Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T23:33:36.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Private Political Authority and Public Responsibility: Transnational Politics, Transnational Firms, and Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Stephen J. Kobrin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Transnational corporations have become actors with significant political power and authority which should entail responsibility and liability, specifically direct liability for complicity in human rights violations. Holding TNCs liable for human rights violations is complicated by the discontinuity between the fragmented legal/political structure of the TNC and its integrated strategic reality and the international state system which privileges sovereignty and non-intervention over the protection of individual rights. However, the post-Westphalian transition—the emergence of multiple authorities, increasing ambiguity of borders and jurisdiction and blurring of the line between the public and private spheres—should facilitate imposing direct responsibility on transnational firms. Mechanisms for imposing direct responsibility on TNCs are considered including voluntary agreements and international law. However, I conclude that a hybrid public-private regime which relies on non-hierarchical compliance mechanisms is likely to be both more effective and consistent with the structure of the emerging transnational order.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 349 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K. W., and Snidal, D., D. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization 54(3): 421–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avi-Yonah, R. 2005. “The Cyclical Transformations of the Corporate Form: A Historical Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility.” Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 30: 767–818.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S., and Cashore, B.. 2000. “Globalization, Four Paths of Internationalization and Domestic Policy Change: The Case of EcoForestry in British Columbia, Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 33(1): 67–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, P. I. 1993. The Multinational Challenge to Corporation Law: The Search for a New Corporate Personality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, P. I. 2002. “Asserting Human Rights Against Multinational Corporations Under United States Law: Conceptual and Procedural Problems.” American Journal of Comparative Law 50 (Fall): 493–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BNA Monitoring Service. 2005. “OECD Countries Reaffirm Commitment to Multinational Guidelines, NGOs Want More.” International Business and Finance Daily (September 22)Google Scholar
Bridgeford, T. A. 2003. “Imputing Human Rights Obligations on Multinational Corporations: The Ninth Circuit Strikes Again in Judicial Activism.” American University International Law Review 18: 1009–57.Google Scholar
Bull, H. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T. 2006. “A Human Rights Approach to Developing Voluntary Codes of Conduct for Multinational Corporations.” Business Ethics Quarterly 16(2): 255–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, A. 2006. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, J. 1998. “The Privatization of Global Environmental Governance: ISO 14000 and the Developing World.” Global Governance 4: 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clougherty, J. A., and Grajek, M.. 2006. The Impact of ISO 9000 Diffusion on Trade and FDI: A New Institutional Analysis. Berlin: Social Science Research Center.Google Scholar
Collingwood, V. 2006. “Non-Governmental Organizations, Power and Legitimacy in International Society.” Review of International Studies 32: 439–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corporate Social Responsibility Group. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility 2001. Calgary: Talisman Energy Incorporated.Google Scholar
Corr, C. F., and Lawler, J.. 1999. “Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't: The OECD Convention and the Globalization of Anti-Bribery Measures.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 32: 1249–1344.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. C. 1999. “Locating ‘Authority’ in the Global Political Economy.” International Studies Quarterly 43: 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. C. 2001. “Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organization: A Crisis of Legitimacy.” Review of International Studies 27: 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deva, S. 2004. “Acting Extraterritorially to Tame Multinational Corporations for Human Rights Violations: Who Should ‘Bell the Cat.’” Melbourne Journal of International Law 5: 37–65.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1989. The Ethics of International Business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1996. Values in Tension: Ethics Away From Home. Harvard Business Review (September-October): 48–62.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. 2004. State Sovereignty and Human Rights, Human Rights and Human Welfare. Denver: University of Denver Graduate School of International Studies.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. 2007. International Human Rights, 3rd ed. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Drohan, M. 1999. “Sudan Play Bad Timing for Talisman.” Toronto Globe and Mail (October 27): B2Google Scholar
Drohan, M. 2003. Making a Killing: How and Why Corporations Use Armed Force to Do Business. Toronto: Random House Canada.Google Scholar
Dupuy, P.-M. 1990. “Soft Law and the International Law of the Environment.” Michigan Journal of International Law 12: 420–35.Google Scholar
Esty, D. C. 2006. “Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law.” Yale Law Journal 115: 1490–1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, S. 1999. “Crude Pressures: A Canadian Oil Company Operating in Sudan Gets Targeted by Rebels, the U.S. State Department and its own Foreign Affairs Ministry.” Time Canada (November 22): 36.Google Scholar
Gagnon, G., and Ryle, J.. 2001. “Report of an Investigation into Oil Development, Conflict and Displacement in Western Upper Nile, Sudan.” Canadian Auto Workers Union, Steelworkers Humanities Fund, The Simons Foundation, United Church of Canada, World Vision Canada (October). Available at www.ecosonline.org/back/pdf_reports/2001/SudanReportGagnon103001.pdf.Google Scholar
Haass, R. N. 1997. “Sanctioning Madness.” Foreign Affairs 76(6) (November/December): 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. B., and Biersteker, T. J.. 2002. “The Emergence of Private Authority in the International System.” In The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance, ed. Hall and, R. B.Biersteker, T. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, J. 2000. Human Security in Sudan: The Report of a Canadian Assessment Mission. Ottawa: Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade.Google Scholar
Haufler, V. 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Held, D. 2006. Models of Democracy, 3rd ed. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Henkin, L. 1999. “The Global Market as a Friend or Foe of Human Rights: The Universal Declaration at 50 and the Challenge of Global Markets.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 25: 17–25.Google Scholar
Hillgenberg, H. 1999. “A Fresh Look at Soft Law.” European Journal of International Law, 10(3): 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Council. 2007. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary General (SRSG) on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises; Addendum. Corporate Repsonsibility Under International Law and Issues in Extraterritorial Regulation. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Hurrell, A. 1999. “Power, Principles and Prudence: Protecting Human Rights in a Deeply Divided World.” In Human Rights in Global Politics, ed. Dunne, T. and Wheeler, N. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Council on Human Rights Policy. 2002. Beyond Voluntarism: Human Rights and the Developing International Legal Obligations of Companies. Veersoix, Switzerland: International Council on Human Rights Policy.Google Scholar
Jadwin, P. J., and Shilling, M.. 1994. “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.” American Criminal Law Review 31: 677–86.Google Scholar
Johns, F. 1994. “The Invisibility of the Transnational Corporation: An Analysis of International Law and Theory.” Melbourne University Law Review 19: 893–923.Google Scholar
Kinley, D., and Tadaki, J.. 2003–2004. “From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law.” Virginia Journal of International Law 44(4): 931–1023.Google Scholar
Kobrin, S. J. 1989. “Enforcing Export Embargoes through Multinational Corporations: Why It Doesn't Work Anymore. Business in the Contemporary World 1 (Winter): 31–42.Google Scholar
Kobrin, S. J. 2001. “Soverignty@Bay: Globalization, Multinational Enterprise and the International Political System.” In Oxford Handbook of International Business, ed. Brewer, T. and Rugman, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobrin, S. J. 2004. “Oil and Politics: Talisman Energy in Sudan.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 36(2/3): 425–56.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. 1982. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” International Organization 36(2): 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, J. 2002. “UN Seeks Help From Companies in War on HIV/AIDs.” Financial Times (August 30): 1.Google Scholar
Livermore, M. A. 2006. “Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation, Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius.” New York University Law Review 81(2): 766–801.Google Scholar
March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. 1998. “Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52(4): 943–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, A., ed. 1997. The Transformation of Democracy. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
McGrew, A., ed. 2003. “Models of Transnational Democracy.” In The Global Transformations Reader, 2nd ed., ed. Held, D. and McGrew, A.. Cambridge: Polity Press, 500–13.Google Scholar
Meeran, R. 1999. “The Unveiling of Transnational Coprorations: A Direct Approach.” In Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations, ed. Addo, M. K.. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 161–70.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P. T. 2001. “Human Rights and Multinationals: Is There a Problem?” International Affairs 77(1): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, E., and Perkins, R.. 2004. Uneven Geographies of Organizational Practice: Explaining the Cross-National Transfer and Diffusion of ISO 9000. London: London School of Economics Department of Geography and Environment.Google Scholar
Nye, J. S. J., and Keohane, R.. 1971. “Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction.” In Transnational Relations and World Politics, ed. Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. J.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, ix–xxix.Google Scholar
OECD. 2000. Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Revision 2000, Vol. 2006. Paris.Google Scholar
OECD. 2001. The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Policy Brief.Google Scholar
OECD Watch. 2005. Five Years On: A Review of the OECD Guidelines and National Contact Points. Amsterdam: Center For Research on Multinational Corporations.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. 2002. “Global Ethics and the Alien Tort Claims Act: A Summary of Three Cases within the Oil and Gas Industry.” Management Decision 40(7): 720–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palazzo, G., and Scherer, A. G.. 2006. “Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework.” Journal of Business Ethics 66: 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, J. R. 2001. “Holding Multinational Corporations Responsible Under International Law.” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 24 (Spring): 285–96.Google Scholar
Paust, J. J. 2002. “Human Rights Responsibilities of Private Corporations.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 35 (May): 801–25.Google Scholar
Pegg, S. 2003. “An Emerging Market for the New Millennium: Transnational Corporations and Human Rights.” In Transnational Corporations and Human Rights, ed. Frynas, J. G. and Pegg, S.. Houndmill: Palgrave MacMillan, 1–32.Google Scholar
Picciotto, S. 2003. “Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 42(131): 131–52.Google Scholar
Presbyterian Church of Sudan versus Talisman Energy, Inc. 2003. 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4085.Google Scholar
Presbyterian Church of Sudan versus Talisman Energy, Inc. 2006. S.D.N.Y.Google Scholar
Ratner, S. R. 2001. “Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility.” Yale Law Journal 111: 443–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, T. 2004. “Global Governance and Communicative Action.” Government and Opposition 39(2): 288–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N. 1995. “Shifting the Point of Regulation: The International Organization for Standardization and Global Lawmaking on Trade and the Envrionment.” Ecology Law Quarterly 22: 479–539.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. N. 1992. “Governance, Order and Change in World Politics.” In Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, ed. Rosenau, J. N. and Czempiel, E.-O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. 2004. “Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues, Actors and Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 10(4): 499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoro, M. A. 1995. Pfizer: Global Protection of Intellectual Property. Boston: Harvard Business School Case.Google Scholar
Scholte, J. A. 1997. “Global Capitalism and the State.” International Affairs 73(3): 427–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, S. K. 2003. Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, P. J. 1996. “New Global Potentates: Nongovernmental Organizations and the ‘Unregulated’ Market Place.” Cardozo Law Review 18: 957–69.Google Scholar
Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. 2005. Report of the United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Related Business Enterprises with Regards to Human Rights. New York: The United Nations Commission on Human Rights.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudan Update. 1999. “Raising the Stakes: Oil and Conflict in Sudan.” Vol. 2003. Available at http://www.sudanupdate.org/REPORTS/oil/oil.pdf.Google Scholar
UNCTAD. 2007. World Investment Report: 2007. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations. 1990. The New Code Environment. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. 1998 (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights, vol. 2005. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Social and Economic Council. 2003. Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Vagts, D. F. 1970. “The Multinational Enterprise: A New Challenge for Transnational Law.” Harvard Law Review 83(3) (January): 739–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, C. M. 2005. “Direct vs. Indirect Obligations of Corporations Under International Law.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 43: 927–59.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. 1971. Sovereignty at Bay. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. 2006. The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct. Working paper. Center for Responsible Business, University of California, Berkeley. Working paper Series, Paper 34.Google Scholar
Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights. 2006. “The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights.” Available at http://www.voluntaryprinciples.org/files/voluntary_principles.pdf.Google Scholar
Wawryk, A. 2003. “Regulating Transnational Corporations through Corporate Codes of Conduct.” In Transnational Corporations and Human Rights, ed. Frynas, J. G. and Pegg, S.. Houndmill: Palgrave MacMillan, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissbrodt, D., and Kruger, M., M. 2003. “Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights.” The American Journal of International Law 97 (October): 901–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, C., and Elias, J.. 2003. Holding Multinational Corporations Responsible for Breaches of Human Rights. Cardiff: Cardiff University Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability and Sustainabilty and Society.Google Scholar
Williamson, H., and Peel, M.. 2006. “Nations Shamed over Bribery.” Financial Times, U.S. ed. (June 27): 4.Google Scholar
Windsor, D. 2004. “The Development of International Business Norms.” Business Ethics Quarterly 14(4): 729–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar