Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T18:09:28.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizational Justice and Behavioral Ethics: Promises and Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Russell Cropanzano  and
Jordan H. Stein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Scholars studying organizational justice have been slow to incorporate insights from behavioral ethics research, despite the fields’ conceptual affinities. We maintain that this stems from differences in the paradigmatic approaches taken by scholars in each area. First, justice research historically has assumed that individuals are motivated by a desire for instrumental control of worthwhile outcomes or by a concern with social status, while behavioral ethics has paid more attention to the role of internalized moral convictions and duties. Second, organizational justice researchers have investigated one set of individual differences, behavioral researchers have examined another. Third, justice scholars focus on social identities while behavioral ethics scholars also investigate moral identities. As an impetus to future inquiry, our review attends to contemporary organizational justice research that takes into account concepts derived from behavioral ethics. In so doing we hope to highlight an avenue for integrative scholarship that will further our understanding of organizational justice.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 193 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. S. 1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47: 422–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: 267–99. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ambrose, M. L., & Arnaud, A. 2005. Are procedural justice and distributive justice conceptually distinct? In Greenberg, J. & Colquitt, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: 59–84. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ambrose, M. L., Hess, R. L., & Ganesan, S. 2007. The relationship between justice and attitudes: An examination of justice effects on event and system-related attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103: 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & ReedA., II. A., II. 2002. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 1423–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aquino, K., ReedA., II A., II, Stewart, M. M., & Shapiro, D. L. 2005. Self-regulatory identity theory and reactions toward fairness enhancing organizational policies. In Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D., Skarlicki, D. P., & van den Bos, K. (Eds.), What motivates fairness in organizations?: 129–48. Greenwich, CT: IAP.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1962. Nicomachean ethics (Ostwald, M., Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
Ashkanasy, N. M., Windsor, C. A., & Trevino, L. K. 2006. Bad apples in bad barrels revisited: Personal factors and organizational rewards as determinants of managerial ethical decision-making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 449–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D. 1987. Self-report ratings of empathic emotion. In Eisenberg, N. & Strayer, J. (Eds.), Empathy and its development: 356–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. 1991. The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. 1978. Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bies, R. J. 1987. The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: Vol. 9, 289–319. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Bies, R. J. 2001. Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In Greenberg, J. & Cropanzano, R. (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice: 89–118. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bies, R. J. 2005. Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct? In Greenberg, J. & Colquitt, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: 85–112. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., & Bazerman, M. H. (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations: 43–55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. 1987. Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1: 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., & Cummings, L. L. 1988. Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it is not my fault? Communication Research, 15: 381–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blader, S. L., Rothman, N. B., & Gonzalez, C. M. 2008. How efforts to do the right thing can go astray: Empathy, justice, and managerial decision making. Paper presented at the Fifth International Roundtable on Innovations in Organizational Justice. Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. 2001. Justice and empathy: What motivates people to help others? In Ross, M. & Miller, D. T. (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life: 226–50. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. 2005. How can theories of organizational justice explain the effects of fairness? In Greenberg, J. & Colquitt, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: 329–54. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Blasi, A. 1980. Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobocel, D. R., Agar, S. E., Meyer, J. P., & Irving, P. G. 1998. Managerial accounts and fairness perceptions in conflict resolution: Differentiating the effects of minimizing responsibility and providing justification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20: 133–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobocel, D. R., & Farrell, A. 1996. Sex-based promotion decisions and interactional fairness: Investigating the influence of managerial accounts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18: 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobocel, D. R., & Holmvall, C. 1999a. Are interactional justice and procedural justice different? Framing the debate. Paper presented at the International Roundtable on Innovations in Organizational Justice Research, Nice, France.Google Scholar
Bobocel, D. R., & Holmvall, C. 1999b. Distributive, procedural, and interactional justice: Exploring the nomological network of organizational justice constructs. Paper presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Bobocel, D. R., McCline, R. L., & Folger, R. 1997. Letting them down gently: Conceptual advances in explaining controversial organizational policies. In Cooper, C. L. & Rousseau, D. M. (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior: Vol. 4, 73–88. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Boeckmann, R. J., & Tyler, T. R. 1997. Commonsense justice and inclusion within the moral community: When do people receive procedural protections from others? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3: 362–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, F. N. 1985. A Janus-headed model of ethical theory: Looking two ways at business/ society issues. Academy of Management Review, 10: 568–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, F. N., & Wheeler, G. E. 1996. An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 927–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockner, J. 1990. Scope of justice in the workplace: How survivors react to co-workers’ layoffs. Journal of Social Issues, 46: 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Magner, N., Folger, R., Umphress, E., van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., Magner, M., and Siegel, P. 2003. High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91: 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Siegel, P. A., Wiesenfeld, B. M., Martin, C., Grover, S., et al. 1998. The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75: 394–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brockner, J., Tyler, T. R., & Cooper-Schneider, R. 1992. The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived unfairness: The higher they are, the harder they fall. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 241–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. 2006. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17: 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavioral and Human Decision Processes, 97: 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Z. S., & Cropanzano, R. 2001. History of organizational justice: The founders speak. In Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), Justice in the workplace (Vol. II): From theory to practice: 3–26. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. 2003. Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7: 298–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. 2001. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86: 278–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquitt, J. A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., & Chertkoff, J. M. 2002. Explaining injustice: The interactive effects of explanation and outcome on fairness perceptions and task motivation. Journal of Management, 28: 591–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 425–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A., & Shaw, J. C. 2006. Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100: 110–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. 2007. The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21: 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., &, Rupp, D. R. 2001. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58: 164–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B. M., & Folger, R. 2003. Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24: 1019–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B. M., & Folger, R. 2005. Self-interest: Defining and understanding a human motive. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 985–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. 1997. Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In Cooper, C. L. & Robertson, I. T. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology: 317–72. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., & Rupp, D. E. 2002. Some reflections on the morality of organizational justice. In Gilliland, S., Steiner, D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on managing organizational justice: 225–78. Greenwich, CT: Informational Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., & Rupp, D. E. 2003. An overview of organizational justice: Implications for work motivation. In Porter, L. W., Bigley, G., & Steers, R. M. (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior: 82–95. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., & Rupp, D. E. 2003. In press. Social exchange theory and organizational justice: Job performance, citizenship behaviors, multiple foci, and a historical integration of two literatures. In Gilliland, S., Steiner, D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: Justice, morality, and social responsibility. Greenwich CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Mohler, C. J., & Schminke, M. 2001. Three roads to organizational justice. In Ferris, J. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management: Vol. 20, 1–113. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Stein, J., & Goldman, B. M. 2007. Individual Aesthetics: Self-interest. In Kessler, E. H. & Bailey, J. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational and managerial wisdom: 181–221. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
DaGloria, J., & DeRidder, R. 1977. Aggression in dyadic interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7: 189–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DaGloria, J., & DeRidder, R. 1979. Sex differences in aggression: Are current notions misleading? European Journal of Social Psychology, 9: 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H. 1983. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44: 113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D. 2003. Why inconsistent leadership is regarded as procedurally unfair: The importance of social self-esteem concerns. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33: 535–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., & Blader, S. L. 2006. Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36: 211–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. 2005. Am I respected or not? Inclusion and reputation as issues in group membership. Social Justice Research, 18: 121–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Dijke, M., & Bos, A. E. R. 2004. How self-relevant is fair treatment? Self-esteem moderates interactional justice effects. Social Justice Research, 17: 407–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eek, D., & Biel, A. 2003. The interplay between greed, efficiency, and fairness in public-goods dilemmas. Social Justice Research, 16: 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N. 2000. Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51: 665–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellard, J. H., & Skarlicki, D. P. 2002. A third-party observers’ reactions to employee mistreatment: Motivational and cognitive processes in deservingness assessments. In Gilliland, S.W., Steiner, D. D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: 133–58. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1990. The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Folger, R. 1994. Workplace justice and employee worth. Social Justice Research, 7: 225–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folger, R. 1998. Fairness as a moral virtue. In Schminke, M. (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes: 13–34. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Folger, R. 2001. Fairness as deonance. In Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: Vol. 1, 3–33. New York: Information Age Publishers.Google Scholar
Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. 2005. Justice, accountability, and moral sentiment: The deontic response to “foul play” at work. In Greenberg, J. & Colquitt, J. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: 215–45. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. 1989. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 115–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folger, R., & Salvador, R. 2008. Is management theory too “self-ish”? Journal of Management. 34: 1127–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, W. 1964. The personal management process: Human resource administration. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Frohlich, N. 2007. A very short history of distributive justice. Social Justice Research, 20: 250–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A. 1992. Choosing justice: An experimental approach to ethical theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, L. W. 2003. Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14: 693–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, L. W., Vitucci, S., & Cedillo, M. 2005. Spiritual leadership and army transformation: Theory, measurement, and establishing a baseline. Leadership Quarterly, 16: 835–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudine, A., & Thorne, L. 2001. Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31: 175–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J. Z., & Greenberg, J. 2005. Are the goals of organizational justice self-interested? In Greenberg, J. & Colquitt, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: 179–213. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C., & Wiggins, G. 1987. The origins of morality in early childhood relationships. In Kagan, J. & Lamb, S. (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1990. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16: 606–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. 2002. Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89: 985–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafer, C. L., & Olson, J. M. 2003. An analysis of empirical research on the scope of justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7: 311–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108: 814–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. 2006. The happiness hypothesis: Finding modern truth in ancient wisdom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. 2007. The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316: 998–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. 2007. When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20: 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. 2004. Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Dcedlaus (Fall): 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., Rosenberg, E., & Hom, H. 2003. Differentiating diversities: Moral diversity is not like other kinds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31: 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, D., Atkins, R., & Ford, D. 1998. Urban American as a context for the development of moral identity in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 54: 513–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, E., Walster, G. W., & Piliavin, J. A. 1978. Equity theory and help relationships. In Wispe, L. (Ed.), Altruism, sympathy, and helping: Psychological and sociological principals: 115–39. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook, R. L. Jr.,, & Kulik, C. T. 2001. Customer perceptions of justice in service transactions: The effects of strong and weak ties. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 743–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmvall, C. M., & Bobocel, D. R. 2008. What fair procedures say about me: Self-construals and reactions to procedural fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105: 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, G. C. 1961. Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Hosmer, L. T., & Kiewitz, C. 2005. Organizational justice: A behavioral science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly,15: 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. 1996. Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separation the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7: 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. 1985. Test for individual perceptions of job equity: Some preliminary findings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61: 1055–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. 1987. A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12: 222–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabanoff, B. 1991. Equity, equality, power, and conflict. Academy of Management Review, 16: 416–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. 1986. Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59: 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W. C. Jr. & Miles, E. W. 1994. The measurement of equity sensitivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67: 133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W. C. Jr.,, Miles, E. W., & Day, D. D. 1993. A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14: 301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, J. B. 1963. The concept of exchange in sociological theory: 1884 and 1961. Social Forces, 41: 341–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L. 1969. Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. A. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research : 151–235. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. 1971. From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. 1973. The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. Journal of Philosophy, 70: 630–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L. 1981. The philosophy of moral development. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. 1984. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Konovsky, M. A. 2000. Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26: 489–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, D. L., & Denton, K. 2005. Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: A critical evaluation of Kohlberg's model. Psychological Review, 112: 629–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulik, C. T., & Ambrose, M. L. 1992. Personal and situational determinants of referent choice. Academy of Management Review, 17: 212–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, M. J. 1975. The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 3: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, M. J. 1982. Justice motive in human relations and the economic model of man. In Derlega, V. & Grzelak, J. (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: 249–77. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, M. J. 2003. The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7: 388–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leventhal, G. S. 1976. Fairness in social relationships. In Thibaut, J. W., Spence, J. T., & Carson, R. C. (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology: 211–40. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? In Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S. & Willis, R. H. (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research: 27–55. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. 1980. Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In Mikula, G. (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: 167–218. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Liebig, S. 2001. Lessons from philosophy? Interdisciplinary justice research and two classes of justice judgments. Social Justice Research, 14: 265–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, E. A. 2001. Thinking critically about justice judgments. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58: 220–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovsky, B., & Younts, C. W. 2001. Prospects for distributive justice theory. Social Justice Research, 14: 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masterson, S. S., Byrne, Z. S., & Mao, H. 2005. Interpersonal and informational justice: Identifying the differential antecedents of interactional justice behaviors. In Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D., Skarlicki, D. P., & van den Bos, K. (Eds.), What motivates fairness in organizations?: 79–103. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, R., Salvador, R.In press. How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down mode. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.Google Scholar
McPherson Frantz, C., & Janoff-Bulman, R. 2000. Considering both sides: The limits of perspective taking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meindl, J., & Lerner, M. J. 1983. The heroic motive in interpersonal relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikula, G. 2005. Some observations and critical thoughts about the present state of justice theory and research. In Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D., Skarlicki, D. P., & Van den Bos, K. (Eds.), What motivates fairness in organizations?: 197–210. Greenwich, CT: IAP.Google Scholar
Miles, E. W., Hatfield, J. D., & Huseman, R. C. 1989. The equity sensitivity construct: Potential implications for worker performance. Journal of Management, 15: 581–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. T. 1977. Personal deserving and justice for others: An exploration of the justice motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohiyeddini, C. & Schmitt, M. 1997. Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in a laboratory situation. Social Justice Research, 10: 333–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montada, L. 1996. Trade-offs between justice and self-interest. In Montada, L. & Lerner, M. J. (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice: 259–76. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montada, L. 1998. Justice: Just a rational choice? Social Justice Review, 12: 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowday, R. T., & Colwell, K. A. 2003. Employee reactions to unfair outcomes in the workplace: The contributions of Adams’ equity theory to understanding work motivation. In Porter, L., Bigley, G., & Steers, R. M. (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior, 7th ed.: 222–54. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mudrack, P. E., Mason, E. S., & Stepanski, K. M. 1999. Equity sensitivity and business ethics. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72: 539–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myyry, L., & Helkama, K. 2002. Moral reasoning and the use of procedural justice rules in hypothetical and real-life dilemmas. Social Justice Research, 15: 373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. 1990. Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opotow, S. 1995. Drawing the line: Social categorization, moral exclusion, and the scope of justice. In Bunker, B. B. & Rubin, J. Z. (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice: 347–69. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. 1996. Affirmative action, fairness, and the scope of justice. The affirmative action debate: What's fair in policy and programs? Journal of Social Issues, 52: 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patient, D. L., & Skarlicki, D. P. 2005. Why managers don't always do the right thing when delivering bad news. In Gilliland, S., Steiner, D., & Skarlicki, D. (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: 149–78. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Patient, D. L., & Skarlicki, D. P. 2005. In press. Increasing interpersonal and informational justice when communicating negative views: The role of the manager's empathic concern and moral development. Journal of Management.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reb, J., Goldman, B. M., Kray, L. J., & Cropanzano, R. 2006. Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice. Personnel Psychology, 59: 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ReedA., II A., II, & Aquino, K. F. 2003. Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 1270–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, S. J. 2006a. Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 233–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, S. J. 2006b. A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 737–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. 2007. The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1610–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roch, S. G., & Shanock, L. R. 2006. Organizational justice in an exchange framework: Clarifying organizational justice distinctions. Journal of Management, 32: 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, R., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. 1999. The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76: 547–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rupp, D. E., & Bell, C.In press. Retribution, moral self regulation, and self interest in the decision to punish: A moral motives extension of the deontic model of justice. Business Ethics Quarterly.Google Scholar
Sabbagh, C. 2001. A taxonomy of normative and empirically oriented theories of distributive justice. Social Justice Research, 14: 237–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schminke, M. 1998. The magic punchbowl: A nonrational model of ethical management. In Schminke, M. (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes: 197–214. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Neubaum, D. O. 2005. The effect of leader moral development on ethical climate and employee attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97: 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Noel, T. W. 1997. The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1190–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schminke, M., Mayer, D. M., Shapiro, D. L., & Harned, P. J. 2007. Under pressure: Do ethical leaders help employees blow the whistle? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. J., Neumann, R., & Montada, L. 1995. Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice. Social Justice Research, 8: 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedikides, C., Hart, C. M., & De Cremer, D. In press. The self in procedural fairness. Social and Personality Psychology Compass.Google Scholar
Shao, R., Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. 2008. Beyond moral reasoning: A review of moral identity research and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18: 513–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, D. L. 1993. Reconciling theoretical differences among procedural justice researchers by re-evaluating what it means to have one's view “considered”: Implications for third-party managers. In Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management: 51–78. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. C., Wild, E., & Colquitt, J. A. 2003. To justify or excuse? A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 444–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shweder, R. A., & Haidt, J. 1993. The future of moral psychology: Truth, intuition, and the pluralist way. Psychological Science, 4: 360–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. 1997. The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In Brandt, A. M. & Rozin, P. (Eds.), Morality and health: 119–69. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Singer, M. S. 1996. Effects of scope of justice, informant ethnicity, and information frame on attitudes toward ethnicity-based selection. International Journal of Psychology, 31: 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitkin, S. B., & Bies, R. J. 1993. Social accounts in conflict situations: Using explanations to manage conflict. Human Relations, 46: 349–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitkin, S. B., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Reed, G. L. 1993. Prescriptions for justice: Using social accounts to legitimate the exercise of professional control. Social Justice Research, 6: 87–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skarlicki, D. P., & Kulik, C. 2005. Third party reactions to employee mistreatment: A justice perspective. In Staw, B. & Kramer, R. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: Vol. 26, 183–230. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Skitka, L. J. 2003. Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7: 286–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Mullen, E. In press. Morality and justice: An expanded theoretical perspective and empirical review. In Hedgvedt, K. A. & Clay-Warner, J. (Guest Editors). Advances in group processes. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Skitka, L. J., & Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. 2005. Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 895–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skitka, L. J., & Bravo, J. 2005. An accessible identity approach to understanding fairness in organizational settings. In Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D., Skarlicki, D. P., & van den Bos, K. (Eds.), What motivates fairness in organizations?: 105–28. Greenwich, CT: IAP.Google Scholar
Smith, N. C., Simpson, S. S., & Huang, C.-Y. 2007. Why managers fail to do the right thing: An empirical study of unethical and illegal conduct. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17: 633–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. 1975. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. 1978. A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66: 541–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J., Walker, L., LaTour, S., & Houlden, P. 1974. Procedural justice as fairness. Stanford Law Review, 26: 1271–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K. 1986. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11: 601–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K. 1992a. Moral reasoning and business ethics: Implications for research, education and management. Journal of Business Ethics, 11: 445–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K. 1992b. The social effects of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 17: 647–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., & Bies, R. 1997. Through the looking glass: A normative manifesto for organizational behavior. In Jackson, S. & Cooper, C. (Eds.), Creating tomorrow's organizations: A handbook for future research in organizational behavior: 439–52. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., & Brown, M. E. 2004. Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 18: 69–81.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., & Victor, B. 1992. Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 38–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K. & Weaver, G. R. 1994. Business ETHICS/BUSINESS Ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K. & Weaver, G. R. 2001. Organizational justice and ethics program “follow-through”: Influences on employees’ harmful and helpful behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11: 651–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., Gibson, D., & Toffler, B. 1999. Managing ethics and legal compliance: What works and what hurts. California Management Review, 41: 131–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. 2006. Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32: 951–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. 1990. Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 378–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turiel, E. 2002. The culture of morality: Social development, context, and conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turillo, C. J., Folger, R., Lavelle, J. J., Umphress, E., & Gee, J. 2002. Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89: 839–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1984. The role of perceived injustice in defendants’ evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law and Society Review, 18: 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1987. Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 333–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1989. The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 830–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1990. Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1991. Using procedures to justify outcomes: Testing the viability of a procedural justice strategy for managing conflict and allocating resources in work settings. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12: 259–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1994. Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67: 850–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1997. The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1: 323–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. 2000. Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. 2002. The influence of status judgments in hierarchical groups: Comparing autonomous and comparative judgments about status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89: 813–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. 2003. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7: 349–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Dawes, R. M. 1993. Fairness in groups: Comparing self-interest and social identity perspectives. In Mellers, B. A. & Baron, J. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications: 87–108. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. 1995. Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69: 482–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: 115–91. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. 1998. Social justice and social movements. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 4: 595–629. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J-W.In press. Egocentrism in procedural justice judgments. Morality and justice: An expanded theoretical perspective and empirical review. In Hedgvedt, K. A. & Clay-Warner, J. (Guest Editors). Advances in group processes. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J-W., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. A. M. 2002. Procedural fairness and status: Status salience as antecedent of the fair process effect. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Justice Research. Skovde, Sweden.Google Scholar
Vecchio, R. P. 1981. An individual-differences interpretation of the conflicting predictions generated by equity theory and expectancy theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66: 470–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasquez, M. G. 2001. Business ethics: Concepts and cases, 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Vermunt, R., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., & Blaauw, E. 2001. Self-esteem and outcome fairness: Differential importance of procedural and outcome considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 621–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. 1978. Equity: Theory and research. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Weaver, G. R., & Treviño, L. K. 1994. Normative and empirical business ethics: Separation, marriage of convenience or marriage of necessity? Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Agle, B. 2005. “Somebody I look up to:” Ethical role models in organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 34: 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendorf, C. A., Alexander, S., & Firestone, I. J. 2002. Social justice and moral reasoning: An empirical integration of two paradigms in psychological research. Social Justice Research, 15: 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M. 2000. Justice and identity: The significance of inclusion for perceptions of entitlement and the justice motive. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26: 157–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Younis, J., & Yates, M. 1999. Youth service and moral-civic identity: A case for everyday morality. Educational Psychology Review, 11: 361–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar