2004. Lascaux, a Work of Memory. Périgueux: Fanlac.Google Scholar
Gittins, R. & Pettitt, P., 2017. Is Palaeolithic cave art consistent with costly signalling theory? Lascaux as a test case. World Archaeology 49(4), 466–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenen, M., 2000. Sombra y luz en el arte Paleolitico [Darkness and light in Palaeolithic art]. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Hodgson, D., 2000. Shamanism, phosphenes, and early art: an alternative synthesis. Current Anthropology 41(5), 866–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, D., 2003. The biological foundations of Upper Palaeolithic art: stimulus, Percept and representational imperatives. Rock Art Research 20(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Hodgson, D., 2008. The visual dynamics of Upper Palaeolithic cave art. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(3), 341–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, D. & Pettitt, P., 2018. The origins of iconic depictions: a falsifiable model derived from the visual science of Palaeolithic cave art and world rock art. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 28(4), 591–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, D.L., Standish, C.D., García-Diez, M., et al. , 2018a. U-Th dating of carbonate crusts reveals Neandertal origin of Iberian cave art. Science 359(6378), 912–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, D.L., Standish, C.D., García-Diez, M., et al. , 2018b. Response to Comment on ‘U-Th dating of carbonate crusts reveals Neandertal origin of Iberian cave art’. Science 362(6411), eaau1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, D.L., Standish, C.D., García-Diez, M., et al. , 2018c. Dates for Neanderthal art and symbolic behaviour are reliable. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2(7), 1044–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, D.L., Standish, C.D., García-Diez, M., et al. , Response to Aubert et al.'s reply ‘Early dates for “Neanderthal cave art” may be wrong’ [J. Hum. Evol. 125 (2018), 215–217]. Journal of Human Evolution 135, 102644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyge, D., Aubert, M., Barnard, H., Claes, W., Darnell, J.C., De Dapper, M. & Therasse, I., 2007. ‘Lascaux along the Nile’: Late Pleistocene rock art in Egypt. Antiquity 81, 1–3.Google Scholar
Jouteau, A., Feruglio, V., Bourdier, C., Camus, H., Ferrier, C., Santos, F. & Jaubert, J., 2019. Choosing rock art locations: geological parameters and social behaviours. The example of Cussac Cave (Dordogne, France). Journal of Archaeological Science 105, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D. & Friess, M., 2014. Technical note: 3D from standard digital photography of human crania—a preliminary assessment. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 154(1), 152–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kersten, T.P. & Lindstaedt, M., 2012. Image-based low-cost systems for automatic 3D recording and modelling of archaeological finds and objects, in Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation (EuroMed 2012), eds Ioannides, M., Fritsch, D., Leissner, J., Davies, R., Remondino, F. & Caffo, R.. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7616.) Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 1–10.Google Scholar
Koutsoudis, A., Vidmar, B. & Arnaoutoglou, F., 2013. Performance evaluation of a multi-image 3D reconstruction software on a low-feature artefact. Journal of Archaeological Science 40(12), 4450–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemozi, A., 1929. La grotte-temple du Pech-Merle, un nouveau sanctuaire préhistorique. Paris: A. Picard.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1968. The evolution of Paleolithic art. Scientific American 218, 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1992. L'art pariétal: Langage da la préhistoire. Grenoble: Jérome Millon.Google Scholar
Lorblanchet, M., 1989. Nouvelles découvertes d'art pariétal paléolithique en Quercy [New discoveries of Palaeolithic parietal art in Quercy], in L'art pariétal paléolithique. Actes des Colloques de la direction du Patrimoine, Périgueux-Le Thot, novembre 1984. Paris: Ministère de la Culture, de la Communication, des Grands Travaux et du Bicentenaire, 79–105.Google Scholar
Lorblanchet, M., 1995. Les grottes ornées de la préhistoire: nouveaux regards [Decorated caves in prehistory: a fresh approach]. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Lorblanchet, M., 2001. La grotte ornée de Pergouset (Saint-Géry, Lot): un sanctuaire secret paléolithique [The decorated cave of Pergouset (Saint-Géry, Lot): a secret Palaeolithic sanctuary]. Documents d'archéologie française 85, 5–189.Google Scholar
Lorblanchet, M., 2010. Art parietal: Grottes ornées du Quercy [Parietal art: decorated caves of Quercy]. Paris: Rouergue.Google Scholar
Luís, L. & Fernandes, A.P.B., 2010. ‘On endless motion’: depiction of movement in the Upper Palaeolithic Côa Valley rock art (Portugal), in Congresso Internacional da IFRAO 2009, Piauí, Brasil. IFRAO, 1303–18.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Benjamin, J., 2014. Multi-image photogrammetry for underwater archaeological site recording: an accessible, diver-based approach. Journal of Maritime Archaeology 9(1), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina-Alcaide, M.A., Cristo, A., Romero, A. & Sanchidrián, J.L., 2012. Otro punto de luz. Iluminación estática en los ‘santuarios’ paleolíticos. El ejemplo de la Cueva de Nerja (Málaga, España) [Points of fixed lighting in Nerja Cave], in Pleistocene Art of the World. Actes du Congres IFRAO, Tarascon sur Ariège, septembre 2010, ed. Clottes, J.. Préhistoire, Art et Sociétés: Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Ariège-Pyrénées (Special number) 45–46 (2010–2011), CD-105–121.Google Scholar
Medina-Alcaide, M.Á., Cabalín, L.M., Laserna, J., Sanchidrián, J.L., Torres, A.J., Intxaurbe, I. & Romero, A., 2019. Multianalytical and multiproxy approach to the characterization of a Paleolithic lamp. An example in Nerja cave (Southern Iberian Peninsula). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 28, 102021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montes Barquin, R., Gonzalez, J.S., Laguna, A.J.G. & Luque, C.G., 1998. New Palaeolithic cave art in cueva de El Pendo, Cantabrian region, Spain. Rock Art Research 15(2), 89–97.Google Scholar
Montes Barquin, R., 2001. Las manifestaciones rupestres paleolíticas [Palaeolithic rock-art], in Las cuevas del desfiladero: Arte rupestre paleolítico en el valle del río Carranza (Cantabria-Vizcaya) [The caves of the gorge: Paleolithic rock art in the valley of the river Carranza (Cantabria-Vizcaya)] eds Sainz, C.G. & Llamosas, C.S.M.. Santander: Universidad de Cantabria, 175–203.Google Scholar
Moure Romanillo, A., Morales, M.G. & Sainz, C.G., 1990. Las pinturas rupestres paleolíticas de la cueva de Covalanas (Ramales de la Victoria, Cantabria) [Palaeolithic rock paintings of Covalanas cave (Ramales de la Victoria, Cantabria)]. Trabajos de Prehistoria 47, 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabil, M. & Saleh, F., 2014. 3D reconstruction from images for museum artefacts: a comparative study, in Virtual Systems & Multimedia (VSMM) 2014, 257–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, M., 2005. Integration in Franco-Cantabrian parietal art: a case study of Font-de-Gaume Cave, France, in Aesthetics and Rock Art, eds Heyd, T. & Clegg, J.. Aldershot: Ashgate, 117–29.Google Scholar
Pastoors, A. & Weniger, G.C., 2011. Cave art in context: methods for the analysis of the spatial organization of cave sites. Journal of Archaeological Research 19(4), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettitt, P., 2014. The European Upper Palaeolithic. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology and Anthropology of Hunter-Gatherers, eds Cummings, V., Jordan, P. & Zvelebil, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 279–309.Google Scholar
Pettitt, P.B., 2016. Darkness visible. Shadows, art and the ritual experience of caves in Upper Palaeolithic Europe, in The Archaeology of Darkness, eds Dowd, M. & Hensey, R.. Oxford: Oxbow, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettitt, P., Castillejo, A.M., Arias, P., Peredo, R.O. & Harrison, R., 2014. New views on old hands: the context of stencils in El Castillo and La Garma caves (Cantabria, Spain). Antiquity 88, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettitt, P., Sakamoto, T. & Lelushko, S., 2017. Light, human evolution, and the Palaeolithic, in The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Light, eds Papadopoulos, G. & Moyes, H.. (Oxford Handbooks Online.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198788218.013.1Google Scholar
Pike-Tay, A., Cabrera Valdés, V. & Bernaldo de Quirós, F., 1999. Seasonal variations of the Middle–Upper Paleolithic transition at El Castillo, Cueva Morín and El Pendo (Cantabria, Spain). Journal of Human Evolution 36(3), 283–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzato, M., 2013. Cave rituals and the brain's theatre. Theatre Symposium 21, 116–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plénier, A., 1971. L'art de la grotte de Marsoulas. Toulouse: l'Institut d'art préhistorique de Toulouse.Google Scholar
Plisson, H. & Zotkina, L.V., 2015. From 2D to 3D at macro-and microscopic scale in rock art studies. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 2(2), 102–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, J. H., 1999. From Margin to Center: The spaces of installation art. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robert, E., Petrognani, S. & Lesvignes, E., 2016. Applications of digital photography in the study of Paleolithic cave art. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 10, 847–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Redondo, A., Komšo, D., Maidagan, D.G., Moro-Abadía, O., González-Morales, M.R., Jaubert, J. & Karavanić, I., 2019. Expanding the horizons of Palaeolithic rock art: the site of Romualdova Pećina. Antiquity 93, 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakamoto, T., 2014. Upper Palaeolithic Cave Art as Multisensory Interactive Installation Art: Analysis of Human-Art-Environment Triad. Unpublished Master's dissertation, Durham University.Google Scholar
Sauvet, G. & Tosello, G., 1998. Le mythe paléolithique de la caverne [The Palaeolithic cave myth], in Le propre de l'homme: Psychanalyse et préhistoire [Uniquely human: Psychoanalysis and prehistory], eds Sacco, F. & Sauvet, G.. Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé, 55–90.Google Scholar
Slimak, L., Fietzke, J., Geneste, J.M. & Ontañón, R., 2018. Comment on ‘U-Th dating of carbonate crusts reveals Neandertal origin of Iberian cave art’. Science 361(6408), eaau1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, L.G., 1987. The paleolithic cave art of Vasco-Cantabrian Spain. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 6(2), 149–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, L.G., Morales, M.R.G., Martı´nez, M.Á.F. & Garcı´a-Gelabert, M.P., 2002. Last glacial human settlement in eastern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science 29(12), 1403–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surre, Y., 1992. L'anamorphose dans l'art pariétal: mythe ou réalité? [Anamorphosis in parietal art: myth or reality?]. Préhistoire Ariégeoise 47, 95–104.Google Scholar
Valladas, H., Tisnerat-Laborde, N., Cachier, H., et al. , 2001. Radiocarbon AMS dates for Paleolithic cave paintings. Radiocarbon 43(2B), 977–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vialou, D., 1998. Our Prehistoric Past: Art and civilization. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Welker, W., 2016. First Palaeolithic rock art in Germany: engravings on Hunsrück slate. Antiquity 90, 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westoby, M.J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N.F., Hambrey, M.J. & Reynolds, J.M., 2012. ‘Structure-from-motion’ photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 179, 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R., 2003. Prehistoric Art: The symbolic journey of humankind. New York (NY): Harry N. Abrams.Google Scholar
Zilhão, J., Aubry, T., Carvalho, A.F., Baptista, A.M., Gomes, M.V. & Meireles, J., 1997. The rock art of the Côa Valley (Portugal) and its archaeological context: first results of current research. Journal of European Archaeology 5, 7–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar