Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:35:56.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modern Slavery Laws in Australia: Steps in the Right Direction?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2019

Amy SINCLAIR
Affiliation:
Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Researcher and Representative, Business and Human Rights Resource Centre.
Justine NOLAN
Affiliation:
Associate Professor and Associate Dean (Academic), Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Developments in the Field
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, ‘Hidden in Plain Sight’ (December 2017), https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/committees/reportjnt/024102/toc_pdf/HiddeninPlainSight.pdf (accessed 23 March 2019).

2 The Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, ‘Report Modern Slavery Bill 2018 [Provisions]’ (24 August 2018), https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/ModernSlavery/Report (accessed 23 March 2019).

3 Comments by Mr Chris Crewther MP made at Global Compact Network Australia’s Modern Slavery Forum held in Sydney on 6 April 2017.

4 Amy Sinclair and Felicitas Weber, ‘Australia Must Legislate to Prevent Modern Slavery in our Supply Chains, The Guardian (11 April 2017), https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/apr/11/australia-must-legislate-to-prevent-modern-slavery-in-our-supply-chains (accessed 23 March 2019).

5 Whilst injunctive relief is available under the UK Act, this avenue of recourse remains untested.

6 The method of publication and prescribed reporting content will be detailed in accompanying statutory regulations, which will also likely take effect on 1 July 2019.

7 The NSW Act establishes a corresponding law approach with the Federal Act. If an entity is subject to both, then the NSW reporting requirement does not apply.

8 As at 23 March 2019, the Modern Slavery Registry contains 8,469 statements of the estimated 12,000–17,000 required statements. IASC, University of Nottingham Rights Lab, ‘Agriculture and Modern Slavery Act Reporting: Poor Performance Despite High Risks’ (2018), http://www.antislaverycommissioner.co.uk/media/1220/modern-slavery-act-and-agriculture-poor-performance-briefing.pdf (accessed 23 March 2019).

9 Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, ‘First Year of FTSE 100 Reports Under the UK Modern Slavery Act: Towards Elimination?’ (2017), https://www.business-humanrights.org/sites/default/files/FTSE%20100%20Report%20FINAL%20%28002%291Dec2017.pdf (accessed 23 March 2019).

10 See Surya Deva, ‘Slavery and Gender-Blind Regulatory Responses’, BHRJ Blog, http://blog.journals.cambridge.org/2019/03/08/slavery-and-gender-blind-regulatory-responses/ (accessed 23 March 2019).

11 See Melanie Barber et al v Nestle USA, Inc., No. 16-55041 9th Cir. (2018); Monica Sud v Costco Wholesale Corporation et al, No. 4 15-cv-03783; and Tomasella v The Hershey Company No. 1 18-cv-10360 (2018).

12 Human Rights Council, ‘Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, A/HRC/17/31 (21 March 2011), Principles 17-20.

13 Ethical Trading Initiative and Hult International Business School, ‘Corporate Leadership on Modern Slavery: How Have Companies Responded to the Modern Slavery Act One Year On?’, https://www.ethicaltrade.org/sites/default/files/shared_resources/corporate_leadership_on_modern_slavery_full_report_2016.pdf (accessed 21 August 2018).

14 The open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights is currently negotiating a binding instrument. The zero draft of the proposed instrument was released in July 2018: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/WGTransCorp/Session3/DraftLBI.pdf (accessed 23 March 2019).

15 Krawiec, KD, ‘Cosmetic Compliance and the Failure of Negotiated Governance’ (2003) 81  Washington University Law Quarterly 487.Google Scholar