Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:10:22.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business advocacy in Asian PTAs: a model of selective corporate lobbying with evidence from Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mireya Solís
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What explains the pattern of selective business interest in preferential trade agreements (PTAs) with active campaigning for and utilization of tariff preferences for some trade agreements, but not others? Under what conditions can business advocates of PTA policy mount an effective lobbying campaign to influence policy outcomes (i.e., shaping decisions on who to negotiate with and what to negotiate about)? These are important questions given that analyses of Asian PTAs frequently assign a negligible role to business interests either out of apathy or lobbying weakness. To understand the pattern of selective business lobbying for PTAs, I develop a theoretical model with three main independent variables: venue selection, preference intensity, and advocacy effectiveness, and apply it to the case of Japan to test its usefulness. My model shows that the conditions for effective business PTA campaigning are exacting: loss avoidance, high technical expertise, and influence-seeking strategies that maximize access opportunities given institutional constraints. And yet when these factors align, business interests do influence PTA outcomes. My research shows that the current trend to characterize the agency of PTA proliferation as either state-led or business-driven needs to be re-examined as it is more useful to think about state-society constellations in favor or against PTAs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , April 2013 , pp. 87 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2013 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggarwal, V. K. 2001. “Corporate market and nonmarket strategies in Asia: a conceptual framework.” Business and Politics 3 (2): 89–108.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, V. K. and Lee, S. 2011. “The domestic political economy of preferential trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific.” In: Aggarwal, V. K. and Lee, S. (eds.), Trade policy in the Asia-Pacific. The role of ideas, interests, and domestic institutions. New York: Springer, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. 1995. “A domino theory of regionalism.” In: Baldwin, R., Haaparanta, P. and Kiander, J. (eds.), Expanding membership of the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, D. P. 2010. Business and its environment. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Campos, J. E. and Root, H. L. 1996. The key to the Asian miracle. Making shared growth credible. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Cheong, I. and Cho, J. 2011. “Republic of Korea.” In: Kawai, M. and Wignaraja, G. (eds.), Asia's free trade agreements: how is business responding? ADB, ADBI, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 130–154.Google Scholar
Choi, W.-M. 2009. “Aggressive regionalism in Korea-U.S. FTA; The present and future of Korea's FTA policy.” Journal of International Economic Law 12 (3): 595–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, G. and Kennedy, S. 2010. “Big business and industry association lobbying in China: the paradox of contrasting styles.” The China Journal 63: 101–125.Google Scholar
Dent, C. M. 2006. New free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields, K. 1997. “Strong states and business organization in Korea and Taiwan.” In: Maxfield, S. and Schneider, B. R. Business and the state in developing countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 122–151.Google Scholar
Foster, K. W. 2001. “Associations in the embrace of an authoritarian state: state domination of society?” Studies in Comparative International Development 35 (4): 84–109.Google Scholar
Gardini, G. L. 2006. “Government-business relations in the construction of Mercosur.” Business and Politics 8 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Hoadley, S. 2008. “Thailand's and Malaysia's cross-regional FTA initiatives.” In: Katada, S. N. and Solís, M. (eds.), Cross-regional trade agreements: understanding permeated regionalism in East Asia. Berlin: Springer, pp. 95–121.Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. 2010. “China's pursuit of free trade agreements: is China exceptional?” Review of International Political Economy 17 (2): 238–261.Google Scholar
Kawai, M. and Wignaraja, G. 2011. “Main findings and policy implications.” In: Kawai, M. and Wignaraja, G. (eds.), Asia's free trade agreements: how is business responding? ADB, ADBI, and Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 33–73.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, K. 2004. “The impact of free trade agreements in Asia.” unpublished manuscript available at: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/1757.pdf, (accessed on March 3, 2007).Google Scholar
Kawasaki, K. 2010. “Macro and sectoral significance of an FTAAP.” ESRI Discussion Paper Series, no. 244. Cabinet Office Japan. Available at: http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/e_dis/e_dis250/e_dis244.pdf, (accessed on December 7, 2011).Google Scholar
Katada, S. and Solís, M. 2010. “Domestic sources of Japanese foreign policy activism: loss avoidance and demand coherence.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 10 (1): 129–157.Google Scholar
Kim, E. 1999. “The State's Authority in the Organizing of the World of Business: Corporatist Business interest representation in South Korea.” Asian Perspective 23 (2): 285–309.Google Scholar
Krauss, E. S. and Naoi, M. 2011. “The domestic politics of Japan's regional foreign economic policies.” In: Aggarwal, V. K. and Lee, S. (eds.), Trade policy in the Asia-Pacific. The role of ideas, interests, and domestic institutions. New York: Springer, pp. 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, M. G. 2009. “South Korea's FTAs: moving from an emulative to competitive strategy.” In: Solís, M., Stallings, B. and Katada, S. (eds.), Competitive regionalism: FTA diffusion in the pacific rim. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 181–197.Google Scholar
Laothamatas, A. 1992. Business associations and the new political economy of Thailand. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Levy, J. 1997. “Prospect theory, rational choice and international relations.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (1): 87–112.Google Scholar
Manger, M. 2009. Investing in protection: the politics of preferential trade agreements between north and south. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mochizuki, M. 2009. “Political-security competition and the FTA movement.” In: Solís, M., Stallings, B., and Katada, S. (eds.), Competitive regionalism: FTA diffusion in the Pacific rim. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 54–73.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. 1993. “Preferences and power in the European community: a liberalintergovernmental approach.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31: 18–85.Google Scholar
Munakata, N. 2002. “How trade agreements can reform Japan.” The Globalist, http://www.theglobalist.com/DBWeb/StoryId.aspx?StoryId=2560, (accessed on January 27, 2006).Google Scholar
Odell, J., ed. 2006. Negotiating trade: developing countries in the WTO and NAFTA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ogita, T. 2003. “Japan as a late-coming FTA holder: trade policy change for Asian orientation?” In: Okamoto, J. (ed.), Wither free trade agreements? Proliferation, evaluation, and multilateralization. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies, pp. 216–251.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, S. 2008. Japan's aggressive legalism: law and foreign trade politics beyond the WTO. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, S., Solís, M., and Katada, S. 2007. “Trading gains for control: international trade forums and Japanese economic diplomacy.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (4): 945–970.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. and Tsunekawa, K. 1979. “Corporatism without labor? The Japanese anomaly.” In: Schmitter, P. and Lehmbruch, G. (eds.), Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills, Calif./London: Sage, pp. 231–270.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. 1988. “Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games.” International Organization 42 (3): 427–460.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, J. 2006. “The political economy of the new Asia-Pacific bilateralism: benign, banal, or simply bad?” In: Aggarwal, V. K. and Urata, S. (eds.), Bilateral trade agreements in Asia-Pacific: origins, evolution and implications. New York: Routledge, pp. 27–49.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, J. 2010. “The ‘new East Asian regionalism’: a political domino effect.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (2): 178–208.Google Scholar
Rhyu, S.-Y. 2011. “South Korea's political dynamics of regionalism: a comparative study of Korea-Japan FTA and Korea-US FTA.” In: Aggarwal, V. K. and Lee, S. (eds.), Trade policy in the Asia-Pacific. The role of ideas, interests, and domestic institutions. New York: Springer, pp. 71–88.Google Scholar
Sally, R. 2007. “Thai trade policy: from non-discriminatory liberalization to FTAs.” The World Economy 30 (10): 1594–1620.Google Scholar
Sekizawa, Y. 2008. “Nihon no FTA Seisaku: Sono Seiji Katei no Bunseki” [Japan's FTA Policy: Analysis of Its Political Process]. ISS Research Series, no. 26. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Institute of Social Science.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. R. 2004. Business politics and the state in twentieth-century Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. R. 2010. “Business politics and policymaking in contemporary Latin America.” In: Scartascini, C., Stein, E., and Tommasi, M. (eds.), How democracy works: political institutions, actors, and arenas in Latin American policymaking. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, pp. 217–246.Google Scholar
Solís, M. 2003. “Japan's new regionalism: the politics of free trade talks with Mexico.” Journal of East Asian Studies 3: 377–404.Google Scholar
Solis, M. 2010. “Can FTAS deliver market liberalization in Japan? A study on domestic political constraints.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (2): 209–237.Google Scholar
Solis, M. and Katada, S. 2007. “The Japan-Mexico FTA: a cross-regional step in the path towards Asian regionalism.” Pacific Affairs 80: 279–302.Google Scholar
Stein, J. G. 1993. Choosing to cooperate: how states avoid losses. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. and Urata, S. 2010. “On the use of FTAs by Japanese firms: further evidence.” Business and Politics 12 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taliaferro, J. W. 2004. Balancing risks: great power intervention in the periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Terada, T. 2009. “Competitive regionalism in Southeast Asia and beyond: role of Singapore and ASEAN.” In: Solís, M., Stallings, B. and Katada, S. (eds.), Competitive regionalism: FTA diffusion in the pacific rim. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 161–180.Google Scholar
Terada, T. 2010. “The origins of ASEAN+6 and Japan's initiatives: China's rise and the agent-structure analysis.” The Pacific Review 23 (2): 71–92.Google Scholar
Wan, M. 2011. “The domestic political economy of China's preferential trade agreements.” In: Aggarwal, V. K. and Lee, S. (eds.), Trade policy in the Asia-Pacific. The role of ideas, interests, and domestic institutions. New York: Springer, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
Wignaraja, G., Olfino, R., Puppahavesa, W., Panpiemras, J. and Ongkittikul, S. 2011. “Thailand.” In: Kawai, M. and Wignaraja, G. (eds.), Asia's free trade agreements: how is business responding? ADB, ADBI, and Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 199–226.Google Scholar
Woll, C. 2008. Firm interests: how governments shape business lobbying on global trade. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Woll, C. and Artigas, A. 2007. “When trade liberalization turns into regulatory reform: the impact on business-government relations in international trade politics.” Regulation and Governance 1: 121–138.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Y. 2007. “Seiji shikin no nagare ni miru zaikai shijai” [The control of the business community as seen in the flow of political funds]. In: Sasaki, K. (ed.), Henbô suru Zaikai. Nippon Keidanren no Bunseki [Changing Business World: An Analysis of Nippon Keidanren]. Tokyo: Shinnihon Shuppansha, pp. 175–235.Google Scholar
Yoshimatsu, H. 2005. “Japan's Keidanren and free trade agreements: societal interests and trade policy.” Asian Survey 45 (2): 258–278.Google Scholar