Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:02:18.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

No Big Brother Here: Heterarchy, Shona Political Succession and the Relationship between Great Zimbabwe and Khami, Southern Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2017

Shadreck Chirikure
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cape Town Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa Email: [email protected]
Tawanda Mukwende
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cape Town Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa Email: [email protected]
Abigail J. Moffett
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cape Town Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa Email: [email protected]
Robert T. Nyamushosho
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cape Town Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa Email: [email protected]
Foreman Bandama
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cape Town Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa Email: [email protected]
Michelle House
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cape Town Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa Email: [email protected]

Abstract

In southern Africa, there has been a long-standing but unsubstantiated assumption that the site of Khami evolved out of Great Zimbabwe's demise around ad 1450. The study of local ceramics from the two sites indicate that the respective ceramic traditions are clearly different across the entire sequence, pointing towards different cultural affiliations in their origins. Furthermore, there are tangible typological differences between and within their related dry-stone architecture. Finally, absolute and relative chronologies of the two sites suggest that Khami flourished as a major centre from the late fourteenth/early fifteenth century, long before Great Zimbabwe's decline. Great Zimbabwe also continued to be occupied into the late seventeenth and perhaps eighteenth centuries, after the decline of Khami. Consequently, the combined significance of these observations contradicts the parent-offspring relationship implied in traditional frameworks. Instead, as chronologically overlapping entities, the relationship between Khami and Great Zimbabwe, was heterarchical. However, within the individual polities, malleable hierarchies of control and situational heterarchies were a common feature. This is in tune with historically documented political relations in related pre-colonial southern Zambezian states, and motivates for contextual approaches to imagining power relations in pre-colonial African contexts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, D.P., 1959. The Monomotapa dynasty. NADA 36, 5884.Google Scholar
Beach, D.N., 1980. The Shona and Zimbabwe 900–1850: An outline of Shona history. Gwelo: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
Beach, D.N., 1994. The Shona and their Neighbours. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Beach, D.N., 1994. Zimbabwe before 1900. Gwelo: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
Beach, D.N., 1998. Cognitive archaeology and the imaginary history of Great Zimbabwe. Current Anthropology, 39, 4772.Google Scholar
Caton-Thompson, G., 1931. The Zimbabwe Culture: Ruins and reactions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chimhundu, H. 1992. Early missionaries and the ethnolinguistic factor during the ‘invention of tribalism’ in Zimbabwe. Journal of African History 33 (1), 87109.Google Scholar
Chimhundu, H. & Mangoya, E., 2001. Duramazwi guru reChiShona [The General Shona Dictionary]. Harare: College Press in conjunction with the African Languages Research Institute, University of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Chipunza, K.T., 1994. A Diachronic Analysis of the Architecture of the Hill Complex at Great Zimbabwe. Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Chirikure, S., Bandama, F., Chipunza, K., Mahachi, G., Matenga, E., Mupira, P. & Ndoro, W., 2016b. Seen but not told: re-mapping Great Zimbabwe using archival data, satellite imagery and geographical information systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 24 (2), 489513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirikure, S., Bandama, F., House, M., Moffett, A., Mukwende, T. & Pollard, M., 2016a. Decisive evidence for multidirectional evolution of sociopolitical complexity in Southern Africa. African Archaeological Review 33 (1): 7595.Google Scholar
Chirikure, S., Bandama, F., Moffett, A.J., House, M., Nyamushosho, R.T. & Manyanga, M., 2016c. Excavation of the Unwalled Settlements at Great Zimbabwe. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Chirikure, S., Manyanga, M., Pikirayi, I. & Pollard, M., 2013a. New pathways of socio-political complexity in southern Africa. African Archaeological Review 30, 339–66.Google Scholar
Chirikure, S., Manyanga, M. & Pollard, M., 2012. When science alone is not enough: radiocarbon timescales, history, ethnography and elite settlements in southern Africa. Journal of Social Archaeology 12 (3), 356–79.Google Scholar
Chirikure, S., Manyanga, M., Pollard, A.M., Bandama, F., Mahachi, G. & Pikirayi, I., 2014. Zimbabwe Culture before Mapungubwe: new evidence from Mapela Hill, south-western Zimbabwe. PLoS ONE 9 (10), e111224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111224Google Scholar
Chirikure, S. & Pikirayi, I. 2008. Inside and outside the dry-stone walls: revisiting the material culture of Great Zimbabwe. Antiquity 82, 976–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirikure, S., Pikirayi, I. & Pwiti, G., 2001. A comparative study of Khami pottery, Zimbabwe, in People, Contacts and the Environments in the African Past, eds. Chami, F. & Pwiti, G.. (Studies in the African Past 1.) Dar es Salaam: Dar es Salaam University Press, 106–31.Google Scholar
Chirikure, S., Pollard, M., Manyanga, M. & Bandama, F., 2013b. A Bayesian chronology for Great Zimbabwe: re-threading the sequence of a vandalised monument. Antiquity 87, 854–72.Google Scholar
Collett, D., Vines, A. & Hughes, G., 1992. The chronology of the Valley Enclosures: implications for the interpretation of Great Zimbabwe. The African Archaeological Review 10, 139–61.Google Scholar
Crumley, C.L., 1995. Heterarchy and the analysis of complex societies, in Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, eds. Ehrenreich, R.M., Crumley, C.L. & Levy, J.E.. (Archeological Papers 6.) Washington (DC): American Anthropological Association, 16.Google Scholar
Davies, M.I., 2009. Wittfogel's dilemma: heterarchy and ethnographic approaches to irrigation management in Eastern Africa and Mesopotamia. World Archaeology 41 (1), 1635.Google Scholar
Davies, M.I., 2013. The archaeology of clan- and lineage-based societies in Africa, in The Oxford Handbook of African Archaeology, eds. Mitchell, P. & Lane, P.J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Denbow, J., Smith, J., Ndobochani, N.M., Atwood, K. & Miller, D., 2008. Archaeological excavations at Bosutswe, Botswana: cultural chronology, paleo-ecology and economy. Journal of Archaeological Science 35, 459–80.Google Scholar
Gardner, G.A., 1963. Mapungubwe, Vol. II. Pretoria: J.L. Van Schaik.Google Scholar
Garlake, P.S., 1968. The value of imported ceramics in the dating and interpretation of the Rhodesian Iron Age. The Journal of African History 9 (1), 1333.Google Scholar
Garlake, P.S., 1970. Rhodesian ruins – a preliminary assessment of their styles and chronology. Journal of African History 11 (4), 495513.Google Scholar
Garlake, P.S., 1973. Great Zimbabwe. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Hannan, M., 1959. Standard Shona Dictionary. Harare: College Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, H., 2009. Mapping conflict: heterarchy and accountability in the ancient capital of Buganda. Journal of African History, 50 (2), 179202.Google Scholar
Hogg, A.G., Hua, Q., Blackwell, P.G., et al. 2013. SHCal13 Southern Hemisphere calibration, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55 (4), 1889–903.Google Scholar
Holleman, J., 1952. Shona Customary Law with Reference to Kinship, Family and Estate. London: Butler & Turner.Google Scholar
Howard, A.M., 2005. Nodes, networks, landscapes, and regions: reading the social history of tropical Africa, 1700–1920, eds. Howard, A.M. & Shain, R.M.. The Spatial Factor in African History: The relationship of the social, material, and perceptual (African Social Studies 8.) Leiden/Boston: Brill, 103–30.Google Scholar
Huffman, T.N., 1981. Snakes and birds: expressive space at Great Zimbabwe. African Studies 40, 131–50.Google Scholar
Huffman, T.N., 1982. Archaeology and ethnohistory of the African Iron Age. Annual Review of Anthropology 11, 133–50.Google Scholar
Huffman, T.N., 1996. Snakes and Crocodiles: Power and symbolism in ancient Zimbabwe. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, T.N., 2000. Mapungubwe and the origins of the Zimbabwe Culture. South African Archaeological Society Goodwin Series 8, 1429.Google Scholar
Huffman, T.N., 2007. Handbook to the Iron Age: The archaeology of pre-colonial farming societies in Southern Africa. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, T.N., 2015. Mapela, Mapungubwe and the origins of states in southern Africa. South African Archaeological Bulletin 70 (201), 1527.Google Scholar
Huffman, T.N. & Vogel, J.C., 1991. The chronology of Great Zimbabwe. South African Archaeological Bulletin 46 (154), 6170.Google Scholar
Hughes, G., 1997. Excavations from the peripheral area of settlement of Khami. Zimbabwea 5, 321.Google Scholar
Lan, D., 1987. Guns and Rain: Guerrillas and spirit mediums in Zimbabwe. London: James Curry.Google Scholar
Lane, P.J., 1994/5. The use and abuse of ethnography in the study of the southern African Iron Age. Azania, 29/30, 5164.Google Scholar
Lane, P.J., 2005. Barbarous tribes and unrewarding gyrations? The changing role of ethnographic imagination, in African Archaeology. A critical introduction ed. Stahl, A.B.. London: Blackwell, 2454.Google Scholar
McIntosh, R.J., 2005. Ancient Middle Niger: Urbanism and the self-organizing landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McIntosh, S.K. (ed.), 1999a. Beyond Chiefdoms: Pathways to complexity in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McIntosh, S.K., 1999b. Pathways to complexity: an African perspective, in Beyond Chiefdoms: Pathways to complexity in Africa, (ed.) McIntosh, S.K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 130.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. 2002. The Archaeology of Southern Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mudenge, S.I., 1974. The role of foreign trade in the Rozvi Empire. A reappraisal. Journal of African History 15 (3), 373–91.Google Scholar
Mudenge, S.I., 1988. A Political History of Munhumutapa. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.Google Scholar
Mukwende, T., 2016. An Archaeological Study of the Zimbabwe Culture Capital of Khami, South-western Zimbabwe. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Ndoro, W. 2005. The Preservation of Great Zimbabwe: Your monument our shrine. Rome: ICCROM.Google Scholar
Pikirayi, I., 1993. The Archaeological Identity of the Mutapa State: Towards an historical archaeology of northern Zimbabwe. (Studies in African Archaeology 6.) Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Pikirayi, I., 2001. The Zimbabwe Culture: Origins and decline in Southern Zambesian states in Southern Africa. Walnut Creek (CA): Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Pikirayi, I., 2007. Ceramics and group identity: towards a social archaeology in southern African Iron Age ceramic studies. Journal of Social Archaeology 7 (3), 286301.Google Scholar
Pikirayi, I., 2013. Stone architecture and the development of power in the Zimbabwe tradition ad 1270–1830. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa 2, 282300.Google Scholar
Pwiti, G., 1996. Peasants, chiefs and kings: a model of the development of cultural complexity in northern Zimbabwe. Zambezia 23, 3152.Google Scholar
Randall-MacIver, D.R., 1906. Medieval Rhodesia. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robertshaw, P., Wood, M., Melchiorre, E., Popelka-Filcoff, R.S. & Glascock, M.D., 2010. Southern African glass beads: chemistry, glass sources and patterns of trade. Journal of Archaeological Science 37, 1898–912.Google Scholar
Robinson, K.R., 1959. Khami Ruins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, K., 1961a. Excavations on the Acropolis Hill, in Zimbabwe Excavations, 1958, eds. Summers, R., Robinson, K.R. & Whitty, A.. (Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia 3(23a).) Bulawayo: National Museums of Southern Rhodesia, 159–92.Google Scholar
Robinson, K., 1961b. Zimbabwe pottery, in Zimbabwe Excavations, 1958, eds. Summers, R., Robinson, K.R. & Whitty, A.. (Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia 3(23a).) Bulawayo: National Museums of Southern Rhodesia, 193226.Google Scholar
Robinson, K., 1961c. Zimbabwe beads, in Zimbabwe Excavations, 1958, eds. Summers, R., Robinson, K.R. & Whitty, A.. (Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia 3(23a).) Bulawayo: National Museums of Southern Rhodesia, 227–9.Google Scholar
Robinson, K.R., 1965. The Leopard's Kopje culture: a preliminary report on recent work. Arnoldia, 25, 17.Google Scholar
Robinson, K.R., 1985. Dated Iron Age sites from the Upper Umguza valley 1982: their possible implications. South African Archaeological Bulletin 43, 4952.Google Scholar
Sinclair, P.J., Pikirayi, I., Pwiti, G. & Soper, R., 1993. Urban trajectories on the Zimbabwe plateau, in The Archaeology of Africa: Food, metals and towns, eds. Shaw, T., Sinclair, P.J., Andah, B. & Okpoko, A.. London: Routledge, 705–31.Google Scholar
Summers, R., Robinson, K.R. & Whitty, A., 1961. Zimbabwe Excavations, 1958. (Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Southern Rhodesia 3(23a).) Bulawayo: National Museums of Southern Rhodesia.Google Scholar
Thorp, C., 1995. Kings, Commoners and Cattle at Zimbabwe Tradition Sites. (Museum Memoir (n.s.) 1.) Harare: National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
van Waarden, C., 2011. The origin of the Zimbabwe Tradition walling. Zimbabwean Prehistory 29, 5477.Google Scholar
van Waarden, C., 2012. Butua and the End of an Era: The effect of the collapse of the Kalanga state on ordinary citizens: An analysis of behaviour under stress. (BAR International series 2420.) Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Vansina, J., [1965]1996. Oral tradition and historical methodology, reprinted in Oral History. An interdisciplinary anthology, eds. Dunaway, D.K. & Baum, W.K.. Walnut Creek (CA): Altamira, 121–5.Google Scholar
Weinrich, A.K.H., 1971. Chiefs and Councils in Rhodesia. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Whitty, A., 1961. Architectural style at Great Zimbabwe, in Zimbabwe Excavations, 1958, eds. Summers, R., Robinson, K.R. & Whitty, A.. (Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia 3(23a).) Bulawayo: National Museums of Southern Rhodesia, 289305.Google Scholar
Wood, M., 2005. Glass Beads and Pre-European Trade in the Shashe-Limpopo Region. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
Wood, M., 2011. A glass bead sequence for southern Africa from the 8th to the 16th century AD. Journal of African Archaeology 9 (1), 6784.Google Scholar