Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:23:25.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negotiating under the Monroe Doctrine: Weetman Pearson and the Origins of U.S. Control of Colombian Oil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2011

Marcelo Bucheli
Marcelo Bucheli
Affiliation:
MARCELO BUCHELI is assistant professor in the Department of Business Administration and the Department of History at the University of Illinois (Urbana–Champaign).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Before World War I, most foreign investment in Latin America came from Britain. By World War II, however, the United States had become the main and unchallenged foreign investor in the region. This analysis of the negotiations that took place between the British firm (Pearson and Son) and the Colombian government over oil contracts reveals the reasons for the shift in influence. The company's lack of awareness that Britain had been overtaken by the United States as the hegemonic power in the hemisphere eventually caused the negotiations to collapse. While talks were proceeding, the company failed to consider how much influence the United States had on Colombian internal politics, and it overlooked the history of U.S.–Colombia relations. As a result, Pearson never received oil concessions in Colombia; instead, they were granted to American companies, consolidating U.S. power in the region.

Type
Articles
Information
Business History Review , Volume 82 , Special Issue 3: Business in Latin America , Autumn 2008 , pp. 529 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Lord Cowdray's Oil Interests,” London Times, 28 Nov. 1913, p. 8; “Cowdray Gives Up Colombian Grant,” New York Times, 27 Nov. 1913, p. 1.

2 “We Barred Oil Deal?” New York Times, 29 Nov. 1913, p. 1.

3 Grosse, Robert, “The Bargaining View of Government-Business Relations,” in International Business and Government Relations in the Twenty-First Century, ed. Grosse, Robert (Cambridge, 2005), 277–82Google Scholar.

4 Wells, Louis, “Negotiating with Third-World Governments,” Harvard Business Review 55 (Jan. 1977): 72–80Google Scholar.

5 Young, Desmond, Member for Mexico: A Biography of Weetman Pearson, First Viscount Cowdray (London, 1966), 184–85Google Scholar; Spender, John, Weetman Pearson: First Viscount Cowdray, 1865–1927 (London, 1930), 209–10Google Scholar; Jones, Geoffrey, The State and the Emergence of the British Oil Industry (London, 1981), 73–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Calvert, Peter, “The Murray Contract: An Episode in International Finance and Diplomacy,” Pacific Historical Review 35 (May 1966): 203–24Google Scholar.

7 Miller, Nathan, Theodore Roosevelt: A Life (New York, 1992), 399Google Scholar.

8 Wilkins, Mira, The Emergence of Multinational Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass., 1970), 149–72Google Scholar.

9 Kenwood, A. G. and Lougheed, A. L., The Growth of the International Economy, 1820–2000 (London, 1999), 30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wilkins, Mira, “European and North American Multinationals, 1870–1914: Comparisons and Contrasts,” in The End of Insularity, ed. Davenport-Hines, R. P. T. and Jones, Geoffrey (London, 1988), 13–14Google Scholar; Jones, Geoffrey, The Evolution of International Business (London, 1996), 30Google Scholar.

10 Kalmanovitz, Salomón, Economía y Nación (Bogotá, 1994), 251–52Google Scholar; Bucheli, Marcelo, Bananas and Business: The United Fruit Company in Colombia, 1899–2000 (New York, 2005), 86–92Google Scholar; Rippy, J. Fred, British Investments in Latin America, 1822–1949: A Case Study in the Operations of Private Enterprise in Retarded Regions (Minneapolis, 1959), 68Google Scholar; Taylor, Alan, “Foreign Capital Flows,” in The Cambridge Economic History of Latin America, vol. 2, ed. Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, Coatsworth, John, and Cortés-Conde, Roberto (Cambridge, U.K., 2006), 73Google Scholar

11 Kalmanovitz, Economía y Nación, 290.

12 Randall, Stephen, Colombia and the United States: Hegemony and Interdependence (Athens, Ga., 1992), 83Google Scholar.

13 Ibid., 85.

14 Ibid., 86.

15 Melo, Jorge Orlando, “De Carlos E. Restrepo a Marco Fidel Suarez: Republicanismo y gobiernos conservadores,” in Nueva Historia de Colombia, vol. 1, ed. Mejía, Alvaro Tirado (Bogotá, 1989), 220Google Scholar.

16 Randall, Colombia, 90.

17 Palacios, Marco, Between Legitimacy and Violence: A History of Colombia, 1875–2002 (Durham, N.C., 2006), 63–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Bejarano, Jesus Antonio, “El despegue cafetero, 1900–1928,” in Historia Económica de Colombia, ed. Ocampo, José Antonio (Bogotá, 1987), 182Google Scholar.

19 Cárdenas, Enrique, Ocampo, José Antonio, and Thorp, Rosemary, “Introduction,” in An Economic History of Twentieth Century Latin America, vol. 1, ed. Cárdenas, Enrique, Ocampo, José Antonio, and Thorp, Rosemary (New York, 2000), 26Google Scholar.

20 Jones, Geoffrey, “Pearson, Weetman Dickinson, First Viscount Cowdray (1856–1927),” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar.

21 For the most complete and detailed study of Pearson's operations in Mexico and his close business and political relationship with Díaz, see Connolly, Priscilla, El contratista de don Porfirio (Mexico, 1997)Google Scholar. Also, see Perló, Manuel, El paradigma porfiriano (Mexico, 1999), 157–217Google Scholar; Young, Member for Mexico, 58–139.

22 Brown, Jonathan, Oil and Revolution in Mexico (Berkeley, 1993), 47–55Google Scholar.

23 Ibid., 55–56.

24 Jones, The State and the Emergence of the British Oil Industry, 67.

25 Brown, Oil and Revolution, 63–65.

26 Jones, The State and the Emergence of the British Oil Industry, 69.

27 Yergin, Daniel, The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power (New York, 1991), 231Google Scholar.

28 Jones, The State and the Emergence of the British Oil Industry, 68–69.

29 Womack, John, “The Mexican Revolution,” in Mexico since Independence, ed. Bethell, Leslie (Cambridge, U.K., 1991), 125–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Brown, Oil and Revolution, 182.

31 Katz, Friedrich, The Secret War in Mexico (Chicago, 1981), 156–202Google Scholar; Meyer, Lorenzo, Mexico, Estados Unidos y el conflicto petrolero (Mexico, 1968), 32–39Google Scholar.

32 For the early developments of the oil industry in Colombia, see Isaza, José F. and Salcedo, Luis, Sucedió en la Costa Atlántica (Bogota, 1991)Google Scholar; and Ripoll, María Teresa, “La actividad empresarial de Diego Martínez Camargo, 1890–1937,” Cuadernos de Historia Económica y Empresarial 2 (Sept. 1999): 30Google Scholar.

33 Sir Clarendon Hyde to Lord Alexander Murray, 24 Dec. 1912, Pearson (S.) and Son, Ltd. Collection, microfilm of manuscript s in the Science Museum Library, London, U.K., film 24,985, reel 134 (hereafter PC). Unless stated, all the PC files come from reel 133.

34 Grigg, John, “Murray, Alexander William Charles Oliphant, Baron Murray of Elibank (1870–1920),” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar.

35 Murray to Martin Ribon, London, 3 Oct. 1912, PC.

36 Heroy, William B., “Obituary: Arthur Clifford Veatch,” Geographical Review 29 (Apr. 1939): 336–37Google Scholar.

37 Guillermo de Landa to Cowdray, Paris, 24 Oct. 1912, PC.

38 Rafael Reyes, memorandum relating to petroleum and asphalt deposits in Columbia (Paris, no date), PC.

39 Randall, Colombia, 93–94; Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 205.

40 Cowdray to Murray, 31 Oct. 1912, PC.

41 Cowdray to Landa, 31 Oct. 1912, PC.

42 Murray to Ribon, London, 7 Dec. 1912, PC.

43 Rippy, J. Fred, The Capitalists and Colombia (New York, 1931), 32Google Scholar.

44 Murray to Cowdray, Bogotá, 13 Mar. 1913, PC.

45 Murray to Cowdray, Bogotá, 4 Mar. 1913, PC. Matabeland is located in present-day southwestern Zimbabwe.

46 Veatch, A. C., From Quito to Bogotá (London, 1917), 231Google Scholar; Ribon to Cowdray, Bogotá, 25 Mar. 1913, PC.

47 See Cacua, Antonio, Historia del periodismo colombiano (Bogotá, 1982)Google Scholar.

48 Posada-Carbó, Eduardo, “The Limits of Power: Elections under the Conservative Hegemony in Colombia, 1886–1930,” Hispanic American Historical Review 77 (May 1997): 254CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Memorandum by Murray, “Conference with the Minister of Public Works, Bogotá,” 13 Feb. 1913; “Murray's Statement to the Minister of Public Works,” Bogotá, 13 Feb. 1913, PC.

50 Ribon to Murray, Bogotá, 17 Feb. 1913, PC.

51 Murray to Cowdray, Bogotá, 18 Feb. 1913, PC.

52 Memorandum by Murray, “Interview with the President,” Bogotá, 18 Feb. 1913, PC.

53 Murray to Cowdray, Bogotá, 19 Feb. 1913, PC.

54 Ribon to Murray, Bogotá, 26 Feb. 1913, PC.

55 Arias, Ricardo, El episcopado colombiano: Intransigencia y laicidad, 1850–2000 (Bogotá, 2003), 63–74Google Scholar.

56 “Memorandum of Conversation between General Jorge Holguín, Murray, and Ribon,” Bogotá, 24 Feb. 1913, PC.

57 Diego Martínez to Murray, Mariquita, Feb. 1913, PC, reel 134.

58 Isaza and Salcedo, Sucedió, 131. A few days later, Ribon declined Martínez's invitation (Ribon to Martínez, Bogotá, 1 Mar. 1913, PC, reel 134).

59 “Memorandum of Conversation between General Jorge Holguin, Murray, and Mr. Ribon,” Bogotá, 24 Feb. 1913, PC.

60 “Translation by Mr. Ribon of Sr. Uribe Holguin's Draft Contract based on Dr. Veatch's draft of 20th February, 1913,” PC.

61 “Mr. Ribon's translation of the Draft Contract prepared by Sr. Uribe Holguin,” Bogotá, 28 Feb. 1913, PC.

62 “Memorandum between the Minister of Public Works, Dr. Miguel Uribe Holguín, Murray, and Ribon,” Bogotá, 3 Mar. 1913, PC.

63 Murray to Cowdray, Bogotá, 6 Mar. 1913, PC.

64 “Memorandum of Interview with the Minister of Public Works,” by Ribon, Bogotá, 7 Mar. 1913, PC.

65 Murray to Simón Araújo, 11 Mar. 1913; “Memorandum by Mr. Ribon of Interview with Minister of Public Works,” Bogotá, 10 Mar. 1913; “Memorandum from Murray to His Excellency the Minister of Public Works,” Bogotá, 10 Mar. 1913; “Memorandum on the Colombian Negotiations,” by Arthur Veatch, Bogotá, 12 Mar. 1913; “Memorandum by Mr. Ribon of conference with Dr. Rodríguez Piñeres,” Bogotá, 14 Mar. 1913, PC.

66 Report on luncheon at Hotel Uscategui by Sr. Palacio, Bogotá, 10 Mar. 1913; report on dinner at Hotel Uscategui, 11 Mar. 1913, PC.

67 “Abstract of Murray's letters from March 6th to March 19th,” London, 17 Apr. 1913, PC.

68 Murray to Cowdray, 25 Mar. 1913, PC.

69 “Memorandum by Murray,” Bogotá, 4 Apr. 1913, PC.

70 Ribon to Cowdray, Bogotá, 25 Mar. 1913, PC.

71 “Memorandum by Ribon,” 18 Mar. 1913, PC.

72 “Memorandum by Dr. Veatch of Interview with Frank Stapleton,” Bogotá, 25 Mar. 1913, PC.

73 Ribon to Cowdray, Bogotá, 2 Apr. 1913, PC.

74 Unless stated, the information in this paragraph comes from Murray to Cowdray, Bogotá, 9 Apr. 1913, PC.

75 “Memorandum by Murray,” Bogotá, 11 Apr. 1913, PC.

76 “Translation of draft contract prepared and submitted by the Minister of Public Works today,” by Ribon, Bogotá, 12 Apr. 1913, PC.

77 “Contrato entre el Gobierno de Colombia y la Sociedad Pearson and Son,” Bogotá, 23 Apr. 1913, PC.

78 Murray to Wyndham, Bogotá, 23 Apr. 1913, PC.

79 Ribon to Cowdray, Mariquita, 3 May 1913, PC.

80 Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 205.

81 Ribon to Murray, Bogotá, 10 Feb. 1913, PC.

82 Lael, Richard, Arrogant Diplomacy: U.S. Policy Toward Colombia, 1903–1922 (Wilmington, Del., 1987), 88Google Scholar; Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 208.

83 Murray to Cowdray, Bogotá, 14 Apr. 1913, PC.

84 Murray to Ribon, Panama, 20 May 1913, PC; Lael, Arrogant Diplomacy, 89.

85 Ribon to Murray, Bogotá, 6 June 1913, PC.

86 Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 215.

87 Ribon to Murray, 12 June 1913; Ribon to Cowdray, 12 June 1913, PC.

88 “Memorandum by Mr. Ribon, Interview with Dr. Abadía Miguel Mendez, 21 June 1913,” PC.

89 “Memorandum by Mr. Ribon, Translation from ‘Revista Nacional de Colombia’ by Dr. Mendoza,” Bogotá, 21 June 1913, PC.

90 Ribon to Cowdray, 10 July 1913, PC.

91 Ribon to Murray, Bogotá, 25 June 1913; Murray to Cowdray, Quito, 25 June 1913, PC.

92 Murray to Cowdray, Quito, 26 June 1913, PC.

93 Cowdray to Murray, London, 27 June 1913, PC.

94 Ribon to Cowdray, 10 July 1913, PC.

95 Ribon to Murray, l Aug. 1913, PC; Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 209.

96 Ribon to Murray, Bogotá, 9 Aug. 1913, PC.

97 Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 208.

98 Ibid., 210.

99 Murray to Cowdray, Bogotá, 21 Aug. 1913, PC; Lael, Arrogant Diplomacy, 89–90.

100 Informe de una Comisión,” Anales de la Cámara de Representantes (Colombia), 5 Nov. 1913, 625–27.

101 Ribon to Cowdray, 2 Sept. 1913, PC.

102 “Changes to the draft of A.C. Veatch,” Bogotá, 16 Sept. 1913, PC.

103 Randall, Colombia, 95.

104 Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 211.

105 Lael, Arrogant Diplomacy, 98.

106 “No Darien Invasion: Pearson Concession Will not Violate the Monroe Doctrine,” New York Times, 24 Sept. 1913, p. 4.

107 “Suggests Rival to Canal: Colombia Might Cut One with English Money, Says London Paper,” New York Times, 27 Sept. 1913, p. 1.

108 This was not a publicly held corporation. See “The Great Central Northern Railway of Colombia,” London Times, 6 Mar. 1908, 6.

109 Lael, Arrogant Diplomacy, 95.

110 Restrepo, Carlos E., Orientatión Republicana (Bogotá, 1972), 166–67Google Scholar.

111 Ibid., 167–68.

112 Ibid., 148–49.

113 Murray to Cowdray, Bogotá, 14 Oct. 1913, PC; Restrepo, Orientatión, 143–44, 170.

114 From Wyndham, Percy to SirGrey, Edward, Bogotá, Feb. 4, 1914, in British Documents on Foreign Affairs, vol. 9, ed. Bourne, Kenneth and Watt, Cameron (Frederick, Md., 1989), 187Google Scholar.

115 Calvert, “Murray Contract,“ 217.

116 Murray to Cowdray, Bogotá, 15 Oct. 1913, PC; Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 216.

117 Murray to Carlos Restrepo, Bogotá, 22 Oct. 1913, PC.

118 Murray to Restrepo, Bogotá, 24 Oct. 1913, PC.

119 Murray to Jorge Holguín, Bogotá, 30 Oct. 1913; Murray to Martínez, Bogotá, 31 Oct. 1913, PC.

120 Wilson, Woodrow, “Address before the Southern Commercial Congress in Mobile, Alabama, 27 Oct. 1913,” in The American Presidency Project (Santa Barbara, 2007)Google Scholar.

121 “Précis of American opposition,” Feb. 1914, PC, reel 134.

122 Murray to Cowdray, 30 Oct. 1913, PC.

123 “Precis of American opposition,” Feb. 1914, PC, reel 134.

124 Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 217; “Précis of American opposition,” Feb. 1914, PC, reel 134.

125 Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 218.

126 “Précis of American opposition,” Feb. 1914; Lael, Arrogant Diplomacy, 93.

127 Lael, Arrogant Diplomacy, 94.

128 Restrepo, Orientatión, 162.

129 Murray to Cowdray, Bogotá, 12 Nov. 1913; Cowdray to Murray, London, 14 Nov. 1913, PC.

130 Lael, Arrogant Diplomacy, 94; Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 218.

131 John Body to Murray, Mexico, 29 Dec. 1913, PC.

132 “Précis of American opposition,” Feb. 1914, PC, reel 134.

133 Calvert, “Murray Contract,” 221.

134 Wilkins, Mira, “Multinational Oil Companies in South America in the 1920s: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru,” Business History Review 48 (Autumn 1974): 430CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

135 Parks, Taylor, Colombia and the United States, 1765–1934 (Durham, N.C., 1935), 452–56Google Scholar.

136 “Colombia: Annual Report, 1920,” British Documents, 213.