Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T14:34:58.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drivers of Proactive Environmental Strategy in Family Firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Pramodita Sharma  and
Sanjay Sharma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Globally, family firms are the dominant organizational form. Family involvement in business and unique family dynamics impacts organizational strategy and performance. However, family control of business has rarely been adopted as a discriminating variable in the organizations and the natural environment (ONE) research field. Drawing on the theory of planned behavior we develop a conceptual framework of the drivers of proactive environmental strategy (PES) in family firms. We argue that family involvement in business influences the attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control of a firm’s dominant coalition. Together these factors determine the extent of the dominant coalition’s intentions to undertake PES. Further, family firms with lower levels of relationship conflict within the controlling family will be more successful in translating the dominant coalition’s intentions to allocate resources for the pursuit of PES. Research implications of the theory are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 309 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ajzen, I. 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Kuhl, J.K. & Beckmann, (Eds.), Action Control: From cognition to behavior. 11–39. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I.. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50:179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. 2003. The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing. 18: 573–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragón-Correa, J. A. 1998. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 556–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. 2003 A contingent natural-resource based view of proactive environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28: 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arregle, J., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. 2007. The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, N. A. 1993. Understanding technological responses of industrial firms to environmental problems: Implications for government policy. In Schot, J. & Fischer, K. (Eds.), Environmental strategies for industry. International perspectives on research needs and policy implications: 277–310. Washington D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Bansal, P. 2003. From issue to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14: 510–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, P., and Roth, K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 717–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basco, R., & Rodriguez, M. J. P. 2009. Studying the family enterprise holistically: Evidence for integrated family and business systems. Family Business Review, 22: 82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Kintana, M. L. 2010. Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 82–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björnberg, A., & Nicholson, N. 2007. The family climate scales: Development of a new measure for use in family business research. Family Business Review, 20: 229–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. 2003. Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 453–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, M. 2005. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29: 249–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cebon, P. B. 1993. The myth of best practices: The context dependence of two high-performing waste reduction programs. In Schot, J. & Fischer, K. (Eds.), Environmental strategies for industry: International perspectives on research needs and policy implications: 167–97. Washington D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. 2004. Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 28: 335–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. 2005. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice. 29: 555–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. P. 2003. An introduction to theories of family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18: 441–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Zahra, S. A. 2003. Creating wealth in family firms through managing resources: Comments and extensions. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27: 359–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christmann, P. 2000. Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 663–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. 1999. Defining family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 231: 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cordano, M., & Frieze, I. H. 2000. Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers: Applying Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 627–41.Google Scholar
Craig, J., & Dibrell, C. 2006. The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 19: 275–88.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd ed.). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Danes, S. M., Stafford, K., Haynes, G., & Amarapurkar, S. S. 2009. Family capital of family firms: Bridging human, social, and financial capital. Family Business Review, 22: 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durso, T. W. 2007. Clean and green. Family Business, Summer: 60–62.Google Scholar
Dyer, W. G. Jr. 2003. The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4): 401–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, W. G. Jr., & Dyer, W. J. 2009. Putting the family into family business research. Family Business Review, 22: 216–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, W. G. Jr., & Whetten, D.A. 2006. Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6) (November): 785–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddleston, K., & Kellermanns, F. W. 2007. Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing. 22(4): 545–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egri, C. P., & Herman, S. 2000. Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 571–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G. 2005. Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’s development. Organization Science, 16(6): 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gersick, K. E., Davis, J. A., Hampton, M. M., & Lansberg, I. 1997. Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. S. 1995. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20: 874–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. 2007. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 106–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 36: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grote, J. 2003. Conflicting generations: A new theory of family business rivalry. Family Business Review, 16: 113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. 1999. A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms, Family Business Review 12(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. L. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20: 874–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. 1996. Does it pay be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5: 30–37.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. 2004. Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18:7–18.Google Scholar
Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. 1999. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. 1999. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 351–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, D. T., Rutherford, M. W., & Kuratko, D. F. 2010. Advancing the field of family business research: Further testing the measurement properties of the F-PEC. Family Business Review, 23: 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, F., & Sharma, P. 2009. Entrepreneurial family firms. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A.. 1997. A quantitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3): 530–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. 1995. Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20: 1015–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, G., & Saks, A. M. 2008. Organizational Behaviours: Understanding and managing life at work. Toronto: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jones, E. E., & Gerard, H. B. 1967. Foundations of social psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D. Jr. 1992. Effects of work values on job choice decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 261–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. 1998. Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies, 35: 241–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, R. M. 2009. Supercorp: How vanguard companies create innovation, profits, growth, and social good. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. 2006. Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 145–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. 2004. Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28: 209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A., & Lennox, M. 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 698–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42: 1199–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, S. A., Astrachan, J. H., & Smyrnios, K. 2005. The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implications for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29: 321–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54: 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leana, C. R., & Van Buren, H. J. 1999. Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24:538–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. 2008. To grow or to harvest? Governance, strategy, and performance in family and lone founder firms. Journal of Management and Strategy, 1: 41–56.Google Scholar
Litz, R. A. 1997. The family firm’s exclusion from business school research: Explaining the void, addressing the opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 21: 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumpkin, G. T., Martin, W., & Vaughn, M. 2008. Family orientation: Individual-level influences on family firm outcomes. Family Business Review, 21: 127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, A. A., & Geffen, D. 1998. The dialectics of competency acquisition: Pollution prevention in electric generation. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 1145–68.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, R. S., Cordano, M., & Silverman, M. 2005. Exploring individual and institutional drivers of proactive environmentalisms in the US wine industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14: 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConaughy, D. L. 2000. Family CEOs vs. Nonfamily CEOs in the family controlled firm: An examination of the level and sensitivity of pay to performance. Family Business Review, 3: 121–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvily, B., & Marcus, A. 2005. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 1033–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. 2005. Managing for the long-run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Orts, E. W., & Strudler, A. 2002. The ethical and environmental limits of stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12: 215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, A. W., Carr, J. C., and Shaw, J. C. 2008. Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32: 949–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, J. E. 1993. The greening of Boston Park Plaza Hotel. Family Business Review, 6: 131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. B. 2007. Multiple logics and strategic approach: Family firms in the Canadian wine industry. Paper presented at the Family Enterprise Research Conference, Monterrey, Mexico.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. 1973. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Roome, N. 1992. Developing environmental management strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1: 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 534–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, C., & Moores, K. 2010. Research on accounting in family firms: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Family Business Review, 23: 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciascia, S., & Mazzola, P. 2008. Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring the nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review, 21: 331–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, P. 2004. An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for future. Family Business Review, 17: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, P.. 2008. Familiness: Capital stocks and flows between family and business. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 32: 971–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. 2003. Succession planning as planned behavior: Some empirical results. Family Business Review, 16: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, P., & Manikutty, S. 2005. Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 29: 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, P., & Nordqvist, M. 2008. A classification scheme for family firms: From family values to effective governance to firm performance. In Tàpies, J. & Ward, J. L. (Eds.), Family values and value creation: The fostering of enduring values within family-owned businesses: 71–101. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 681–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rueda, A. 2007. The contingent influence of organizational capabilities on proactive environmental strategy in the service sector: An analysis of North American and European ski resorts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24: 268–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 729–53.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrivastava, P. 1995. The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20: 936–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrivastava, P.. 2000. Ecocentering strategic management. In Reichart, J. & Werhane, P. H. (Eds.), Ruffin Series in Business Ethics, vol. 2: Environmental Challenges to Business: 23–42. Charlottesville, Va.: Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27: 339–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sogg, D. 2000. Vineyards vs. environment in California. The Wine Spectator. http://www.winespectator.com/wine/Daily/News/.Google Scholar
Sorenson, R. L. 1999. Conflict management strategies used in successful family businesses. Family Business Review,12: 325–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorenson, R. L., & Bierman, L. 2009. Family capital, family business, and free enterprise. Family Business Review, 22: 193–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorenson, R. L., Goodpaster, K. E., Hedberg, P. R., & Yu, A. 2009. The family point of view, family social capital, and firm performance. Family Business Review, 22: 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, L. J., Jeurissen, R., & Rutherfoord, R. 2000. Small business and the environment in the UK and the Netherlands: Toward stakeholder cooperation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10: 945–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, K., Duncan, K. A., Dane, S. M., & Winter, M. 1999. A research model of sustainable family business. Family Business Review, 12: 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. 1995. Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20: 908–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, M. 2008. Continuity through change. Family Business, Summer: 48–52.Google Scholar
Steier, L. 2007. New venture creation and organization: A familial sub-narrative. Journal of Business Research, 60: 1099–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tàpies, J., & Ward, J. L. 2008. Family values and value creation: The fostering of enduring values within family-owned businesses. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokarczyk, J., Hansen, E., Green, M., & Down, J. 2007. A resource based view and market orientation theory examination of the role of “familiness” in family business success. Family Business Review, 20: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, R. 2010. Organizational identity in a family-owned business: The hybrid identity of a family enterprise. Unpublished dissertation, The George Washington University, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Ward, J. J. 1987. Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2006. Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15: 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar