Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:08:00.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Staying Egalitarian and the Origins of Agriculture in the Middle East

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2022

Ian Hodder Open the ORCID record for Ian Hodder [Opens in a new window]
Ian Hodder*
Affiliation:
Stanford Archaeology Center Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6104 USA Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article uses results from the recent excavations at Çatalhöyük in Turkey to propose that continuous tensions between egalitarian and hierarchical impulses were dealt with in two principal ways during the Neolithic of the Middle East. A tendency towards overall balance and community (termed molar) is seen as in tension with more particulate and molecular tendencies, with both being brought into play in order to combat inequalities. It is also suggested that tendencies towards more molecular systems increased over time, at different rates and in different ways in different places, partly as a response to constraints associated with more molar articulations. Finally, it is proposed that a shift to molecular autonomy was associated with agricultural intensification. Staying egalitarian can be seen as an active process that contributed to the Neolithic transformations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , November 2022 , pp. 619 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akkermans, P.M.M.G., 2013. Living space, temporality and community segmentation: interpreting Late Neolithic settlement in Northern Syria, in Interpreting the Late Neolithic of Upper Mesopotamia, eds Nieuwenhuyse, O. P., Bernbeck, R., Akkermans, P.M.M.G. & Rogasch, J.. (PALMA 9.) Turnhout: Brepols, 63–76.Google Scholar
Akkermans, P.A., Boerma, J.A.K., Clason, A.T., 1983. Bouqras revisited: preliminary report on a project in Eastern Syria. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 49, 335–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkermans, P.M.M.G. & Schwarz, G.M., 2003. The Archaeology of Syria: From complex hunter-gatherers to early urban society (c. 16,000–300 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asouti, E., 2017. Human palaeoecology in Southwest Asia during the Early Pre-Pottery Neolithic (c. 9700–8500 cal BC): the plant story, in Neolithic Corporate Identities, eds. Benz, M., Gebel, H.G. & Watkins, T.. Berlin: Ex Oriente, 21–53.Google Scholar
Asouti, E. & Fuller, D.Q, 2013. A contextual approach to the emergence of agriculture in Southwest Asia: reconstructing Early Neolithic plant-food production. Current Anthropology 54(3), 299–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, G., Wainwright, J., Walker, J., Hodara, R., Lloyd, J.M., Leng, M. & Doherty, C., 2017. Palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of the alluvial landscape of Neolithic Çatalhöyük, central southern Turkey: the implications for early agriculture and responses to environmental change. Journal of Archaeological Science 87, 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D., Fairbairn, A., & Martin, L., 2017. The animate house, the institutionalization of the household in Neolithic Central Anatolia. World Archaeology 49(5), 753–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banning, E.B., 2011. So fair a house: Göbekli Tepe and the identification of temples in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic of the Near East. Current Anthropology 52(5), 619–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banning, E.B. & Chazan, M. (eds), 2006. Domesticating Space Construction, Community, and Cosmology in the Late Prehistoric Near East. Berlin: Ex Oriente.Google Scholar
Barth, F., 1966. Anthropological models and social reality. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 165(998), 20–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Baum, W.M., 2004. Molar and molecular views of choice. Behavioural Processes 66(3), 349–59.Google ScholarPubMed
Bayliss, A., Chivall, D., Farid, S., Goslar, T., Issavi, J., J. & Tung, B., forthcoming. A Northern timescape, in Çatalhöyük Excavations: The 2009–2017 Seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. London: British Institute at Ankara.Google Scholar
Bender, B., 1978. Gatherer-hunter to farmer: a social perspective. World Archaeology 10(2), 204–22.Google Scholar
Benz, M., Alt, K.W., Erdal, Y.S., Şahin, F.S. & Özkaya, V., 2018. Re-presenting the past: evidence from daily practices and rituals at Körtik Tepe, in Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life, ed. Hodder, I.. Boulder (CO): University Press of Colorado, 137–61.Google Scholar
Blanton, R.E. 1998. Beyond centralization: steps towards a theory of egalitarian behavior in archaic states, in Archaic States, eds. Feinman, G.M. & Marcus, J.. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research, 135–72.Google Scholar
Bogaard, A., Charles, M., Twiss, K.C., et al. , 2009. Private pantries and celebrated surplus: storing and sharing food at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Central Anatolia. Antiquity 83, 649–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaard, A., Charles, M., Filipović, D., et al. , 2021. The archaeobotany of Çatalhöyük: results from 2009-2017 excavations and final synthesis, in Peopling the Landscape of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. London: British Institute at Ankara, 91–124.Google Scholar
Bogue, R., 1989. Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borrell, F. & Molist, M., 2014. Social interaction at the end of the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B: an inter-site analysis in the Euphrates Valley. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 24(2), 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, B.F., 1994. Public and private, domestic and corporate: the emergence of the southwest Asian village. American Antiquity 59(4), 639–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cauvin, J., 1978. Les Premiers Villages de Syrie-Palestine du IXème au VIIème Millénaire av. J.-C. Lyons: Maison de l'Orient.Google Scholar
Cauvin, J., 2000. The Birth of the Gods and the Origins of Agriculture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cessford, C., 2005. Absolute dating at Çatalhöyük, in Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–99 seasons, ed. Hodder, I. Cambridge: British Institute at Ankara/McDonald Archaeological Institute, 65–99.Google Scholar
Cessford, C., 2007. Overall discussion of Buildings 1 and 5 in Excavating Çatalhöyük: South, North and KOPAL Area Reports from the 1995–99 Seasons, ed. Hodder, I. Cambridge: British Institute at Ankara/McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 531–49.Google Scholar
Clare, L. & Kinzel, M., 2020. Response to comments by Ian Hodder and Christian Jeunesse with notes on a potential Upper Mesopotamian ‘Late PPNA Hunter-Crisis’, in Monumentalising Life in the Neolithic, eds. Gebauer, A.B., Sorenson, L., Teather, A. & Valera, A.C.. Oxford: Oxbow, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clastres, P., 1987. Society Against the State. New York (NY): Zone Books.Google Scholar
Colledge, S., Conolly, J., Finlayson, B. & Kuijt, I., 2018. New insights on plant domestication, production intensification, and food storage: the archaeobotanical evidence from PPNA Dhra’. Levant 50(1), 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crumley, C., 1995. Heterarchy and the analysis of complex societies. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 6(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currás, B.X. & Sastre, I. (eds), 2019. Alternative Iron Ages: Social theory from archaeological analysis. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F., 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Demirergi, G.A., Twiss, K.C., Bogaard, A., Green, L., Ryan, P. & Farid, S., 2014. Of bins, basins and banquets: storing, handling and sharing at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, in Integrating Çatalhöyük. Themes from the 2000–2008 Seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. Los Angeles (CA): British Institute at Ankara/Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, 91–108.Google Scholar
Dresch, P., 1986. The significance of the course events take in segmentary systems. American Ethnologist 13(2), 309–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dueppen, S.A., 2012. Egalitarian Revolution in the Savanna. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Düring, B., 2005. Building continuity in the Central Anatolian Neolithic: exploring the meaning of buildings at Asıklı Höyük and Çatalhöyük. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 18(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düring, B., 2006. Constructing Communities: Clustered Neighbourhood Settlements of the Central Anatolian Neolithic, ca. 8500–5500 cal BC. PhD thesis, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Düring, B., 2007. Reconsidering the Çatalhöyük community: from households to settlement systems. Journal for Mediterranean Archaeology 20,155–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düring, B. & Marciniak, A., 2006. Households and communities in the central Anatolian Neolithic. Archaeological Dialogues 12(2), 165–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duru, G. 2018. Sedentism and solitude: exploring the impact of private space on social cohesion in the Neolithic, in Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life, ed. Hodder, I.. Boulder (CO): University Press of Colorado, 162–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erim-Özdoğan, A., 2011. Çayönü, in The Neolithic in Turkey. The Tigris Basin, eds Özdoğan, M., Başgelen, N. & Kuniholm, P.. Istanbul: Archaeology and Art, 185–269.Google Scholar
Farid, S., 2014. The North Shelter foundation trenches, in Çatalhöyük Excavations. The 2000–2008 seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. Los Angeles (CA): British Institute at Ankara/Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, 557–96.Google Scholar
Farid, S., Hodder, I., Taylor, J. & Tung, B., forthcoming. Chronology and overall phasing of North and South Areas, in Çatalhöyük Excavations. The 2009–2017 seasons, ed. Hodder, I. London: British Institute at Ankara.Google Scholar
Feinman, G.M., 1995. The emergence of inequality: a focus on strategies and processes, in Foundations of Social Inequality, eds Price, T.D. & Feinman, G.M.. New York (NY): Plenum, 255–80.Google Scholar
Fernández, E., Ortiz, J.E., Torres, T., et al. , 2008. Mitochondrial DNA genetic relationships at the ancient Neolithic site of Tell Halula. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 1(1), 271–3.Google Scholar
Finlayson, B., 2020. Egalitarian societies and the earliest Neolithic of Southwest Asia. Prehistoric Archaeology Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 1, 27-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, B. & Makarewicz, C.A., 2018. Contextualising Beidha, Jordan, in the Southern Levantine PPNB: communal architecture and chronology. Paléorient 44(1), 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, K. & Marcus, J., 2012. The Creation of Inequality: How our prehistoric ancestors set the stage for monarchy, slavery, and empire. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowles, S., 2010. A people's history of the American Southwest, in Ancient Complexities: New perspectives in pre-Columbian North America, ed. Alt, S.. Salt Lake City (UT): University of Utah Press, 183–204.Google Scholar
Fowles, S., 2012. The Pueblo village in an age of reformation (AD 1300–1600), in The Oxford Handbook of North American Archaeology, ed. Pauketat, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 631–44.Google Scholar
Frangipane, M., 2007. Different types of egalitarian societies and the development of inequality in early Mesopotamia. World Archaeology 39(2), 151–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, J., 1998. Transnationalization, socio-political disorder, and ethnification as expressions of declining global hegemony. International Political Science Review 19(3), 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Y., 2006. The social organization at Neolithic Sha'ar Hagolan, in Domesticating Space. Construction, Community, and Cosmology in the Late Prehistoric Near East, eds Banning, E.B. & Chazan, M.. Berlin: Ex Oriente, 103–10.Google Scholar
Gebel, H.G.K., 2004. There was no centre: the polycentric evolution of the Near Eastern Neolithic. Neo-lithics 1(04), 28–32.Google Scholar
Goring-Morris, N. & Belfer-Cohen, A., 2020. Highlighting the PPNB in the Southern Levant. Neo-Lithics 20, 3–22.Google Scholar
Graeber, D., 2004. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Chicago (IL): Prickly Paradigm.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. & Wengrow, D., 2021. The Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Hamilton, N., 1996. Figurines, clay balls, small finds and burials, in On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95, ed. Hodder, I. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 215–64.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, H., 2011. The Urfa region, in The Neolithic in Turkey. The Euphrates Basin, eds Özdoğan, M., Başgelen, N. & Kuniholm, P.. Istanbul: Archaeology and Art, 85–138.Google Scholar
Hayden, B., 1990. Nimrods, piscators, pluckers, and planters: the emergence of food production. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9(1), 31–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, B., 2014. The Power of Feasts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, B., 2018. The Power of Ritual in Prehistory. Secret societies and origins of societal complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmer, D., Gourichon, L. & Stordeur, D., 2004. À l'aube de la domestication animale. Imaginaire et symbolisme animal dans les premières sociétés néolithiques du nord du Proche Orient. Anthropozoologica 39(1), 143–63.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2014. Çatalhöyük: the leopard changes its spots. A summary of recent work. Anatolian Studies 64, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 2016. More on history houses at Çatalhöyük: a response to Carleton et al. Journal of Archaeological Science 67, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 2018. Things and the slow Neolithic: the Middle Eastern transformation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 25(1), 155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 2021a. Peopling the Landscape of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons. London: British Institute at Ankara.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 2021b. The Matter of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons. London: British Institute at Ankara.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), forthcoming. Çatalhöyük Excavations: The 2009–2017 seasons. (Monograph 57.) London: British Institute at Ankara.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., Bogaard, A., Engel, C., Pearson, J. & Wolfhagen, J., forthcoming. Spatial autocorrelation analysis and the social organization of crop and herd management at Çatalhöyük. Anatolian Studies.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. & Cessford, C., 2004. Daily practice and social memory at Çatalhöyük. American Antiquity 69(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. & Pels, P., 2010. History houses: a new interpretation of architectural elaboration at Çatalhöyük, in Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a case study, ed. Hodder, I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 163–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. & Tsoraki, C. (eds), 2022. Communities at Work: The making of Çatalhöyük. London: British Institute at Ankara.Google Scholar
Holland, E.W., 2013. Deleuze and Guattari's A Thousand Plateaus. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, M., 2013. Building 77, in Çatalhöyük Excavations: The 2000–2008 Seasons, ed. Hodder, I. Los Angeles (CA): British Institute at Ankara/Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, 485–504.Google Scholar
Ibáñez, J.J., González-Urquijo, J., Teira-Mayolini, L.C. & Lazuén, T., 2018. The emergence of the Neolithic in the Near East: a protracted and multi-regional model. Quaternary International 470, 226–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabukcu, C., Asouti, E., Pöllath, N., Peters, J. & Karul, N., N., 2021. Pathways to plant domestication in Southeast Anatolia based on new data from aceramic Neolithic Gusir Höyük. Scientific Reports 11(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karul, N., 2020. Beginnings of the Neolithic in Southeast Anatolia: Upper Tigris Basin. Documenta Praehistorica 47, 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karul, N., 2021. Buried buildings at Pre-Pottery Neolithic Karahantepe. Türk Arkeoloji ve Etnografya Dergisi (82), 21–31.Google Scholar
Kay, K., 2020. Dynamic houses and communities at Çatalhöyük: a building biography approach to prehistoric social structure. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 30(3), 451–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, K., 2022. Entwining time and materializing communities: house biographies and temporalities of space-making, in Communities at Work: The making of Çatalhöyük, eds. Hodder, I & Tsoraki, C.. London: British Institute at Ankara, 199–214.Google Scholar
Kenyon, K.M., 1981. Excavations at Jericho. The architecture and stratigraphy of the Tell. Jerusalem: British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Kinzel, M. & Clare, L., 2020. Monumental – compared to what? A perspective from Göbekli Tepe, in Monumentalising Life in the Neolithic, eds Gebauer, A.B., Sorenson, L., Teather, A. & Valera, A.C.. Oxford: Oxbow, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knüsel, C.J., Milella, M., Betz, B., et al. , 2021. Bioarchaeology at Neolithic Çatalhöyük: indicators of health, well-being and lifeway in their social context, in Peopling the Landscape of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons, ed. Hodder, I. London: British Institute at Ankara, 315–56.Google Scholar
Kodaş, E., 2020. Çemka Höyük: a Late Epipalaeolithic and Pre-Pottery Neolithic site on the Upper Tigris, Southeast Anatolia. Neo-Lithics 20, 40–46.Google Scholar
Kohler, T.A., Smith, M.E., Bogaard, A., et al. , 2017. Greater post-Neolithic wealth disparities in Eurasia than in North America and Mesoamerica. Nature 551(7682), 619–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroeber, A.L., 1917. Zuni Kin and Clan. (Anthropological Papers of the AMNH 18,2.) New York (NY): American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Kuijt, I., 2002. Keeping the peace, in Life in Neolithic Farming Communities, ed. Kuijt, I.. Boston (MA): Springer, 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuijt, I., 2018. Material geographies of house societies: reconsidering Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 28(4), 565–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuijt, I. & Finlayson, B., 2009. Evidence for food storage and predomestication granaries 11,000 years ago in the Jordan Valley. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(27), 10966–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuijt, I., Guerrero, E., Molist, M. & Anfruns, J., 2011. The changing Neolithic household: household autonomy and social segmentation, Tell Halula, Syria. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 30(4), 502–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, C.S., Hillson, S.W., Ruff, C.B., Sadvari, J.W. & Garofalo, E.M., 2013. The human remains II: interpreting lifestyle and activity in Neolithic Çatalhöyük, in Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. Los Angeles (CA): British Institute at Ankara/Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, 397–412.Google Scholar
Leach, E.R., 1973. Political Systems of Highland Burma: A study of Kachin social structure. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Marciniak, A., Asouti, E., Doherty, C. & Henton, E., 2015. The nature of household in the upper levels at Çatalhöyük, in Assembling Çatalhöyük, eds Hodder, I and Marciniak, A.. Leeds: Maney, 151–65.Google Scholar
Marston, J.M., 2021. Archaeological approaches to agricultural economies. Journal of Archaeological Research 29, 327–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, W., Almond, M., Anderson, E., Wiles, J. & Stokes, H., 2013. Biographies of architectural materials and buildings: integrating high-resolution micro-analysis and geochemistry, in Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000-08 Seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. Los Angeles (CA): British Institute at Ankara/Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, 115–36.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, C., 2019. Socio-material archaeological networks at Çatalhöyük: a community detection approach. Frontiers in Digital Humanities 6(8), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzucato, C., Doyle, S., Issavi, J., et al. , 2022. An integrated approach to the study of socio-material networks at Çatalhöyük, in Communities at Work: The making of Çatalhöyük, eds Hodder, I. & Tsoraki, C.. London: British Institute at Ankara, 147–76.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1967. Çatal Hüyük. A Neolithic town in Anatolia. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Mills, B.J., 2014. Relational networks and religious sodalities at Çatalhöyük, in Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society. Vital matters, ed. Hodder, I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S., Finlayson, B., Maricevic, D., Smith, S., Jenkins, E. & Najjar, M., 2018. WF16: Excavations at an Early Neolithic Site in Southern Jordan. Stratigraphy, Chronology, Architecture, Burials. London: Council for British Research in the Levant.Google Scholar
Moscona, J., Nunn, N. & Robinson, J.A., 2020. Segmentary lineage organization and conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa. Econometrica 88(5), 1999–2036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munson, H. Jr, 1989. On the irrelevance of the segmentary lineage model in the Moroccan Rif. American Anthropologist 91(2), 386–400.Google Scholar
Nakamura, C., 2021. Figuring diversity: the Neolithic Çatalhöyük figurines, in The Matter of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons, ed. Hodder, I. London: British Institute at Ankara, 97–130.Google Scholar
Orton, D., Anvari, J., Gibson, C., Last, J., Bogaard, A., Rosenstock, E. & Biehl, P., 2018. A tale of two tells: dating the Çatalhöyük West Mound. Antiquity 92, 620–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özbaşaran, M. & Duru, G., 2011. Akarçay Tepe. A PPNB and PN settlement in Middle Euphrates – Urfa, in The Neolithic in Turkey. The Euphrates Basin, eds Özdoğan, M., Başgelen, N. & Kuniholm, P.. Istanbul: Archaeology and Art, 165–202.Google Scholar
Özbaşaran, M., Duru, G. & Stiner, M., 2018. The Early Settlement at Aşıklı Höyük. Essays in honor of Ufuk Esin. Istanbul: Ege Yayınları.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, A. & Özdoğan, M., 1998. Buildings of cult and the cult of buildings, in Light on Top of the Black Hill: Studies presented to Halet Cambel, eds. Arsebük, G., Mellink, M.J. & Schirmer, W.. Istanbul: Ege Yayınları, 581–92.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M., 2011. Mezraa-Teleilat, in The Neolithic in Turkey. The Euphrates Basin, eds Özdoğan, M., Başgelen, N. & Kuniholm, P.. Istanbul: Archaeology and Art, 203–60.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M., 2018. Humanization of buildings. The Neolithic ritual of burying the sacred. Origini 41, 7–24.Google Scholar
Pearson, J., Lamb, A. & Evans, J., 2021. Multi-isotope evidence of diet (carbon and nitrogen) and mobility (strontium) at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, in Peopling the Landscape of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons, ed. Hodder, I. London: British Institute at Ankara, 217–44.Google Scholar
Pearson, J. & Meskell, L., 2015. Isotopes and images: fleshing out bodies at Çatalhöyük. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22(2), 461–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, J., Pöllath, N. & Arbuckle, B., 2017. The emergence of livestock husbandry in Early Neolithic Anatolia, in The Oxford Handbook of Zooarchaeology, ed. Albarella, U.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 247–65.Google Scholar
Pilloud, M.A. & Larsen, C.S., 2011. ‘Official’ and ‘practical’ kin: inferring social and community structure from dental phenotype at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 145(4), 519–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plug, J.-H., Hodder, I. & Akkermans, P.M.M.G., 2022. Breaking continuity? Site formation and temporal depth at Çatalhöyük and Tell Sabi Abyad. Anatolian Studies 71. DOI: 10.1017/S0066154621000028Google Scholar
Powers, S.T. & Lehmann, L., 2014. An evolutionary model explaining the Neolithic transition from egalitarianism to leadership and despotism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1791), 20141349.Google ScholarPubMed
Price, T.D. & Bar-Yosef, O., 2010. Traces of inequality at the origins of agriculture in the ancient Near East, in Pathways to Power, eds. Price, T.D. & Feinman, G.M.. New York (NY): Springer, 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollefson, G.O., 2002. Ritual and social structure at Neolithic ‘Ain Ghazal, in Life in Neolithic Farming Communities, ed. Kuijt, I.. Boston (MA): Springer, 165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstock, E., Anvari, J., Franz, I., Orton, D., Ostaptchouk, S., Stroud, E. & Biehl, P.F., 2019. The transition between the East and West Mounds at Çatalhöyük around 6000 cal BC: a view from the west, in Concluding the Neolithic: The Near East in the second half of the seventh millennium BCE, ed. Marciniak, A.. Atlanta (GA): Lockwood Press, 163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, N. & Meece, S., 2006. Animal representations and animal remains at Çatalhöyük, in Çatalhöyük Perspectives: Themes from the 1994–1999 seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: British Institute at Ankara/McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 209–30.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M.D., 1961. The segmentary lineage: an organization of predatory expansion. American Anthropologist 63(2), 322–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southall, A., 1988. The segmentary state in Africa and Asia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 30(1), 52–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stordeur, D., 2015. Le Village de Jerf el Ahmar. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Tsoraki, C., 2021. The ground stone technologies at Neolithic Çatalhöyük: issues of production, use and deposition, in The Matter of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons, ed. Hodder, I. London: British Institute at Ankara, 309–70.Google Scholar
Twiss, K.C., Bogaard, A., Bogdan, D., et al. , 2008. Arson or accident? The burning of a Neolithic house at Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Journal of Field Archaeology 33(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twiss, K.C., Wolfhagen, J., Demirergi, G.A. & Mulville, J.A., 2021. Macromammals of Çatalhöyük: new practices and durable traditions, in Peopling the Landscape of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. London: British Institute at Ankara, 145–80.Google Scholar
Vasić, M., Knüsel, C.J. & Haddow, S.D., 2021. Funerary practices II: burial associations, in Peopling the Landscape of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. London: British Institute at Ankara, 357–94.Google Scholar
Wason, P.K., 2004. The Archaeology of Rank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, T., 2005. Ritual centers for socio-cultural networks. Neo-Lithics 2(05), 47–9.Google Scholar
Wengrow, D. & Graeber, D., 2015. Farewell to the ‘childhood of man’: ritual, seasonality, and the origins of inequality. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 21(3), 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfhagen, J., 2019. Rethinking Human-Cattle Interactions at Çatalhöyük (Turkey) through Bayesian Analysis of Cattle Biometry and Behaviour. PhD thesis, Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
Wolfhagen, J., Twiss, K.C., Mulville, J.A. & Demirergi, G.A., 2021. Examining caprine management and cattle domestication through biometric analyses at Çatalhöyük East (North and South Areas), in Peopling the Landscape of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2009–2017 Seasons, ed. Hodder, I. London: British Institute at Ankara, 181–98.Google Scholar
Yaka, R., 2021. Variable kinship patterns in Neolithic Anatolia revealed by ancient genomes. Current Biology 31, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yartah, T., 2004. Tell ‘Abr 3, un village du néolithique précéramique (PPNA) sur le Moyen Euphrate. Première approche. Paléorient 30(2), 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeder, M.A., 2006. Central questions in the domestication of plants and animals. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 15(3), 105–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar