Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T14:43:31.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mesarites as a source: then and now

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2016

Michael Angold
Michael Angold*
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I am guessing, but I suspect that Bryer's first introduction to Nicholas Mesarites was like mine through a very short article by A. A. Vasiliev, entitled ‘Mesarites as a source’,1 which was a footnote to his much more substantial ‘The foundation of the Empire of Trebizond’,2 which dominated the field for years. Vasiliev was responding to a criticism by Franz Dölger, who suggested that Vasiliev might have benefited from a perusal of the works of Nicholas Mesarites, which had been edited by his old master August Heisenberg.3 Vasiliev was adamant Nicholas Mesarites had little to contribute to the early history of the Empire of Trebizond. In his opinion, the Seljuq inscription from the walls of Sinope, which Heisenberg included in his commentary, was far more valuable than anything that could be gleaned from Mesarites’ writings. This rather explains why they remained a neglected source.

Type
Articles
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , April 2016 , pp. 55 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vasiliev, A.A., ‘Mesarites as a source’, Speculum 13(1938) 180–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Vasiliev, A.A., ‘The foundation of the Empire of Trebizond (1204–1222)’, Speculum 11(1936) 3–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Dölger, F., ‘August Heisenberg’, in Chalikes: Festgabe für die Teilnehmer am XI. Internationalen Byzantinistenkongreß, ed. Beck, H.-G. (Freising, 1958) 137–59Google Scholar.

4 Bryer, A.A.M., ‘David Komnenos and Saint Eleutherios’, Ἀρχεῖον Πόντου 42 (1988-1989) 163–87Google Scholar.

5 Macrides, R., ‘What's in the name “Megas Komnenos”?’, Ἀρχεῖον Πόντου 35 (1978) 238–41Google Scholar.

6 Korobeinikov, D., Byzantium and the Turks in the Thirteenth Century (Oxford 2014) 150CrossRefGoogle Scholar note 249.

7 K. Varzos, Ἡ Γενεαλογία τῶν Κομνηνῶν [Βυζαντινὰ κείμενα καὶ μελέται, 20α] (Thessalonike 1984) II, 526.

8 Georgii Acropolitae Opera, ed. A. Heisenberg and P. Wirth (Stuttgart 1978) I, §11, 18; trans. R. Macrides, George Akropolites the History (Oxford 2007) 132.

9 Macrides, Akropolites, 39–41, 134.

10 Shukurov, R., ‘The enigma of David Grand Komnenos’, Mésogeios, 12 (2001) 125–36Google Scholar.

11 Booth, I. L., ‘Theodore Laskaris and Paphlagonia, 1204–1214: towards a chronological description’, Ἀρχεῖον Πόντου 50 (2003–2004) 201–207Google Scholar, esp. 205.

12 Korobeinikov, Byzantium and the Turks, 150–51.

13 Prinzing, G., ‘Der Brief Kaiser Heinrichs von Konstantinopel vom 13. Januar 1212’, Byzantion 43 (1973) 414–16Google Scholar.

14 A. Heisenberg, ‘Neue Quellen zur Geschichte des lateinischen Kaisertums und der Kirchenunion: III. Der Bericht des Nikolaos Mesarites über die politischen und kirchlichen Ereignisse des Jahres 1214’, Sitzungsberichte der bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philos.-philol und hist. Kl., 1923 Abh. 3 (Munich 1923) [repr. in Heisenberg, A., Quellen und Studien zur spätbyzantinischen Geschichte (London 1973)Google Scholar II, 9.5–8 (hereafter, Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites II’).

15 Akropolites, ed. Heisenberg/Wirth, 292 = Additamenta.

16 Akropolites, ed. Heisenberg, I, §10, 16–17, at 17; trans. Macrides, 131.

17 Angold, M. J., ‘Byzantine ‘Nationalism’ and the Nicaean empire’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 1(1975) 49–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Kaldellis, A., Hellenism in Byzantium: The Transformation of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition (Cambridge 2007) 354–58Google Scholar.

19 A. Heisenberg, ‘Neue Quellen zur Geschichte des lateinischen Kaisertums and der Kirchenunion I. Der Epitaphios des Nikolaos Mesarites auf seinen Bruder Johannes’, Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philos.–philol. and hist. Kl. 1922 (Munich 1923) 3–75. here at 62.?23–32 (hereafter, Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites I’).

20 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites I’, 25.24–29.

21 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites I’, 27.30–31.

22 Heisenberg, A., Nikolaos Mesarites: die Palastrevolution des Johannes Komnenos (Würzburg 1907)Google Scholar §12–14, 29–32.

23 Magdalino, P., ‘L’église du Phare et les reliques de la Passion à Constantinople (viie/viiie-xiiie siècles)’, in Durand, J. and Flusin, B. (eds), Byzance et les reliques de Christ (Paris 2004) 15–30Google Scholar; Lidov, A., ‘The imperial Pharos chapel as the Holy Sepulchre’, in Hoffmann, A. and Wolf, G. (eds), Jerusalem as Narrative Space (Leiden and Boston 2012) 63–103Google Scholar. Cf. Patlagean, E., ‘La double terre sainte de Byzance. Autour du XIIe siècle’, Annales ESC 49/2 (1994) 459-69Google Scholar.

24 Most recently, Cohen, M., The Sainte-Chapelle and the Construction of Sacral Monarchy: Royal Architecture in thirteenth-century Paris (Cambridge 2014) 115–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites I’, 46.1–2.

26 J. M. Hoeck and R. J. Loenertz, Nikolaos-Nektarios von Otranto, Abt von Casole: Beiträge zur Geschichte der ost-westlichen Beziehungen unter Innozenz III. und Friedrich II. [Studia Patristica et Byzantina, 11] (Ettal1965) 39 and notes 50–51.

27 See Perry, D. M., Sacred Plunder: Venice and the Aftermath of the Fourth Crusade (University Park PA 2015) 34–37Google Scholar, 88–90. Perry challenges the long-held view that this was an official title accorded to Bishop Garnier on the grounds that there was no systematic collection of relics in the aftermath of the conquest of Constantinople, which is as may be. The title does not indicate general responsibility for relics, but specific responsibility for the relics of the passion, which will have been of great concern to the crusader leadership.

28 Galatariotou, C., ‘Travel and perception in Byzantium’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 47 (1993) 225–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites II’, 35–46.

30 This is contained in Cod. Ambros. Gr. F 96 sup. f.182r-f.193v.

31 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites II’, 43–46. This is contained in Cod. Ambros. Gr. F96 sup. f.139r-f.139v. On the manuscript tradition see Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites II’, 9–10.

32 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites II’, 35.13–16, though it comes first in the printed edition.

33 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites II’, 43.23–31.

34 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites II’, 45.4–25.

35 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites II’, 35.17–25.

36 Mullett, M. E., ‘In peril on the sea: travel genres and the unexpected’, in Travel in the Byzantine World, ed. Macrides, R. (Aldershot and Burlington VT 2002) 259–84Google Scholar.

37 Mullett, ‘Travel genres’, 278.

38 Mullett, ‘Travel genres’, 281.

39 Mullett’ ‘Travel genres’, 283.

40 Mullett, ‘Travel genres’, 284.

41 I. Giarenis, ‘Προσλήψεις τῆς ἀρχαιότητας στὸ ἔργο τοῦ Νικολάου Μεσαρίτη’, in G. Xanthaki-Karamanou (ed.), The Reception of Antiquity with emphasis on the Palaeologan Era [Research Institute of Byzantine Culture, 1] (Athens 2014) 79–106.

42 G. Downey, ‘Nikolaos Mesarites: Description of the Church of the Holy Apostles at Constantinople’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s. 47(1957) 862–3; Giarenis, art. cit., 83–85.

43 Giarenis, art. cit., 85.

44 Giarenis, art. cit., 87–89.

45 Giarenis, art. cit., 90.

46 Downey, ‘Holy Apostles’, 865–67, 899–900.

47 Downey, ‘Holy Apostles’, 894–96, 916–17.

48 Heisenberg, A., ‘Neue Quellen zur Geschichte des lateinischen Kaisertums und der Kirchenunion III Der Bericht des Nikolaos Mesarites über die politischen und kirchlichen Ereignisse des Jahres 1214’, Sitzungs- berichte der bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philos. – philol. und hist. Kl. 1923 (Munich 1923) 3–96Google Scholar, here at 21.9–12 (hereafter Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites III’).

49 Browning, R., ‘Il codice marciano gr. XI.31 e la schedografia bizantina’, Medioevo e Umanesimo 24 (1976) 21–34;Google ScholarAgapitos, P. A., ‘Grammar, genre and patronage in the twelfth century: a scientific paradigm and its implications’, Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 64 (2014) 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; P. Agapitos, ‘Anna Komnene and the politics of schedographic training and colloquial discourse’, Νέα ῾Ρώμη 10 (2013 [2014]) 89–107; Agapitos, P., ‘New genres in the twelfth century: the schedourgia of Theodore Prodromos’, Medioevo Greco 15 (2015) 1–41Google Scholar.

50 Garzya, A., ‘Une rédaction byzantine du mythe de Pasiphaë’, Le parole e le idee 9 (1967) 222–26Google Scholar.

51 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites I’, 24.1–16; 28.30–31.

52 E.g. L'Huillier, P., ‘La nature des relations ecclésiastiques greco-latines après la prise de Constantinople par les croisés’, Akten des XI. Internationalen Byzantinisten-Kongresses München (Munich 1960) 312–20Google Scholar.

53 Hoeck and Loenertz, Nikolaos-Nektarios von Otranto, 43.

54 Spiteris, G., ‘I dialoghi di Nicolas Mesarites coi Latini: opera storica o finzione letteraria?’, in Collectanea Byzantina [Orientalia Christiana Analecta, 204] (Rome 1977)Google Scholar 181–86.

55 Cataldi Palau, A., ‘ L’ Arsenale Sacro di Andronico Camatero. Il proemio ed il dialogo dell'imperatore con I cardinali latin: original, imitazioni, arrangiamenti’, Revue des Études Byzantines 51(1993) 33–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites III’, 29–32.

57 Heisenberg, ‘Mesarites III’, 13.28, 17.20.

58 Cataldi Palau, L'Arsenale Sacro’, 36–49.

59 Kazhdan, A. P., ‘Nikifor Hrisoverg i Nikolaj Mesarit: Opyt sravnitel'noj harakteristiki’, Vizantiiskii Vremennik 30 (1969) 94–112Google Scholar.

60 Kazhdan, A. (with S. Franklin), Studies on Byzantine Literature of the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries (Cambridge 1984) 224–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Kazhdan, Studies, 242.

62 Kazhdan, Studies, 251.

63 Kazhdan, Studies, 253.

64 Kazhdan, Studies, 254.

65 Kazhdan, Studies, 254.

66 Heisenberg, A., Grabeskirche und Apostelkirche (Leipzig 1908)Google Scholar 2 vols.

67 Downey, G., ‘Nikolaos Mesarites: Description of the Church of the Holy Apostles at Constantinople’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s. 47.6 (1957) 853–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 James, L., Constantine of Rhodes, On Constantinople and the Church of the Holy Apostles (Farnham and Burlington VT 2012Google Scholar)

69 Krautheimer, R., Early Christian, Medieval and Renaissance Art (London and New York 1969) 197–201.Google Scholar

70 Kitzinger, E., ‘Byzantine and medieval mosaics after Justinian’, in Encyclopaedia of World Art, 10 (London and New York 1965) 344Google Scholar.

71 Malickij, N., ‘Remarques sur la date des mosaïques de l’église des Saints-Apôtres à Constantinople décrites par Mesaritès’, Byzantion 3 (1926) 125–51Google Scholar.

72 Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium sub Eulalios; C. Mango, The Art of the Byzantine Empire 312–1453 (Toronto 1986) 229–33.

73 Downey, ‘Holy Apostles’, 910 note 17.

74 Demus, O., ‘“The Sleepless Watcher”: ein Erklärungsversuch’, Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 28 (1979) 241–45Google Scholar.

75 Kalopissi-Verti, S., ‘Painters’ portraits in Byzantine art’, Δελτίον τῆς Χριστιανικῆς Ἀρχαιολογικῆς Ἑταιρείας 17 (1993–1994) 129–42Google Scholar, at 142.

76 Epstein, A. W., ‘The rebuilding and redecoration of the Holy Apostles in Constantinople: a reconsideration’, Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies 23 (1982) 79–92Google Scholar.

77 Epstein, ‘The rebuilding and redecoration of the Holy Apostles’, 89.

78 For a very different interpretation, see B. Daskas, ‘A literary self-portrait of Nikolaos Mesarites’, in this issue.

79 James, L. and Webb, R., ‘ “To understand ultimate things and enter secret places”: ekphrasis and art in Byzantium’, Art History 14 (1991) 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Webb, R., ‘The aesthetics of sacred space: narrative, metaphor and motion in Ekphraseis of church buildings’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 53 (1999) 59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 James and Webb, ‘Ekphrasis and art’, 1–2.

81 James and Webb, ‘Ekphrasis and art’, 11–12.

82 L. James, Constantine of Rhodes, 216.

83 Kazhdan, A. P. and Epstein, A.W., Change in Byzantine Culture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries (Berkeley and Los Angeles 1985) 224Google Scholar.

84 Jenkins, R., ‘The Hellenistic origins of Byzantine literature’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 17 (1963) 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.