Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:49:53.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Relevance of Philosophy to Business Ethics: A Response to Rorty’s “Is Philosophy Relevant to Applied Ethics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Philosophy’s Role vis-à-vis Business Ethics
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. “Theses on Feuerbach,” Thesis XI, available in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd ed., ed. Robert C. Tucker (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1978), 145.

2. Ibid., 95.

3. Some have done this by combining utilitarian and deontological approaches in their analysis of particular problems, some have adopted a pluralistic position in ethics, still others have opted for an Aristotlean or a pragmatic or some other approach to issues, assimilating the contributions of those, for instance, working on virtue ethics either as an alternative to or as an addition to the traditional deontological and utilitarian approaches.

4. “The History of Business Ethics,” in The Accountable Corporation, ed. Marc Epstein and Kirk Hanson (Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2005), vol. 2, pp. 263–67; a version of it is available online: Richard T. De George, “A History of Business Ethics,” paper presented at the Conference on The Accountable Corporation, Santa Clara University, Feb. 17–19, 2005, available at http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/business/conference/presentations/business-ethics-history.html (Nov. 8, 2005).