No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
What is modern about sovereign wealth funds? A reply to Pete Moore
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
We welcome the opportunity to respond to Pete Moore's comments on our paper. In doing so, we address the central issue raised by Moore concerning our use of the term “modern” in our analysis of the origin, structure, and management of Gulf states’ sovereign wealth funds. As it turns out, our use of the term modern is complex and multifaceted; we hope to show that the issue raised by Pete Moore runs in a variety of directions and is not so easily resolved, as he suggests.
- Type
- Critical dialogue
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2013 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press
References
Clark, Gordon L., Dixon, Adam D., and Monk, Ashby. 2013. Sovereign Wealth Funds: Legitimacy, Governance, and Global Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Gordon L., Feldman, Maryann P., and Gertler, Meric S., eds. 2000. The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Gordon L., and Wójcik, Dariusz. 2007. The Geography of Finance: Corporate Governance in the Global Marketplace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert C. and Bodie, Zvi. 2005. “The Design of Financial Systems: Towards a Synthesis of Function and Structure.” Journal of Investment Management
3 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar