Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:40:06.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tool Standardization in the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic: a Closer Look (with comments)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2001

Anthony Marks ,
Harold J. Hietala  and
John K. Williams
Anthony Marks
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dedman College, PO Box 750336, Dallas, TX 75275-0336m, USA.
Harold J. Hietala
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dedman College, PO Box 750336, Dallas, TX 75275-0336m, USA.
John K. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dedman College, PO Box 750336, Dallas, TX 75275-0336m, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has been postulated that one difference between Neanderthals and anatomically modern people lies in a ‘clearer mental template’ of flaked stone tools on the part of modern people. This is thought to have been manifested in greater tool standardization during the Upper Palaeolithic than in the Middle Palaeolithic. Testing of this hypothesis, using three samples of a characteristic Upper Palaeolithic tool class — burins — from one Middle Palaeolithic and two Upper Palaeolithic assemblages, reveals that they are equally standardized for both metric and non-metric traits. Further consideration suggests that most Palaeolithic flaked stone tools are poorly suited to test notions of standardization, although some tool attributes may be well suited when considered in specific adaptive contexts.

Keywords

stone tools, PalaeolithicNeanderthal tools
Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , April 2001 , pp. 17 - 44
Copyright
2001 The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)