No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2015
1. Lee, Daniel E. & Lee, Elizabeth J., Human Rights and the Ethics of Globalization 12 (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar For a harsher critique of the idea of self-evident moral truths and human rights from the field of business ethics, see the critique from Frederick, Bill, Frederick, William C., Values, Nature, and Culture in the American Corporation (Oxford University Press 1995).Google Scholar
2. Lee, Daniel E. & Lee, Elizabeth J., Human Rights and the Ethics of Globalization 34 (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
3. Id. at 247.
4. Id.
5. Id. at 55, citing Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals 41 (4:433) (Gregor, Mary trans.; Cambridge University Press 1998).Google Scholar
6. See Lee & Lee, supra note 1, at 56.
7. Werhane, Patricia H., Persons, Rights, and Corporations (Prentice Hall 1982).Google Scholar
8. See Freeman, EDWARD, Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach (Pitman 1984).Google Scholar
9. See, e.g., Donaldson, Thomas and Dunfee, Thomas W., Ties that Bind: a Social Contracts Approach To Business Ethics (Harvard Business Review Press 1999),Google Scholar elaborating their Integrative Social Contracts theory; see also Donaldson, Thomas, Corporations and Morality (Prentice Hall College Div 1982);Google Scholarsee also Donaldson, Thomas, The Ethics Of International Business (Oxford University Press 1989);Google Scholarsee alsoDonaldson, Thomas and Dunfee, Thomas W., Integrative Social Contracts Theory, in Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management, 2nd edition 243 (Werhane, P. and Freeman, R. eds., Blackwell Publishing 2005).Google Scholar
10. Donaldson and Dunfee, supra note 9.
11. Phillips, Robert A., Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics, 1st edition (Berrett-Koehler Publishers 2003);Google Scholarsee also Phillips, Robert A., Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness, 7 Bus. Ethics Q. 51 (1997).Google Scholar
12. Donaldson, Thomas, Values in Tension: Ethics Away from Home, 74 Harvard Business Review 48 (1996);Google Scholarsee also Donaldson, Thomas, The Ethics of International Business (Oxford University Press 1989);Google Scholarsee also Donaldson, Thomas and Dunfee, Thomas, When Ethics Travel: The Promise and Perils of Global Business Ethics, 41 Cal. Mgmt. Rev. 48 (1999).Google Scholar
13. De George, Richard T., Competing with Integrity in International Business (Oxford University Press 1993).Google Scholar
14. On this issue, see, e.g., Solomon, Robert C., Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity In Business (Oxford University Press 1993);Google Scholarsee also Hartman, Edwin, Organizational Ethics and The Good Life (Oxford University Press 1995);Google Scholarsee also Fort, Timothy L., Ethics and Governance: Business As Mediating Institution 62 – 86 (Oxford University Press 2001),Google Scholar for Aristotelian articulations of the notion of how business can have a sense of community.
15. See, e.g.,The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd–1, et seq. (“FCPA”).
16. See, e.g., Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (“The Data Protection Directive”).
17. For a set of critiques about extra-territoriality in general and with the FCPA in mind, see Salbu, Steven R., Bribery in the Global Market: A Critical Analysis of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 54 Wash, . & Lee, L. REV. 229, 283–84 (1997);Google Scholarsee also Salbu, Steven R., The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as a Threat to Global Harmony, 20 MICH. J. INT’L L. 419, 433 (1999);Google Scholarsee also Are Extraterritorial Restrictions on Bribery a Viable and Desirable International Policy Goal Under the Global Conditions of the Late Twentieth Century? 24 YALE J. INT’L L. 223 (1999).Google Scholar
18. See Lee & Lee, supra note 2, at 210–45.Google Scholar
19. Id. at 211.
20. Id.
21. See Thomas, DeNae, Note. Xiaoning v. Yahoo! Inc.’s Invocation of the Alien Tort Statute: An Important Issue but an Improper Vehicle. 11 VAND. J. ENT.&TECH. L. 211–48 (2008).Google Scholar For the Alien Tort Statute claim against Yahoo, see Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc., et al., 07–CV–02151 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2007).Google ScholarSee also Gardiner, Jill, Thompson Targets Google, Yahoo Over China Policy, N.Y. SUN, Dec. 14, 2006, http://www.nysun.com/new-york/thompson-targets-google-yahoo-over-china-policy/45150.Google Scholar
22. See Gathii, James Thuo, War, Commerce and International Law, 14 (Oxford University Press 2010);Google ScholarSee also Fort, Timothy L., Book Review, 21 Business Ethics Quarterly 345 (2011).Google Scholar
23. Seabright, Paul, The Company of STrangers: a Natural History Of Economic Life (Princeton University Press 2004).Google Scholar
24. Palmer, Parker, The Company of Strangers: Christians and the Renewal of America’S Public Life (The Crossroad Publishing Company 1983).Google Scholar
25. For a more extensive discussion of these numbers, see Fort, Timothy L., Fort, Ethics and Governance; Business as Mediating Institution (Oxford University Press 2001).Google Scholar
26. See King, Martin Luther Jr., Letter from a Birmingham Jail at http://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/ documents/letter_birmingham_jail.pdf (last accessed April 21, 2012).Google Scholar Originally, The Negro Is Your Brother, 212 The Atlantic Monthly 78 (1963).Google Scholar