Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:56:06.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infant Death and the Archaeology of Grief

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2015

Aubrey Cannon
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L9, Canada Email: [email protected]
Katherine Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of York, The King's Manor, York Y01 7EP, UK Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To build a theoretical and empirical foundation for interpretation of the absence, segregation or simplicity of infant burials in archaeological contexts, we review social theories of emotion, inter-disciplinary views on the relationship between mortality rates and emotional investment, and archaeological interpretations of infant burial patterns. The results indicate a lack of explicit theory in most archaeological accounts and a general lack of consideration for individual variation and the process of change in mortuary practice. We outline the tenets of Bowlby's attachment theory and Stroebe and Schut's dual process model of bereavement to account theoretically for pattern, variation and change in modes of infant burial. We illustrate the value of this psychology-based perspective in an analysis of Victorian gravestone commemorations of infant burials in 35 villages in rural south Cambridgeshire, England, where individual and class-based variation, relative to falling mortality rates, is best explained as a function of coping strategies and contextually based social constraint on the overt representation of grief and loss.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2015