Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:48:15.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

R&D in the periphery? Foreign direct investment, innovation, and institutional quality in developing countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Patrick J.W. Egan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the relationship between assessments of institutional quality in developing countries and the innovative activities of multinational corporations. Firm entry mode literature has established links between domestic institutions and ownership equity patterns among multinationals, but institutionalist analyses have not adequately addressed the types of activities pursued by multinational firms. I argue that in addition to various socioeconomic indicators, the quality of domestic political institutions in developing countries is an important determinant of local innovative activity. I argue that institutional quality in host countries reinforces consistent patterns of interaction between states and firms, leading to reduced risk of technological expropriation and other undesirable outcomes for firms. I test this argument by examining the impact of institutional assessments, carried out by firms themselves and by outside observers, on R&D effort among multinationals, using firm-level surveys conducted in developing countries between 2002 and 2005. The multilevel empirical analysis suggests that multinational firms are likely to both locate R&D activities and pursue them intensively in developing countries with well-regarded institutions, and that the impact of institutional variables is more significant than other likely predictors, such as education levels in host countries.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , April 2013 , pp. 1 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2013 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, S. 1994. “Socio-cultural distance and the choice of joint ventures: a contingency perspective.” Journal of International Marketing 2 (2): 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal, S. and Ramaswami, S. 1992. “Choice of foreign market entry mode: impact of ownership, location and internalization factors.” Journal of International Business Studies 23 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J., Limongi, F. and Przewroski, A. 1996. “Classifying political regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (2): 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez, I. and Marín, R. 2010. “Entry modes and national systems of innovation.” Journal of International Management 16 (4): 340–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, C., Biglaiser, G. and DeRouen, K. 2007. “Sovereign bonds and the ‘democratic advantage’: does regime type affect credit rating agency ratings in the developing world?” International Organization 61: 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arndt, C. and Oman, C. 2006. “Uses and abuses of governance indicators.” OECD Development Center Study.Google Scholar
Asiedu, E. and Esfahani, H. 2001. “Ownership structure in foreign direct investment projects.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (4): 647–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baran, P. 1968. The political economy of growth. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Barro, R. and Lee, J. 2000. “International data on educational attainment: updates and implications.” Center for International Development Working Paper No. 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouthers, K. 2002. “Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance.” Journal of International Business Studies 33 (2): 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, A., Kisunko, G. and Weber, B. 1998. “Credibility of rules and economic growth: evidence from a worldwide survey of the private sector.” The World Bank Economic Review 12 (3): 353–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, M. and Hefeker, C. 2007. “Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment.” European Journal of Political Economy 23 (2): 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büthe, T. and Milner, H. 2008. “The politics of foreign direct investment into developing countries: increasing FDI through international trade agreements?” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 741–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarti, A. 2001. “The determinants of foreign direct investments: sensitivity analyses of cross-country regressions.” Kyklos 54: 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, J., Gandhi, J. and Vreeland, J. 2010. “Democracy and dictatorship revisited.” Public Choice 143: 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, W. 1995. “Empirical studies of innovative activity and performance.” In: Stoneman, P. (ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davidson, W. and McFetridge, D. 1985. “Key characteristics in the choice of international technology transfer mode.” Journal of International Business Studies 16 (2): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikova, D. and Witteloostuijn, A. 2007. “Foreign direct investment mode choice: entry and establishment modes in transition economies.” Journal of International Business Studies 38: 1013–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. 1980. “Toward an eclectic paradigm of international production: some empirical tests.” Journal of International Business Studies 11 (1): 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. and Lundan, S. 2008. “Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 25: 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist. 2010, April 15. “The world turned upside down: a special report on innovation in emerging markets”: 1–14.Google Scholar
Evans, P. 1979. Dependent development: the alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatignon, H. and Anderson, E. 1988. “The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: an empirical test of a transaction cost explanation.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 4 (2): 305–336.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G. and Kaplinsky, R. 2001. The value of value chains. IDS Bulletin, 32, No. 3.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J. and Sturgeon, T. 2005. “The governance of global value chains.” Review of International Political Economy 12 (1): 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S. 1989. “The political economy of foreign direct investment in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 24 (1): 184–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henisz, W. 2000. “The institutional environment for multinational investment.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 16: 334–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennart, J. and Larimo, J. 1998. “The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: does national origin affect ownership decisions?” Journal of International Business Studies 29 (3): 515–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C., Hwang, P. and Kim, W. 1990. “An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode.” Strategic Management Journal 11 (2): 117–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymer, S. 1976. The international operations of national firms: a study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, N. 2003. “Democratic governance and multinational corporations: political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment.” International Organization 57 (3): 587–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, N. 2006. Nation-states and the multinational corporation: a political economy of foreign direct investment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, N., Li, Q. and Rahman, A. 2010. “Understanding corruption and firm responses in cross-national firm-level surveys.” Journal of International Business Studies 41: 1481–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, K. and Singh, H. 1996. “The determinants of foreign direct investment in developing countries.” Transnational Corporations 5 (2): 67–105.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. 2009. “Governance matters VIII: aggregate and individual governance indicators, 1996–2008.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. 2010. “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: methodology and analytical issues.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430.Google Scholar
Kenyon, T. and Naoi, M. 2010. “Policy uncertainty in hybrid regimes: evidence from firm-level surveys.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (4): 486–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Y. 1989. “Firm-specific strategic advantages and foreign direct investment behavior of firms: the case of Japanese semiconductor firms.” Journal of International Business Studies 20 (2): 296–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B. and Singh, H. 1988. “The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode.” Journal of International Business Studies 19 (3): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, N. 1994. “Determinants of export orientation of foreign production by U.S. multinationals: an inter-country analysis.” Journal of International Business Studies 25 (1): 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, N. 2002. Globalization and the quality of foreign direct investment. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kurtz, M. and Schrank, A. 2007. “Growth and governance: models, measures, and mechanisms.” Journal of Politics 69 (2): 538–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, L. and Knack, S. 2010. “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: six, one, or none?” Journal of Development Studies 46 (2): 350–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. 2001. “Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe.” Journal of International Business Studies 32 (2): 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. and Nguyen, H. 2005. “Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: evidence from Vietnam.” Journal of Management Studies 42 (1): 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. and Peng, M. 2009. “Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies.” Strategic Management Journal 30 (1): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, G. 2003. “Measures of democracy, governance and rule of law: an overview of cross-national data sets.” Paper prepared for World Bank workshop on “Understanding growth and freedom from the bottom up” Washington, DC, July 15–17, 2003.Google Scholar
North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. 1994. “Economic performance through time.” American Economic Review 84 (3): 359–368.Google Scholar
Oxley, J. 1999. “Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 38 (3): 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, L. and Reich, S. 1997. “National structures and multinational corporate behavior: enduring differences in the age of globalization.” International Organization 51 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, R. 1989. The Internationalisation of research and development by multinational enterprises. London: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. and Delios, A. 2006. “What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 23 (4): 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M., Lee, S. and Wang, D. 2005. “What determines the scope of the firm over time? A focus on institutional relatedness.” The Academy of Management Review 30 (3): 622–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. and Organ, D. 1986. “Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects.” Journal of Management 12: 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J. and Podsakoff, N. 2003. “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slangen, A. and Tulder, R. 2009. “Cultural distance, political risk, or governance quality? Towards a more accurate conceptualization and measurement of external uncertainty in foreign entry mode research.” International Business Review 18 (3): 276–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smarzynska, B. and Wei, S. 2000. “Corruption and composition of foreign direct investment: firm-level evidence.” NBER Working Paper 7969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbergen, M. and Jones, B. 2002. “Modeling multilevel data structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 218–2137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNCTAD. 2005. World Investment Report (WIR) 2005: TNCs and the Internationalization of R&D. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
Volpe Martincus, C. and Carballo, J. 2008. “Is export promotion effective in developing countries? Firm-level evidence on the intensive and the extensive margins of exports.” Journal of International Economics 76 (1): 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, D. and Moody, A. 1992. “International investment location decisions: the case of US firms.” Journal of International Economics 33: 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. 2000. “The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead.” Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3): 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar