Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:17:04.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power in international trade politics: is ISDS a solution in search of a problem?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2017

Andrew Reddie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the controversial investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms in recent mega-free trade agreement. Below, I examine the origins of the ISDS concept and outline the controversy surrounding its use in the context of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Then, I provide a theoretical discussion that outlines both the exogenous and endogenous factors that contribute to the inclusion of ISDS provisions in international trade agreements. Focusing on the latter endogenous factors, I then argue that not all international trade agreements are the same and that, as such, it is possible to develop a typology of international trade agreement across two variables (the number of parties and relative power) that impact the appropriateness of including an ISDS provision. I test this typology against the empirical record. Finally, I discuss potential innovations to the ISDS provisions and market-based mechanisms that address the dual challenges of discrimination and expropriation that ISDS is designed to address.1

Keywords

ISDSdispute settlementTTIPinternational trade agreements
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 19 , Special Issue 4: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) , December 2017 , pp. 738 - 757
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2017 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I would like to thank Vinod Aggarwal and Simon Evenett along with two anonymous reviewers for comments that contributed to this manuscript. The Institute d'Etudes Européennes de l'Université Libre de Bruxelles graciously hosted me as a visiting scholar and provided research support during the writing of this article.

References

Aggarwal, Vinod and Fogerty, E. A.. 2004. “Between Regionalism and Globalism: European Union Interregional Trade Strategies.” In EU Trade Trade Strategies: Between Regionalism and Multilateralism, edited by Aggarwal, Vinod and Fogerty, E. A.. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–40.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Evenett, Simon J.. 2013. “A Fragmenting Global Economy: A Weakened WTO, Mega FTAs, and Murky Protectionism.” Swiss Political Science Review 19(4): 550–57. doi:10.1111/spsr.12059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allee, Todd and Elsig, Manfred. 2016. “Why Do Some International Institutions Contain Strong Dispute Settlement Provisions? New Evidence from Preferential Trade Agreements.” The Review of International Organizations 11(1): 89–120. doi:10.1007/s11558-015-9223-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allee, Todd and Peinhardt, Clint. 2010. “Delegating Differences: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bargaining Over Dispute Resolution Provisions.” International Studies Quarterly 54(1): 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00575.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allee, Todd and Peinhardt, Clint. 2014. “Evaluating Three Explanations for the Design of Bilateral Investment Treaties.” World Politics 66(1): 47–87. doi:10.1017/S0043887113000324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard. 2011. “Trade and Industrialisation After Globalization's 2nd Unbundling: How Building and Joining A Supply Chain Are Different and Why It Matters.” NBER Working Paper Series 17716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buthe, Tim and Milner, Helen V.. 2009. “Bilateral Investment Treaties and Foreign Direct Investment: A Political Analysis.” In The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows, edited by Sauvant, Karl P. and Sachs, Lisa E.. New York: Oxford University Press, 171–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVille, Ferdi and Gabriel Siles-Brugge. 2015. TTIP: The Truth about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity, 160.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?” International Organization 50(3): 379–406. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. and McNamara, Kathleen R.. 2013. “International Political Economy, Global Financial Orders and the 2008 Financial Crisis.” Perspectives on Politics 11(1): 155–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egger, Peter and Merlo, Valeria. 2007. “The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties on FDI Dynamics.” World Economy 30 (10): 1536–49. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01063.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2015. “Report presented today: Consultation on investment protection in EU-US trade talks.” Press release. (Accessed on 18 May 2016) http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-3201_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Union. 2015. “Investment in TTIP and beyond – the Path for Reform: Enhancing the Right to Regulate and Moving from Current Ad Hoc Arbitration towards an Investment Court.” Concept Paper. (Accessed on 18 May 2016) http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/may/tradoc_153408.PDF.Google Scholar
Griffith, Melissa, Steinberg, Richard, and Zysman, John. 2017. “From great power politics to a strategic vacuum: Origins and Consequences of the TPP and TTIP.” Business and Politics 19(4): forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haftel, Yoram Z. 2010. “Ratification counts: US investment treaties and FDI flows into developing countries.” Review of International Political Economy 17(2): 348–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haigh, David R. 2000. “Chapter 11--Private Party vs. Governments, Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Frankenstein or Safety Valve The Management and Resolution of Cross Border Disputes as Canada/U.S. Enter the 21st Century.” Canada-United States Law Journal 26: 115–34.Google Scholar
Hallward-Driemeier, Mary. 2003. Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Attract Foreign Direct Investment? Only a Bit? And They Could Bite. Policy Research Working Papers. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-3121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L. J. Bezuiien, Derderyan, S., and Coman, E.. 2014. “The Rise of Supranational Courts in International Organizations.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary. 2016. “Investor-State Dispute Settlement.” In Policy Analyses in International Economics, edited by Cimino-Isaacs, Cathleen and Schott, Jeffrey, 136. Washington, D.C.:Peterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Kerner, Andrew and Jane Lawrence. 2012. “What's the Risk? Bilateral Investment Treaties, Political Risk and Fixed Capital Accumulation.” British Journal of Political Science: 115. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 2007. “If Only Half of International Agreements Have Dispute Resolution Provisions, Which Half Needs Explaining?” The Journal of Legal Studies 36(1): 189–212. doi:10.1086/509275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krist, B. 2014. “TPP Negotiations Put Progress on Reconciling Trade and Environment at Risk.” America's Trade Policy.Google Scholar
Legum, Barton. 2002. “The Innovation of Investor-State Arbitration under NAFTA Focus: Emerging Fora for International Litigation (Part 1).” Harvard International Law Journal 43: 531–40.Google Scholar
Manger, Mark S. 2009. Investing in Protection: The Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements Between North and South. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter. 2001. “Private Justice in a Global Economy: From Litigation to Arbitration.” International Organization 55(4): 919–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. “Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldenski, Lindsey. 2015. “What Do the Data Say about the Relationship between Investor-State Dispute Settlement Provisions and FDI?” Peterson Institute for International Economics. (Accessed on 18 May 2016) https://piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/what-do-data-say-about-relationship-between-investor-state.Google Scholar
Pandya, Sonal S. 2016. “Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment: Globalized Production in the Twenty-First Century.” Annual Review of Political Science 19(1): 455–75. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051214-101237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric and Yoo, John C.. 2005. “Judicial Independence in International Tribunals.” California Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard. 2013. “Bounded Rationality and the Diffusion of Modern Investment Treaties.” International Studies Quarterly 58(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard, Bonnitcha, Jonathan, and Yackee, Jason. 2015. “Transatlantic Investment Treaty Protection.” CEPS Special Report 102. Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Quick, Reinhard. 2015. “Why TTIP Should Have an Investment Chapter Including ISDS.” Journal of World Trade 49(2): 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W. 2007. “Is There a Better Way - Alternative Methods of Treaty-Based, Investor-State Dispute Resolution Eighteenth Annual Philip D. Reed Memorial Issue.” Fordham International Law Journal 31: 138–85.Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W. and Sullivan, Nicholas P.. 2005. “Do BITs Really Work? An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain.” Harvard International Law Journal 46(1): 67–130.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 1998. “Compliance with International Agreements.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2014. “Bargaining over BITs, Arbitrating Awards: The Regime for Protection and Promotion of International Investment.” World Politics 66(1): 12–46. doi:10.1017/S0043887113000312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smythe, E. 2000. “State Authority and Investment Security.” In Non-State Actors and Authority in the Global System, by Higgott, R.A.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strange, Michael. 2015. “Power in Global Trade Governance: Is the EU a Unitary Actor, a Tool for Dominance, or a Site of Contestation? GATS and the TTIP Negotiations.” International Journal of Public Administration 38(12): 884–94. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.982290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trakman, Leon E. 2001. “Arbitrating Investment Disputes under the NAFTA.” Journal of International Arbitration 18: 385–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNCTAD. 2013. “Recent Developments in Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS).” (Accessed on 18 May 2016) http://unctad.org/en/publicationslibrary/webdiaepcb2013d3_en.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 1997. “Investment Treaty with the Republic of Ecuador,” footnote. (Accessed on 18 May 2016) https://2001-2009.state.gov/documents/organization/43558.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2012. “Treaty Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Rwanda Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment,” footnote. (Accessed on 18 May 2016) https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/101735.pdf.Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus. 2012. “Arbitrator Behaviour in Asymmetrical Adjudication: An Empirical Study of Investment Treaty Arbitration.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 50(1): 211–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Harten, Gus. 2005. “Private Authority and Transnational Governance: The Contours of the International System of Investor Protection.” Review of International Political Economy 12(4): 600–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, A. 2000. “Globalisation and Policy Convergence: The Case of Direct Investment Rules.” In Non-State Actors and Authority in the Global System, edited by Higgott, R.A.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yackee, Jason Webb. 2012. “Controlling the International Investment Law Agency.” Harvard International Law Journal 53: 391–448.Google Scholar
Young, Alasdair. 2016. “Not Your Parents’ Trade Politics: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Negotiations.” Review of International Political Economy 23(3): 345–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar