Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:53:07.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconciliation in Business Ethics: Some Advice from Aristotle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Edwin M. Hartman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It may be nearly impossible to use standard principles to make a decision about a complex ethical case. The best decision, say virtue ethicists in the Aristotelian tradition, is often one that is made by a person of good character who knows the salient facts of the case and can frame the situation appropriately. In this respect ethical decisions and strategic decisions are similar. Rationality plays a role in good ethical decision-making, but virtue ethicists emphasize the importance of intuitions and emotions as well.

Virtue ethics suggests a reconciliation of the factual and the normative. Virtues may explain as well as justify actions. The same is true of other psychological states and events. That psychological terms have normative implications does not render them useless in explanation. As Aristotle does not distinguish cleanly between the normative and empirical, so many moral philosophers today reject the is-ought dichotomy. They are prepared to learn from economists, psychologists, and other empirical scientists who offer information about the nature of the good life and of values. Social psychologists who study community or corporate culture suggest a close relationship between organizational and ethical features, much as Aristotle saw a close relationship between politics and ethics. We should infer from all this that in business ethics there is good reason for philosophers and organization scholars to work closely together.

Type
Presidential Address
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 253 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alzola, Miguel. 2007. Character and environment: The status of virtues in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 78: 343–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1894. Ethica Nicomachea. Bywater, I. (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1985. Nicomachean ethics. Irwin, T. H. (Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. 2004. Knowing thyself: The evolutionary psychology of moral reasoning and moral sentiments. In Freeman, R. E. and Werhane, P. H. (Eds.), Business, Science, and Ethics (The Ruffin Series No. 4), 93–128. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. 1979. Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. Journal of Philosophy, 76: 256–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1963. Actions, reasons, and causes. Journal of Philosophy, 60: 685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De George, R. T. 2006. The relevance of philosophy to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 381–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DesJardins, J. 2004. Explanation and justification: The relevance of the biological and social sciences to business ethics. In Freeman, R. E. and Werhane, P. H. (Eds.), Business, Science, and Ethic (The Ruffin Series No. 4), 239–61. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. 2005. For positive management theories while retaining science: Reply to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning and Education: 4: 109–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T., and Dunfee, T. 1999. Ties that bind: A social contract approach to business ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Doris, J. 2002. Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. 1984. Ulysses and the sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality. Rev. edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J.. 1985. Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J.. 1998. Emotions and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 36 47–74.Google Scholar
Flack, J. C., and deWaal, F. B. M. 2004. Monkey business and business ethics: Evolutionary origins of human morality. In Freeman, R. E. and Werhane, P. H. (Eds.), Business, Science, and Ethics (The Ruffin Series No. 4), 7–41. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. 1988. Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H.. 2004. What price the moral high ground? Ethical dilemmas in competitive environments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 409–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. 1983. Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4: 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108: 814–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J.. 2006. The happiness hypothesis: Finding modern truth in ancient wisdom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2003. No character or personality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13: 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, E. M. 2006. Can we teach character? An Aristotelian answer. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5: 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehn, D. 2006. A response to Rorty. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 391–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, I. 1997. Virtuous markets: The market as school of the virtues. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. W. 2006. From morality to mental health: Virtue and vice in a therapeutic culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, D. M. 1998. Social categories and business ethics. In Freeman, R. E. (Ed.), New Approaches to Business Ethics (The Ruffin Series No. 1), 149–72. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Norman, W. 2006. Negotiating nationalism: Nation-building, federalism, and secession in the multinational state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. 2005. Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4: 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 2002. The collapse of the fact/value distinction and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J.. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. M. 1990. The priority of democracy to philosophy. In Malachowski, A. (Ed.), Reading Rorty, 279–302. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. M.. 2006a. Is philosophy relevant to business ethics? Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 369–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. M. 2006b. Replies to Koehn, De George, and Werhane. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 409–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, P. 2007. The halo effect… and the eight other business delusions that deceive managers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1949. The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. S. 1963. Science, perception, and reality. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1987. On ethics and economics. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. C. 1992. Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. H. 1999. Moral imagination and management decision-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. H. 2006. A place for philosophy in applied ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 401–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, J. B. 2002. Saving Adam Smith. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. 2007. The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House.Google Scholar