Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:05:50.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intermediary Functions and the Market for Innovation in Meiji and Taishō Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2013

Tom Nicholas  and
Hiroshi Shimizu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Japan experienced a transformational phase of technological development during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. We argue that an important, but so far neglected, factor was a developing market for innovation and a patent-attorney system that was conducive to rapid technical change. We support our hypothesis using patent data and we also present a detailed case study on Tomogorō Ono, a key developer of salt-production technology who used attorneys in connection with his patenting work at a time when Japan was still in the process of formally institutionalizing its patent-attorney system. In accordance with Lamoreaux and Sokoloff's 1999 influential study of trade in invention in the United States, our quantitative and qualitative evidence highlights how inventors and intermediaries in Japan interacted to create a market for new ideas.

Type
Articles
Information
Business History Review , Volume 87 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Markets for Innovation , Spring 2013 , pp. 121 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a summary of this literature, see Odagiri, Hiroyuki and Goto, Akira, Technology and Industrial Development in Japan: Building Capabilities by Learning, Innovation and Public Policy (Oxford, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Röhl, Wilhelm, “Public Law,” in History of Law in Japan since 1868, ed. Röhl, Wilhelm (Leiden, 2005), 31Google Scholar.

3 See in particular, Romer, Paul M., “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy 98 (1990): S71–S102CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy (Cambridge, MA, 1991)Google Scholar; Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter, “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction,” Econometrica 60 (1992): 323–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 See further, Rosovsky, Henry, Capital Formation in Japan, 1868–1940 (Glencoe, 1961)Google Scholar; Ohkawa, Kazushi and Rosovsky, Henry, Japanese Economic Growth: Trend Acceleration in the Twentieth Century (Stanford, 1973)Google Scholar; Kelley, Allen C. and Williamson, Jeffrey G., Lessons from Japanese Development (Chicago, 1974)Google Scholar.

5 Arora, Ashish, Fosfuri, Andrea, and Gambardella, Alfonso, Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy (Cambridge, MA, 2001), 8Google Scholar.

6 Lamoreaux, Naomi R. and Sokoloff, Kenneth L., “Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries,” Table 1.2, 28, in Learning By Doing in Firms, Markets, and Nations, ed. Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter (Chicago, 1999), 19–57Google Scholar.

7 See further, Burhop, Carsten, “The Transfer of Patents in Imperial Germany,” Journal of Economic History 70 (2010): 921–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Serrano, Carlos, “The Dynamics of the Transfer and Renewal of Patents,” Rand Journal of Economics 41 (2010): 686–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 These include a method for waterproofing wool (¥16,800 in 1901), a glass tube to cover a lantern (¥10,000 in 1904), and a cigar-manufacturing machine (¥19,000 in 1905).

10 Current price calculation based on Lawrence H. Officer and Samuel H. Williamson, “Six Ways to Compute the Relative Value of a Japanese Yen Amount, 1879–2009,” Measuring Worth, 2011, http://www.measuringworth.com/.

11 Lamoreaux, and Sokoloff, , “Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries,” 25Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., 57.

13 We use prefecture-level GDP estimates for 1890, 1909, and 1925 that were painstakingly collected, and kindly supplied to us, by Bassino, Jean-Pascal, Fukao, Kyoji, Paprzycki, Ralph, Settsu, Tokihiko, and Yuan, Tangjun, “Regional Inequality and Migration in Prewar Japan, 1890–1940,” paper presented at the Asian Historical Economics Conference, Hitotsubashi University, Kunitachi, Tokyo, 2012Google Scholar.

14 Figures compiled from various volumes of Tokkyo Kyoku Toukei Nenpyō [Japanese Patent Office Annual Statistical Report].

15 Comin, Diego and Hobijn, Bart, “An Exploration of Technology Diffusion,” American Economic Review 100 (2010): 2051CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 All of the patents per capita series are in logs with a base of 2 so that a unit change in the log is equivalent to a twofold change in the level.

17 Moser, Petra and Nicholas, Tom, “Was Electricity a General Purpose Technology? Evidence from Historical Patent Citations,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 94 (2004): 388–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Minami, Ryoshin, Power Revolution in the Industrialization of Japan, 1885–1940 (New York, 1987)Google Scholar.

19 Nishimura, Shigehiro, “International Patent Control and Transfer of Knowledge: The United States and Japan before World War II,” Business and Economic History 9 (2011): 5Google Scholar.

20 Jeremy, David, The Transfer of International Technology (London, 1991)Google Scholar.

21 See further, Westney, Eleanor, Imitation and Innovation: The Transfer of Western Organizational Patterns to Meiji Japan (Cambridge, MA, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Hunter, Janet, “Institutional Change in Meiji Japan: Image and Reality,” in Institutional Change in Japan, ed. Blomstrom, Magnus and La Croix, Sumner (London, 2006)Google Scholar.

22 It is often argued that as part of the catch-up process Japanese inventors observed and adapted imported intermediate goods. And a notable case is the textile machinery industry where ideas spread rapidly across manufacturing establishments. The upshot of learning was the rise of Japanese preeminence and “the astonishing ascendancy of Osaka over Lancashire.” See further Saxonhouse, Gary, “A Tale of Japanese Technological Diffusion in the Meiji Period,” Journal of Economic History 34 (1974): 149–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Wada, Kazuo, “The Fable of the Birth of the Japanese Automobile Industry: A Reconsideration of the Toyoda-Platt Agreement of 1929,” Business History 48 (2006): 90–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In current prices ¥250,000 is equivalent to ¥165,000,000 (around $2.1 million or £1.4 million).

24 Fukasaku, Yukiko, “Origins of Japanese Industrial Research: Pre-war Government Policy and In-House Research at Mitsubishi Nagasaki Shipyard,” Research Policy 21 (1992): 197–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 See further, Morck, Randall and Nakamura, Masao, “Business Groups and the Big Push: Meiji Japan's Mass Privatization and Subsequent Growth,” Enterprise and Society 8 (2007): 543–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Tang, John P., “Technological Leadership and Late Development: Evidence from Meiji Japan, 1868–1912,” Economic History Review 64 (2011): 99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Nicholas, Tom, “Independent Invention during the Rise of the Corporate Economy in Britain and Japan,” Economic History Review 64 (2011): 995–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Ibid., 1000.

28 Japanese Patent Office, Kōgyō Shoyūken Seido Hyakunenshi Jōkan [100-year History of Industrial Property Systems], vol. 1 (Tokyo, 1984), 342Google Scholar.

29 Nicholas, , “Independent Invention during the Rise of the Corporate Economy in Britain and Japan,” 3Google Scholar.

30 Mosk, Carl, Japanese Industrial History: Technology, Urbanization, and Economic Growth (Armonk, 2001)Google Scholar.

31 Hashino, Tomoko, “Institutionalising Technical Education: The Case of Weaving Districts in Meiji Japan,” Australian Economic History Review 52 (2012): 25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Mitchener, Kris and Ohnuki, Mari, “Institutions, Competition, and Capital Market Integration in Japan,” Journal of Economic History 69 (2009): 138–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Morck, and Nakamura, , “Business Groups and the Big Push,” 543–601Google Scholar.

34 Ohkawa and Rosovsky, Japanese Economic Growth.

35 See further Uchida, Hoshimi, Nihon Bōseki Gijyutsu No Rekishi [History of Japanese Cotton Spinning Industry] (Tokyo, 1960)Google Scholar; Uchida, Hoshimi, Sangyō Gijyutsu Nyūmon [History of Industrial Technology] (Tokyo, 1974)Google Scholar; and Ishii, Tadashi, Chitekizaisan no Rekishi to Gendai [Intellectual Property Right, History, and Today] (Tokyo, 2005)Google Scholar.

36 Heath, Christopher, “Intellectual Property and Anti-Trust,” in Röhl, Wilhelm, ed., History of Law in Japan since 1868 (Leiden, 2005), 415–17Google Scholar.

37 Gerschenkron, Alexander, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays (Cambridge, MA, 1962)Google Scholar.

38 Heath, , “Intellectual Property and Anti-Trust,” 405Google Scholar.

39 Hasebe, Fukuji, “Nihon ni okeru Tokkyo Seido ni Kansuru Shiteki Kenkyu” [History of Patent Law System in Japan] Patento 1, no. 30 (1977), 20–31Google Scholar.

40 Tom Nicholas, “Hybrid Innovation in Meiji Japan,” International Economic Review (forthcoming).

41 Sardjono, Agus, “The Japanese Patent Law System,” World Intellectual Property Organization Working Paper, 2000Google Scholar.

42 Lerner, Josh, “150 Years of Patent Protection,” Harvard Business School Working Paper, 2000, Table 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 Khan, B. Zorina, The Democratization of Invention: Patents and Copyrights in American Economic Development, 1790–1920 (Cambridge, 2005)Google Scholar.

44 Ibid., 295–96.

45 Prior to this point, only bilateral treaties existed with selected countries such as Germany, Denmark, Britain, and the United States.

46 Sardjono, “The Japanese Patent Law System.”

47 Heath, , “Intellectual Property and Anti-Trust,” 424–25Google Scholar.

48 Lamoreaux and Sokoloff, “Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.”

49 Arora, Fosfuri, and Gambardella, Markets for Technology.

50 Jones, Ben, “The Knowledge Trap: Human Capital and Development Reconsidered,” NBER Working Paper no. 14138 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Benrishi Seido 100 Kinen, ShūnenJikkō, JigyōHensanbu, Iinkai Kaishi, ed., Benrishi Seido 100 nenshi [100-Year History of Patent Attorney] (Tokyo, 2000), 12–13Google Scholar.

52 Ibid., 18.

53 Brindley, H. S. Bickerton, Japanese Patents: A Practical Handbook to the Japanese Laws Relating to Patents, Utility Devices, Designs, and Trade Marks for the Patent Agent and Inventor (London, 1909), 13Google Scholar.

54 Benrishi Seido 100 Shūnen Kinen Jigyō Jikkō Iinkai Hensanbu, Kaishi ed., Benrishi Seido 100 nenshi [100-Year History of Patent Attorney], 19Google Scholar.

55 Ibid., 18.

56 Ibid., 22–23.

57 On Ono Tomogoro's life and his salt making business, see Fuji, Tetsuhiro, Kanrin Maru Kōkaichō Ono Tomogorō no Shōgai: Bakumatsu Meiji no Technokurāto [Captain of Japanese War Ship Kanrin Maru, Ono Tomogoro's Life: Technocrat of the End of Edo and Meiji Period] (Tokyo, 1985)Google Scholar.

58 Hakurankaigakari, Nōmushō, Meiji 14 nen Dai 2 kai Naikoku Kangyōhakurankai Hōkokusho, Dai 2 Ku, Dai 1 Rui [Report on the Second Domestic Industrial Exhibition Second Segment, Type 1] (Tokyo, 1883)Google Scholar.

59 Shin 5 dai 3455 gō. Meisai Teisei Tsūchisho [no. 5-3445. Notification for Patent Specification Correction] (2 Mar. 1891). Reference Number 198909-47, Hiroshima Prefecture Archives, Hiroshima, Japan (hereafter, HPA).

60 Sōfusho Shin 5 dai 3483 gō. Shinkō Shokuenseihō Shutsugan ni Kansuru Sateisho Sōfu [no. 5-3483. Decision Report on New Salt Production Patent Application] (11 Mar. 1891). Reference Number 198909-48, HPA.

61 Senbai Seienhō Kakuchō nitsuki Iin Yakuteisho [Agreement on Extension of Salt Making Patent] (3 Dec. 1890). Reference Number 198909-42/43, HPA. It is worth noting that the Komori family was Ono's parental home and that Ono was thus related to Mitsuta Komori by blood.

62 Shokuen Seizō Sōchi Tokkyonegai Ishoku nitsuki Tokkyonegai Seikō nosetsu Hōshū no Keiyakusho [Contract of Contingent on Success of Patenting Salt Making Facility] (11 Sept. 1893). Reference Number 198909-73, HPA.

63 Patent Number 2181.

64 Shokuen Seizō Sōchi Tokkyonegai Seikō Hōshūkinn Ryōshūsho [Receipt of Fee Contingent on Success of Patenting Salt Making Facility] (29 Dec. 1894). Reference Number 198909-98, HPA.

65 Tokkyonegai Jippi Uchikinn oyobi Inshiryōkinn Uketorisho [Receipt of Actual Expense for Patent Application and Official Stamp Fee] (10 Sept. 1894). Reference Number 198909-99, HPA.

66 Shokuen Seizō Sōchi Shitagaki Meisaisho [Draft of Salt Making Facility Specification]. Reference Number 198909-206, HPA.

67 Shō Seichi Tokkyonegai Zankinn no Uchikin Azukarisho [Receipt of Remaining Account for patent filing expenses] (28 Apr. 1897). Reference Number 198909-405, HPA; Nukiyama Shōjirō Shokan [Letter from Shōjirō Nukiyama] (18 Aug. 1898). Reference Number 198909-681, HPA.

68 Shokuen Seizō Sōchi Tokkyoken Baiyo Tōrokuseikyū ni Kanshi Manaka Naomichi o Dairinin tosuru Todoke [Attorney Registration: Naomichi Manaka as Attorney regarding to Patent of Salt Making Facility] (1898). Reference Number 198909-190, HPA.

69 Lamoreaux, and Sokoloff, , “Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries,” 20Google Scholar.

70 See further, Nicholas, “Independent Invention during the Rise of the Corporate Economy in Britain and Japan”; and Burhop, “The Transfer of Patents in Imperial Germany.”