Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:42:15.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How the Cycladic Islanders Found Their Marbles: Material Engagement, Social Cognition and the Emergence of Keros

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2020

Alexander Aston Open the ORCID record for Alexander Aston [Opens in a new window]
Alexander Aston*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Keble College, Parks Road, OxfordOX1 3PG, UK Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper utilizes Material Engagement Theory (MET), which examines material culture as a dynamic and integral component of human cognitive systems, in order to explore the relationship between Cycladic marble sculpting and the complex social organization evinced at the sites of Dhaskalio and Kavos on the island of Keros. The article shows how the development of Cycladic sculpting in conjunction with transforming settlement patterns suggests that the figurines emerged as part of a kinshipping dynamic. In this context, evidence from the cognitive sciences reveals how Cycladic figurines were profound attention-capturing technologies which shaped the development of intersubjectivity and collective activity. Cycladic marble provided a medium through which a semiotics of value could be generated, circulated and manipulated across the archipelago. The article argues that marble artefacts formed part of a distributed cognitive system which enabled the regional organization of long-range voyaging regimes centred on Dhaskalio-Kavos. The role of Cycladic sculpture in mediating maritime social interactions is clarified by examining the dynamics of social cognition and the organizational burdens of long-range voyaging culture. The relationship between marble, social interaction and longboat voyaging provides a strong explanation for the development and transformation of Keros as well as for broader chronological developments in the region. Cycladic sculpting traditions mediated the shifting burdens upon social cognition during the Early Bronze Age, facilitating the novel forms of social organization in the central Cyclades as a response to both the pressures and the opportunities of the Aegean world. Keros provides an exemplary case study of material culture's role in extending the boundaries of social cognition in ways that enable social complexity to emerge at new scales.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , November 2020 , pp. 587 - 610
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agouridis, C., 1997. Sea routes and navigation in the third millennium Aegean. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 16(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alessandroni, N. & Rodríguez, C., 2017. Is CONTAINER a natural and embodied image schema? A developmental, pragmatic, and cultural proposal. Human Development 60(4), 144–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelopoulou, A., 2008. The ‘Kastri Group’: evidence from Korfi ton Amygdalion (Parnormos) Naxos, Dhaskalio Keros and Akrotiri Thera, in Horizon: A colloquium on the prehistory of the Cyclades, eds. Brodie, N., Doole, J., Gavalas, G. & Renfrew, C.. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 149–64.Google Scholar
Astafiev, S.V., Stanley, C.M., Shulman, G.L. & Corbetta, M., 2004. Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions. Nature Neuroscience 7(5), 542–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aston, A., 2017. Cognition and the city: cognitive ecology and the Paris commune of 1871, in Cognition Beyond the Brain, eds Cowley, S.J. & Vallée-Tourangeau, F.. Cham: Springer International, 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aston, A., 2019. Metaplasticity and the boundaries of social cognition: exploring scalar transformations in social interaction and intersubjectivity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18(1), 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet, J., 2018. The work of the British School at Athens, 2017–2018. Archaeological Reports 64, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, M.J., 2015. Assemblage studies, in Kavos and the Special Deposits, eds Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. II.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 353–80.Google Scholar
Boyd, M.J. & Renfrew, C., 2018. The material worlds of Dhaskalio and Kavos, in The Marble Finds from Kavos and the Archaeology of Ritual, eds. Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N.J., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. III.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 533–45.Google Scholar
Broodbank, C., 1989. The longboat and society in the Cyclades in the Keros-Syros culture. American Journal of Archaeology 93(3), 319–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broodbank, C., 1993. Ulysses without sails: trade, distance, knowledge and power in the early Cyclades. World Archaeology 24(3), 315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broodbank, C., 2000. An Island Archaeology of the Early Cyclades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, J., 2004. After Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J.E., 1977. Kephala: A late Neolithic settlement and cemetery. Princeton (NJ): American School of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F.L. & Wynn, T.G., 2018. The Rise of Homo sapiens: The evolution of modern thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Costantini, M., Urgesi, C., Galati, G., Romani, G.L. & Aglioti, S.M., 2011. Haptic perception and body representation in lateral and medial occipito-temporal cortices. Neuropsychologia 49(5), 821–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David-Barrett, T., forthcoming. Kinship is a network tracking social technology, not an evolutionary phenomenon.Google Scholar
Dixon, J., 2013. The petrology of the walls, in The Settlement at Dhaskalio, eds Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. I.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 309–23.Google Scholar
Doumas, C. 1977. Early Bronze Age Burial Habits in the Cyclades. Gothenburg: Paul Astroms Forlag.Google Scholar
Downing, P.E., Bray, D., Rogers, J. & Childs, C., 2004. Bodies capture attention when nothing is expected. Cognition 93(1), B27–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenici, M. & Garofoli, D., 2017. The biocultural emergence of mindreading: integrating cognitive archaeology and human development. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 1(2), 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S., 2011. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S., 2017. Enactivist Interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, C., Gowlett, J. & Dunbar, R., 2011. The social brain and the shape of the Palaeolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21(1), 115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garofoli, D., 2017. RECkoning with representational apriorism in evolutionary cognitive archaeology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17, 973–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garofoli, D. & Iliopoulos, A., 2017. Replacing epiphenomenalism: a pluralistic enactive take on the metaplasticity of early body ornamentation. Philosophy & Technology 32(3), 215–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavalas, G. & Brodie, N.J., 2018. The stone vessels, in The Marble Finds from Kavos and The Archaeology of Ritual, eds Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. III.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 259–353.Google Scholar
Gavalas, G., 2013. The marble vessels from Dhaskalio, in The Settlement at Dhaskalio, eds Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. I.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 505–16.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, M., 2013. Metal artefacts and metallurgy, in The Settlement at Dhaskalio, eds Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. I.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 667–92.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, M., 2018. Metal production, working and consumption across the sites of Dhaskalio and Kavos, in The Marble Finds from Kavos and the Archaeology of Ritual, eds. Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N.J., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. III.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 501–32.Google Scholar
Getz-Preziosi, P., 1994. Early CycladicSculpture: An introduction. Malib, (CA): The J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Graeber, D., 2001. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The false coin of our own dreams. New York (NY): Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeber, D., 2013. It is value that brings universes into being. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3(2), 219–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, C.A., 2015. Gifts and Commodities. Chicago (IL): HAU Books.Google Scholar
Hadji, A., 2016. (Dis) entangled bodies or the (be) holder vs. the spectator: detached views of Early Cycladic figures and figurines. Quaternary International 405, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.A. & Gobbini, M.I., 2000. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(6), 223–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendrix, E.A., 2003. Painted Early Cycladic figures: an exploration of context and meaning. Hesperia 72(4), 405–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilditch, J., 2015. The ceramic fabrics of the Special Deposit South, in Kavos and the Special Deposits, eds Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. II.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 229–47.Google Scholar
Hilditch, J., Hein, A. & Kilikoglou, V., 2018. The fabric study of the pottery of Dhaskalio and Kavos, in The Marble Finds from Kavos and the Archaeology of Ritual, eds. Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N.J., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. III.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 445–500.Google Scholar
Hsiao, J.H. & Cottrell, G., 2008. Two fixations suffice in face recognition. Psychological Science 19(10), 998–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iliopoulos, A., 2016a. The material dimensions of signification: rethinking the nature and emergence of semiosis in the debate on human origins. Quaternary International 405, 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliopoulos, A., 2016b. The evolution of material signification: tracing the origins of symbolic body ornamentation through a pragmatic and enactive theory of cognitive semiotics. Signs and Society 4(2), 244–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliopoulos, A. & Garofoli, D., 2016. The material dimensions of cognition: reexamining the nature and emergence of the human mind. Quaternary International 405. DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.04.031Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2009. Stories against classification: transport, wayfaring and the integration of knowledge, in Kinship and Beyond: The genealogical model reconsidered, eds Bamford, S.C. & Leach, J.. New York (NY): Berghahn, 193–213.Google Scholar
Itier, R.J. & Batty, M., 2009. Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: the core of social cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 33(6), 843–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knappett, C., 2005. Thinking Through Material Culture: An interdisciplinary perspective. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knappett, C., 2014. An Archaeology of Interaction: Network perspectives on material culture and society Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kouka, O., 2008. Diaspora, presence or interaction? The Cyclades and the Greek mainland from the Final Neolithic to Early Bronze II, in Horizon: A colloquium on the prehistory of the Cyclades, eds. Brodie, N., Doole, J., Gavalas, G. & Renfrew, C.. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 271–9.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., [1949] 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship (trans. Bell, J.H., von Sturmer, J.R. & Needham, R.). Boston (MA): Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L., 2008. Beads for a plastic mind: the ‘Blind Man's Stick’ (BMS) hypothesis and the active nature of material culture. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(3), 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, L., 2009. ‘Neuroarchaeology’: exploring the links between neural and cultural plasticity. Progress in Brain Research 178, 253–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, L., 2010a. Metaplasticity and the human becoming: principles of neuroarchaeology. Journal of Anthropological Sciences 88, 49–72.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L., 2010b. The brain–artefact interface (BAI): a challenge for archaeology and cultural neuroscience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5(2–3), 264–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, L., 2012. Prosthetic gestures: how the tool shapes the mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35(4), 230–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malafouris, L., 2013. How Things Shape the Mind: A theory of material engagement. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, L., 2015a. Metaplasticity and the primacy of material engagement. Time and Mind 8(4), 351–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, L., 2015b. Creative thinging: the feeling of and for clay. Pragmatics & Cognition 22(1), 140–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, L., 2016a. On human becoming and incompleteness: a material engagement approach to the study of embodiment in evolution and culture, in Embodiment in Evolution and Culture, eds Etzelmüller, G. & Tewes, C.. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 289–305.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L., 2016b. Material engagement and the embodied mind, in Cognitive Models in Palaeolithic Archaeology, eds Wynn, T. & Coolidge, F.L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69–82.Google Scholar
Marthari, M., Renfrew, C. & Boyd, M.J. (eds), 2017. Early Cycladic Sculpture in Context. Oxford/Philadelphia: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Marthari, M., Renfrew, C. & Boyd, M.J., 2019. Early Cycladic sculpture beyond the Cyclades: the Aegean context, in Beyond the Cyclades: Early Cycladic sculpture in context from mainland Greece, the north and east Aegean, eds Marthari, M., Renfrew, C. & Boyd, M.J.. Oxford: Oxbow, 292.Google Scholar
Mauss, M., [1925] 2002. The Gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A.N. & Moore, M.K., 1983. Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development 54(3), 702–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moutafi, I., 2015. The human remains from Area A, in Kavos and the Special Deposits, eds Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. II.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 483–505.Google Scholar
Nymo, G., Renfrew, C. & Dixon, J., 2013. The pebbles from Dhaskalio, in The Settlement at Dhaskalio, eds Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. I.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 517–30.Google Scholar
Overmann, K.A., 2016. The role of materiality in numerical cognition. Quaternary International 405, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overmann, K.A., 2017. Thinking materially: cognition as extended and enacted. Journal of Cognition and Culture 17(3–4), 354–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papamichelakis, G. & Renfrew, C., 2010. Hearsay about the ‘Keros Hoard’. American Journal of Archaeology 114(1), 181–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peelen, M.V. & Downing, P.E., 2007. The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8(8), 636–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peirce, C.S., [1902] 2011. Logic as semiotic: the theory of signs, in Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. Buchler, J.. New York (NY): Dover, 98–119.Google Scholar
Phoca-Cosmetatou, N., 2011. Initial occupation of the Cycladic islands in the Neolithic: strategies for survival, in The First Mediterranean Islanders: Initial occupation and survival strategies, ed. Phoca-Cosmetatou, N.. Oxford: University of Oxford School of Archaeology, 77–97.Google Scholar
Rambach, J., 2017. Schematic marble figurines from secure Early Cycladic I grave contexts on the islands of Ano Kouphonisi, Antiparos, Dhespotiko, Naxos, Paros and Siphnos, in Early Cycladic Sculpture in Context, eds Marthari, M., Renfrew, C. & Boyd, M.J.. Oxford: Oxbow, 65–87.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1969. The development and chronology of the Early Cycladic figurines. American Journal of Archaeology 73(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1991. The Cycladic Spirit: Masterpieces from the Nicholas P. Goulandris Collection. London: Nicolas P. Goulandris Foundation Museum of Cycladic Art/Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1996. The sapient behaviour paradox: how to test for potential, in Modelling the early human mind, eds Mellars, P. & Gibson, K.R.. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 11–14.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 2001. Symbol before concept: material engagement and the early development of society, in Archaeological Theory Today, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Polity Press, 122–40.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 2004. Towards a theory of material engagement, in Rethinking Materiality: The engagement of mind with the material world, eds DeMarrais, E. & Renfrew, C.. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 23–31.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 2011. The Emergence of Civilisation: The Cyclades and the Aegean in the third millennium BC. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 2013. The sanctuary at Keros: questions of materiality and monumentality. Journal of the British Academy 1, 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C., 2017. The sculptures of Neolithic Saliagos, in Early Cycladic Sculpture in Context, eds Marthari, M., Renfrew, C. & Boyd, M.J.. Oxford: Oxbow, 23–9.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 2018. The conclusions of the 2006–2008 Project, in The Marble Finds from Kavos and The Archaeology of Ritual, eds Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. III.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 547–58.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., Boyd, M. & Ramsey, C.B., 2012. The oldest maritime sanctuary? Dating the sanctuary at Keros and the Cycladic Early Bronze Age. Antiquity 86, 144–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. & Nymo, G., 2015. The other finds from the Special Deposit South: the pebbles, in Kavos and the Special Deposits, eds Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. II.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 326–9.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N. & Gavalas, G., 2009. The Early Cycladic settlement at Dhaskalio, Keros: preliminary report of the 2008 excavation season. Annual of the British School at Athens 104, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J. (eds), 2013. The Settlement at Dhaskalio. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. I). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G., Margaritis, E., French, C. & Sotirakopoulou, P., 2007. Keros: Dhaskalio and Kavos, early Cycladic stronghold and ritual centre. Preliminary report of 2006 and 2007 seasons. Annual of the British School at Athens 102, 103–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, R., Knappett, C. & Evans, T., 2013. What makes a site important? Centrality, gateways and gravity, in Network Analysis in Archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction, ed. Knappett, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M., 2013a. On the culture of material value and the cosmography of riches. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3(2), 161–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M.D., 2013b. What Kinship Is – and Is Not. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotirakopoulou, P., 2008. Dhaskalio Kavos, Keros: The pottery from the investigations of the 1960s, in Horizon: A colloquium on the prehistory of the Cyclades, eds. Brodie, N., Doole, J., Gavalas, G. & Renfrew, C.. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 115–20.Google Scholar
Sotirakopoulou, P., 2016. Ceramic regionalism at Dhaskalio, in The Pottery from Dhaskalio, eds Sotirakopoulou, P. & Renfrew, C.. (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008 Vol. IV.) Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 379–88.Google Scholar
Spiridon, M., Fischl, B. & Kanwisher, N., 2006. Location and spatial profile of category-specific regions in human extrastriate cortex. Human Brain Mapping 27(1), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tambakopoulos, D. & Maniatis, Y., 2017. The marble of the Cyclades and its use in the early Bronze Age, in Early Cycladic Sculpture in Context, eds Marthari, M., Renfrew, C. & Boyd, M.J.. Oxford: Oxbow, 467–82.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.C., Wiggett, A.J. & Downing, P.E., 2007. Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. Journal of Neurophysiology 98(3), 1626–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Televantou, C.A., 2008. Strofilas: a Neolithic settlement on Andros, in Horizon: A colloquium on the prehistory of the Cyclades, eds Brodie, N., Doole, J., Gavalas, G. & Renfrew, C.. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 43–53.Google Scholar
Televantou, C.A., 2017. Figurines from Strophilas, Andros, in Early Cycladic Sculpture in Context, eds Marthari, M., Renfrew, C. & Boyd, M.J.. Oxford: Oxbow, 39–51.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Rakoczy, H., 2003. What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind and Language 18(2), 121–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevarthen, C., 1979. Communication and cooperation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity, in Before Speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication, ed. Bullowa, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 321–47.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C.H. & Hubley, P., 1978. Secondary intersubjectivity: confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year, in Action, Gesture and Symbol: The emergence of language, ed. Lock, A.. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E., 2009. The gift and the given: three nano-essays on kinship and magic, in Kinship and Beyond: The genealogical model reconsidered, eds Bamford, S.C. & Leach, J.. New York (NY): Berghahn, 237–68.Google Scholar
Vocks, S., Busch, M., Grönemeyer, D., Schulte, D., Herpertz, S. & Suchan, B., 2010. Differential neuronal responses to the self and others in the extrastriate body area and the fusiform body area. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 10(3), 422–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagstaff, M. & Cherry, J.F., 1982. Settlement and population change, in An Island Polity: The archaeology of exploitation in Melos, eds Renfrew, C. & Wagstaff, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 136–55.Google Scholar
Watts, C., 2008. On mediation and material agency in the Peircean semeiotic, in Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach, eds Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L.. New York (NY): Springer, 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wengrow, D. & Graeber, D., 2015. Farewell to the ‘childhood of man’: ritual, seasonality, and the origins of inequality. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 21(3), 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, T. & Coolidge, F.L., 2014. Technical cognition, working memory and creativity. Pragmatics & Cognition 22(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zapheiropoulou, P., 2007. The 1967 rescue project, in Keros, Dhaskalio, Kavos: The invesigations of 1987–88, eds Renfrew, C., Doumas, C., Marangou, L. & Gavalas, G.. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 30–32.Google Scholar