Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T01:16:58.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding and Overcoming Roadblocks to Environmental Sustainability: Past Roads and Future Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2019

Ann-Kristin Bergquist ,
Shawn A. Cole ,
John Ehrenfeld ,
Andrew A. King  and
Auden Schendler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines key barriers to business sustainability discussed at a multidisciplinary conference held at the Harvard Business School in 2018. Drawing on perspectives from both the historical and business literatures, speakers debated the historical success of and future opportunities for voluntary business actions to advance sustainability. Roadblocks include misaligned incentives, missing institutions, inertia of economic systems, and the concept of sustainability itself. Overcoming these roadblocks will require systematic interventions and alternative normative concepts.

Keywords

environmentsustainabilityexternalitiesbusiness voluntary actionclimate changesystematic interventions
Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 93 , Issue 1: Business and the Environment Revisited , Spring 2019 , pp. 127 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank the Division of Research and Faculty Development at the Harvard Business School for funding the conference “Understanding and Overcoming the Roadblocks to Sustainability,” June 14, 2018. The conference organizers were Ann-Kristin Bergquist, Amy Edmondson, and Geoffrey Jones.

References

1 One well-known court case concerning industrial smoke pollution played out as early as 1770 against the English Macclesfield Copper Company. See Newell, Edmond, “Atmospheric Pollution and the British Copper Industry, 1690–1920,” Technology and Culture 38, no. 3 (1997): 663CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. See also Brimblecombe, Peter, “Air Pollution in Industrializing England,” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 28, no. 2 (1978): 115–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Rosen, Christine Meisner and Sellers, Christopher C., “The Nature of the Firm: Towards an Ecocultural History of Business,” Business History Review 73, no. 4 (1999): 577–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosen, Christine Meisner, “Businessmen against Pollution in Late Nineteenth Century Chicago,” Business History Review 69, no. 3 (1995): 351–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosen, Christine Meisner, “The Role of Pollution Regulation and Litigation in the Development of the U.S. Meat Packing Industry,” Enterprise & Society 8, no. 2 (2007): 297–len CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Uekötter, Frank, “Divergent Responses to Identical Problems: Businessmen and the Smoke Nuisance in Germany and the United States, 1880–1917,” Business History Review 73, no. 4 (1999): 641–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Uekötter, Frank, The Age of Smoke: Environmental Policy in Germany and the United States, 1880–1970 (Pittsburgh, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gorman, Hugh S., Redefining Efficiency: Pollution Concerns, Regulatory Mechanisms, and Technological Change in the U.S. Petroleum Industry (Akron, OH, 2001)Google Scholar. For a recent review of literature, see Ann-Kristin Bergquist, “Business and Sustainability,” in Routledge Companion to the Makers of Global Business, ed. Teresa Da Silva Lopes, Christina Lubinski, and Heidi J. S. Tworek (forthcoming).

3 Pearce, David, “An Intellectual History of Environmental Economics,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 27, no. 1 (2002): 57–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Andrews, Richard N. L., Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves: A History of American Environmental Policy, 2nd ed. (New Haven and London, 2006)Google Scholar; Andersen, Mikael Skou and Lifferink, Duncan, European Environmental Policy: The Pioneers (Manchester and New York, 1997)Google Scholar.

5 Vogel, David, National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States (Ithaca, 1986)Google Scholar.

6 Porter, Michael. E. and van der Linde, Claas, “Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate,” Harvard Business Review 73, no. 5 (1995): 120–34Google Scholar; Porter, Michael. E. and van der Linde, Claas, “Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, no. 4 (1995): 97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar; von Weiszäcker, Ernst, Lovins, Amory B., and Lovins, L. Hunter, Factor Four: Doubling Wealth – Halving Resource Use (London, 1997)Google Scholar; Lovins, Amory B., Blumstein, Carl, Harris, Jeffrey, and Miller, Peter M., “The Cost of Energy Efficiency,” Science 261, no. 5124 (1993): 969–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Hart, Stuart L., Capitalism at the Crossroads: The Unlimited Business Opportunities in Solving the World's Most Difficult Problems (Philadelphia, 2005)Google Scholar; Hart, Stuart L., “A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm,” Academy of Management Review 20, no. 4 (1995): 986–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 For historical overviews, see Jones, Geoffrey, Profits and Sustainability (Oxford, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, part 2; Berghoff, Hartmut, “Shades of Green: A Business-History Perspective on Eco-Capitalism,” in Green Capitalism? Business and the Environment in the Twentieth Century, ed. Berghoff, Hartmut and Rome, Adam (Philadelphia, 2017), 13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Adam Rome, “The Ecology of Commerce: Environmental History and the Challenges of Building a Sustainable Economy,” in Berghoff and Rome, Green Capitalism?, 3–12.

8 Lyon, Thomas P., Delmas, Magali A., Maxwell, John W., Bansal, Pratima, Chiroleu-Assouline, Mireielle, Crifo, Patricia, Durand, Rodolphe, et al. , “CSR Needs CPR: Corporate Sustainability and Politics,” California Management Review 6, no. 4 (2018): 5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Pigou, Arthur C., The Economics of Welfare (London: 1932)Google Scholar.

10 Milton Friedman, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,” New York Times Magazine, 13 Sept. 1970. Friedman argued that business has only one social responsibility, which is to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game.

11 Lovins, Amory B., Soft Energy Paths: Towards a Durable Peace (San Francisco, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; von Weiszäcker, Lovins, and Lovins, Factor Four.

12 Hawken, Paul, The Ecology of Commerce: A Declaration of Sustainability (New York, 1993)Google Scholar. See Jones, Profits, 95–96, 180-97, 272-90.

13 Elkington, John, “Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development,” California Management Review 36, no. 2 (1994): 90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Elkington, John, “Enter the Triple Bottom Line” in The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up?, ed. Henriques, Adrian and Richardson, Julie (London, 2004), 1–16Google Scholar.

14 DeSimone, Livio D. and Popoff, Frank with World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Eco-efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development (Cambridge, MA, 1997)Google Scholar. The Business Council for Sustainable Development (BCSD) merged with the World Industry Council on the Environment (WICE) to form the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) in 1995. A global business association dealing with sustainability, WBCSD consists of leading companies such as Toyota, GE, Posco, Shell, BP, and Unilever. See Clapp, Jennifer and Dauvergne, Peter, Path to a Green World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment (London, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Corbett, Charles J. and Van Wassenhove, Luk N., “The Green Fee: Internalizing and Operationalizing Environmental Issues,” California Management Review 36, no. 1 (1993): 116–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ayres, Robert U., Toward Zero Emissions: Is There a Feasible Path? (Fontainebleau, France, 1997)Google Scholar.

16 Jones, Geoffrey, Varieties of Green Business: Industries, Nations and Time (Northampton, MA, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chap. 8.

17 Holliday, Charles O. Jr., Schmidheiny, Stephan, and Watts, Philip, Walking the Talk: The Business Case of Sustainable Development (Sheffield, 2002)Google Scholar.

18 King, Andrew A. and Lenox, Michael J., “Lean and Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Lean Production and Environmental Performance,” Production and Operations Management 10, no. 3 (2001): 244–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rothenberg, Sandra, Pil, Frits K., and Maxwell, James, “Lean, Green, and the Quest for Superior Environmental Performance,” Production and Operations Management 10, no. 3 (2001): 228–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Womack, James P., Jones, Daniel T., and Roos, Daniel, The Machine That Changed the World: How Japan's Secret Weapon in the Global Auto Wars Will Revolutionize Western Industry, 1st HarperPerennial ed. (New York, 1991)Google Scholar.

20 Ayres, Ian and Braithwaite, John, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (New York and Oxford, 1995)Google Scholar.

21 McWilliams, Abagail and Siegel, Donald S., “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?,” Strategic Management Journal 21, no. 5 (2000): 603–93.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McWilliams, Abagail and Siegel, Donald, “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective,” Academy of Management Review 26, no. 1 (2001): 117–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Palmer, Karen, Oates, Wallace E., and Portney, Paul R., “Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, no. 4 (1995): 119–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; King, Andrew A. and Lenox, Michael, “Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction,” Management Science 48, no. 2 (2002): 289–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Herdman, Roger C., Industry, Technology, and the Environment: Competitive Challenges and Business Opportunities (Washington, DC, 1994)Google Scholar.

24 King, Andrew A., “Innovation from Differentiation: Pollution Control Departments and Innovation in the Printed Circuit Industry,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 42, no. 3 (1995): 270–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 DeCanio, Stephen J. and Lee, Kai, “Doing Well by Doing Good: Technology Transfer to Protect the Ozone,” Policy Studies Journal 19, no. 2 (1991): 140–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Höglund-Isaksson, Lena, “Abatement Costs in Response to the Swedish Charge on Nitrogen Oxide Emissions,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50, no. 1 (2005): 102–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Porter and van der Linde, “Environment-Competitiveness Relationship.”

28 Uekötter, Age of Smoke, 49.

29 Uekötter, Age of Smoke, 7. See also Stradling, David, Smokestacks and Progressives: Environmentalists, Engineers and Air Quality in America, 1881–1951 (Baltimore, 1999)Google Scholar, chap. 6.

30 Hayes, Samuel P., Conservation and Gospel of Efficiency (Cambridge, MA, 1959)Google Scholar; Miller, Char, Gifford Pinchot and the Making of Modern Environmentalism (Washington, DC, 2009)Google Scholar.

31 Gorman, Hugh, “Efficiency, Environmental Quality and Oil Field Brines: The Success and Failure of Pollution Control by Self-Regulation,” Business History Review 73, no. 4 (1999): 603CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Bergquist, Ann-Kristin and Lindmark, Magnus, “Sustainability and Shared Value in the Interwar Swedish Copper Industry,” Business History Review 90, no. 2 (2016): 197–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Examples of profitable by-products include sulfuric acid, fertilizers, pesticides, and wood impregnates. See LeCain, Timothy J., “The Limits of ‘Eco-Efficiency’: Arsenic Pollution and the Cottrell Electrical Precipitator in the U.S. Copper Smelting Industry,” Environmental History 5, no 3. (2000): 341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; and LeCain, Timothy J., Mass Destruction: The Men and Giant Mines That Wired America and Scarred the Planet (New Brunswick, NJ, 2009)Google Scholar. See also Wlasiuk, Jonathan, Refining Nature: Standard Oil and the Limits of Efficiency (Pittsburgh, 2017)Google Scholar.

34 Gorman, “Efficiency.”

35 Jones, Profits.

36 The remainder of this article draws on the presentations given by the speakers at the conference.

37 Schendler, Auden, Getting Green Done: Hard Truths from the Front Lines of the Sustainability Revolution (New York, 2010)Google Scholar.

38 See, for example, Ann-Kristin Bergquist, “Dilemmas of Going Green: Environmental Strategies in the Swedish Mining Company Boliden, 1960–2005,” in Berghoff and Rome, Green Capitalism?, 117–47. Michael Lenox, Andrew King, and John Ehrenfeld have described a similar process in U.S. electronic companies. Lenox, Michael, King, Andrew A., and Ehrenfeld, John, “An Assessment of Design-for-Environment Practices in Leading US Electronics Firms,” Interfaces 30, no. 3 (2000): 83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Governmental regulations proved to be the most potent driver behind technological innovations and radical reductions of plant emissions in these industries. Legislative requirements, expressed in permits, urged firms to explore new technological options, to invest in costly R&D, and to develop new organizational capabilities, which resulted in solutions that typically, but not always, proved profitable over time. Bergquist conducts research focused foremost on the history of business and environmental policy.

40 See Adam Rome, “DuPont and the Limits of Corporate Environmentalism,” elsewhere in this special issue of Business History Review. Rome's research is focused on the history of environmental activism, business, and the environment.

41 Gorman conducts historical research analyzing the interaction of technological innovation, uses of the environment, and systems of governance.

42 Serafeim conducts research on measuring, driving, and communicating corporate performance and social impact. Among other assignments, he has been involved with several not-for-profit organizations including on the board of directors of the High Meadows Institute, the working group of the Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism, and the Standards Council of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB).

43 The European Union enforced the nonfinancial directive 2017, a law that requires large companies to disclose certain information on the way they operate and manage social and environmental issues. Serafeim noted that this affects U.S. firms operating in Europe, while the United States does not have equivalent legislation.

44 Elper Wood is the director of the International Sustainable Tourist Initiative at Harvard Chan School of Public Health and is the author of Sustainable Tourism on a Finite Planet (New York, 2018).

45 Spinak's current research ties the history of electrification in the rural United States to the evolution of twentieth-century American capitalism and alternative economic visions.

46 See Marten Boon, “A Climate of Change? The Oil Industry and Decarbonization in Historical Perspective,” in this issue. Boon currently studies the history of the oil industry and commodity trading.

47 Crawford has a background as chief technology officer and executive director, managing global R&D operations for multinational corporations in energy and chemical sectors, and currently teaches at Harvard Business School.

48 King conducts research on various topics related to business strategy and business and the natural environment. He is, among other things, a founder of the Alliance for Research on Corporate Sustainability (ARCS).

49 In doing so, Ehrenfeld echoed Wilfred Beckerman's argument that weak sustainability “offers nothing beyond traditional economic welfare maximization.” Beckerman, Wilfred, “‘Sustainable Development’: Is it a Useful Concept?,” Environmental Values 3, no. 3 (1994): 191–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Ehrenfeld, John and Hoffman, Andrew J., Flourishing: A Frank Conversation about Sustainability (Stanford, 2013)Google Scholar.

51 Scharmer chairs the MIT IDEAS program for cross-sector innovation that helps leaders from business, government, and civil society to innovate at the level of the whole system.

52 Scharmer, Otto C., Theory U: Leading from the Future as It Emerges (Cambridge, MA, 2007)Google Scholar.

53 See Scharmer, Otto C. and Kaufer, Katrin, Leading from the Emerging Future: From Ego-System to Eco-System Economies (San Francisco, 2013)Google Scholar.

54 By the early twenty-first century the planet was experiencing rising sea levels and glaciers were retreating worldwide. The rate of Antarctica ice loss tripled between 2012 and 2017. The levels of the dominant greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere continue to increase. According to NASA statistics, the sea level rose by approximately 80 mm between 1993 and 2017. “Vital Signs: Sea Level,” NASA Global Climate Change website, accessed 10 Jan. 2019, https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/.

55 Worster, Donald, The Wealth of Nature (New York and Oxford, 1994), 142Google Scholar.

56 Auden Schendler, “The Big Whiff: How Corporate America Missed the Climate Fix,” Green Biz, 25 Aug. 2017.

57 Jones, Profits.

58 Boulding, Kenneth, The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth (New York, 1966)Google Scholar.

59 Meadows, Donella H., Meadows, Dennis L., Randers, Jergen, and Behrens, William W., The Limits to Growth (New York, 1972)Google Scholar.

60 Pezzey, John C. V. and Toman, Michael A., The Economics of Sustainability (London, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas, The Entropy Law and the Economic Process (Cambridge, MA, 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas, “The Entropy Law and the Economic Problem,” in Valuing the Earth: Economics, Ecology, Ethics, ed. Daly, Herman E. and Townsend, Kenneth N. (Cambridge, MA, 1993)Google Scholar. See also Daly, Herman, “Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz,” Ecological Economics 22, no. 3 (1997): 261–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Daly, Herman E., Toward a Steady-State Economy, vol. 2 (San Francisco, 1973)Google Scholar.

63 Nordhaus, William D., The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World (New Haven, 2013)Google Scholar; Weitzman, Martin L., “On a World Climate Assembly and the Social Cost of Carbon,” Economica 84 (Oct. 2017): 559–86Google Scholar; Weitzman, Martin L., “Fat-Tailed Uncertainty in the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change,” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5, no 2 (2011): 275–92Google Scholar.

64 Rees, Joseph, “Self Regulation: An Effective Alternative to Direct Regulation by OSHA,” Policy Studies Journal 16, no. 3 (1988): 602–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rees, Joseph, “Development of Communitarian Regulation in the Chemical Industry,” Law and Policy 19, no. 4 (1997): 477–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vol. 1 (London, 1776)Google Scholar.

66 Thompson, Edward Palmer, Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture (New York, 1993)Google Scholar.

67 In 1713, the German chief mining official Hans Carl von Carlowitz introduced the concept of sustainability (Nachhaltigkeit) silviculture in his book Sylvicultura oecenomic. Carlowitz's basic question was how to achieve such conservation of timber to allow for continuous, steady, and sustained use which at the time was a serious issue in Europe. See Ulrich Grober, “Deep Roots – A Conceptual History of ‘Sustainable Development’ (Nachhaltigkeit)” (working paper, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Berlin, 2007); Hartmut Berghoff, “Shades of Green” in Berghoff and Rome, Green Capitalism?, 13–32, 18.

68 Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge, UK, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Ingram, Paul and Inman, Crist, “Institutions, Intergroup Competition, and the Evolution of Hotel Populations around Niagara Falls,” Administrative Science Quarterly 41, no. 4 (1996): 629–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 Furger, Franco, “Accountability and Systems of Self-Governance: The Case of the Maritime Industry,” Law & Policy 19, no. 4 (1997): 154–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Gulbrandsen, Lars H., “The Emergence and Effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council,” Marine Policy 33, no. 4 (2009): 654–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 King, Andrew A., “Why It Pays to Become a Rule Maker,” MIT Sloan Management Review 56, no. 2 (2015): 11–13Google Scholar.

73 Malone, Thomas W. and Klein, Mark, “Harnessing Collective Intelligence to Address Global Climate Change,” Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 2, no. 3 (2007): 15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Berchicci, Luca and King, Andrew A., “11 Postcards from the Edge: A Review of the Business and Environment Literature,” Academy of Management Annals 1, no. 1 (2007): 1513–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.