Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:07:53.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Market responses to global governance: International climate cooperation and Europe's carbon trading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2020

Federica Genovese Open the ORCID record for Federica Genovese [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

International environmental cooperation can impose significant costs on private firms. Yet, in recent years some companies have been supportive of international climate agreements. This suggests that under certain conditions environmental accords can be profitable. In this paper, I seek to explain this puzzle by focusing on the interaction between domestic regulation and decisions at international climate negotiations. I argue that global climate cooperation hurts the profits of polluting firms if domestic governments do not shield them from international compliance costs. Vice versa, if firms are subject to protective (i.e., insufficiently severe) policy instruments at home, firms can materially gain from international climate agreements that sustain expectations about their profitability. I test the argument with an event study of the effect of decisions at the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) on major European firms that received free carbon permits in the early stages of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS). The analysis suggests that financial markets carefully follow the international climate negotiations, and reward the regulated firms based on the outcome of UNFCCC decisions. The evidence also indicates the advantageous interplay between certain types of domestic regulations and international regimes for business. More generally, the results show the perils of privately supported policy for the effectiveness of international public good provision.

Keywords

businessesclimate changemarket regulationglobal governanceinternational negotiations
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 91 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2020 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I thank Patrick Bayer, Thomas Bernauer, Jeff Colgan, Jessica Green, Alexandru Grigorescu, Katja Michaelowa, Stefan Renckens, Christina Schneider, Detlef Sprinz, Matt Winters, and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments. I also thank Thibaud Henin and Georg Zachmann for advice on the EU firms’ data, Endre Tvinnereim for help with the survey data, and Winifred Michael for great research assistance. Previous versions of this paper were presented at ISA 2014, PEIO 2015, MPSA 2015, SPSA 2016, and Virtual IPES 2017 meetings.

References

Baldwin, R. 2008. “Regulation Lite: The Rise of Emissions Trading.” Regulation and Governance 2 (2): 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, P. 2019. “Strategic government enforcement and firm compliance with international regulation: Evidence from carbon regulation.” Paper presented at the 2019 PEIO Conference.Google Scholar
Bechtel, M. M., and Sattler, T.. 2015. “What Is Litigation in the World Trade Organization Worth?” International Organization 6 (2): 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, M. M., and Schneider, G.. 2010. “Eliciting Substance from ‘Hot Air’: Financial Market Responses to EU Summit Decisions on European Defense.” International Organization 64 (2): 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhagen, P. 2008. “Business and international environmental agreements: Domestic sources of participation and compliance by advanced industrialized democracies.” Global Environmental Politics 81 (1): 78–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betzold, C. 2010. “‘Borrowing’ Power to Influence International Negotiations: AOSIS in the Climate Change Regime, 1990–1997.” Politics 20 (3): 131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biedenkopf, K., Mueller, R., Slominski, P., and Wettestad, J.. 2017. “A Global Turn To Green-house Gas Emissions Trading? Experiments, Actors, and Diffusion.” Global Environmental Politics 17 (3): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovenberg, A. L., and Goulder, L. H.. 2001. “Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of CO2 Abatement Policies: What Does It Cost?” In Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M. et al. 2014. Transnational Climate Change Governance Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushnell, J. B., Chong, H., and Mansur, E. T.. 2013. “Profiting from Regulation: Evidence from the European Carbon Market.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5 (4): 78–106.Google Scholar
Castro, P., Hoernlein, L., and Michaelowa, K.. 2014. “Constructed Peer Groups and Path Dependence in International Organizations: The Case of the International Climate Change Negotiations.” Global Environmental Change 25 (109–20).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaikwad, N. 2013. “Presidential prospects, political support, and stock market performance.” Quar-terly Journal of Political Science 8(4): 451–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genovese, F., and Tvinnereim, E.. 2019. “Who Opposes Climate Regulation? Business Preferences for the European Emission Trading Scheme.” The Review of International Organizations 14 (3): 511–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. F. 2013. Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Green, J. F. 2017. “Don't link carbon markets.” Nature 543 (7646): 484–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grubb, M., and Neuhoff, K.. 2006. “Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: Policy overview.” Climate Policy 6 (1): 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, J. 2010. “A History of International Climate Change Policy.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1 (5): 636–53.Google Scholar
Hale, T. 2016. “‘All Hands on Deck’: The Paris Agreement and Nonstate Climate Action.” Global Environmental Politics 16 (3): 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, C., Grubb, M., Neuhoff, K., Matthes, F., and Tse, M.. 2006. “Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: How and why?” Climate Policy 6: 137–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O., and Victor, D. G.. 2016. “Cooperation and discord in global climate policy.” Nature Climate Change 6: 570–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. E., Urpelainen, J., and Yang, J.. 2016. “Electric Utilities and American Climate Policy: Lobbying by Expected Winners and Losers.” Journal of Public Policy 36 (2): 251–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, N., Fuss, S., Grosjean, G., and Edenhofer, O.. 2014. “Causes of the EU ETS price drop: Recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything? New evidence.” Energy Policy 73 (676–85).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R., Muuls, M., and Wagner, U. J.. 2015. “Trading Behavior in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.” In Emissions Trading as a Policy Instrument: Evaluation and Prospects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meckling, J. 2011. Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics and the Rise of Emissions Trading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, P., and Paterson, M.. 2010. Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R. G. 2010. “The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26 (2): 253–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oestreich, A. M., and Tsiakas, I.. 2015. “Carbon Emissions and Stock Returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.” Journal of Banking and Finance 58: 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattler, T. 2013. ‘Do Markets Punish Left Governments?” The Journal of Politics 75 (2): 343–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, B. 2001. “The International Politics of Harmonization: The Case of Capital Market Regulation.” International Organization 55 (3): 589–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, D. 2011. Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, D., and House, J.. 2004. “A new currency: Climate change and carbon credits.” Harvard International Review 26 (2): 56–59.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilf, M. 2016. “Credibility and Distributional Effects of International Banking Regulations: Evidence from US Bank Stock Returns.” International Organization 70 (4): 736–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Genovese Supplementary Materials

Genovese Supplementary Materials

Download Genovese Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 540.1 KB