Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:03:49.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolutionary Psychology and Business Ethics Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

David M. Wasieleski  and
Sefa Hayibor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In this article, we describe evolutionary psychology and its potential contribution to business ethics research. After summarizing evolutionary theory and natural selection, we specifically address the use of evolutionary concepts in psychology in order to offer alternative explanations of behavior relevant to business ethics, such as social exchange, cooperation, altruism, and reciprocity. Our position is that individuals, groups, and organizations all are affected by similar natural, evolutionary processes, such that evolutionary psychology is applicable at multiple levels of analysis (e.g., individual and group). We introduce a variety of experiments and instruments employed by evolutionary psychologists to illustrate how ethics-relevant cultural norms and practices evolve and are regulated, and to raise the prospect that these experiments and instruments can be useful in future business ethics research.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 587 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 62: 335–13.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. 1982. A condition for group selection to prevail over counteracting individual selection. Evolution, 36: 832–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. 1981. The evolution of co-operation. Science, 211: 1390–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. 1977. Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, S., Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. 2003. Strong reciprocity may evolve with our without group selection. Unpublished manuscript. Center for Empirical Economics, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richardson, P. J. 1992. Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizeable groups. Ethnology and Sociobiology, 13: 171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordano, M., Frieze, I. H., & Ellis, K. M. 2004. Entangled affiliations and attitudes: An analysis of the influences on environmental policy stakeholders’ behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 49: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L. 1985. Deduction or Darwinian algorithms? An explanation of the elusive content effect on the Wason selection task. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, Harvard University: University Microfilms, #86-02206.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. 1989. The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31 (1989): 187–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. 1989. Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part 2. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10: 51–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. 2000. The cognitive neuroscience of social reasoning. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, 2nd ed., 1259–70. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. 2004. Knowing thyself: The evolutionary psychology of moral reasoning and moral sentiments. In Edward Freeman, R. & Patricia, H. Werhane (Eds.), Business, Science, and Ethics. The Ruffin Series No. 4, 93–128. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Cummins, D. D. 1999. Cheater detection is modified by social rank: The impact of dominance on the evolution of cognitive functions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20: 229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1958 (orig. 1859). The origin of species. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. 2002. Appropriating the commons: A theoretical explanation. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S., & Weber, E. (Eds.). The Drama of the Commons. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. 2003. The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425: 785–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. 2004. Third party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25: 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. 2005. Human altruism: Proximate patterns and evolutionary origins. Analyse & Kritik, 27: 6–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. 2002. Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nautre, 13: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. 1998. How effective are trust- and reciprocity-based incentives? In Ben-Ner, A. and Putterman, L. (Eds.), Economics, values, and organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415: 137–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E., & Henrich, J. Forthcoming. Is strong reciprocity a maladaptation? On the evolutionary foundations of human altruism. In Hammerstein, P. (Ed.), The Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & List, J. 2004. The hidden costs and returns of incentives: Trust and trustworthiness among CEOs. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2: 743–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. & Tougareva, E. 1995. Do high monetary stakes remove reciprocal fairness? Experimental evidence from Russia. Mimeo. Institute for Empirical Economic Research, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Flack, J. C., & de Waal, F. B. M. 2004. Monkey business and business ethics: Evolutionary origins of human morality. In Edward Freeman, R. & Patricia, H. Werhane (Eds.), Business, Science, and Ethics. The Ruffin Series No. 4, 7–41. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Fort, T. 2004. Biological contributions to business ethics. In Edward Freeman, R. & Patricia, H. Werhane (Eds.), Business, Science, and Ethics. The Ruffin Series No. 4, 81–91. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Werhane, P. H. 2004. Introduction. In Edward Freeman, R. & Patricia, H. Werhane (Eds.), Business, Science, and Ethics. The Ruffin Series No. 4, 1–6. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futuyma, D. J. 1979. Evolutionary biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Incorporated.Google Scholar
Gaulin, S. J. C., & McBurney, D. H. 2001. Psychology: An evolutionary approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., & Hug, K. 1992. Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change. Cognition, 43(1992): 127–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gintis, H. 2000. Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206(2): 169–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. 2003. Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24: 153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3: 367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Behavior, 7: 1–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Hayibor, S. 2008. Equity and expectancy considerations in stakeholder action. Business and Society (August 14). Doi:10.1177/0007650308323396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. 2001. Why people punish defectors: Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208: 79–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F., Tracer, D., & Ziker, J. 2006. Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312: 1767–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hull, D. L. 2002. History of evolutionary thought. In Mark, Pagel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evolution, 7–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. 1991. Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 366–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilies, R., Arvey, R. D., & Bouchard, T. J. 2006. Darwinism, behavioral genetics, and organizational behavior: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 121–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, S. 1999. Toward a new theory of the firm: A critique of stakeholder theory. Management Decision, 37(4): 317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzban, R., McCabe, K., Smith, V. L., & Wilson, B. J. 2001. Incremental commitment and reciprocity in a real time public goods game. Personnel and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(12): 1662–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manktelow, K. 1999. Reasoning and thinking. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J., & Price, G. R. 1973. The logic of animal conflicts. Nature, 246: 1318.Google Scholar
Nicholson, N. 1998. How hardwired is human behavior? Harvard Business Review, 76(4): 136–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, N., & White, R. 2006. Darwinism: A new paradigm for organizational behavior? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 111–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. 1997. New directions for organizational theory: Problems and prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, B. D., & White, R. 1999. The evolution of social structure: Why biology matters. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 843–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. 2002. Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23: 203–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rest, J. R. 1986. Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S., 2006. A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process. Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 737–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, S. & Ceranic, T. L. 2007. The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6): 1610–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridley, M. 1985. The problems of evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowley, T., & Berman, S. 2000. A new brand of corporate social performance. Business and Society, 39: 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, T., & Moldoveanu, M. 2003. When will stakeholder groups act? An interest and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28: 204–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saad, G. 2006. Applying evolutionary psychology in understanding the Darwinian roots of consumption phenomena. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27(2,3): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvador, R., & Folger, R. G. 2009. Business ethics and the brain. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamaría, C., Garcia-Madruga, J. A., & Carretero, M. 1996. Universal connectives in the selection task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A(3): 814–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. M. 1976. Group Selection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 51: 277–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. 1994. Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioural sciences. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 17: 585–654.Google Scholar
Stone, Linda. 1997. Kinship and gender. Boulder, CO: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. 1992. The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, 19–136. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. 2000. Mapping the evolved functional organization of mind and brain. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, 1185–96. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Price, M. E. 2006. Cognitive adaptations for n-person exchange: The evolutionary roots of organizational behavior. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27: 103–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46 (1971): 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vroom, V. H. 1964. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wasieleski, D. M., & Hayibor, S. 2008. Breaking the rules: Examining the facilitation effects of moral intensity characteristics on the recognition of rule violations. Journal of Business Ethics, 78: 275–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasieleski, D. M., & Weber, J. Forthcoming. The influence of job functionality on ethical reasoning: Using the adapted Wason selection task to analyze differences in detection of rule-based social contract violations across organizational job functions. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Wason, P. C. 1966. Reasoning. In Foss, B. M. (Ed.), New Horizons in Psychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wason, P. C. 1966. Reasoning. 1968. Reasoning about a rule. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20: 273–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. 1993. The moral sense. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammuto, R. F., & Connolly, T. 1984. Coping with disciplinary fragmentation. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9: 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar