Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:09:22.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multilateralism and the Multinational Enterprise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Thomas C. Lawton
Affiliation:
Cranfield University
Johan P. Lindeque
Affiliation:
Queen's University - Belfast
Steven M. McGuire
Affiliation:
University of Bath

Abstract

How do multilateral institutions influence the strategic choices and actions of international managers? This paper addresses the question by exploring the impact of the World Trade Organization's (WTO) decision-making process on multinational enterprises (MNEs). We discuss the three phases of the WTO decision-making lifecycle - the formulation of trade rules, the implementation of those rules, and the enforcement of the rules – and propose a strategic adjustment framework for understanding how companies alter their strategies and structures in response to the WTO's rules and operations. We argue that the increased relevance of multilateral rules and enforcement mechanisms – embodied in the WTO - is an important influence on MNE strategies and structures because of the increasing embeddedness of the WTO in national levels of regulation. We illustrate this through examples taken from the pharmaceutical, textiles and sugar industries sectors that have witnessed substantial multilateral regulation.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2009 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Roderick. 2007. Are Developing Countries Deterred from Using the WTO Dispute Settlement Process? ECIPE Working Paper No.1, Brussels: The European Centre for International Political Economy.Google Scholar
Ackrill, Robert and Kay, Adrian. 2009. “Historical Learning in the Design of WTO Rules: The EC Sugar Case.” World Economy 32 (5): 754771.Google Scholar
ALFA. 2009. Home Page of the Apparel Lesotho Alliance to Fight AIDS. Available at http://www.alafa.info/Pages/Default.asp, (accessed 19 May 2009).Google Scholar
plc, AstraZeneca. 2003. “AstraZeneca Opens Multi-Million Dollar Indian Research Facility to Find New Treatments for Tuberculosis.” http://www.astrazeneca.com/pressrelease/497.aspx, 2 June (accessed 5 August 2005).Google Scholar
plc, AstraZeneca. 2005. “AstraZeneca Starts Construction of a $10 million Process R&D Facility in Bangalore.” http://www.astrazenecaindia.com/News/AstraZeneca-India-22-Jan-05.asp, 17 January (accessed 5 August 2005).Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A. (1993) ed. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Barfield, Claude. 2001. Free Trade, Sovereignty and Democracy, Washington: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 1995a. “Integrated Strategy: Market and Nonmarket Components.” California Management Review 37 (2): 4765.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 1995b. ”The Nonmarket Strategy System.” Sloan Management Review 37 (1): 7385.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 1997a. “Integrated Strategy and International Trade Disputes: The Kodak-Fujifilm Case.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 6 (2): 291346.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 1997b. “Integrated Strategy, Trade Policy, and Global Competition.” California Management Review 39 (2): 145169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC news service. 2005a. “Lesotho Textile Workers Lose Jobs.” http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4169587.stm, 12 January (accessed 7 August 2005).Google Scholar
BBC news service. 2005b. “Lesotho Loses from Global Trade Shift.” http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4656987.stm, 6 July 2005 (accessed 7 August 2005).Google Scholar
Behrman, Jack N. and Grosse, Robert E. 1990. International Business and Governments: Issues and Institutions. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Boarman, Patrick M. and Schollhammer, Hans. eds. 1975. Multinational Corporations and Governments: Business-Government Relations in an International Context. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Boddewyn, Jean J. 1988. “Political Aspects of MNE Theory.” Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 341–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddewyn, Jean J. 1993. “Political Resources and Markets in International Business: Beyond Porter's Generic Strategies.” in Rugman, Alan M. and Verbeke, Alain eds. Research in Global Strategic Management 4: 8399. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Boddewyn, Jean J. and Brewer, Thomas L. 1994. “International-Business Political Behavior: New Theoretical Directions.” Academy of Management Review 19 (1): 119143.Google Scholar
Boddewyn, Jean J. 1995. “The Legitimacy of International-Business Political Behavior.” The International Trade Journal 9 (1): 143161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonardi, Jean-Philippe., Hillman, Amy and Keim, Gerald. 2005. “The Attractiveness of Political Markets: Implications for Firm Strategy.” Academy of Management Review 30 (2): 397413.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. and Crowley, Meredith A. 2006. “Policy Externalities: How US Antidumping Affects Japanese Exports to the EU.” European Journal of Political Economy 22 (3): 696714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Thomas L. 1992a. “An Issue-Area Approach to the Analysis of MNC-Government Relations.” Journal of International Business Studies 23 (3): 295309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Thomas L. 1992b. “MNC-Government Relations: Strategic Networks and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States in the Automotive Industry.” The International Executive 34: 113129.Google Scholar
Brewer, Thomas L. (1993). “Government Policies, Market Imperfections, and Foreign Direct Investment.” Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (1): 101–20.Google Scholar
Brown, Andrew G. and Stern, Robert M. (2006). “Global Market Integration and National Sovereignty.” World Economy 29 (3): 257279.Google Scholar
Czinkota, Michael R. and Ronkainen, Ilkka A. 1997. “International Business and Trade in the Next Decade: Report from a Delphi Study.” Journal of International Business Studies 27 (4): 827844.Google Scholar
Daly, Michael. (2006). “The WTO Rules on Direct Taxation.” World Economy 29 (5): 527557.Google Scholar
de Lima-Campos, Aluisio, and Vito, Adriana. 2004. “Abuse and Discretion: The Impact of Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings on Brazilian Exports to the United States.” Journal of World Trade Law 38 (1): 3768.Google Scholar
Doz, Yves and Prahalad, C.K. 1980. “How MNCs Cope with Host Government Intervention.” Harvard Business Review March-April: 149–57.Google Scholar
Doh, Jonathan P. and Guay, Terrence R. 2006. “Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional Stakeholder Perspective.” Journal of Management Studies 43 (1): 4773.Google Scholar
Eden, Lorraine, Tina Dacin, M. and Wan, William P. 2001. “Standards Across Borders: Cross-Border Diffusion of the Arm's Length Standard in North America.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 26 (1): 123.Google Scholar
Eden, Lorraine. (1991). “Bringing the Firm Back In: Multinationals in International Political Economy.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 20 (2): 197224.Google Scholar
Commission, European. 2005. “European Commission Regrets Attack on Sugar Regime, but will Abide by Appellate Ruling.” Commission press release, 28 April.Google Scholar
Commission, European. 2009. “CAP reform: Commission Welcomes Success of EU Sugar Reform as Restructuring Process Concludes.” Commission press release, 09 March.Google Scholar
Fairchild, Richard, McGuire, Steve and Kaivanto, K. 2009. “The Boeing-Airbus Dispute Re-visited: A Game-Theoretic Analysis.” Working Paper Series 2008.07. Bath, UK: University of Bath School of Management.Google Scholar
Fagre, N. and Wells, L.T. (1982). “Bargaining Power of Multinationals and Host Governments.” Journal of International Business Studies 13 (2): 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Financial Times news service (2005a), Wal-Mart Sets Sights on Europe, http://search.ft.com/search/article.html?id=050627000754&query=wal-mart&vsc_appId=powerSearch&offset=0&resultsToShow=10&vsc_subjectConcept=&vsc_companyConcept=&state=More&vsc_publicationGroups=TOPWFT&searchCat=-1, Elizabeth Rigby in London, Tobias Buck in Brussels and, Jonathan Birchall in New York; Jun 27, 2005.Google Scholar
Navigator, Food. 2005a. “Cargill Taps into Brazilian Sugar Market.” http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/ng.asp?id=60212, 25 May (accessed 7 August 2005).Google Scholar
Navigator, Food. 2005b. “Tough Reform Inevitable as EU Loses Sugar Appeal at WTO.” http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/news-ng.asp?n=59705-tough-sugar-reform, 29 April (accessed 7 August 2005).Google Scholar
Frynas, Jędrzej George, Mellahi, Kamel, and Pigman, Geoffrey Allen. 2006. “First Mover Advantages in International Business and Firm-specific Political Resources.” Strategic Management Journal 27 (4): 321345.Google Scholar
Gale, F. (1998). “Cave ‘Cave! Hic Dragones’: A Neo-Gramscian Deconstruction and Reconstruction of International Regime Theory.” Review of International Political Economy 5 (2): 252283.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. (2000). “The United States and World Trade: Hegemony by Proxy?Strange Power: Shaping the Parameters of International Relations and International Political Economy, edited by Lawton, Thomas C., Rosenau, James N. and Verdun, Amy C. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Goodrick, Elizabeth and Salancik, Gerald R. 1996. “Organizational Discretion in Responding to Institutional Practices: Hospitals and Ceasarian Births.” Administrative Sciences Quarterly 41 (1): 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. (1993). “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Baldwin, David. A. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hagedoorn, John, Cloodt, Danielle and Hans van Kranenburg, H. 2005. “Intellectual Property Rights and the Governance of R&D PartnershipsJournal of International Business Studies 36 (2): 175186.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, and Rittberger, Volker. (2002). Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heinsz, Witold J., Holburn, Guy L.F. and Zelner, Bennet A. (2005). Deinstitutionalization and Institutional Replacement: State-centred and neo-liberal in the global electricity supply industry” Available from, http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/papers/download/hhz_diir_eiba.pdf, (accessed 14 August 2005).Google Scholar
Heinsz, Witold J. and Zelner, Bennet A. 2005. “Legitimacy, Interest Group Pressures, and Change in Emergent Institutions: The Case of Foreign Investors and Host Country Governments.” Academy of Management Review 30 (2): 361382.Google Scholar
Heinsz, Witold J., Zelner, Bennet A. and Guillén, Mauro F. 2005. “The World-Wide Diffusion of Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reform, 1977-1999.” American Sociological Review 70 (6): 871897.Google Scholar
Hillman, Amy J. and Hitt, Michael A., (1999). “Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation, and Strategy Decisions.” Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 825–42.Google Scholar
Hillman, Amy J., Keim, Gerald D., and Schuler, Douglas A., (2004). “Corporate Political Activity: A Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Management 30 (6): 837–57.Google Scholar
Hillman, Amy J., Zardkoohi, Asghar, and Bierman, Leonard. 1999. “Corporate Political Strategies and Firm Performance: Indications of Firm-Specific Benefits from Personal Service in the U.S. Government.” Strategic Management Journal 20 (1): 6781.Google Scholar
Hocking, Brian and McGuire, Steven. 2002. “Government – Business Strategies in EU-US Economic Relations: the Lessons of the Foreign Sales Corporation Issue.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (3): 449470.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Kostecki, Michel M. (2001). The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Javorcik, B Smarzynska. 2004. “Policies Facilitating Firm Adjustment to Globalization.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20 (3): 457473.Google Scholar
House of Lords, (2008) ‘European Union Committee, Developments in EU Trade Policy’. European Union Committee 35th Report of the 2007-08 Session (5 December 2008). Available at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldeucom/200/200.pdf [Accessed 29 May 2009].Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary C. and Goodrich, Ben. 2003. Steel Policy: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. International Economics Policy Brief PB03-1. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary C. 2002. “International Economic Law in Times that are Stressful.” Journal of International Economic Law 5 (1): 318.Google Scholar
IMF (2005). The IMF at a Glance. Available from www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/glance.htm (accessed 15 July 2005).Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gary H. 2002. “China's Evolving (Implicit) Economic Constitution.” China Economic Review 13: 394401.Google Scholar
Kim, W. Chan. 1988. “The Effects of Competition and Corporate Political Responsiveness on Multinational Bargaining Power.” Strategic Management Journal 9 (3): 289–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Co-operation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Robert, Keohane. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Robert, Keohane. 1988. “International Institutions: Two Approaches.” International Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 379–96.Google Scholar
Kleen, Peter. (2008) ‘So Alike and Yet So Different: A Comparison of the Uruguay Round and the Doha Round’, European Centre for International Political Economy, Jan Tumlir Policy Essay 02, (March 2008). Available at http://www.ecipe.org/publications/jan-tumlir-policy-essays/so-alike-and-yet-so-different-a-comparison-of-the-uruguay-round-and-the-doha-round [Accessed 29 May 2009].Google Scholar
Knodt, Michèle. 2004. “International Embeddedness of European Multi-Level Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 701719.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” In International Regimes, edited by Krasner, Stephen D. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier.” World Politics 45 (3): 336–67.Google Scholar
Krikorian, Jacqueline D. 2005. “Planes, Trains and Automobiles: The Impact of the ‘WTO Court’ on Canada in Its First Ten Years.” Journal of International Economic Law 8 (4): 921975.Google Scholar
Lawton, Thomas C. 1999. ed. European Industrial Policy and Competitiveness: Concepts and Instruments. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lawton, Thomas C. and McGuire, Steven M. 2001. “Supranational Governance and Corporate Strategy: The Emerging Role of the World Trade Organization.” International Business Review 10 (4): 217233.Google Scholar
Lawton, Thomas C. and McGuire, Steven M. 2002. “Tracing the Impact of Supranational Regulation on Corporate Strategy: Towards a Model of Causal Effect with Lessons from the US Steel Industry.” Presented at the Academy of International Business Annual Conference, Puerto Rico, June 28-July 1.Google Scholar
Lawton, Thomas C. and McGuire, Steven M. 2005. “Adjusting to Liberalization: Tracing the Impact of the WTO on the European Chemicals and Textiles Industries.” Business and Politics 7 (2): Article 4.Google Scholar
Lenway, Stefanie A. 1985. The Politics of U.S. International Trade: Protection, Expansion and Escape. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Lenway, Stefanie A. and Murtha, Thomas P. 1994. “The State as Strategist in International Business Research.” Journal of International Business Studies 25 (3): 513–35.Google Scholar
Matrix Laboratories Limited. 2007. Annual Report, 2006-07, Secunderabad, India, www.matrixlabsindia.com Google Scholar
McGuire, Steven M. 2002. “Between Pragmatism and Principle: Legalization, Political Economy and the WTO's Subsidy Agreement.” The International Trade Journal 16 (3): 319343.Google Scholar
McGuire, Steven M. 2004. Firms and Governments in International Trade, in Trade Politics edited by Brian, Hocking. & McGuire, Steven M. 2nd. ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGuire, Steven M. 2006. “No more Euro-Champions? The interaction of EU industrial and trade policies.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6): 887905.Google Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick A. 2004. “China in the WTO: Antidumping and Safeguards.” In China and the WTO: Accession, Policy Reform, and Poverty Reduction Strategies, edited by Bhattasali, Deepak, Li, Shantong and Martin, Will. Washington, D.C: World Bank and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forum, MFA. 2009. “Home Page of the MFA Forum”. Available at http://www.mfa-forum.net/index.asp, (accessed 19 May 2009).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. “Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (4): 473524.Google Scholar
Murtha, Thomas P. and Lenway, Stefanie A. 1994. “Country Capabilities and the Strategic State: How National Political Institutions Affect Multinational Corporations’ Strategies.” Strategic Management Journal 15 (1): 113–30.Google Scholar
Nayar, Baldev R. 1995. “Regimes, Power and International Aviation.” International Organization 49 (1): 139170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlitz, Uwe. 2008. “India's Pharmaceutical Industry on Course for GlobalisationDeutsche Bank Research. April.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1994. “Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate.” International Organization 48 (2): 313344.Google Scholar
Ramamurti, Ravi. 2001. “The Obsolescing Bargaining Model? MNC-Host Developing Country Relations Revisited.” Journal of International Business Studies 32 (1): 2339.Google Scholar
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited. 2004. Annual Report, Harayana, India, www.ranbaxy.com Google Scholar
Rehbein, Kathleen and Lenway, Stefanie A. 1991. “Leaders, Followers, and Free Riders: An empirical test of variation in corporate political involvement.” Academy of Management Journal 34 (5): 893905.Google Scholar
Ring, Peter S. Lenway, Stefanie A. and Govekar, Michele. 1990. “Management of the Political Imperative in International Business.” Strategic Management Journal 11 (2): 141151.Google Scholar
Rittberger, Volker and Mayer, Peter ed. 1995. Regime Theory and International Relations. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1975. “International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends.” International Organization 29 (3): 557–83.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1993. Multilateralism Matters. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rugman, Alan M. and Verbeke, Alain. 1990. Global Corporate Strategy and Trade Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rugman, Alan M. and Verbeke, Alain. 1998. “Multinational Enterprises and Public Policy.” Journal of International Business Studies 29 (1): 115–36.Google Scholar
Rugman, Alan M. 2000. The End of Globalization. London: Random House.Google Scholar
Sally, Razeen. 2003. “The WTO in Perspective.” in Hocking, B. and McGuire, S. eds. Trade Politics 2nd ed. London: Routledge: 105119.Google Scholar
Schuler, Douglas A. 1996. “Corporate Political Strategy and Foreign Competition: The Case of the Steel Industry.” Academy of Management Journal 39 (3): 720737.Google Scholar
Schuler, Douglas A., Rehbein, Kathleen and Cramer, Roxy D. 2002. “Pursuing Strategic Advantage through Political Means: A Multivariate Approach.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (4): 659672.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan K. 2003. Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C., Ratton Sanchez, Michelle and Rosenberg, Barbara. 2008. “The Trials of Winning at the WTO: What Lies Behind Brazil's Success.” Cornell International Law Journal, 41 (2): 383502.Google Scholar
Shaw, Timothy M. and van der Westhuizen, Janis. 2003. “Trade and Africa: Transforming Fringe into Franchise.” in Hocking, B. and McGuire, S. eds. Trade Politics, 2nd ed. London: Routledge: 90102.Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. and Fillippi, I. (2005) Global Trade Protection Report – Update 2004, Mayer, Brown, Rowe and Maw, London.Google Scholar
Stopford John, M., Strange, Susan and Henley, John S. 1991. Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Share. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1982. “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis.” International Organization 36 (2): 479496.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1999. “The Wesfailure system.” Review of International Studies 25 (3): 345354.Google Scholar
Tate & Lyle. 2005. “Tate and Lyle PLC: EU Sugar Sector Reform – potential impact.” Corporate press release, 23 June, http://193.35.126.50/PressReleases/PressRelease1363.asp, (accessed 2 August 2005).Google Scholar
Tate & Lyle. 2008. Tate & Lyle Annual Report 2008. http://www.tateandlyle.com/TateAndLyle/investor_relations/annualreport/default.htm, (accessed 19 May 2009).Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel. 2004. “Changing the Rules: Constitutional Moments at the WTO.” Harvard International Review, 26 (2).Google Scholar
Vernon, Raymond. 1971. Sovereignty at Bay. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Arieh. (1985), The Impact of the Regulatory Life Cycle on Corporate Political Strategy’, California Management Review, 28 (1): 140154.Google Scholar
Viotti, Paul R. and Kauppi, Mark V. (1999) International Relations Theory 3rd ed. London: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Weiss, Linda. 2005. “Global Governance, National Strategies: How industrialised states make room to move under the WTO.” Review of International Political Economy 12 (5): 723749.Google Scholar
Williams, M. 2005. “Civil Society and the World Trading System.” in Kelly, Dominic and Grant, Wyn eds. The Politics of Trade in the Twenty-First Century: Actors, Issues and Regional Dynamics. London: Palgrave: 3046.Google Scholar
Wöll, Cornelia. 2007. “Leading the Dance? Power and Political Resources of Political Lobbyists.” Journal of Public Policy 27 (1): 5778.Google Scholar
Bank, World (2005a) About the World Bank: What is the World Bank. Available from www.worldbank.org, (accessed 8 July 2005).Google Scholar
Bank, World (2005b) About the World Bank: What is the World Bank: Strategic Direction. Available from www.worldbank.org, (accessed 8 July 2005).Google Scholar
WTO. 2000. “Seven Common Misunderstandings About the WTO.” In The Globalization Reader, edited by Lechner, Frank J. and Boli, John. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
WTO. 2003. The World Trade Organization: Understanding the WTO 3rd ed. Geneva: World Trade Organization Publications.Google Scholar
YNFX. 2006. “Lesotho Textile Industry Makes a Remarkable Comeback with Reopening of Factories.” Available at http://www.yarnsandfibers.com/news/index_fullstory.php3?id=9565&section=&country=Lesotho&p_type=General, 03 July (accessed 19 May 2009).Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1991. International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment. London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zangl, Bernhard. 2008. “Judicialization Matters! A Comparison of Dispute Settlement Under GATT and the WTO.” International Studies Quarterly 52 (4): 825854.Google Scholar