Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:40:01.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Geoglyph as a Medium for Anarchist Ritual

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2020

Darryl Wilkinson Open the ORCID record for Darryl Wilkinson [Opens in a new window]
Darryl Wilkinson*
Affiliation:
Department of Religion 6036 Thornton Hall 19 College Street Dartmouth CollegeHanover, NH03755USA Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Geoglyphs are widely seen as an expression of past sacred landscapes. In this article, I offer a new theoretical approach to geoglyphs, interpreting them as a distinctly anarchic and decentralized medium for ritual activity. When we define geoglyphs as large-scale images, and exclude other phenomena such as earthworks, it is clear that their occurrence is actually quite limited in space and time. Almost all known examples of geoglyphs are located in the Americas, and they are particularly associated with ‘middle-range’ societies, rather than states or empires. Geoglyphs produced by hunter-gatherer communities are also comparatively rare. I regard this pattern as a direct consequence of the anarchist affordances of the geoglyph medium. In agricultural societies where regional integration and incipient centralization were taking place (e.g. the ancient Nasca), geoglyphs provided a decentralizing counterbalance. I therefore theorize the incorporation of geoglyph-based ritual practices as a historically situated process of constitutional reform, whereby ancient peoples consciously sought to redistribute power and authority.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 95 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelbeck, B., 2019. Interpreting the dialectic of sociopolitical tensions in the archaeological past: implications of an anarchist perspective for Iron Age societies, in Alternative Iron Ages: Social theory from archaeological analysis, eds Currás, B.X. & Sastre, I.. London: Routledge, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelbeck, B. & Grier, G., 2012. Anarchism and the archaeology of anarchic societies: resistance to centralization in the Coast Salish region of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Current Anthropology 53(5), 547–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkush, E. & Tung, T.A., 2013. Patterns of war in the Andes from the Archaic to the Late Horizon: insights from settlement patterns and cranial trauma. Journal of Archaeological Research 21(4), 307–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aveni, A., 1990a. Introduction, in The Lines of Nazca, ed. Aveni, A.. Philadelphia (PA): American Philosophical Society, i–vi.Google Scholar
Aveni, A., 1990b. Order in the Nazca Lines, in The Lines of Nazca, ed. Aveni, A.. Philadelphia (PA): American Philosophical Society, 41–114.Google Scholar
Bauer, B.S., 1998. The Sacred Landscape of the Inca: The Cusco ceque system. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bettey, J.H., 1981. The Cerne Abbas Giant: the documentary evidence. Antiquity 55, 118–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bey, H., 1991. The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy and Poetic Terrorism. New York (NY): Autonomedia.Google Scholar
Birmingham, R.A., 2009. Spirits of Earth: The effigy mound landscape of Madison and the Four Lakes. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Blanton, R. & Fargher, L., 2016. How Humans Cooperate: Confronting the challenges of collective action. Boulder (CO): University Press of Colorado.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, T., 2018. Partnering with pots: the work of objects in the imperial Inca project. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 28(2), 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briones, L., 2006. The geoglyphs of the north Chilean desert: an archaeological and artistic perspective. Antiquity 80, 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, B., 2003. The Wheel of Time Sand Mandala: Visual scripture of Tibetan Buddhism. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion Publications.Google Scholar
Bychkov, O., 2009. Theology, aesthetics and the Gothic space. Does scholastic theology have anything to do with the Gothic?, in Theology in Built Environments: Exploring religion, architecture and design, ed. Bergmann, S.. New York (NY): Transaction Publishers, 39–58.Google Scholar
Clarkson, P.B., 1990. The archaeology of the Nazca pampa, Peru: environmental & cultural parameters, in The Lines of Nazca, ed. Aveni, A.. Philadelphia (PA): American Philosophical Society, 115–72.Google Scholar
Cobb, C.R., 2003. Mississippian chiefdoms: how complex? Annual Review of Anthropology 32(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlee, C., 2014. Nasca culture integration and complexity: a perspective from the site of La Tiza. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 35, 234–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crumley, C., 1987. A dialectical critique of hierarchy, in Power Relations and State Formation, eds Patterson, T.C. & Gailey, C.W.. Washington (DC): American Anthropological Association, 155–69.Google Scholar
Crumley, C., 2005. Heterarchy and the analysis of complex societies. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 6(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMarrais, E. & Earle, T., 2017. Collective action theory and the dynamics of complex societies. Annual Review of Anthropology 46, 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMarrais, E. & Robb, J., 2013. Art makes society: an introductory visual essay. World Art 3(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelke, M., 2010. Religion and the media turn: a review essay. American Ethnologist 37(2), 371–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G., 1958. Ancient Mesopotamian assemblies. Journal of the American Oriental Society 78(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M., 2005. Media Ecologies: Materialist energies in art and technoculture. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gartner, W.G., 1999. Late woodland landscapes of Wisconsin: ridged fields, effigy mounds and territoriality. Antiquity 73, 671–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilreath, A.J., 2007. Rock art in the golden state: pictographs and petroglyphs, portable and panoramic, in California Prehistory: Colonization, culture and complexity, eds Jones, T.L. & Klar, K.. New York (NY): Altamira, 273–90.Google Scholar
Graeber, D., 2004. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Chicago (IL): Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Grigoriev, S.A. & Menshenin, N.M., 2012. Discovery of a geoglyph on the Zjuratkul Ridge in the southern Urals. Antiquity 86, Project Gallery. http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/grigoriev331/Google Scholar
Hirschkind, C., 2006. The Ethical Soundscape: Cassette sermons and Islamic counterpublics. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Horsfield, P., 2008. Media, in Key Words in Religion, Media and Culture, ed. Morgan, D.. London: Routledge, 111–22.Google Scholar
Isbell, W.H., 1978. The prehistoric ground drawings of Peru. Scientific American 239(4), 140–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isla, J. & Reindel, M., 2005. New studies on the settlements and geoglyphs in Palpa, Peru. Andean Past 7, 57–92.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., 2011. The ‘Works of the Old Men’ in Arabia: remote sensing in interior Arabia. Journal of Archaeological Science 38(12), 3185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambers, K., 2006. The Geoglyphs of Palpa, Peru: Documentation, analysis and interpretation. Bielefeld: Linden Soft.Google Scholar
Marcus, J., 2008. The archaeological evidence for social evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology 37, 251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquardt, W.H., 1992. Dialectical archaeology. Archaeological Method and Theory 4, 101–40.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M., [1964] 2001. Understanding Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mejía Xesspe, T., 1940. Acueductos y caminos antiguos de la hoya del Río Grande de Nazca [Aqueducts and ancient roads in the valley of the Río Grande de Nazca], in Actas y Trabajos Cientificos del 27 Congreso Internacional de Americanistas 1. Lima: Gil, 559–69.Google Scholar
Miller, R.J., 2015. American Indian constitutions and their influence on the United States Constitution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 159(1), 32–56.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W.J.T., 2005. There are no visual media. Journal of Visual Culture 4(2), 257–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D., 2012. The Embodied Eye: Religious visual culture and the social life of feeling. Los Angeles (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Motuzaite Matuzeviciute, G., Logvin, A.V., Shevnina, I., Seitov, A.M., Feng, J. & Zhou, L., 2016. OSL dates for the ancient geometric earthworks of Kazakhstan. Archaeological Research in Asia 7, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orefici, G., 2012. Cahuachi: Capital Teocrática Nasca [Cahuachi: Theocratic capital of Nasca]. Lima: Universidad de San Martin de Porres.Google Scholar
Pärssinen, M., Schaan, D., & Ranzi, A., 2009. Pre-Columbian geometric earthworks in the upper Purús: a complex society in western Amazonia. Antiquity 83, 1084–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J., 2017. The Uffington White Horse geoglyph as sun-horse. Antiquity 91, 406–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proulx, D., 2008. Paracas and Nasca: regional cultures on the south coast of Peru, in The Handbook of South American Archaeology, eds Silverman, H. & Isbell, W.H.. New York (NY): Springer, 563–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhard, J., 1988. The Nazca lines, water and mountains: an ethnoarchaeological study, in Recent Studies in Pre-Columbian Archaeology, eds Saunders, N.J. & Montmollin, O.. (BAR International series S421.) Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 363–502.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J., 2006. Rethinking Social Evolution: The perspective from middle-range societies. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggles, C. & Saunders, N.J., 2012. Desert labyrinth: lines, landscape and meaning at Nazca, Peru. Antiquity 86, 1126–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, K. & Rojas, J.L., 2003. Irrigation and Society in the Peruvian Desert: The Puquios of Nasca. Lanham (MD): Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Silverman, H., 1990. The Early Nasca pilgrimage center of Cahuachi & the Nasca lines: anthropological and archaeological perspectives, in The Lines of Nazca, ed. Aveni, A.. Philadelphia (PA): American Philosophical Society, 207–44.Google Scholar
Silverman, H., 1993. Cahuachi in the Ancient Nasca World. Iowa City (IO): University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, H., 2002. Ancient Nasca Settlement and Society. Iowa City (IO): University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, H. & Browne, D., 1991. New evidence for the date of the Nazca lines. Antiquity 65, 208–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, H. & Proulx, D., 2002. The Nasca. Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatum, J.W., 2009. Roman democracy?, in A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought, ed. Balot, R.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 214–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urton, G., 1990. Andean social organization and the maintenance of the Nazca Lines, in The Lines of Nazca, ed. Aveni, A.. Philadelphia (PA): American Philosophical Society, 173–206.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, D. and Clarkson, P.B., 2014. Geoglyphs, in Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, ed. Smith, C.. New York (NY): Springer, 3017–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, K., 2005. Crafts and the materialization of chiefly power in Nasca. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 14, 113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, K., 2006. Craft production, exchange, and political power in the pre-Incaic Andes. Journal of Archaeological Research 14(4), 313–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, K., 2009. The Ancient Andean Village: Marcaya in Prehispanic Nasca. Tuscon (AZ): University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Weismantel, M., 2013. Inhuman eyes: looking at Chavín de Huantar, in Relational Archaeologies, ed. Watts, C.. London: Routledge, 21–41.Google Scholar
Weismantel, M. & Meskell, L., 2014. Substances: ‘following the material’ through two prehistoric cases. Journal of Material Culture 19(3), 233–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wengrow, D. & Graeber, D., 2015. Farewell to the ‘childhood of man’: ritual, seasonality, and the origins of inequality. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 21(3), 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoffee, N., 2005. Myths of the Archaic State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar