Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:09:59.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building Industrial Districts: Do Subsidies Help? Evidence from Postwar Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2020

Anna Spadavecchia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The “historical alternatives” approach calls for research into the role of national institutions and public policies in the resilience or decline of industrial districts. Policies in support of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) were launched in various Western economies in the second half of the twentieth century. This article focuses on the paradigmatic Italian case and investigates the importance of government subsidies for SMEs on firms located in a southern and a northeastern district, between 1971 and 1991. This discussion deepens our understanding of the role of national policies in the reemergence of industrial districts in the decades of the Second Industrial Divide. It also indicates the importance of firms’ utilization of subsidies and their ecosystem as complementary to the policy's effectiveness.

Keywords

small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)industrial districtsSecond Industrial Dividegovernment policiesregional policy
Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , Summer 2020 , pp. 399 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank Bernardo Batiz-Lazo, Ove Bjarnar, Mark Casson, the late Francesca Carnevali, Evelyn Fenton, the late Chris Kobrak, Simon Niziol, Giorgio Riello, Alberto Rinaldi, Peter Scott, and Michelangelo Vasta for their comments; Alberto Baffigi, Giovanni Iuzzolini, Maria Lucia Stefani, and staff of the Biblioteca Paolo Baffi, Banca d'Italia for their help with the research. This article benefited greatly from discussions with Brian A'Hearn, Paolo Di Martino, Oscar Calvo-Gonzalez, Giuliano Maielli, and Max-Stephan Schulze. Any errors are my own.

References

1 Zeitlin, Jonathan, “The Historical Alternatives Approach,” in Oxford Handbook of Business History, ed. Jones, Geoffrey and Zeitlin, Jonathan (Oxford, 2008), 120–40Google Scholar; Sabel, Charles F. and Zeitlin, Jonathan, “Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets and Technology in Nineteenth-Century Industrialization,” Past and Present 108 (Aug. 1985): 133–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Piore, Michael J. and Sabel, Charles F., The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (New York, 1984)Google Scholar; Bagnasco, Arnaldo, Tre Italie: La Problematica Territoriale dello Sviluppo Italiano (Bologna, 1977)Google Scholar; Brusco, Sebastiano, “The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 6 (June 1982): 167–84Google Scholar.

3 Piore and Sabel, Second Industrial Divide, 304; Kristensen, Peer H. and Sabel, Charles F., “The Small-Holder Economy in Denmark: The Exception as Variation,” in World of Possibilities: Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization, ed. Sabel, Charles F. and Zeitlin, Jonathan (Cambridge, U.K., 1997), 374–78Google Scholar.

4 Jonathan Zeitlin, “Industrial Districts and Regional Clusters,” in Jones and Zeitlin, Oxford Handbook of Business History, 219–43.

5 Vasta, Michelangelo, “Italian Export Capacity in the Long-Term Perspective (1861–2009): A Tortuous Path to Stay in Place,” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 15, no. 1 (2010): 133–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Bagnasco, Tre Italie, 153–62, 168–84.

7 For the institutional perspective, see Weiss, Linda, Creating Capitalism: The State and Small Business since 1945 (Oxford, 1988)Google Scholar; and Longoni, Giuseppe M. and Rinaldi, Alberto, “Industrial Policy and Artisan Firms (1930s–1970s),” in Forms of Enterprise in 20th Century Italy: Boundaries, Structures and Strategies, ed. Colli, Andrea and Vasta, Michelangelo (Cheltenham, U.K., 2010), 204–24Google Scholar.

8 For Marshall's writings on economies arising from the concentration of small firms, see his Principles of Economics, 9th (variorum) ed., C. W. Guillebaud, ed. (London, 1961), 1:266–71; and The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall, 1967–1890, ed. John K. Whitaker (London, 1975), 2:196–98.

9 The concepts of industrial districts and clusters have different emphases. On these cognate concepts, see Zeitlin, “Industrial Districts”; Wilson, John F. and Popp, Andrew, “Districts, Networks and Clusters in England: An Introduction,” in Industrial Clusters and Regional Business Networks in England, 1750–1970, ed. Wilson, John F. and Popp, Andrew (Aldershot, 2003), 1–18Google Scholar; and Porter, Michael and Ketels, Christian, “Clusters and Industrial Districts: Common Roots, Different Perspectives,” in A Handbook of Industrial Districts, ed. Becattini, Giacomo, Bellandi, Marco, and De Propris, Lisa, (Cheltenham, U.K., 2009), 172–83Google Scholar. For a review of approaches, see Valeria Giacomin, “A Historical Approach to Clustering in Emerging Economies” (Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 18-018, Boston, 2017).

10 Enright, Michael J., “Organization and Coordination in Geographically Concentrated Industries,” in Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise, ed. Lamoreaux, Naomi R. and Raff, Daniel M. G. (Chicago, 1995), 103–42Google Scholar; Becattini, Giacomo, “The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion,” in Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-operation in Italy, ed. Pyke, Frank, Becattini, Giacomo, and Sengenberger, Werner (Geneva, 1990), 37–51Google Scholar.

11 Scranton, Philip, Endless Novelty: Specialty Production and American Industrialization, 1865–1925 (Princeton, 1997), 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Sabel and Zeitlin, “Historical Alternatives,” 160.

13 Scranton, Endless Novelty, 349–50.

14 Jean Saglio, “Local Industry and Actors’ Strategies: From Combs to Plastics in Oyonnax,” in Sabel and Zeitlin, World of Possibilities, 419–60.

15 Hashino, Tomoko and Kurosawa, Takafumi, “Beyond Marshallian Agglomeration Economies: The Roles of Trade Associations in Meiji Japan,” Business History Review 87, no. 3 (2013): 489–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Yamawaki, Hideki, “The Evolution and Structure of Industrial Clusters in Japan,” Small Business Economics 18, no. 1–3 (2002): 121–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Zeitlin, “Historical Alternatives,” 124–25.

17 Piore and Sabel, Second Industrial Divide, 21, 163–64; Charles F. Sabel and Jonathan Zeitlin, “Stories, Strategies, Structures: Rethinking Historical Alternatives to Mass Production,” in Sabel and Zeitlin, World of Possibilities, 1–33.

18 Compare Zeitlin, “Historical Alternatives,” and Landes, David S., “Small Is Beautiful. Small Is Beautiful?,” in Piccola e Grande Impresa: un Problema Storico, ed. Fondazione ASSI/Istituto per la Storia dell'Umbria Contemporanea (Milan, 1987), 15–28Google Scholar.

19 Piore and Sabel, Second Industrial Divide, 163.

20 Sabel, Charles F., “Flexible Specialisation and the Re-emergence of Regional Economies,” in Reversing Industrial Decline? Industrial Structure and Policy in Britain and Her Competitors, ed. Hirst, Paul and Zeitlin, Jonathan (Oxford, 1989), 17–70Google Scholar; Zeitlin, “Historical Alternatives,” 126.

21 Piore and Sabel, Second Industrial Divide, 157; Ganne, Bernard, “Industrial Development and Local Industrial Systems in Postwar France,” in Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development, ed. Storper, Michael and Scott, Allen J. (London, 1992), 216–52Google Scholar.

22 Zeitlin, “Historical Alternatives.”

23 Zeitlin, “Industrial Districts”; Sabel, “Flexible Specialisation.”

24 Patruco, Pier Paolo, “The Emergence of Technology Systems: Knowledge Production and Distribution in the Case of the Emilian Plastics District,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 29, no. 1 (2005): 37–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brenner, Thomas, “Identification of Local Industrial Clusters in Germany,” Regional Studies 40, no. 6 (2006): 991–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Regional Cluster Atlas Baden-Wurttenberg, 2016, https://www.clusterportal-bw.de/en/cluster-data/cluster-atlas-baden-wuerttemberg/ accessed 21 Aug. 2018.

25 Aoyama, Yuko, “Policy Intervention for Industrial Network Formation: Contrasting Historical Underpinnings of the Small Business Policy in Japan and the United States,” Small Business Economics 12, no. 3 (1999): 217–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Wengenroth, Ulrich, “Small-Scale Business in Germany,” in Small Firms, Large Concerns: The Development of Small Business in Comparative Perspective, ed. Odaka, Konosuke and Sawai, Minoru (Oxford, 1999), 117–39Google Scholar.

27 Czarnitski, Dirk, “Research and Development in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: The Role of Financial Constraints and Public Funding,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 53, no. 3 (2006): 335–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Michele Lescure, “SMEs in France, 1900–1975,” in Odaka and Sawai, Small Firms, Large Concerns, 140–67; Parker, Rachel, “From National Champions to Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: Changing Policy Emphasis in France, Germany and Sweden,” Journal of Public Policy 19, no. 1 (1999): 63–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Boutin, Bernard L., “Small Business Loans from Government Sources,” in Financing of Small Business: A Current Assessment, ed. Pfeffer, Irving (New York, 1967), 314–32Google Scholar; Blackford, Mansel G., A History of Small Business in America (Chapel Hill, 2003), 134–37Google Scholar.

30 Boutin, “Small Business Loans”; Blackford, A History, 135; Kenney, Martin and Florida, Richard, “Venture Capital in Silicon Valley: Fuelling New Firm Formation,” in Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region, ed. Kenney, Martin (Stanford, 2000), 98–123Google Scholar.

31 For a review, see Paniccia, Ivana, Industrial Districts: Evolution and Competitiveness in Italian Firms (Cheltenham, U.K., 2002), 3–44Google Scholar; Zeitlin, “Industrial Districts.”.

32 Weiss, Creating Capitalism; Spadavecchia, Anna, “Financing Industrial Districts in Italy: A Private Venture?,” Business History 47, no. 4 (2005): 569–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zeitlin, “Industrial Districts,” 227–31.

33 Among others see Abdesslem, Amel Ben and Chiappini, Raphaël, “Cluster Policy and Firm Performance: A Case Study of the French Optic/photonic Industry,” Regional Studies, 53, no. 5 (2019): 692–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Audretsch, David B., Lehmann, Erik E., Menter, Matthias & Seitz, Nikolaus, “Public Cluster Policy and Firm Performance: Evaluating Spillover Effects across Industries,” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 31, no. 1–2 (2019): 150–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Giacomin, Valeria, “Negotiating Cluster Boundaries: Governance Shifts in the Palm Oil and Rubber Cluster in Malay(si)a (1945–1970 ca.),” Management and Organizational History 12, no. 1 (2017): 76–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nishimura, Junichi and Okamuro, Hiroyuki, “Subsidy and Networking: The Effects of Direct and Indirect Support Programs of the Cluster Policy,” Research Policy 40, no. 5 (2011): 714–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Zeitlin, “Industrial Districts,” 227–31.

35 Carnevali, Francesca, Europe's Advantage (Oxford, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Conti, Giuseppe and Ferri, Giovanni, “Banche Locali e Sviluppo Economico Decentrato,” in Storia del Capitalismo Italiano dal Dopoguerra a Oggi, ed. Barca, Fabrizio (Rome, 1997), 429–65Google Scholar; Ottati, Gabi Dei, “Trust, Interlinking Transactions and Credit in the Industrial District,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 18, no. 6 (1994): 529–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 Martino, Paolo Di and Vasta, Michelangelo, “Reassessing the Italian ‘Economic Miracle’: Law, Firms’ Governance, and Management, 1950–1973,” Business History Review 92, no. 2 (2018): 281–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Stimulating investment was by far the largest single area of policy intervention in favor of SMEs in the OECD countries. Other policy tools included administrative and fiscal measures, such as reduced employment contributions and tax breaks, training and mentoring schemes, and loan guarantees for start-ups. OECD, Small Businesses, Job Creation and Growth: Facts, Obstacles and Best Practices (Paris, 1997), 27Google Scholar.

38 Amatori, Franco, Bugamelli, Matteo, and Colli, Andrea, “Technology, Firms Size, and Entrepreneurship,” in The Oxford Handbook of the Italian Economy since Unification, ed. Toniolo, Gianni (Oxford, 2013), 455–84Google Scholar.

39 Alberto Rinaldi and Anna Spadavecchia, “The Political Economy of Financing Italian Small Businesses, 1950–1990s,” in People, Places and Business Cultures: Essays in Honour of Francesca Carnevali, ed. Paolo Di Martino, Andrew Popp, and Peter Scott (Martlesham, U.K., 2017), 55–74, bibliography; Weiss, Creating Capitalism, 55–80, 104–26; Peluffo, Paolo and Giacché, Vladimiro, Storia del Mediocredito Centrale (Rome-Bari, 1997), 5–9Google Scholar.

40 Rinaldi and Spadavecchia, “Political Economy,” bibliography.

41 Centro di Ricerca per le Politiche dell'Innovazione (CERPI), Il Finanziamento alle Piccole e Medie Imprese in Italia (Milano, 1973), vii, 112Google Scholar.

42 On the distinction between short-term (up to one year) and medium-term (above one year) credit, see Piluso, Giandomenico, “From the Universal Bank to the Universal Bank: A Reappraisal,” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 15, no. 1 (2010): 84–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 “Costituzione di Istituti Regionali per il finanziamento alle medie e piccole industrie,” in Atti Parlamentari, Senato della Repubblica, IX Commissione Industria, Commercio Interno ed Estero, e Turismo 27a Riunione, DDL n. 1013, 1 June 1950, Rome.

44 Peluffo and Giacché, Storia del Mediocredito, 6–18.

45 Associazione Bancaria Italiana (ABI), La Legislazione Italiana sul Credito Speciale all'Industria e al Commercio (Rome, 1963), 179–80.

46 Peluffo and Giacché, Storia del Mediocredito, 31–36.

47 “Nuovi incentivi a favore delle medie e piccole industrie e dell'artigianato,” in Atti Parlamentari, Camera dei Deputati, III Legislatura, Documenti, Disegni di Leggi e Relazioni, DDL n. 1494, 23–24 July 1959, Rome.

48 CERPI, Il Finanziamento, 30.

49 Lepore, Amedeo, “Cassa per il Mezzogiorno e Politiche per lo Sviluppo,” in Istituzioni ed Economia, ed. Leonardi, Andrea (Bari, 2011), 107–65Google Scholar.

50 Leandra D'Antone, “Straordinarietà e Stato Ordinario,” in Barca, Storia del Capitalismo Italiano, 579–625; Alacevich, Michele, “Postwar Development in the Italian Mezzogiorno: Analyses and Policies,” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 18, no. 1 (2013): 90–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Federico, Giovanni and Giannetti, Renato, “Italy: Stalling and Surpassing,” in European Industrial Policy: The Twentieth-Century Experience, ed. Foreman-Peck, James and Federico, Giovanni (Oxford, 1999), 124–51Google Scholar. A body of research interprets the lack of a coherent industrial policy as a result of various governments’ inability to reform the state and its apparatus. See Di Martino and Vasta, “Italian ‘Economic Miracle.’”.

52 Fratianni, Michele and Spinelli, Franco, A Monetary History of Italy (Cambridge, U.K., 1997), 228–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Croff, Davide and Passacantando, Franco, “Il controllo diretto del credito,” in La politica monetaria in Italia: Istituti e strumenti, ed. Cotula, Franco and de’ Stefani, Pietro (Bologna, 1979), 563–85Google Scholar.

54 Vassalli, Francesco and Visentini, Giuliano, Legislazione Economica, Settembre 1976–Agosto 1977 (Milan, 1978), 27–30Google Scholar.

55 Alberto Baffigi, Stephen N. Broadberry, Claire Giordano, and Francesco Zollino, “Data Appendix—Italy's National Accounts (1861–2010),” in Toniolo, Oxford Handbook of the Italian Economy, 631–712.

56 Modifiche al Decreto del Presidente della Repubblica 9 Novembre 1976, n. 902, concernente la disciplina del credito agevolato al settore industriale (19723), in Atti Parlamentari, Commissione XII Industria, Artigianato e Commercio con l'Estero, Seduta del 27 Apr. 1978, Rome.

57 Cafiero, Salvatore, Storia dell'Intervento Straordinario nel Mezzogiorno (1950–1993) (Rome, 2000)Google Scholar.

58 Viesti, Gianfranco, “L'Abbigliamento nella Puglia Centrale,” in Mezzogiorno dei Distretti, ed. Viesti, Gianfranco (Rome, 2000), 59–95Google Scholar.

59 Michele D'Ercole, “Il Distretto Barlettano della Calzatura,” in Viesti, Mezzogiorno, 37–58; Fratianni and Spinelli, Monetary History, 235–39.

60 Garavini, Roberto, Calistri, Franco, and Cilona, Ornella, La Quarta Italia (Rome, 1988), 240–42Google Scholar; “Training,” Distretto Calzature San Mauro Pascoli website, n.d., accessed 7 Jan. 2017, http://www.distrettocalzaturesanmauropascoli.it/formazione.asp.

61 Garavini, Calistri, and Cilona, La Quarta Italia, 240–42.

62 Istat, I Censimenti delle Attività Produttive dal 1951 al 1991: Dati Comunali, CD-ROM (Rome, 1998).

63 For San Mauro, footwear exports amounted to €296 million in 2016 and for Barletta €216. Giovanni Foresti, Serena Fumagalli, and Lavinia Stoppani, “Monitor dei Distretti e Poli Technologici,” 33, 37, Novembre 2017, Intesa Sanpaolo website, accessed 22 Sept. 2019, https://www.group.intesasanpaolo.com/scriptIsir0/si09/contentData/view/esempio_MonDis_02.pdf?id=CNT-04-0000000042FF2&ct=application/pdf.

64 It would have been interesting to cover the previous decades; however, company records for the 1950s and 1960s were very limited.

65 European Commission, “Commission Staff Working Document on the Implementation of Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the Definition of Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises,” SEC(2009) 1350, Brussels, 7 Oct. 2009.

66 For a definition of family business, see Lubinski, Christina, “Path Dependency and Governance in German Family Firms,” Business History Review 85, no. 4 (2011): 699–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Siracusano, Filippo and Tresoldi, Carlo, “Le Piccole Imprese Manifatturiere nel Mezzogiorno: Diseconomie Esterne, Incentivi, Equilibri Gestionali e Finanziari,” in Il sistema finanziario nel Mezzogiorno, Numero Speciale dei Contributi all'Analisi Economica, ed. d'Italia, Banca (Rome, 1990), 103–67Google Scholar.

68 Bagella, Michele, Gli Incentivi di Politica Industriale: Presupposti Teorici e Valutazioni Empiriche (Rome, 1998)Google Scholar.

69 Trovato, Giovanni and Alfò, Marco, “Credit Rationing and the Financial Structure of Italian Small and Medium Enterprises,” Journal of Applied Economics 9, no. 1 (2006): 167–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Atzeni, Gianfranco E. and Carboni, Oliviero A., “The Effects of Subsidies on Investment: An Empirical Evaluation on ICT in Italy,” Revue de l'OFCE 97, no. 5 (2006): 279–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 Bagella, Michele and Caggese, Andrea, “Struttura del capitale, finanziamenti agevolati e redditività delle imprese manifatturiere italiane,” Rassegna Economica 59, no. 4 (1995): 813–37Google Scholar.

71 This aspect is studied in work on learning-by-doing. See, for instance, Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter, eds., Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries (Chicago, 1999)Google Scholar.

72 Brealey, Richard A. and Myers, Stewart C., Principles of Corporate Finance (Boston, 2003), 187–219Google Scholar. Table 2 displays coefficients of variation because these are more appropriate than standard deviations for comparing different samples.

73 Siracusano and Tresoldi, “Le Piccole”; Bagella and Caggese, “Struttura del capitale.”

74 For example, company records Sbia 1973–1991 (file 2,645), Sfi 1971–1991 (2,442), Sga 1979–1991 (file 3,400), Sto 1978–1991 (file 3,479), Chamber of Commerce, Bari (hereafter CCBari).

75 Company records Sco 1984–1991 (file 4,600), CCBari; company records Nca 1981–1991 (file 8,367), Nfr 1982–1991 (file 4,662), Npn 1984–1991 (file 11,850), Npo 1981–1991 (file 4,935), Nrs 1976–1991 (file 5,212), Chamber of Commerce, Forlì.

76 Company records Stu 1978–1991 (file 3,603) and Sri 1974–1991 (file 2,749), CCBari.

77 Faini, Riccardo, Galli, Gianpaolo, and Giannini, Curzio, “Finance and Development: The Case of Southern Italy,” in Finance and Development: Issues and Experience, ed. Giovannini, Alberto (Cambridge, U.K., 1992), 158–214Google Scholar; Felice, Emanuele, Perchè il Sud E'Rimasto Indietro (Bologna, 2015)Google Scholar.

78 Trigilia, Carlo, Sviluppo senza Autonomia: Effetti Perversi delle Politiche nel Mezzogiorno (Bologna, 1992), 93–94Google Scholar.

79 See, for instance, Dercon, Stefan, “Risk, Crop Choice, and Savings: Evidence from Tanzania,” Economic Development and Cultural Change 44, no. 3 (1996): 485–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Bigsten, Arne and Söderbom, Måns, “What Have We Learned from a Decade of Manufacturing Enterprise Survey in Africa?,” World Bank Research Observer 21 (Fall 2006): 241–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Colli, Andrea, “Risk, Uncertainty, and Family Ownership,” in The Endurance of Family Businesses: A Global Overview, ed. Pérez, Paloma Fernández and Colli, Andrea (Cambridge, U.K., 2013), 85–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Casson, Mark, “The Economics of the Family Firm,” Scandinavian Economic History Review 47, no. 1 (1999): 10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 See, for instance, Sabel and Zeitlin, “Stories, Strategies, Structures,” 1–33; Carnevali, Francesca, “Crooks, Thieves, and Receivers: Transaction Costs in Nineteenth-Century Industrial Birmingham,” Economic History Review 57, no. 3 (2004): 533–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hashino and Kurosawa, “Beyond Marshallian Agglomeration”; Brusco, “Emilian Model”; Best, Michael, The New Competition: Institutions of Industrial Restructuring (Cambridge, MA, 1990), 203–26Google Scholar; and Alberto Rinaldi, “The Emilian Model Revisited: Twenty Years After,” Business History 47, no. 2 (2005): 244–66.

82 Konosuke Odaka, “Evaluating Japanese Industrial Policy: The Auto-Parts Industry Example,” in Odaka and Sawai, Small Firms, Large Concerns, 290–306; Whittaker, D. H., Small Firms in the Japanese Economy (Cambridge, U.K., 1997), 164–79Google Scholar.

83 Friedman, David, The Misunderstood Miracle: Industrial Development and Political Change in Japan (Ithaca, 1988), 187–94Google Scholar.

84 Boutin, “Small Business Loans”; Blackford, A History, 135, 165–68.

85 Kenney and Florida, “Venture Capital,” 106–9; Saxenian, AnnaLee, Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Cambridge, MA, 1996), 26–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

86 Timothy J. Sturgeon, “How Silicon Valley Came to Be,” in Kenney, Understanding Silicon Valley, 15–47; Stuart W. Leslie, “The Biggest ‘Angel’ of Them All: The Military and the Making of Silicon Valley,” in Kenney, Understanding Silicon Valley, 48–67; Saxenian, Regional Advantage, 20–27; Blackford, A History, 157–60.

87 Lehmann, Erik E. and Menter, Matthias, “Public Cluster Policy and Performance,” Journal of Technology Transfer 43, no. 3 (2018): 558CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

88 Lehmann and Menter, “Public Cluster Policy.”

89 Martin, Philippe, Mayer, Thierry, and Mayneris, Florian, “Public Support to Clusters: A Firm Level Study of French ‘Local Productive Systems’,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 41, no. 2 (2011): 108–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

Supplementary material: File

Spadavecchia supplementary material

Spadavecchia supplementary material 1

Download Spadavecchia supplementary material(File)
File 235 KB
Supplementary material: File

Spadavecchia supplementary material

Spadavecchia supplementary material 2

Download Spadavecchia supplementary material(File)
File 17.6 KB