Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:27:54.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prioritizing Democracy: A Commentary on Smith’s Presidential Address to the Society for Business Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2019

Abraham Singer  and
Amit Ron Open the ORCID record for Amit Ron [Opens in a new window]
Abraham Singer
Affiliation:
Loyola University Chicago
Amit Ron
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In his 2018 presidential address to the Society of Business Ethics, Jeffery Smith claimed that political approaches to business ethics must be attentive to both the distinctive nature of commercial activity and, at the same time, the degree to which such commercial activity is structured by political decisions and choices. In what we take to be a friendly extension of the argument, we claim that Smith does not go far enough with this insight. Smith’s political approach to business ethics focuses solely on the outcomes of political choices. But if we think of politics in terms of processes—as in, ongoing disagreement and contest—and not merely a series of legal, administrative, or institutional outcomes, a different view of business ethics emerges. In particular, we argue that such an emphasis points us toward seeing business actors as having a normative duty to preserve the integrity and functioning of democracy.

Keywords

division of moral labormarket failures approach to business ethicsPCSRdemocratic theoryrealist political theory
Type
Commentary
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 139 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Claassen, Rutger, and Gerbrandy, Anna. 2018. “Doing Good Together: Competition Law and the Political Legitimacy of Interfirm Cooperation.” Business Ethics Quarterly 28 (4): 401–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer. 1999. “The Basic Right to Justification: Toward a Constructivist Conception of Human Rights.” Constellations 6 (1): 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, Rainer. 2017. Normativity and Power: Analyzing Social Orders of Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph. 2014. Morality, Competition, and the Firm: The Market Failures Approach to Business Ethics . Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Nien-He. 2009. “Does Global Business Have a Responsibility to Promote Just Institutions?” Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2): 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, Waheed, and Moriarty, Jeffrey. 2018. “Accountable to Whom? Rethinking the Role of Corporations in Political CSR.” Journal of Business Ethics 149 (3): 519–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jack, and Johnson, James. 2011. The Priority of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Dominic. 2013. “The Contained-Rivalry Requirement and a ‘Triple Feature’ Program for Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 115 (1): 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Chris. 1981. “Morality and the Invisible Hand.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (3): 247–77.Google Scholar
Néron, P. Y. 2016. “Rethinking the Ethics of Corporate Political Activities In A Post-Citizens United Era: Political Equality, Corporate Citizenship, and Market Failures.” Journal of Business Ethics 136 (4): 715–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Julia S., and Gregg, Olsen. 1998. Power Resources Theory and the Welfare State A Critical Approach. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sabadoz, Cameron, and Singer, Abraham. 2017. “Talk ain’t Cheap: Political CSR and the Challenges of Corporate Deliberation.” Business Ethics Quarterly 27 (2): 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Andreas, and Palazzo, Guido. 2007. “Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1096–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1995. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Jeffery. 2019. “Navigating Our Way Between Market and State.” Business Ethics Quarterly 29 (1): 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2017. “A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, Glen. 2012. “The Political Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Research Agenda.” Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (4): 709–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 2005. In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument . Edited by Hawthorn, G.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar