Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2011
Recently, a number of groups sponsored large international research projects that are concerned with business history. Harm G. Schröter's group investigated the European integration that followed the Treaty of Rome in 1957 in order to discover whether it had led to the appearance of a characteristically “European” corporation. Franco Amatori, Camilla Brautaset, and Youssef Cassis coordinated an analysis with the ambitious title “The Performance of European Business in the Twentieth Century.” The projects shared some common “Chandlerian” features: they were problem-oriented, comparative studies of the long-term development of large enterprises, and their goal was to propose illuminating generalizations. Such Chandler-inspired studies are likely to undergo a renaissance in the next couple of years. Still, as the term “renaissance” implies, Chandler's impact on European business studies has undergone upswings and downturns over the past four decades.
1 Schröter, Harm G., ed., The European Enterprise: Historical Investigation into a Future Species (Heidelberg, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brautaset, Camilla and Cassis, Youssef, “The Performance of European Business in the Twentieth Century: A Pilot Study,” Business and Economic History On-Line (vol. 1, 2003).Google Scholar
2 Encyclopaedia Britannica (Chicago, Ill., 2007).
3 Based on Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED): 1945-present; Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI): 1956–present; Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI): 1975–present. From 1957 to 2007, there was a total of 3,869 citations to Chandler's works in the ISI Web of Knowledge database (accessed on 20 Nov. 2007). One citation may corre spond to one or more subject-area categories. Therefore in order to have an overview of the distribution of citations by subject area, I have made a summation of the record count, from 1957 to 2007, of Chandler citations per subject area category. All 92 subject area categories add up to 6,392. The percentage of each subject category is then computed from this total. The Article Citation Count was produced by research assistant Leopoldo Alonso, CBS, and it is based on Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED): 1945–present; Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI): 1956–present; Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI):1975–present.
4 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass., 1962).Google Scholar
5 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, “The Beginnings of ‘Big Business’ in American Industry,” Business History Review 33 (Spring 1959): 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chandler, Strategy and Structure; and McCraw, Thomas K., ed., The Essential Alfred Chandler: Essays toward a Historical Theory of Big Business (Boston, Mass., 1988), 2.Google Scholar
6 Supple, Barry E., “American Business History: A Survey,” Business History 1 (June 1959): 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Ibid., 75.
8 Ashworth, W., “Review of Alfred D. Chandler Jr.'s Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise,” Business History 7, no. 2 (July 1965): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Note that the Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) only covers the period after 1975; there might thus have been more American and European Chandler citations within these fields before 1975.
10 Channon, Derek, The Strategy and Structure of British Enterprise (London, 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dyas, Gareth and Thanheiser, Heinz, The Emerging European Enterprise (London, 1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pavan, Robert J., “Strategy and Structure: The Italian Experience,” Journal of Economics and Business 28, no. 3 (1976): 254–60Google Scholar; Scott, Bruce R., “The Industrial State: Old Myths and New Realities,” Harvard Business Review (Mar.-Apr. 1973): 135–48Google Scholar; Rumelt, Richard P., Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance (Cambridge, Mass., 1974)Google Scholar; and Wrigley, Leonard, Divisional Autonomy and Diversification (Cambridge, Mass., 1970).Google Scholar
11 Whittington, Richard and Mayer, Michael, The European Corporation: Strategy, Structure and Social Science (Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar
12 The British researcher Richard Whittington, the German researcher Michael Mayer, the Italian researcher Andrea Colli, and the Swiss researcher Margrit Müller have all used database results from the Harvard program in their analyses.
13 For instance in the early 1950s the Danish foreign ministry published a number of industry specific reports on study trips to the U.S. aimed at productivity improvements.
14 Servan-Schreiber, Jean-Jacques, The American Challenge (London, 1968).Google Scholar
15 Figures are in 1990 Geary-Khamis dollars. See the Conference Board and the Gronigen Growth and Development Centre, Total Economy Database (Utrecht, 2008).
16 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, “The Opportunities for Business History at the Beginning of the Twenty-First-Century,” in Business History around the World, ed. Amatori, Franco and Jones, Geoffrey (Cambridge, U.K., 2003), 394–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Glamann, Kristof, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Economic History Conference(Copenhagen, 1974).Google Scholar
18 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr and Daems, Herman, “Investment Strategy in Europe, United States, and Japan,” in Five Themes: Sixth International Congress on Economic History (Copenhagen, 1974).Google Scholar
19 The article introduces the three types of enterprises identified in The Visible Hand: The private enterprise, the entrepreneurial enterprise, and the managerial enterprise. Managerial capitalism refers to a system dominated by enterprises with separation of management from ownership. Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, Mass., 1977).Google Scholar
20 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, Mass., 1990)Google Scholar; Albert Carreras, Xavier Tarimeli, and Eugenio Torres, “Business His tory in Spain”; Franco Amatori and Giorgio Bigatti, “Business History in Italy”; and Youssef Cassis, “Business History in France”; all in Amatori and Jones, eds., Business History around the World.
21 Hannah, Leslie, The Rise of the Corporate Economy (London, 1976)Google Scholar, and Hannah, , ed., Management Strategy and Business Development (London, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Slaven, Anthony, “Review of Leslie Hannah, The Rise of the Corporate Economy and Management Strategy and Business Development,” Business History 21, no. 1 (1979): 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Chandler, , The Visible HandCrossRefGoogle Scholar; for a debate on markets vs. hierarchies in economic transactions see Perrow, Charles, “Markets, Hierarchies, and Hegemony” [1981], reprinted in The Essential Alfred Chandler, ed. McCraw, , 432–64.Google Scholar
24 Lindgren, Håkan, “Scandinavian Business History at the End of the 1990s: Its Prior Development, Present Situation, and Future,” in Amatori, and Jones, , eds., Business History around the World, 146–69.Google Scholar
25 Hannah, Leslie, “Review of Alfred D. Chandler Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business,” Business History 22, no. 2 (1980): 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Chandler, The Visible Hand; Chandler, Scale and Scope; and Chandler, , “The Emergence of Managerial Capitalism,” Business History Review 58 (Winter 1984): 473–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Whitley, Richard, European Business Systems: Firms and Markets in Their National Contexts (London, 1992).Google Scholar
28 Cassis, , “Business History in France,” 193Google Scholar; Carreras, , Tarimeli, and Torres, , “Business History in Spain,” 244Google Scholar; Schröter, Harm G., “Business History in German-Speaking States at the End of the Century: Achievements and Gaps,” in Business History around the World, ed. Amatori, and Jones, , 181.Google Scholar
29 Kocka, Jürgen, “Germany: Cooperation and Competition,” Business History Review 64 (Winter 1990): 711–15.Google Scholar
30 Fear, Jeffrey R., Organizing Control: August Thyssen and the Construction of German Corporate Management (Cambridge, Mass., 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 For an overview of the debate, see Jones, Geoffrey, “Global Perspectives and British Paradoxes,” Business History Review 71 (1997): 291–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Toms, Steven and Wright, Mike, “Corporate Governance, Strategy and Structure in British Business History, 1950–2000,” Business History 45, no. 3 (2002): 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Toms, Steven and Wilson, John F., “Scale, Scope, and Accountability: Towards a New Paradigm of British Business History,” Business History 45, no. 4 (2003): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Whittington and Mayer, The European Corporation.
34 Ibid., 45.
35 Parsons, Talcott, “Evolutionary Universals in Society,” American Sociological Review 29, no. 3 (1964): 339–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Whittington and Mayer, The European Corporation, 23–24.
37 Ibid., 46.
38 There was, for instance, Franco Amatori and Youssef Cassis's ambitious study, “The Performance of European Business in the Twentieth Century,” Harm G. Schröter's project, “The European Corporation,” and Andrea, , Colli, , Iversen, Martin Jes and Wilson's, John “Corporate Responses to European Integration,” Schröter, , ed., The European EnterpriseGoogle Scholar; Brauta-set and Cassis, “The Performance of European Business in the Twentieth Century”; Wilson, John F. et al., “Mapping Corporate Europe: Business Responses to Institutional Change, 1957–2007,” European Journal of International Management 1 (July 2007): 225–38.Google Scholar
39 Chandler, , Scale and Scope, 10.Google Scholar
40 Ibid., 3.
41 The concept of inductive nature refers to the understanding known from business research methodologies. See for instance Bryman, Alan and Bell, Emma, Business Research Methodology: The Nature of Qualitative Research (Oxford, 2003).Google Scholar
42 Jones, Geoffrey, “In Memoriam: Alfred D. Chandler, 1918–2007,” Business History Review 81 (Summer 2007): 326–27.Google Scholar
43 Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter, “Beyond Markets and Hierarchies: Toward a New Synthesis of American Business History,” American Historical Review 106 (Apr. 2003): 404–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar