Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:48:42.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiple Burials in Ancient Societies: Theory and Methods from Egyptian Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2018

Gianluca Miniaci Open the ORCID record for Gianluca Miniaci [Opens in a new window]
Gianluca Miniaci*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Civiltà e Forme del SapereUniversity of Pisavia Dei Mille 19 56126 PisaItaly Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper aims at providing theoretical models and data interpretation applied to multiple burials. Challenging the current fuzzy definition of multiple burials in ancient societies, the paper proposes a more accurate classification of multiple burials, with particular reference to ancient Egypt funerary culture, based on two main parameters, which may have influenced the association of bodies: p1) architecture; p2) time span, and three flexible sub-parameters that may be used to customize different scenarios, on occasion: sp1) number of deceased; sp2) age of deceased; sp3) nature of death/deposition. The body has been often considered the real ontological centre of the burial itself with all of the other countable objects intended as radiating projections supporting the body-nucleus. The practice of multiple burials disrupts such a perception as it juxtaposes horizontal, multidirectional perspectives: the role of a new body entering among older bodies and objects, and of the multiple bodies and objects themselves. The study of multiple burials, if correctly framed, can lead to insights into different religious, social, and economic reasons behind the mortuary programmes within a society. For instance, sequential multiple burials reinforce the transformation of dead bodies into part of the burial equipment itself, reducing the centrality of the body and disrupting the narrative tied to individual biographies, increasing an ‘artefactual’ perception.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 287 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abd el-Malek Ghattas, F., 1982. Tell el-Balamoun 1978 (Fouilles de l'Université de Mansoura). Annales du Service des Antiquités de l’Égypte 68, 45–9.Google Scholar
Acquaviva, P., 2017. Number in language, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, ed. Aronoff, M.. http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-61 (accessed 10 August 2018).Google Scholar
Adams, W.Y., 1977. Nubia: Corridor to Africa. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Andrews, P. & Bello, S., 2006. Pattern in human burial practice, in Social Archaeology of Funerary Remains, eds. Knüsel, C. & Gowland, R.. Oxford: Oxbow, 14–29.Google Scholar
Armelagos, G.J., 2003. Bioarchaeology as anthropology. (Special issue: ‘Archaeology Is Anthropology’.) Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 13(1), 27–40.Google Scholar
Arnold, D., 1992. The Pyramid Complex of Senwosret I. The south cemeteries of Lisht 3. (MMA Egyptian Expedition 25.) New York (NY): Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Arnold, D., 2002. The Pyramid Complex of Senwosret III at Dahshur: Architectural studies. (MMA Egyptian Expedition 26.) New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. 2007. Middle Kingdom Tomb Architecture at Lisht. (MMA Egyptian Expedition 28.) New York/New Haven/London: Metropolitan Museum of Art/Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Baines, J. & Lacovara, P., 2002. Burial and the dead in ancient Egyptian society. Respect, formalism, neglect. Journal of Social Archaeology 2(1), 5–36.Google Scholar
Barker, C., Alicehajic, E. & Naranjo Santana, J., 2017. Post-mortem differential preservation and its utility in interpreting forensic and archaeological mass burials, in Taphonomy of Human Remains. Forensic analysis of the dead and the depositional environment, eds. Schotsmans, E.M.J., Márquez-Grant, N. & Forbes, S.L.. Chichester: Wiley, 251–76.Google Scholar
Benthien, C., 2002. Skin: On the cultural border between self and the world (trans. T. Dunlop). New York (NY): Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Betrò, M. & Miniaci, G., 2018. Used, reused, plundered and forgotten: an unusual group of Ramesside coffins from the tomb MIDAN.05 in the Theban Necropolis, in Ancient Egyptian Coffins: Craft traditions and functionality, eds. Taylor, J.H. & Vandenbeusch, M.. (BM Egypt and Sudan 4.) Leuven: Peeters, 161–84.Google Scholar
Betrò, M., Miniaci, G. & Del Vesco, P., 2012. La Missione Archeologica dell'Università di Pisa a Dra Abu el-Naga (M.I.D.AN.) Campagne VIII–XI (2008–2011). Egitto e Vicino Oriente 35, 21–51.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1971. Mortuary practices: their study and their potential, in Approaches to the Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices, ed. Brown, J.A.. (Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 25.) Washington (DC): Society for American Archaeology, 6–29.Google Scholar
Boulestin, B. & Duday, H., 2005. Ethnologie et archéologie de la mort: de l'illusion des references à l'emploi d'un vocabulaire, in Les pratiques funéraires à l’âge du Bronze en France. Actes de la table ronde de Sens-en-Bourgogne (Yonne), eds. Mordant, C. & Depierre, G.. Paris: Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques, 17–35.Google Scholar
Bourriau, J., 1991. Patterns of change in burial costumes during the Middle Kingdom, in Middle Kingdom Studies, ed. Quirke, S.. New Malden (MA): SIA, 1–20.Google Scholar
Boz, B. &, Hager, L.D., 2014. Making sense of social behavior from disturbed and commingled skeletons: a case study from Çatalhöyük, Turkey, in Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains: Working toward improved theory, method, and data, eds. Osterholtz, A.J., Baustian, K.M. & Martin, D.L.. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer, 17–33.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 2001. Body metaphors and technologies of transformation in the English Middle and Late Bronze Age, in Bronze Age Landscapes: Tradition and transformation, ed. Brück, J.. Oxford: Oxbow, 149–60.Google Scholar
Bruyère, B., 1937. Rapport sur les fouilles de Deir el Médineh (1934–1935). Deuxième partie: La nécropole de l'est (Fouilles de l'Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale 15.) Cairo: Institut français d'archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Butler, J., 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York (NY): Routledge.Google Scholar
Carnarvon, Fifth Earl of & Carter, H., 1912. Five Years’ Explorations at Thebes: A record of work done 1907–1911. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Castex, D. & Blaizot, F., 2017. Reconstructing the original arrangement, organisation and architecture of burials in archaeology, in Taphonomy of Human Remains. Forensic analysis of the dead and the depositional environment, eds. Schotsmans, E.M.J., Márquez-Grant, N. & Forbes, S.L.. Chichester: Wiley, 277–95.Google Scholar
Cauwe, N., 2001. Skeletons in motion, ancestors in action: Early Mesolithic collective tombs in southern Belgium. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 11(2), 147–63.Google Scholar
Consonni, A., 2016. Precious finds from an early Middle Kingdom tomb in Thebes: reconstructing connections between the dead and their goods, in The World of Middle Kingdom Egypt (2000–1550 BC): Contributions on archaeology, art, religion, and written sources, eds. Miniaci, G. & Grajetzki, W.. (Middle Kingdom Studies 2.), London: Golden House, 13–26.Google Scholar
Crawford, S., 1991. When do Anglo-Saxon children count? Journal of Theoretical Archaeology 2, 17–24.Google Scholar
Crawford, S., 1999. Childhood in Anglo-Saxon England. Stroud: Sutton.Google Scholar
Crawford, S., 2007. Companions, co-incidences or chattels? Children and their role in early Anglo-Saxon multiple burials, in Children, Childhood and Society, eds. Crawford, S. & Shepherd, G. (IAA Interdisciplinary Series Vol. I: Studies in Archaeology, History, Literature and Art/BAR International series S1696.) Oxford: Archaeopress, 83–92.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, G., 2015. Semantic categorization and cognition, in The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ed. Bonvillain, N.. London/New York: Routledge, 13–26.Google Scholar
Duday, H., 2006. L'archéothanatologie ou l'archéologie de la mort [Archaeothanatology or the archaeology of death] (trans. C.J. Knüsel), in Social Archaeology of Funerary Remains, eds. Gowland, R.L. & Knüsel, C.J.. Oxford: Oxbow, 30–56.Google Scholar
Duday, H., 2008. Archaeological proof of an abrupt mortality crisis: simultaneous deposit of cadavers, simultaneous deaths?, in Paleomicrobiology: Past human infections, eds. Raoult, D. & Drancourt, D.. Heidelberg: Springer, 49–54.Google Scholar
Duday, H., 2009. The Archaeology of the Dead. Lectures in Archaeothanatology. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Duncan, W.N. & Schwarz, K.R., 2014. Partible, permeable, and relational bodies in a Maya mass grave, in Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains: Working toward improved theory, method, and data, eds. Osterholtz, A.J., Baustian, K.M. & Martin, D.L.. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer, 149–70.Google Scholar
Ekengren, F., 2013. Contextualizing grave goods: theoretical perspectives and methodological implications, in The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial, eds. Stutz, L.N., Tarlow, S. & Ekengren, F.S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 173–94.Google Scholar
Finlay, N., 2000. Outside of life: traditions of infant burial in Ireland from cillín to cist. World Archaeology 31(3) (Human Lifecycles), 407–22.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., 2002. Body parts: personhood and materiality in the earlier Manx Neolithic, in Thinking Through the Body: Archaeologies of corporeality, eds. Hamilakis, Y., Pluciennik, M. & Tarlow, S.. New York (NY): Springer, 47–69.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., 2004. The Archaeology of Personhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., 2013. Identities in transformation: identities, funerary rites, and the mortuary process, in The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial, eds. Stutz, L.N., Tarlow, S. & Ekengren, F.S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 511–26.Google Scholar
Franke, D., 1988. Review von W.K. Simpson, Personnel accounts of the Early Twelfth Dynasty, papyrus Reisner IV, Boston 1988. Bibliotheca Orientalis 45, 98–102.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L., 1981. One-dimensional archaeology and multi-dimensional people: spatial organization and mortuary analysis, in The Archaeology of Death, eds. Chapman, R., Kinnes, I. & Randsborg, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–69.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. & Marshall, Y., 1999. The biographical role of objects. World Archaeology 31(2) (The Cultural Biography of Objects), 169–78.Google Scholar
Grajetzki, W., 2007. Multiple burials in ancient Egypt to the end of the Middle Kingdom, in Life and Afterlife in Ancient Egypt During the Middle Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period, eds. Grallert, S. & Grajetzki, W.. London: Golden House, 16–34.Google Scholar
Grajetzki, W., 2014. Tomb Treasures of the Late Middle Kingdom. The archaeology of female burials. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Haglund, W.D., 2002. Recent mass graves, an introduction, in Advances in Forensic Taphonomy. Methods, theory, and archaeological perspectives, eds. Haglund, W.D. & Sorg, M.H.. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, 243–62.Google Scholar
Hallam, E., Hockey, J. & Howarth, G., 1999. Beyond the Body: Death and social identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y., 2017. Sensorial assemblages: affect, memory and temporality in assemblage thinking. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 27(1), 169–82.Google Scholar
Harrington, N., 2012. Living with the Dead: Ancestor worship and mortuary ritual in Ancient Egypt. (Studies in Funerary Archaeology 6.) Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Holliday, V.T., 2004. Soils in Archaeological Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurcombe, L., 2014. Perishable Material Culture in Prehistory: Investigating the missing majority. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ikram, S. & Dodson, A., 1998. The Mummy in Ancient Egypt: Equipping the dead for eternity. London/Cairo: Thames & Hudson/American University in Cairo.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 1996. Situating Action VI: a comment on the distinction between the material and the social. Ecological Psychology 8, 183–7.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 1998. From complementarity to obviation: on dissolving the boundaries between social and biological anthropology, archaeology and psychology. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 123, 21–52.Google Scholar
Jessee, E. & Skinner, M., 2005. A typology of mass grave and mass grave-related sites. Forensic Science International 152, 55–9.Google Scholar
Jones, A., 2002. Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kellehear, A., 2007. A Social History of Dying. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kemp, B.J. & Merrillees, R.S., 1980. Minoan Pottery in Second Millennium Egypt. (Sonderschrift, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Abteilung Kairo 7.) Mainz: Zabern.Google Scholar
Keswani, P., 2004. Mortuary Ritual and Society in Bronze Age Cyprus. (Monographs in Mediterranean Archaeology 9.) London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Knappett, C., 2002. Photographs, skeumorphs and marionettes: some thoughts on mind, agency and object. Journal of Material Culture 7(1), 97–117.Google Scholar
Knappett, C., 2013. Network Analysis in Archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knüsel, C.J., 2010. Bio-archéologie: une approche synthétique. Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris 22, 62–73.Google Scholar
Knüsel, C.J., 2014. Crouching in fear: terms of engagement for funerary remains. Journal of Social Archaeology 14(1), 26–58.Google Scholar
Knüsel, C. J. & Robb, J., 2016. Funerary taphonomy: an overview of goals and methods. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 10, 655–73.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I., 1986. The cultural biography of things: commoditization as a process, in The Social Life of Things: Commodities in cultural perspective, ed. Appadurai, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64–91.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 1984. Ideology and material culture: an archaeological perspective, in Marxist Perspectives in Archaeology, ed. Spriggs, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 72–100.Google Scholar
La Fontaine, J.S., 1985. Person and individual: some anthropological reflections, in The Category of the Person: Anthropology, philosophy, history, eds. Carrithers, M., Collins, S. & Lukesal, S.. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press, 123–40.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the Social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leclerc, J. & Tarrête, J., 1998. Sépulture, in Dictionnaire de la Préhistoire, ed. Leroi-Gourhan, A.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 963–4.Google Scholar
Lillios, K.T., 1999. Objects of memory: the ethnography and archaeology of heirlooms. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 6(3), 235–62.Google Scholar
Loe, L., Boyle, A., Webb, H. & Score, D., 2014. ‘Given to the Ground’: A Viking Age mass grave on Ridgeway Hill, Weymouth. Oxford: Oxford Archaeology.Google Scholar
Loendorf, C., 1998. Salado multiple interments. Kiva 63(4), 319–48.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. & Lichtenberg, R., 2013. Les momies égyptiennes: La quête millénaire d'une technique. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Meskell, L., 1998. The irresistible body and the seduction of archaeology, in Changing Bodies, Changing Meanings: Studies of the body in antiquity, ed. Montserrat, D.. London: Routledge, 139–61.Google Scholar
Milledge Nelson, S., 2003. Feasting the ancestors in early China, in The Archaeology and Politics of Food and Feasting in Early States and Empires, ed. Bray, T.L.. New York (NY): Springer, 65–89.Google Scholar
Miniaci, G., 2007. Saccheggi nella necropoli tebana: i sacerdoti alle prese con le ispezioni delle tombe, in Sacerdozio e società civile nell'Egitto antico: Atti del terzo Colloquio, Bologna – 30/31 maggio 2007, eds. Pernigotti, S. & Zecchi, M.. (Archeologia e storia della civiltà egiziana e del vicino Oriente antico – Materiali e studi 14.) Imola: Editrice La Mandragora, 49–67.Google Scholar
Miniaci, G., 2011. Rishi Coffins and the Funerary Culture of Second Intermediate Period Egypt. London: Golden House.Google Scholar
Miniaci, G., 2016. Note on the archaeological context of tomb C 37, Asasif, in The World of Middle Kingdom Egypt (2000–1550 BC): Contributions on archaeology, art, religion and written texts, eds. Miniaci, G. & Grajetzki, W.. (Middle Kingdom Studies 2.) London: Golden House, 228–33.Google Scholar
Miniaci, G., 2017. Unbroken stories: Middle Kingdom faience figurines in their archaeological context, in Company of Images: Modelling the ancient imaginary world of the Middle Kingdom. Proceedings of the international conference held on 18th–20th September in London, UCL, eds. Miniaci, G., Betrò, M. & Quirke, S.. (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 262.) Leuven: Peeters, 235–84.Google Scholar
Miniaci, G., 2018. Burial equipment of rishi coffins and the osmosis of the ‘rebirth machine’ at the end of the Middle Kingdom, in Ancient Egyptian Coffins: Craft traditions and functionality, eds. Taylor, J.H. & Vandenbeusch, M.. (BM Egypt and Sudan 4.) Leuven: Peeters, 247–73.Google Scholar
Miniaci, G., forthcoming a. Burial demography in the late Middle Kingdom: a social perspective, in Concepts in Middle Kingdom Funerary Culture: Proceedings of the Lady Wallis Budge Anniversary Symposium held at Christ's College, Cambridge, January 22 2016, ed. Nyord, R.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Miniaci, G., forthcoming b. The Late Middle Kingdom burial assemblage from the tomb G62 at Abydos (BM EA 37286–37320), in Abydos: The sacred land at the western horizon, ed. Regulski, I.. (BM Egypt and Sudan 8.) Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Miniaci, G. & Quirke, S., 2009. Reconceiving the tomb in the Late Middle Kingdom. The burial of the accountant of the Main Enclosure Neferhotep at Dra Abu al-Naga. Bulletin de l'Institut français d'archéologie orientale 109, 339–83.Google Scholar
Moore, H., 2000. Ethics and ontology: why agents and agency matter, in Agency and Archaeology, eds. Dobres, M.-A. & Robb, J.. London: Routledge, 259–63.Google Scholar
Morris, I., 1991. The archaeology of ancestors: the Saxe/Goldstein hypothesis revisited. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1(2), 147–69.Google Scholar
Näser, C., 2013. Equipping and stripping the dead. A case-study on the procurement, compilation, arrangement, and fragmentation of grave inventories in New Kingdom Thebes, in The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial, eds. Stutz, L.N., Tarlow, S. & Ekengren, F.S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 643–61.Google Scholar
O'Connor, D., 1985. The ‘cenotaphs’ of the Middle Kingdom at Abydos, in Mélanges Gamal eddin Mokhtar, ed. Posener-Kriéger, P.. (Bibliothèque d’étude 97, vol. II.) Cairo, 161–77.Google Scholar
Oestigaard, T. & Fahlander, F., 2008. The materiality of death: bodies, burials, beliefs, in The Materiality of Death: Bodies, burials, beliefs, eds. Oestigaard, T. & Fahlander, F.. (BAR International series S1768.) Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 1–16.Google Scholar
Oestigaard, T. & Goldhahan, J., 2006. From the dead to the living: death as transactions and renegotiations. Norwegian Archaeological Review 39(1), 27–48.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, A.J., 2015. Bodies in Motion: A Bioarchaeological Analysis of Migration and Identity in Bronze Age Cyprus (2400–1100 BC). PhD dissertation, University of Nevada.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, A.J., Baustian, K.M. & Martin, D.L., 2014. Introduction, in Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains: Working toward improved theory, method, and data, eds. Osterholtz, A.J., Baustian, K.M. & Martin, D.L.. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer, 1–13.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., 1993. The powerful dead: archaeological relationships between the living and the dead. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3(2), 203–29.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., 1999. The Archaeology of Death and Burial. College Station (TX): Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Petrie, W.M.F., 1909. Qurneh. (British School of Archaeology in Egypt and Egyptian Research Account 16; London: British School of Archaeology in Egypt.) London: Bernard Quaritch.Google Scholar
Piacentini, P. & Orsenigo, C., 2005. The Valley of the Kings Rediscovered: The Victor Loret excavation journals (1898–1899) and other manuscripts (trans. S. Quirke). Milan: Università degli studi di Milano.Google Scholar
Polz, D., 2007. Der Beginn des Neuen Reiches: Zur Vorgeschichte einer Zeitenwende. (Sonderschrift, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Abteilung Kairo 31.) Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Quirke, S., 2015. Exploring Religion in Ancient Egypt. Chichester/Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Quirke, S., 2016. Birth Tusks: The armoury of health in context – Egypt 1800 BC. Including Publication of Petrie Museum Examples photographed by Gianluca Miniaci, and drawn from the photographs by Andrew Boyce. (Middle Kingdom Studies 3.) London: Golden House.Google Scholar
Reeves, N. & Wilkinson, R.H., 1996. The Complete Valley of the Kings: Tombs and treasures of Egypt's greatest pharaohs. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Reisner, G.A., 1923. Excavations at Kerma. Cambridge (MA): Peabody Museum.Google Scholar
Riggs, C., 2014. Unwrapping Ancient Egypt. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Riggs, C., 2016. The body in the box: archiving the Egyptian mummy. Archival Science 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9266-8Google Scholar
Robb, J., 2013. Creating death: an archaeology of dying, in The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial, eds. Stutz, L.N., Tarlow, S. & Ekengren, F.S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 441–58.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B., 1985. Is there a ‘Pompeii premise’ in srchaeology? Journal of Anthropological Research 41(1), 18–41.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B., 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque (NM): University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, S., 2002. Mass graves and the collection of forensic evidence: genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, in Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: Method, theory and archaeological perspectives, eds. Haglund, W.D. & Sorg, M.H.. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, 277–92.Google Scholar
Schotsmans, E.M.J., Márquez-Grant, N. & Forbes, S.L. (eds.), 2017. Taphonomy of Human Remains. Forensic analysis of the dead and the depositional environment. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Seidlmayer, S.J., 1990. Gräberfelder aus dem Übergang vom Alten zum Mittleren Reich: Studien zur Archäologie der Ersten Zwischenzeit. (Studien zur Archäologie und Geschichte Altägyptens 1.) Heidelberg: Heidelberger Orientverlag.Google Scholar
Sherratt, S., 2012. The intercultural transformative capacities of irregularly appropriated goods, in Materiality and Social Practice. Transformative capacities of intercultural encounters, eds. Maran, J. & Stockhammer, P.W.. Oxford: Oxbow, 152–72.Google Scholar
Shilling, C., 2008. The challenge of embodying archaeology, in Past Bodies: Body-centred research in archaeology, eds. Borić, D. & Robb, J.. Oxford: Oxbow, 145–51.Google Scholar
Skinner, M., 1987. Planning the archaeological recovery for evidence from recent mass graves. Forensic Science International 34, 267–87.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J.R., 2006. The Body as Material Culture: A theoretical osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sommer, U., 2012. Wer hat Dornröschen aufgeweckt? Taphonomie und Mainstream-Archäologie, in Taphonomie, eds. Stäuble, H. & Wolfram, S.. Kerpen: Welt und Erde Verlag, 15–34.Google Scholar
Sprague, R., 2005. Burial Terminology: A guide for researchers. Lanham (MD): AltaMira.Google Scholar
Stevens, A., 2017. Death and the city: the cemeteries of Amarna in their urban context. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 28(1), 103–26.Google Scholar
Stevens, A. & Dabbs, G.R., 2018. Tell el-Amarna, spring 2017. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 104(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Stoodley, N., 2002. Multiple burials, multiple meanings? Interpreting the early Anglo-Saxon multiple interment, in Burial in Early Medieval England and Wales, eds. Lucy, S. & Reynolds, A.. (Society for Medieval Archaeology Monograph 17.) London: Routledge, 103–10.Google Scholar
Strudwick, N., 2013. Ancient robbery in Theban tombs, in Archaeological Research in the Valley of the Kings and Ancient Thebes: Papers presented in honor of Richard H. Wilkinson, ed. Creasman, P.P.. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Egyptian Expedition, 333–52.Google Scholar
Tarlow, S., 1999. Bereavement and Commemoration: An archaeology of mortality. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Tate, J., Eremin, K., Troalen, L.G., Guerra, M.F., Goring, E. & Manley, B., 2009. The 17th Dynasty gold necklace from Qurneh, Egypt. ArcheoSciences. Revue d'archéométrie 33, 121–8.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.H., 2010. Changes in the afterlife, in Egyptian Archaeology, ed. Wendrich, W.. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 220–40.Google Scholar
Testart, A., 2004. Les morts d'accompagnement. La servitude volontaire. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Tooley, A.M.J., 2015. Garstang's El Arabah Tomb E.1, in The World of Middle Kingdom Egypt (2000–1550 BC): Contributions on archaeology, art, religion, and written sources, eds. Miniaci, G. & Grajetzki, W.. (Middle Kingdom Studies 1.) London: Golden House, 339–55.Google Scholar
Troalen, T.G., Tate, J. & Guerra, M.F., 2014. Goldwork in Ancient Egypt: workshop practices at Qurneh in the 2nd Intermediate Period. Journal of Archaeological Science 50, 219–26.Google Scholar
Turner, T., 2011. The body beyond the body: social, material, and spiritual dimensions, in A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, ed. Mascia-Lees, F.. New York (NY): Wiley-Blackwell, 102–18.Google Scholar
Ucko, P., 1969. Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of funerary remains. World Archaeology 1(2), 262–80.Google Scholar
van Dijk, J., 2007. Retainer sacrifice in Egypt and Nubia, in The Strange World of Human Sacrifice, ed. Bremmer, J.N.. Leuven/Dudley: Peeters, 135–55.Google Scholar
Walthall, J.A., 1999. Mortuary behavior and Early Holocene land use in the North American midcontinent. North American Archaeologist 20(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Waterman, A.J. & Thomas, J.T., 2011. When the bough breaks: childhood mortality and burial practice in late Neolithic Atlantic Europe. Journal of Archaeology 30(2), 165–83.Google Scholar
Wickholm, A., 2008. Reuse in the Finnish cremation cemeteries under level ground: examples of collective memory, in The Materiality of Death: Bodies, burials, beliefs, eds. Oestigaard, T. & Fahlander, F.. (BAR International series S1768.) Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 89–97.Google Scholar
Williams, H.M.R., 2003. Introduction: the archaeology of death, memory and material culture, in Archaeologies of Remembrance: Death and memory in past societies, ed. Williams, H.R.. New York (NY): Springer, 1–24.Google Scholar
Winlock, H.E., 1921. The Egyptian Expedition 1920–21. Excavations at Thebes. Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art 16(11), 29–53.Google Scholar
Winlock, H.E., 1945. The Slain Soldiers of Neb-hepet-Re' Mentu-hotep. (MMA Egyptian Expedition 16.) New York (NY): Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Worsaae, J.J.A., 1843. Danmarks Oldtid oplyst ved Oldsager og Gravhøie. Copenhagen: Klein.Google Scholar
Zitman, M., 2010. The Necropolis of Assiut: A case study of local Egyptian funerary culture from the Old Kingdom to the end of the Middle Kingdom. (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 180.) Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar