No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2012
If one remembers Count Detlev von Einsiedel's character and achievements, as described in the first installment of this article, one will not be surprised that under his leadership a spirit of scientific enlightenment, of restless improvement, and of innovation came to permeate the Lauchhammer Works so that it became one of the leading German iron works. To be sure, genuine primary innovation was rare, as it is by necessity. Only in the case of casting figures and in that of enameling iron utensils was something brought into existence in the Lauchhammer plants that had never existed before. But on top of that, there were numerous derivative innovations, i.e., innovations as far as that particular part of Germany was concerned. Or to put it differently, the elder Count Einsiedel transferred to Saxony achievements made in the most advanced areas of eighteenth-century iron industry. It is from this point of view that the following presentation must be read, a presentation in which the Count's primary innovations, previously described, are not mentioned again.
42 See Bulletin of the Business Historical Society, XXVII (June, 1953), 73–74.
43 Trautscholdt expressed this fact in the following charming and old-fashioned way which cannot be translated. He praised that “seit der Leitung des Herrn Conferenzministers ein geistiges Leben das ganze Geschäft beseelte.”
44 For the terminology see my article “Innovation in Business” in The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, X (1951), 285 ff.
45 Beck, Ludwig, Geschichte des Eisens in technischer und kulturgeschichtlicher Beziehung (Braunschweig, 1893–1903), IV, 617.Google Scholar
46 Lampadius, Wilhelm August, Handbuch der allgemeinen Hüttenkunde, des Zweyten Theiles vierter Band enthält die hüttenmännische Benutzung der Eisenerze überhaupt, so wie der Frischprocesse und der Stahlfabrikation (Göttingen, 1810), 98 ff.Google Scholar; reported also by Beck, op. cit., III, 699.
47 200 Jahre Lauchhammer, 1725–1925 (p. p. [1925]), 24.
48 Lampadius, op. cit., 304.
49 See Beck, op. cii., III, 616, 731, 732. On the last-named page there are two drawings of the furnace.
50 Lampadius, op. cit., 297, reports that by 1800 a second furnace was built and held in reserve.
51 The following is based on an anonymously published article “Beiträge zur Geschichte des Eisens” in Stahl und Eisen, XXV (1905), 1231–1234, 1300–1305. The article is based on archival material, much of which is reprinted therein.
52 See my essay, “The Leaders of the German Steam Engine Industry during the First Hundred Years” in Journal of Economic History, IV (1944), 122, 123.
53 According to Lampadius, op. cit., 305, in periods of draught the blower was then worked by man or animal power.
54 Deutscher, BraunkohlenvereinHalle, E. V. (Saale), Festschrift zum 50jährigen Bestehen des …1885–1935 (Halle, 1935), 291 ff.Google Scholar
55 Actually per Zoll, but one Zoll corresponds approximately to one inch.
56 See below page 148.
57 To avoid misunderstandings, the eighteenth-century term Kunstmeister denoted an engineer and engine designer, not a machine tender.
58 See Lampadius, op. cit., 298. Incidentally he also collected minerals and samples of products of furnaces and forges.
59 See Festschrift zum hundertjährigen Jubiläum der Königl. Sächs. Bergakademie zu Freiberg am 30. July, 1866 (Dresden, 1866), 8 ff., 17 ff.
60 The instructions are reprinted by Wappler, , “Oberberghauptmann von Trebra und die drei ersten sächsischen Kunstmeister” in Mitteilungen des Freiberger Altertumsvereins, no. 41 (1905), 141 ff.Google Scholar
61 Stahl und Eisen, XXV (1905), 1,302.
62 von Weber, Karl, “Detlev Graf von Einsiedel, Königlich Sächsischer Cabinets-Minister” in Archiv für die Sächsische Geschichte, I (1863), 187.Google Scholar
63 Regarding this place, see Schumann, August, Vollständiges Staats-Post- und Zeitungslexikon von Sachsen (Zwickau, 1824), I, 313 ff.Google Scholar
64 See my article in Jour. Econ. Hist., IV (1944), 125.
65 See Buhl, Herbert, “Anfänge der kameralistischen Buchhaltung” in Zeitschrift für Handelswissenschaft und Handelspraxis, XXII (1929), 111 ff., 211 ff.Google Scholar; Walb, Ernst, Die Erfolgsrechnung privater und öffentlicher Betriebe: Eine Grundlegung (Berlin, 1926), 208 ff.Google Scholar