Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:00:26.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Binding Dynamics of Non-Binding Governance Arrangements. The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights and the Cases of BP and Chevron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Matthias Hofferberth
Matthias Hofferberth*
Affiliation:
Goethe-University Frankfurt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While the state remains the main unit of analysis in International Relations, the emergence of transnational actors and their integration into global governance have contributed to an opening of perspectives and issues. NGOs and multinational enterprises as well as their interaction in public-private-partnerships have become popular research objects. However, these partnerships are often assessed in terms of effectiveness which leads to juxtapositioning binding and effective versus non-binding and ineffective initiatives. Considering such an either/or-logic to be of limited insight, the article argues that current research on public-private-partnerships suffers from four conceptual difficulties: (1) an underspecified concept of effectiveness, (2) a missing discussion on the yardsticks chosen for assessments, (3) a tendency to (over-)generalize individual findings and (4) underlying yet seldom reflected actor assumptions. To help engage with these difficulties, the paper conceptualizes partnerships as social contexts. Within such contexts, dynamics influence corporate identity and action and create new awareness as well as new conduct. Such a perspective allows to go beyond weighing the effectiveness of binding versus the likelihood of non-binding initiatives. The argument is illustrated by analyzing the emergence, development, and impact of the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights with respect to BP and Chevron.

Keywords

public-private-partnershipsmultinational enterprisesVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rightsglobal governancecorporate social responsibility
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 1 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2011 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan. 2009. “The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State.” In The Politics of Global Regulation, edited by Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 44–88 Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2005. Ten Years on: Injustice and violence haunt the oil Delta. Country Report on Nigeria: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AFR44/022/2005/en/63b716d6-d49d-11dd-8a23-d58a49c0d652/afr440222005en.pdf.Google Scholar
Amoore, Louise. 2000. “International Political Economy and the ’Contested Firm’.” New Political Economy 5 (2): 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha and Sell, Susan K. 2010. “Who Governs the Globe?” In Who Governs the Globe?, edited by Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha and Sell, Susan K. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, Christopher. 2000. Business and Human Rights in a Time of Change. London. Amnesty International UK.Google Scholar
Beckert, Jens. 2003. “Economic Sociology and Embeddedness: How Shall We Conceptualize Economic Action?” Journal of Economic Issues 37 (3): 769–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. and Hönke, Jana. 2011. “From Compliance to Practice. Mining Companies and the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights in the Democratic Republic of Congo” SFB Working Papers Series, DFG Sonderforschungsbereich 700, Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. and Risse, Thomas. 2010. “Governance without a state: Can it work?” Regulation & Governance 4 (2): 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BP. 2002a. What we stand for: Our business policies. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/W/What_we_stand_for_Our_business_policies_2002.pdf.Google Scholar
BP. 2002b. Performance for all our futures: BP Sustainability Report 2001. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/E/Environmental_and_social_report_2001.pdf.Google Scholar
BP. 2003. Environmental and Social Review 2002: BP Sustainability Report 2002. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/E/Environmental_and_social_report_2002.pdf.Google Scholar
BP. 2004. Defining our path: Sustainability Report 2003. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/B/BP_Sustainability_Report_2003.pdf.Google Scholar
BP. 2005a. Human Rights: A Guidance Note. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bpinternet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/BP_Human_Rights_2005.pdf.Google Scholar
BP. 2005b. Making the right choices: BP Sustainability Report 2004. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/S/Sustainability_Report_2004.pdf.Google Scholar
BP. 2006. Making energy more: Sustainability Report 2005. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/S/bp_sustainability_report_2.pdf.Google Scholar
BP. 2007. BP Sustainability Report 2006. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/B/bp_sustainability_report_2006.pdf.Google Scholar
BP. 2008. BP Sustainability Report 2007. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/e_s_assets/downloads/bp_sustainability_report_2007.pdf.Google Scholar
BP. 2011. Annual Report on the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights January to December 2010. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/sustainability/how_we_operate/STAGING/local_assets/downloads_pdfs/Voluntary_Principles_Plenary_2011_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Brown, Dana L., Vetterlein, Antje and Roemer-Mahler, Anne. 2010. “Theorizing Transnational Corporations as Social Actors: An Analysis of Corporate Motivations.” Business and Politics 12 (1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brühl, Tanja. 2007. “Public-private partnerships: unlike partners? Assessing new forms of regulation.” In Globalization. State of the art and perspectives, edited by Schirm, Stefan A. London: Routledge, 143–161.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2010. “Private Regulation in the Global Economy: A (P)Review.” Business and Politics 12 (3), 1–38.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2010b. “Global Private Politics: A Research Agenda.” Business and Politics 12 (3), 1–24.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin, Auld, Graeme and Newsom, Deanna. 2004. Governing through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-state Authority. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chevron. 2003. 2002 ChevronTexaco Corporate Responsibility Report: Integrity and learning in an evolving world. http://www.chevron.com/documents/pdf/corporateresponsibility/Chevron_CR_Report_2002.pdf.Google Scholar
Chevron. 2005. Identifying Issues, Taking Action, Improving Performance: Chevron Corporation 2004 Corporate Responsibility Report. http://www.chevron.com/documents/pdf/corporateresponsibility/Chevron_CR_Report_2004.pdf.Google Scholar
Chevron. 2006a. Human Rights Statement. http://www.chevron.com/documents/pdf/chevronhumanrightsstatement.pdf.Google Scholar
Chevron. 2006b. Corporate Responsibility Report 2005. http://www.chevron.com/documents/pdf/corporateresponsibility/Chevron_CR_Report_2005.pdf.Google Scholar
Chevron. 2008. Energy Partnerships: 2007 Corporate Responsibility. Report,http://www.chevron.com/globalissues/corporateresponsibility/2007/documents/Chevron_CR_report_050208.pdf.Google Scholar
Chevron. 2009. Developing Partnerships: 2008 Corporate Responsibility Report. http://www.chevron.com/globalissues/corporateresponsibility/2008/documents/Chevron_CR_Report_2008.pdf.Google Scholar
Conzelmann, Thomas and Wolf, Klaus Dieter. 2007. “Doing Good While Doing Well? Potenzial und Grenzen grenzüberschreitender privatwirtschaftlicher Selbstregulierung.” In Macht und Ohnmacht internationaler Institutionen. Festschrift für Volker Rittberger, edited by Hasenclever, Andreas, Dieter Wolf, Klaus and Zürn, Michael. Frankfurt a.M: Campus, 145–175.Google Scholar
Cutler, Claire A. 2008. “Problematizing Corporate Social Responsibility under Conditions of Late Capitalism and Postmodernity.” In Authority in the Global Political Economy, edited by Rittberger, Volker and Nettesheim, Martin. Basingstoke, Illinois: Palgrave Macmillan, 189–217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Claire A., Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Tony. eds. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole and Wolf, Klaus Dieter. 2010. “Corporate Security Responsibility: Corporate Governance Contributions to Peace and Security in Zones of Conflict.” In Corporate Security Responsibility? Corporate Governance Contributions to Peace and Security in Zones of Conflict, edited by Deitelhoff, Nicole and Wolf, Klaus Dieter. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–25.Google Scholar
Dunning, John H. 1971. “The Multinational Enterprise: The Background.” In The Multinational Enterprise, edited by Dunning, John H. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers, 15–48.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa and Mische, Ann. 1998. “What is Agency?” The American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Bennett and Uriz, Genoveva Hernandez. 2003. “Managing risk and building trust. The challenge of implementing the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights.” In Business and Human Rights. Dilemmas and Solutions, edited by Sullivan, Rory, Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg and Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2009. “On Acting and Knowing. How Pragmatism can advance International Relations Research and Methodology.” International Organization 63 (4): 701–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froud, Julie, Johal, Sukdhev, Leaver, Adam and Williams, Karel. 2006. Financialization and Strategy. Narrative and numbers. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Doris. 2007. Business and governance: transnational corporations and the effectiveness of private governance. In Globalization. State of the art and perspectives, edited by Schirm, Stefan A. London: Routledge, 122–142.Google Scholar
Ganesan, Arvin. 2006. “Is 2007 the End for Voluntary Standards?”, Human Rights Watch Business for Social Responsibility Newsletter. http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2006/12/12/global14872.htm.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney B. and Biersteker, Thomas J. eds. 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haufler, Virginia. 2001. A public role for the private sector. Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Haufler, Virginia. 2003. “Globalization and Industry Self-Regulation.” In Governance in a Global Economy. Political Authority in Transition, edited by Kahler, Michael and David, A. Lake, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 226–252.Google Scholar
Haufler, Virginia. 2010. “Corporations in zones of conflict: issues, actors, and institutions.” In Who Governs the Globe?, edited by Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 102–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogner, Robert H. 1997. “International Business Studies: Science, Society, and reality.” In International Business. An Emerging Vision, edited by Toyne, Brian and Nigh, Douglas. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press, 115–130 Google Scholar
Huckel, Carmen, Rieth, Lothar and Zimmer, Melanie. 2007. “Die Effektivität von Public-Private Partnerships.” In Macht und Ohnmacht internationaler Institutionen. Festschrift für Volker Rittberger, edited by Hasenclever, Andreas, Dieter Wolf, Klaus and Zürn, Michael. Frankfurt a.M: Campus, 115–144.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2008. Politics as War: The Human Rights Impact and Causes of Post-Election Violence in Rivers State, Nigeria. http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/nigeria0308webcover.pdf.Google Scholar
Information Working Group of the Voluntary Principles. 2010. Overview of Company Efforts to Implement the Voluntary Principles. http://voluntaryprinciples.org/files/vp_company_efforts.pdf.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick T. 2010. “The perpetual decline of the West.” In: The Struggle for the West. A divided and contested legacy, edited by Browning, Christopher S and Lehti, Marko. London: Routledge, 53–70 Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1997. The Creativity of Action. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1988. “International Institutions: Two Approaches.” International Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S. eds. 1973. Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kobrin, Stephen J. 2008. “Globalization, transnational corporations and the future of global governance.” In Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship, edited by Scherer, Andreas G. Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 249–272.Google Scholar
Kollman, Kelly. 2008. “The Regulatory Power of Business Norms: A Call for a New Research Agenda.” International Studies Review 10 (3): 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, Peer Hull and Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2005. Local Players in Global Games. The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milliken, Jennifer. 1999. “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Method.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. “Taking preferences seriously. A Liberal Theory of International Politics.” International Organization 51 (4): 513–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Jane. 2002. Building Partnerships. Cooperation between the United Nations system and the private sector. New York, NY: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
Palan, Ronen. 2000. “New trends in global political economy.” In Global Political Economy. Contemporary theories, edited by Palan, Ronen. London: Routledge, 1–18.Google Scholar
Pattberg, Philipp H. 2005. “The Institutionalization of Private Governance: How Business and Nonprofit Organizations Agree on Transnational Rules.” Governance 18 (4): 589–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Anne, Koechlin, Lucy and Fenner Zinkernagel, Gretta. 2009. “Non-state actors as standard setters: framing the issue in an interdisciplinary fashion.” In Non-State Actors as Standard Setters, edited by Peters, Anne, Koechlin, Lucy, Förster, Till, and Fenner Zinkernagel, Gretta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potoski, Matthew and Prakash, Aseem. 2005. “Green Clubs and Voluntary Governance: ISO 14001 and Firms’ Regulatory Compliance.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2), 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potoski, Matthew and Prakash, Aseem. eds. 2009. Voluntary Programs. A Club Theory Perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prakash, Aseem. 2000. Greening the Firm. The Politics of Corporate Environmentalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Aseem. 2002. “Beyond Seattle: globalization, the nonmarket environment and corporate strategy.” Review of International Political Economy 9 (3): 513–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard. 1998. “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines.” International Organization 52 (3): 613–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2004. “Global Governance and Communicative Action.” Government and Opposition 39 (2): 288–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John. G. 2004. “Reconstituting the Global Public domain. Issues, Actors, and Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 10 (4): 499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäferhoff, Marco, Campe, Sabine and Kaan, Christopher. 2009. “Transnational Public-Private Partnerships in International Relations. Making Sense of Concepts, Research Frameworks, and Results.” International Studies Review 11 (3): 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Andreas Georg and Palazzo, Guido. 2007. “Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective.”, Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, Susan K. and Prakash, Aseem. 2004. “Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest Between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 48 (1): 143–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toyne, Brian and Nigh, Douglas. 1997. “Foundations of an Emerging Paradigm.” In International Business. An Emerging Vision, edited by Toyne, Brian and Nigh, Douglas. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press, 3–26 Google Scholar
Utting, Peter. 2008. “Rearticulating Regulatory Approaches: Private-Public Authority and Corporate Social Responsibility.” In Authority in the Global Political Economy, edited by Rittberger, Volker and Nettesheim, Martin. Basingstoke, Illinois: Palgrave Macmillan, 241–275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, Raymond. 1971. Sovereignty at bay. The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprise. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 2005. The Market for Virtue. The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 2009. “The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct.” In Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 151–188.Google Scholar
VPs. 2000. The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, announced by the US and UK Government, supported and welcomed by participating companies and NGOs. http://voluntaryprinciples.org/files/voluntary_principles_english.pdf.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of international politics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is what states make of it.” International Organization 46 (2): 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Klaus Dieter. 2008. “Emerging patterns of global governance: the new interplay between the state, business and civil society.” In: Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship, edited by Georg Scherer, Andreas. Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 225–248.Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold. 1959. “The Actors in International Relations.” In: Theoretical Aspects of International Relations, edited by Fox, William T.R. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 83–106.Google Scholar
UNCTAD 2009. World Investment Report. Transnational Corporations, Agricultural Production and Development. New York, NY: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
Zalik, Anna. 2005. “The Peace of the Graveyard: The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights in the Niger Delta.” In Global Regulation. Managing Crises After the Imperial Turn, edited by van der Pijl, Kees, Assassi, Libby, and Wigan, Duncan. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 111–121.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2007. “The Historical Alternatives Approach.” In: The Oxford Handbook of Business History, edited by Zeitlin, Jonathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 120–140.Google Scholar