Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:47:41.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tracking Proto-Porcelain Production and Consumption in the Dongjiang Valley of Bronze Age Lingnan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2019

Michèle H.S. Demandt
Michèle H.S. Demandt*
Affiliation:
History DepartmentJinan UniversityGuangzhou PRC Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the Early-Middle Bronze Age, a new package of technological knowledge, including high-fired ‘proto-porcelain’ products and specialized ‘dragon’ kilns, entered Lingnan in South China from neighbouring cultures. This enabled the first local production of proto-porcelain in Bronze Age communities of Guangdong province that later became concentrated in ceramic workshops in the Dongjiang valley. Through a holistic approach towards ceramic production and consumption that integrates elements of functionalist and social perspectives, this study will explore the technological and socio-political conditions underlying the value creation and consequent social usage of proto-porcelain. It will be argued that proto-porcelain was a suitable medium for the simultaneous expression of different social roles that might have included its use as serving ware in community rituals as well as its involvement in politico-economic strategies of elite groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , November 2019 , pp. 671 - 689
Copyright
Copyright © McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allard, F., 1997. Growth and stability among complex societies in prehistoric Lingnan, Southeast China. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 8, 37–58.Google Scholar
Ames, K.M., 1995. Chiefly power and household production on the northwest coast, in Foundations of Social Inequality, eds. Douglas, T.D. & Feinman, G.M.. New York (NY): Plenum Press, 155–87.Google Scholar
Arnold, D.E., 1985. Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhan, K.K., Vidale, M. & Kenoyer, J.M., 1994. Harappan technology: theoretical and methodological issues. Man and Environment 19, 141–57.Google Scholar
Bernier, H., 2010. Craft specialists at Moche: organization, affiliations, and identities. Latin American Antiquity 21(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Blackman, M.J. & Vidale, M., 1992. The production and distribution of stoneware bangles at Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa as monitored by chemical characterization studies, in South Asian Archaeology 1989, ed. Jarrige, C.. Madison (WI): Prehistory Press, 37–43.Google Scholar
Callaghan, M.G., 2016. Techné and ceramic social valuables of the late preclassic Maya lowlands, in Making Value, Making Meaning: Techné in the Pre-Columbian World, ed. Costin, C.L.. Washington (WA): Dumbarton Oaks, 281–318.Google Scholar
Carballo, D.V. (ed.), 2013. Cooperation and Collective Action: Archaeological perspectives. Boulder (CO): University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Cheng, L., 2016. A closer look at the Lingnan society of the Kuiwen-ceramics period through the Henglingshan tombs. Fujian Relics and Museology 1, 37–40. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Clarke, D., 1970. Beaker Pottery of Great Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Costin, C.L., 1991. Craft specialization: issues in defining, documenting, and explaining the organization of production, in Archaeological Method and Theory (Volume 3), ed. Schiffer, M.B.. Arizona (AZ): University of Arizona Press, 1–56.Google Scholar
Costin, C.L., 2005. The study of craft production, in Handbook of Archaeological Methods, eds. Maschner, H.D.G. & Chippindale, C.. Lanham (MD): AltaMira, 1032–1105.Google Scholar
Costin, C.L. (ed.), 2016. Making Value, Making Meaning: Techné in the Pre-Columbian World. Washington (WA): Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
Cui, Y., 2003. The Xibushang Tombs in Boluo District dated from the Shang until the Qing Dynasty, in 2003 Yearbook of Chinese Archaeology, ed. Chinese Archaeological Society. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Dean, A.E., 2015. The Evolution of Ceramic Production Organization in a Maya Community. Boulder (CO): University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Deng, H., & Gu, Y., 2000. Second excavation of the Yingang site in Boluo district, Guangdong. Cultural Relics 6, 4–30. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Demandt, M.H.S., 2015. Early gold ornaments of Southeast Asia: production, trade, and consumption. Asian Perspectives 54(2), 305–30.Google Scholar
Duistermaat, K., 2016. The organization of pottery production: toward a relational approach, in The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Ceramic Analysis, ed. Hunt, A.M.W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 114–47.Google Scholar
Earle, T., 1981. Comment on P. Rice, evolution of specialized pottery production: a trial model. Current Anthropology 22(3): 230–31.Google Scholar
Garcia Rosello, J., 2008. Etnoarqueologia de la ProduccionCeramica: Identidad y Territorio en los VallesCentrales de Chile. Palma: Universitat de les IllesBalears.Google Scholar
Gille, B., 1978. Histoire des Techniques. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gorgues, A., Rebay-Salisbury, K. & Salisbury, R.B., 2017. Material Chains in Late Prehistoric Europe and the Mediterranean: Time, space and technologies of production. Bordeaux: Ausonius.Google Scholar
Gosselain, O.P., 1998. Social and technical identity in a clay crystal ball, in The Archaeology of Social Boundaries, ed. Stark, M.T.. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press, 79–106.Google Scholar
Gosselain, O.P., 2016. The world is like a beanstalk: historicizing potting practice and social relations in the Niger River area, in Knowledge in Motion: Constellations of learning across time and place, eds. Roddick, A. & Brower Stahl, A.. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press, 36–66.Google Scholar
Gu, Q., Li, Z. & Deng, H.. 1998. Short excavation report of the Yingang site in Boluo, Guangdong. Cultural Relics 7, 17–30.Google Scholar
Guangdong (Guangdong Cultural Relics and Archaeology Research Institute) (ed.), 2005. Henglingshan, Boluo: Excavation report of the Shang–Zhou period tombs. Beijing: Science Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Guangdong &Boluo (Guangdong Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology &Boluo District Museum) (eds.), 1998. Excavation of the Meihuadun kiln site, Yuanzhou town, Boluo district, Guangdong. Archaeology 7, 28–44. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Guo, L., 2006. Tomb context analysis and status symbols: with the Henglingshan tombs as example. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University 5, 87–93. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Higham, C., 1996. The Bronze Age of Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hruby, Z.X., 2007. Ritualized lithic production at Piedras Negras, Guatemala, in Rethinking Craft Specialization in Complex Societies: Archaeological analyses of the social meaning of production, eds. Hruby, Z.X. & Flad, R.K. (Archaeological Papers 17.) Arlington (VA): American Anthropological Association, 68–87.Google Scholar
Hruby, Z.X. & Flad, R.K. (eds.), 2007. Rethinking Craft Specialization in Complex Societies: Archaeological analyses of the social meaning of production. (Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 17.) Arlington (VA): American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Inomata, T., 2007. Knowledge and belief in artistic production by classic Maya elites, in Rethinking Craft Specialization in Complex Societies: Archaeological analyses of the social meaning of production, eds. Hruby, Z.X. & Flad, R.K.. (Archaeological Papers 17.) Arlington (VA): American Anthropological Association, 129–41.Google Scholar
Janusek, J.W., 1999. Craft and local power: embedded specialization in Tiwanaku cities. Latin American Antiquity 10(2), 107–31.Google Scholar
Jervis, B., 2014. Pottery and Social Life in Medieval England. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Li, L., 2006. Research about Bronzes Excavated in the Lingnan Region. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Liu, L., & Chen, X., 2012. The Archaeology of China: From the Late Paleolithic to the Early Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lou, X.L., 2010. Pottery Research of Pre-Qin Dynasty of the Dongjiang River Delta. Beijing: Science Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Lu, Y. (ed.), 2015. A History of Chinese Science and Technology, Volume 2. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Luo, H., Li, J. & Gao, L., 1992. Study on manufacture sites for proto-Porcelain excavated in North China, in Science and Technology of Ancient Ceramics 2, eds. Li, J. & Chen, X.. Shanghai: Shanghai Research Society of Science and Technology of Ancient Ceramics, 101–9. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Marakami, T., 2016. Materiality, regimes of value, and the politics of craft production, exchange, and consumption: a case of lime plaster at Teotihuacan, Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 42, 56–78.Google Scholar
Matson, F., 1965. Ceramics and Man. (Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 41.) New York (NY): Aldine.Google Scholar
Mo, Z. & Li, S., 1964. The Zengcheng and Shixing late Warring States period sites. Archaeology 3, 143–60. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Neff, H., 1992. Ceramics and evolution, in Archaeological Method and Theory (Volume 4), ed. Schiffer, M.B.. New York (NY): Academic Press, 141–93.Google Scholar
Peng, S., 1987. The Ancient Stamped Ceramics of South China. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Peng, S. 2008. Baiyue Ethnic Group Research and South China Archaeology. Beijing: Science Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Peregrine, P., 1991. Some political aspects of craft specialization. World Archaeology 23(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Qin, W., 2014. Research of Proto-Porcelain. Beijing: Palace Museum Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Qiu, L., 2008. Quest into the Archaeology of the Yue Region: A selection of QiuLicheng's essays. Beijing: Science Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Qiu, L., Liu, J., Chen, R., Wu, D. & Huang, K., 1992. The Warring States period tomb in Jieyang district, Guangdong. Archaeology 3, 220–26. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Qiu, L. & Mao, Y., 1986. The Warring States period tomb of Beifushan in Luoding, Guangdong. Archaeology 3, 210–20. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Rice, P.M., 1996. Recent ceramic analysis: 1. Function, style, and origins. Journal of Archaeological Research 4(2), 133–63.Google Scholar
Roux, V., 2003. A dynamic systems framework for studying technological change: application to the emergence of the potter's wheel in the southern Levant. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 10(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Santacreu, D.A, 2014. Materiality, Techniques and Society in Pottery Production: The technological study of archaeological ceramics through paste analysis. Warsaw/Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shelach-Lavi, G., 2015. The Archaeology of Early China: From prehistory to the Han dynasty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shen, J. 2003. A History of Lingnan Ceramics and Porcelain. Guangzhou: Guangdong Higher Education Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Skibo, J.M. & Schiffer, B.F.. 2008. People and Things: A behavioral approach to material culture. New York (NY): Springer.Google Scholar
Spielman, K.A., 1998. Ritual craft specialists in middle range societies, in Craft and Social Identity, eds. Costin, C.I. & Wright, R.P.. (Archaeological Papers 8.) Arlington (VA): American Anthropological Association, 153–9.Google Scholar
Spielman, K.A., 2002. Feasting, craft specialization, and the ritual mode of production in small-scale societies. American Anthropologist 104(1), 195–207.Google Scholar
Spielman, K.A., 2008. Crafting the sacred: ritual places and paraphernalia in small-scale societies, in Dimensions of Ritual Economy, eds. Wells, E.C. & McAnany, P.A.. (Research in Economic Anthropology 27.) Bingley: Emerald, 37–72.Google Scholar
Stanish, C., 2013. The ritualized economy and cooperative labor in intermediate societies, in Cooperation & Collective Action: Archaeological Perspectives, ed. Carballo, D.M.. Boulder (CO): University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Tang, Y., 2012. Looking at the cultural exchange of South and North through the finding context of Northern proto-porcelain. Cultural Relics of Central China 1, 12–26. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Trubitt, M.B.T., 2000. Mound building and prestige goods exchange: changing strategies in the Cahokia chiefdom. American Antiquity 65(4), 669–90.Google Scholar
Twiss, K.C., 2007. We are what we eat, in The Archaeology of Food and Identity, ed. Twiss, K.C.. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois University Press, 1–15.Google Scholar
Twiss, K.C., 2012. The archaeology of food and social diversity. Journal of Archaeological Research 20(4), 357–95.Google Scholar
Urem-Kotsou, D. & Kotsakis, K., 2007. Pottery, cuisine and community in the Neolithic of North Greece, in Cooking Up the Past: Food and culinary practices in the Neolithic and Bronze Aegean, ed. Renard, J. & Mee, C.. Oxford: Oxbow, 225–46.Google Scholar
Van der Leeuw, S.E., 1976. Studies in the Technology of Ancient Pottery. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vaughn, K.J., 2006. Craft production, exchange, and political power in the Pre-Incaic Andes. Journal of Archaeological Research 14, 313–44.Google Scholar
Wang, H., 2017. Craftsmanship of proto-porcelain ritual and music utensils in the Yue kingdom Hundred Schools of Art 155(2), 217–18. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Wang, J. & Chen, T., 2005. Combined INAA and WDXRF study on the pottery and proto-porcelain samples of Middle Western Zhou to Autumn-Spring period from Henglingshan site, in Henglingshan, Boluo: Excavation report of the Shang–Zhou period tombs, ed. Guangdong Cultural Relics and Archaeology Research Institute. Beijing: Science Publishing House, 451–5. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Wang, J., Chen, T. & Cheng, Y.. 2004. A XRF and INAA study of the pre-Qin hardware of Boluo, Guangdong. Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology 16(4), 43–9. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Wang, Y. 2010. A Study of Green Proto-Porcelain Production in South China. Beijing: Cathay Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Wu, J., Huang, M., Zhang, M., et al. , 2012. EDXRF analysis of the provenance of proto-porcelain of the southern kiln sites Chinese Journal of Spectroscopy Laboratory 29(6), 3284–8. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Wu, J., Li, J., Wu, R., Deng, Z. & Zhu, T.. 2005. Scientific studies on pottery and proto-porcelain from the tombs of Henglingshan site, in Henglingshan, Boluo: Excavation report of the Shang–Zhou period tombs, ed. Guangdong Cultural Relics and Archaeology Research Institute. Beijing: Science Publishing House, 441–9. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Wu, J., Wu, J., Li, Q., Li, J., Luo& Z, H.. Deng, 2014. Systematic study of the ceramics from the Pre-Qin period excavated at Henglingshan, in Research about Proto-Porcelain, ed. Qin, W.. Beijing: Palace Museum Press, 439–48. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Wu, J., Zhang, M., Wu, J., Li, Q., Li, J., Deng, Z. & Jiang, X.. 2011. Study on the diversification of origins and primary development of Chinese porcelain glazes. Science China 54(1), 99–104.Google Scholar
Yang, H., 2007. Archaeological Study on Tombs and Ruins in Tiechang, Boluo County, Set Up in the Qin Dynasty. Guangzhou: Lingnan Art Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Yang, J., 2011. Cultural Study of the Bronze Age Culture of the Lingnan Region. Beijing: Social Sciences Literature Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Yang, T., Li, S., Yang, T. & Wu, S.. 1997. Study of the ceramics of the Spring and Autumn Period kiln site Meihuadun in Boluo. Journal of the South China University of Technology 10, 106–9. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Yu, J., 2014. Another discussion about the periodization of the Mi-patterned ceramics in the Guangdong-Guangxi region and the Guangzhou Han tombs. Jiang Han Archaeology 131(2), 78–89. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zeng, Z., 1994. Various Pre-Qin kingdoms in Lingnan 1. Lingnan Culture And History 1, 37–8. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zhang, C., 1993. Simple report of the clearing of the Longzhong cave tomb in Hexian district, Guangxi province. Archaeology 4, 324–9. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., 2011. Short excavation report of Fufuling tomb M200 in Zengcheng. Guangzhou Relics and Museology 00, 12–24. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., 2015. Short excavation report of Fufuling Tomb M511 in Zengcheng, Guangdong. Cultural Relics 7, 19–30. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., 2009. Archaeological Research Lingnan 8. Hong Kong: China Academic Review Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zhao, S., 2014. Investigation of the Lingnan Society and Culture during the Pre-Imperial and Qin-Han Periods. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zhao, S. & Sun, J., 2009. The Dongjiang valley during the Zhou period and its commodity exchange activities towards the south. Academic Review 48(559), 34–9. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zheng, H. & Gu, Y., 2000. Second excavation of the Yingang Site in Boluo, Guangdong. Cultural Relics 6, 4–16. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zheng, J., 2012. The regionalization and periodization of the proto-porcelain of the Shang. Southeast Culture Journal 226 (2), 45–56. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zhou, J., 2012. Re-examination of the problem of the status of the Yue kilns. China Ceramics 48(2), 73–6. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zhu, J., 2006. Research on the Provenance of Proto-porcelain Produced in the Shang and Zhou Dynasties. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar