No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Towards the decipherment of Thamudic D: an identification of new glyphs and phoneme values
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2025
Abstract
The Thamudic D script is only partially deciphered. This article attempts to advance our understanding of the script by identifying all the Thamudic D glyphs and their phonemic values with varying degrees of certainty. It also discusses the major writing formulae associated with this script type and offers a few notes on the language it inscribes.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of SOAS University of London
References
Ababneh, Mohammad I. 2005. Neue safaitische Inschriften und deren bildliche Darstellungen. SSHB 6. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
Al-Jallad, Ahmad. 2017a. “Graeco-Arabica I: the southern Levant”, in Al-Jallad, Ahmad (ed.), Arabic in Context, 99–188. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Jallad, Ahmad. 2017b. “Was it Sūrat Al-Baqárah? Evidence for antepenultimate stress in the Quranic consonantal text and its relevance for صلوه type nouns”, Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 167/1, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Jallad, Ahmad. 2018. “What is Ancient North Arabian?”, in Pat-El, Na'ama and Birnstiel, Daniel (eds), Re-engaging Comparative Semitic and Arabic Studies, 1–45. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Al-Jallad, Ahmad. 2019. “Safaitic”, in Huehnergard, John and Pat-El, Na'ama (eds), The Semitic Languages, 2nd ed., 342–66. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Jallad, Ahmad. 2020. “Notes on the language of the Hismaic inscriptions and a re-reading of line 4 of the Madaba Hismaic inscription”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 30/3, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Jallad, Ahmad and Jaworska, Karolina. 2019. A Dictionary of the Safaitic Inscriptions. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avner, Uri, Laïla, Nehmé and Christian J., Robin. 2013. “A rock inscription mentioning Thaʿlaba, an Arab king from Ghassan”, Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 24/2, 237–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G.J. 2010. “Mapping the mute immortals: a locational and contextual analysis of Thamudic E/Ḥismaic inscriptions and rock drawing from the Wādī Ḥafīr of southern Jordan”, PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Graf, David F. and Michael J., Zwettler. 2004. “The North Arabian ‘Thamudic E’ inscription from Uraynibah West”, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 335, 53–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayajneh, Hani. 2018. “A preliminary investigation of an Ancient North Arabian invocation from the Madaba region of central Jordan”, in Macdonald, M.C.A. (ed.), Languages, Scripts and Their Uses in Ancient North Arabia: Papers from the Special Session of the Seminar for Arabian Studies Held on 5 August 2017. Supplement to the Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 48: 95–100. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Halévy, Joseph. 1901. Revue Sémitique d’Épigraphie Et d'Histoire Ancienne, vol. 9: Recueil Trimestriel. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Hoftijzer, J. and Jongeling, K.. 2004. Dictionary of the c Inscriptions, 2 vols. HdO 21. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manẓūr, ibn. 1986. Lisān Al-ʕArab. Edited by al-Kabīr, ʕAbdallāh, Ḥasballāh, Muḥammad and al-Shāḏilī, Hāshim. Cairo: Dār al-Maʕārif.Google Scholar
Jaussen, A. and Savignac, M.. 1909. Mission Archéologique En Arabie, 6 vols. Paris: Leroux/Ernest Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
King, Geraldine M.H. 1990. “Early North Arabian Thamudic E. A preliminary description based on a new corpus of inscriptions from the Ḥismā desert of southern Jordan and published material”, PhD thesis, SOAS University of London.Google Scholar
Kootstra, Fokelien. 2016. “The language of the Taymanitic Inscriptions and its classification”, Arabian Epigraphic Notes 2, 67–140.Google Scholar
Kootstra, Fokelien. 2019. “Language variation at Dadan”, PhD thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Lane, E.W. 1863. An Arabic-English Lexicon, Derived from the Best and Most Copious Eastern Sources, 8 vols. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Littmann, Enno. 1904. Zur Entzifferung der thamudenischen Inschriften. Berlin: W. Peiser.Google Scholar
Littmann, Enno. 1943. Safaïtic Inscriptions. Syria. Publications of the Princeton University Archaeological Expeditions to Syria in 1904–1905 and 1909. Division IV. Section C. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Macdonald, M.C.A. 2000a. “Reflections on the linguistic map of pre-Islamic Arabia”, Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 11, 28–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, M.C.A. 2000b. “Thamudic”, in The Encyclopaedia of Islam, new ed., 10: 436–8. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Naveh, J. 1975. “Thamudic inscriptions from the Negev”, Eretz-Israel: Archaeological, Historical and Geographical Studies, Nelson Gleuck Memorial Volume, 129–31. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Negev, Avraham. 1991. Personal Names in the Nabatean Realm. Qedem 32. Jerusalem: Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Nehmé, Laïla. 2010. “A glimpse of the development of the Nabataean script into Arabic based on old and new epigraphic material”, in Macdonald, Michael C.A (ed.), The Development of Arabic as a Written Language, 47–88. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Nehmé, Laïla (ed.). 2018. The Darb Al-Bakrah. A Caravan Route in North-West Arabia Discovered by Ali I. Al-Ghabban Catalogue of the Inscriptions. Riyadh: Saudi Commission for Tourism and National Heritage.Google Scholar
Norris, Jérôme. 2018. “Dushara dans une inscription thamoudique B de la région du Wādī Ramm (Jordanie du Sud)”, Topoi Orient – Occident 22/1, 185–223.Google Scholar
Prioletta, Alessia. 2018. “New research on the Thamudic graffiti from the region of Ḥimā (Najrān, Saudi Arabia)”, in Macdonald, M.C.A. (ed.), Languages, Scripts and Their Uses in Ancient North Arabia: Papers from the Special Session of the Seminar for Arabian Studies Held on 5 August 2017. Supplement to the Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 48: 53–70. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Robin, Christian J. and Gorea, Maria. 2016. “L'alphabet de Ḥimà (Arabie Séoudite)”, in Finkelstein, Israel, Robin, Christian J. and Römer, Thomas (eds), Alphabets, Texts and Artifacts in the Ancient Near East: Studies Presented to Benjamin Sass, 310–75. Paris: Van Dieren Éditeur.Google Scholar
Ryckmans, Gonzague. 1950–1. Corpus Inscriptionum Semiticarum: Pars Quinta, Inscriptiones Saracenicae Continens: Tomus I, Fasciculus I, Inscriptiones Safaiticae. Paris: E Reipublicae Typographeo.Google Scholar
Stokes, Phillip W. 2016. “A new and unique Thamudic inscription from Northeast Jordan”, Arabian Epigraphic Notes 2, 33–44.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, Albert. 1950. Les Inscriptions Thamoudéennes. Bibliothèque Du Muséon 25. Louvain: Bureau du Muséon.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, Albert. 1956. Les Textes thamoudéens de Philby. Bibliothèque du Muséon, 40–1. Louvain: Publications universitaires.Google Scholar
Winnett, F.V. 1937. A Study of the Liḥyanite and Thamudic Inscriptions. University of Toronto – Oriental Series 3. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Winnett, F.V. and Harding, G. Lankester. 1978. Inscriptions from Fifty Safaitic Cairns. Near and Middle East 9. Toronto-Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Winnett, Frederick Victor and Reed, William LaForest. 1970. Ancient Records from North Arabia. Near and Middle East 6. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Heinz. 1930. Die semitischen Menschennamen in griechischen Inschriften und Papyri des vorderen Orient. Studien zur Epigraphik und Papyruskunde, 1.4. Leipzig: Dieterich.Google Scholar